Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Restricting Jury Deliberations on Executive Clemency in Death Penalty Cases: People v. Haskett

Restricting Jury Deliberations on Executive Clemency in Death Penalty Cases: People v. Haskett

Date: Feb 19, 1982
Restricting Jury Deliberations on Executive Clemency in Death Penalty Cases: People v. Haskett Introduction People v. Randy Haskett is a significant Supreme Court of California decision rendered on...
Limitations on Absolute Privilege for Government Officials: Insights from Kilgore v. Younger

Limitations on Absolute Privilege for Government Officials: Insights from Kilgore v. Younger

Date: Feb 19, 1982
Limitations on Absolute Privilege for Government Officials: Insights from Kilgore v. Younger Introduction The case Gerald Hay Kilgore v. Evelle J. Younger et al. (30 Cal.3d 770) adjudicated by the...
Protecting Families in Housing: The Unruh Act's Role in Marina Point v. Wolfson

Protecting Families in Housing: The Unruh Act's Role in Marina Point v. Wolfson

Date: Feb 9, 1982
Protecting Families in Housing: The Unruh Act's Role in Marina Point v. Wolfson 1. Introduction Marina Point, Ltd. v. Stephen Wolfson et al. is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California,...
Maxwell v. Superior Court: Validity of Conflict Waiver in Defendants’ Retained Counsel Agreements

Maxwell v. Superior Court: Validity of Conflict Waiver in Defendants’ Retained Counsel Agreements

Date: Jan 29, 1982
Maxwell v. Superior Court: Validity of Conflict Waiver in Defendants’ Retained Counsel Agreements Introduction Maxwell v. Superior Court is a pivotal 1982 decision by the Supreme Court of California...
Ramos v. People: Unconstitutional Jury Instructions in Capital Sentencing

Ramos v. People: Unconstitutional Jury Instructions in Capital Sentencing

Date: Jan 26, 1982
Ramos v. People: Unconstitutional Jury Instructions in Capital Sentencing Introduction Ramos v. People, 30 Cal.3d 553 (1982), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California, is a landmark case...
California Supreme Court Confirms Section 1385 Authority to Modify Death Penalty Sentencing

California Supreme Court Confirms Section 1385 Authority to Modify Death Penalty Sentencing

Date: Jan 1, 1982
California Supreme Court Confirms Section 1385 Authority to Modify Death Penalty Sentencing Introduction The case of The People v. Dermon Louise Williams (30 Cal.3d 470) presents a pivotal moment in...
In re Gordon Robert Hall: Establishing Standards for Habeas Corpus Based on Newly Discovered Evidence and Legal Representation

In re Gordon Robert Hall: Establishing Standards for Habeas Corpus Based on Newly Discovered Evidence and Legal Representation

Date: Dec 18, 1981
In re Gordon Robert Hall: Establishing Standards for Habeas Corpus Based on Newly Discovered Evidence and Legal Representation Introduction In re Gordon Robert Hall on Habeas Corpus (30 Cal.3d 408)...
Negligence Liability for Natural Land Conditions: Sprecher v. Adamson Companies

Negligence Liability for Natural Land Conditions: Sprecher v. Adamson Companies

Date: Dec 8, 1981
Negligence Liability for Natural Land Conditions: Sprecher v. Adamson Companies Introduction Sprecher v. Adamson Companies et al., 30 Cal.3d 358 (1981), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Implied Malice in Vehicular Homicide: Analysis of People v. Watson (1981)

Implied Malice in Vehicular Homicide: Analysis of People v. Watson (1981)

Date: Dec 1, 1981
Implied Malice in Vehicular Homicide: Analysis of People v. Watson (1981) Introduction People v. Robert Lee Watson is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of California on November 30, 1981....
Comprehensive Commentary on Samson v. Transamerica Insurance Company: Extending Policy Coverage and Insurer Liability

Comprehensive Commentary on Samson v. Transamerica Insurance Company: Extending Policy Coverage and Insurer Liability

Date: Nov 24, 1981
Extending Policy Coverage and Insurer Liability: A Comprehensive Commentary on Samson v. Transamerica Insurance Company Introduction Samson v. Transamerica Insurance Company (30 Cal.3d 220) is a...
In re Ricky H.: Establishing Limits on Juvenile Authority Commitments

In re Ricky H.: Establishing Limits on Juvenile Authority Commitments

Date: Nov 10, 1981
In re Ricky H.: Establishing Limits on Juvenile Authority Commitments Introduction In re Ricky H., 30 Cal.3d 176 (1981) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that addresses the...
Guarding Defendant Privileges: The People v. Collie Decision on Prosecutorial Discovery

Guarding Defendant Privileges: The People v. Collie Decision on Prosecutorial Discovery

Date: Oct 16, 1981
Guarding Defendant Privileges: The People v. Collie Decision on Prosecutorial Discovery Introduction The People v. Bertram Ellsworth Collie (1981) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Landrum v. Superior Court: Affirming Magistrate Authority to Dismiss Felony Complaints and Enforcing Timely Preliminary Examinations

Landrum v. Superior Court: Affirming Magistrate Authority to Dismiss Felony Complaints and Enforcing Timely Preliminary Examinations

Date: Oct 9, 1981
Landrum v. Superior Court: Affirming Magistrate Authority to Dismiss Felony Complaints and Enforcing Timely Preliminary Examinations Introduction Landrum v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County is a...
Redmond: Affirming the Importance of Timely Objections in Fourth and Fifth Amendment Claims

Redmond: Affirming the Importance of Timely Objections in Fourth and Fifth Amendment Claims

Date: Sep 15, 1981
Redmond: Affirming the Importance of Timely Objections in Fourth and Fifth Amendment Claims Introduction The People v. Robert Stewart Redmond, 29 Cal.3d 904 (1981), adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Life Imprisonment Without Parole for Minors Unlawful: People v. Davis

Life Imprisonment Without Parole for Minors Unlawful: People v. Davis

Date: Sep 1, 1981
Life Imprisonment Without Parole for Minors Unlawful: People v. Davis Introduction People v. Michael Darrell Davis is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California, rendered on August 31,...
Defendant’s Right to Dismiss with Prejudice Prevails Under CCP §581

Defendant’s Right to Dismiss with Prejudice Prevails Under CCP §581

Date: Aug 7, 1981
Defendant’s Right to Dismiss with Prejudice Prevails Under CCP §581: A Comprehensive Commentary on W.G. Wells v. Marina City Properties, Inc. Introduction The case of W.G. Wells v. Marina City...
Refining the Admissibility of Expert Testimony on Future Dangerousness in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of People v. Murtishaw

Refining the Admissibility of Expert Testimony on Future Dangerousness in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of People v. Murtishaw

Date: Jul 28, 1981
Refining the Admissibility of Expert Testimony on Future Dangerousness in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of People v. Murtishaw Introduction Case: The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. David Leslie...
Establishing Reasonableness in Investigative Stops: A Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Leyba (1981)

Establishing Reasonableness in Investigative Stops: A Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Leyba (1981)

Date: Jun 26, 1981
Establishing Reasonableness in Investigative Stops: A Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Leyba (1981) Introduction People v. Leyba (29 Cal.3d 591, 1981) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Protected Political Discourse in Defamation: Insights from Erwin Okun v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Protected Political Discourse in Defamation: Insights from Erwin Okun v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Date: Jun 16, 1981
Protected Political Discourse in Defamation: Insights from Erwin Okun v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County Introduction The case of Erwin Okun v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County, decided...
Minimal Antagonism Does Not Preclude Class Action Certification: Richmond v. Dart Industries

Minimal Antagonism Does Not Preclude Class Action Certification: Richmond v. Dart Industries

Date: Jun 16, 1981
Minimal Antagonism Does Not Preclude Class Action Certification: Richmond v. Dart Industries Introduction In the landmark case of Harold H. Richmond et al. v. Dart Industries, Inc., decided on June...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert