Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Periodic Payment of Damages in Medical Malpractice: Insights from AMERICAN BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF LOS GATOS-SARATOGA, INC.

Periodic Payment of Damages in Medical Malpractice: Insights from AMERICAN BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF LOS GATOS-SARATOGA, INC.

Date: Jul 10, 1984
Periodic Payment of Damages in Medical Malpractice: Insights from AMERICAN BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF LOS GATOS-SARATOGA, INC. Introduction The case of AMERICAN BANK AND TRUST...
Corenevsky v. Superior Court: Affirming Indigent Defendants' Rights to Ancillary Defense Services and Enforcing Court Orders

Corenevsky v. Superior Court: Affirming Indigent Defendants' Rights to Ancillary Defense Services and Enforcing Court Orders

Date: Jul 6, 1984
Corenevsky v. Superior Court: Affirming Indigent Defendants' Rights to Ancillary Defense Services and Enforcing Court Orders Introduction Corenevsky v. Superior Court of Imperial County is a pivotal...
Revocability of Section 998 Offers: T.M. Cobb Co. v. Superior Court of Marin County

Revocability of Section 998 Offers: T.M. Cobb Co. v. Superior Court of Marin County

Date: Jul 3, 1984
Revocability of Section 998 Offers: T.M. Cobb Co. v. Superior Court of Marin County Introduction The case of T.M. Cobb Company, Inc. v. The Superior Court of Marin County (36 Cal.3d 273, 1984)...
Expansion of Felony-Murder Liability under the Washington-Gilbert Doctrine in People v. Caldwell et al.

Expansion of Felony-Murder Liability under the Washington-Gilbert Doctrine in People v. Caldwell et al.

Date: Jun 15, 1984
Expansion of Felony-Murder Liability under the Washington-Gilbert Doctrine in People v. Caldwell et al. Introduction People v. Caldwell et al. (36 Cal.3d 210, 1984) is a landmark decision by the...
Limitation on Expert Testimony: Admissibility of Rape Trauma Syndrome in Proving Rape Established in People v. Bledsoe

Limitation on Expert Testimony: Admissibility of Rape Trauma Syndrome in Proving Rape Established in People v. Bledsoe

Date: Jun 15, 1984
Limitation on Expert Testimony: Admissibility of Rape Trauma Syndrome in Proving Rape Established in People v. Bledsoe Introduction People v. William McKee Bledsoe is a landmark case adjudicated by...
Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners: Establishing Procedural Safeguards for Peremptory Writs and Clarifying Duty of Care in Negligence

Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners: Establishing Procedural Safeguards for Peremptory Writs and Clarifying Duty of Care in Negligence

Date: Jun 8, 1984
Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners: Establishing Procedural Safeguards for Peremptory Writs and Clarifying Duty of Care in Negligence Introduction The case of Richard Palma, Plaintiff and Appellant,...
Restricting 'Common Scheme or Plan' in Admitting Prior Offenses: Insights from People v. Tassell

Restricting 'Common Scheme or Plan' in Admitting Prior Offenses: Insights from People v. Tassell

Date: Apr 21, 1984
Restricting 'Common Scheme or Plan' in Admitting Prior Offenses: Insights from People v. Tassell Introduction People v. Tassell, 36 Cal.3d 77 (1984), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Ensuring Racial Representation in Jury Pools: The Precedent Set by People v. Harris

Ensuring Racial Representation in Jury Pools: The Precedent Set by People v. Harris

Date: Apr 21, 1984
Ensuring Racial Representation in Jury Pools: The Precedent Set by People v. Harris Introduction The landmark case of People v. Lee Edward Harris (36 Cal.3d 36, 1984) addressed significant...
Reevaluation of Felony-Murder Rule: People v. Stanley Burroughs

Reevaluation of Felony-Murder Rule: People v. Stanley Burroughs

Date: Apr 20, 1984
Reevaluation of Felony-Murder Rule: People v. Stanley Burroughs Introduction People v. Stanley Burroughs, 35 Cal.3d 824 (1984), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
Merger Doctrine Limits the Felony-Murder Rule in Cases of Integral Child Abuse

Merger Doctrine Limits the Felony-Murder Rule in Cases of Integral Child Abuse

Date: Apr 17, 1984
Merger Doctrine Limits the Felony-Murder Rule in Cases of Integral Child Abuse Introduction THE PEOPLE v. LINDA LEE SMITH, 35 Cal.3d 798 (1984) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Standard of Review for Reinstatement of Dismissed Charges: People v. Slaughter

Standard of Review for Reinstatement of Dismissed Charges: People v. Slaughter

Date: Mar 23, 1984
Standard of Review for Reinstatement of Dismissed Charges: People v. Slaughter Introduction Case Citation: The People, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Terry L. Slaughter, Defendant and Respondent. (35...
Prescriptive Easements Without Compensation: An In-Depth Analysis of Warsaw v. Chicago Metallicceiling, Inc.

Prescriptive Easements Without Compensation: An In-Depth Analysis of Warsaw v. Chicago Metallicceiling, Inc.

Date: Mar 6, 1984
Prescriptive Easements Without Compensation: An In-Depth Analysis of Warsaw v. Chicago Metalliccelings, Inc. Introduction Warsaw et al. v. Chicago Metallicceiling, Inc., 35 Cal.3d 564 (1984), is a...
Establishing the Necessity of Criminal Intent in Aider and Abettor Liability: People v. Beeman

Establishing the Necessity of Criminal Intent in Aider and Abettor Liability: People v. Beeman

Date: Feb 7, 1984
Establishing the Necessity of Criminal Intent in Aider and Abettor Liability: People v. Beeman Introduction People v. Beeman (35 Cal.3d 547, 1984) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Enhancing Defendant Rights: Expanding Jury Instructions to Related Offenses in People v. Geiger

Enhancing Defendant Rights: Expanding Jury Instructions to Related Offenses in People v. Geiger

Date: Feb 3, 1984
Enhancing Defendant Rights: Expanding Jury Instructions to Related Offenses in People v. Geiger Introduction Case: The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Michael Joseph Geiger, Defendant and...
Restricting Attorney Fees Recovery in Fraud Against Fiduciary Cases: Insights from John Gray v. Don Miller Associates

Restricting Attorney Fees Recovery in Fraud Against Fiduciary Cases: Insights from John Gray v. Don Miller Associates

Date: Jan 31, 1984
Restricting Attorney Fees Recovery in Fraud Against Fiduciary Cases: Insights from John Gray v. Don Miller Associates Introduction The case of John Gray v. Don Miller Associates, Inc., decided by the...
Establishing Strict Standards for Police Detention and Search: The Aldridge Decision

Establishing Strict Standards for Police Detention and Search: The Aldridge Decision

Date: Jan 27, 1984
Establishing Strict Standards for Police Detention and Search: The Aldridge Decision Introduction The People v. Sylvester Peter Aldridge, 35 Cal.3d 473 (1984), is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Interest Entitlement for Judicial Salaries and Pensions: OLSON v. CORY

Interest Entitlement for Judicial Salaries and Pensions: OLSON v. CORY

Date: Dec 31, 1983
Interest Entitlement for Judicial Salaries and Pensions: OLSON v. CORY Introduction The case of OLSON v. CORY ([1983] 35 Cal.3d 390) presented before the Supreme Court of California navigates the...
Severability of Arbitration Clauses in Fraudulent Agreements: Ericksen v. 100 Oak Street

Severability of Arbitration Clauses in Fraudulent Agreements: Ericksen v. 100 Oak Street

Date: Dec 30, 1983
Severability of Arbitration Clauses in Fraudulent Agreements: Ericksen v. 100 Oak Street Introduction Ericksen, Arbuthnot, McCarthy, Kearney Walsh, Inc. v. 100 Oak Street et al. is a landmark...
Representative Jury Selection in Capital Cases: Insights from People v. Stevie Lamar Fields

Representative Jury Selection in Capital Cases: Insights from People v. Stevie Lamar Fields

Date: Dec 30, 1983
Representative Jury Selection in Capital Cases: Insights from People v. Stevie Lamar Fields Introduction People v. Stevie Lamar Fields, 35 Cal.3d 329 (1983), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Protecting Consumers from Deceptive Advertising: Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corporation

Protecting Consumers from Deceptive Advertising: Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corporation

Date: Dec 23, 1983
Protecting Consumers from Deceptive Advertising: Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corporation Introduction The case of Committee on Children's Television, Inc., et al. v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert