Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Attorney-Client Privilege Preserved in Emotional Distress Litigation: Mitchell v. Superior Court of Fresno County

Attorney-Client Privilege Preserved in Emotional Distress Litigation: Mitchell v. Superior Court of Fresno County

Date: Dec 21, 1984
Attorney-Client Privilege Preserved in Emotional Distress Litigation: Mitchell v. Superior Court of Fresno County Introduction The case of Gary A. Mitchell et al. v. The Superior Court of Fresno...
FEHA Venue Provisions Supersede General Venue Rules in Mixed Actions

FEHA Venue Provisions Supersede General Venue Rules in Mixed Actions

Date: Dec 7, 1984
FEHA Venue Provisions Supersede General Venue Rules in Mixed Actions Introduction In Andrew Brown et al. v. The Superior Court of Alameda County, the Supreme Court of California addressed a pivotal...
Reversal of Conviction in People v. Holt Due to Prejudicial Evidentiary Errors

Reversal of Conviction in People v. Holt Due to Prejudicial Evidentiary Errors

Date: Nov 27, 1984
Reversal of Conviction in People v. Holt Due to Prejudicial Evidentiary Errors Introduction People v. Steven Vincent Holt (37 Cal.3d 436) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California...
Requiring Intent for Felony-Murder Special Circumstances: Insights from The People v. Turner

Requiring Intent for Felony-Murder Special Circumstances: Insights from The People v. Turner

Date: Nov 22, 1984
Requiring Intent for Felony-Murder Special Circumstances: Insights from The People v. Turner Introduction The People v. Richard Dean Turner is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California,...
Retroactive Application of the Shirley Rule: Inadmissibility of Hypnotically Induced Testimony in People v. Guerra et al.

Retroactive Application of the Shirley Rule: Inadmissibility of Hypnotically Induced Testimony in People v. Guerra et al.

Date: Nov 22, 1984
Retroactive Application of the Shirley Rule: Inadmissibility of Hypnotically Induced Testimony in People v. Guerra et al. Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Jon Matthew Guerra et al.,...
Admissibility of Psychological Expert Testimony in Eyewitness Identification: People v. McDonald

Admissibility of Psychological Expert Testimony in Eyewitness Identification: People v. McDonald

Date: Nov 22, 1984
Admissibility of Psychological Expert Testimony in Eyewitness Identification: People v. McDonald Introduction People v. Eddie Bobby McDonald (37 Cal.3d 351, Supreme Court of California, 1984)...
Establishing Public Figure Status and Actual Malice in Defamation Law: Reader's Digest Assn. v. Superior Court of Marin County

Establishing Public Figure Status and Actual Malice in Defamation Law: Reader's Digest Assn. v. Superior Court of Marin County

Date: Nov 20, 1984
Establishing Public Figure Status and Actual Malice in Defamation Law: Reader's Digest Association, Inc. v. Superior Court of Marin County Introduction The case of Reader's Digest Association, Inc.,...
Clarifying the Application of Penal Code §1157 in Murder Convictions: People v. Avalos

Clarifying the Application of Penal Code §1157 in Murder Convictions: People v. Avalos

Date: Nov 9, 1984
Clarifying the Application of Penal Code §1157 in Murder Convictions: People v. Avalos Introduction People v. Arturo Manuel Avalos is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of California on...
Establishing Due Process in Sentencing Instructions: The Invalidity of the Briggs Instruction

Establishing Due Process in Sentencing Instructions: The Invalidity of the Briggs Instruction

Date: Nov 2, 1984
Establishing Due Process in Sentencing Instructions: The Invalidity of the Briggs Instruction Introduction PEOPLE v. RAMOS (37 Cal.3d 136, 1984) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Enhancing Sentences Based on Prior Convictions: A New Standard in Collateral Attacks

Enhancing Sentences Based on Prior Convictions: A New Standard in Collateral Attacks

Date: Sep 18, 1984
Enhancing Sentences Based on Prior Convictions: A New Standard in Collateral Attacks Introduction The case of The People v. James Sumstine, decided by the Supreme Court of California on September 17,...
Public Entity Liability for Intersection Safety Despite Adjacent Encroachments: Carson v. Facilities Development Company

Public Entity Liability for Intersection Safety Despite Adjacent Encroachments: Carson v. Facilities Development Company

Date: Sep 14, 1984
Public Entity Liability for Intersection Safety Despite Adjacent Encroachments: Carson v. Facilities Development Company Introduction In the landmark case of Carson v. Facilities Development Company,...
Martinez v. The People: Enhancing Defendants' Access to New Trial Motions through Flexible Diligence Standards

Martinez v. The People: Enhancing Defendants' Access to New Trial Motions through Flexible Diligence Standards

Date: Sep 11, 1984
Martinez v. The People: Enhancing Defendants' Access to New Trial Motions through Flexible Diligence Standards Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Darrick Ted Martinez (1984), the...
San Francisco Community College District Duty of Care Under California Tort Claims Act

San Francisco Community College District Duty of Care Under California Tort Claims Act

Date: Sep 7, 1984
San Francisco Community College District Duty of Care Under California Tort Claims Act Introduction The case Kathleen Peterson v. San Francisco Community College District et al. (36 Cal.3d 799) was...
Implied Covenant of Good Faith in Commercial Contracts: Analysis of Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Company of California

Implied Covenant of Good Faith in Commercial Contracts: Analysis of Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Company of California

Date: Aug 31, 1984
Implied Covenant of Good Faith in Commercial Contracts: Analysis of Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Company of California Introduction The case of Seaman's Direct Buying Service,...
California Coastal Act Does Not Preclude Referendum on Local Land Use Measures: Yost v. Thomas

California Coastal Act Does Not Preclude Referendum on Local Land Use Measures: Yost v. Thomas

Date: Aug 24, 1984
California Coastal Act Does Not Preclude Referendum on Local Land Use Measures: Yost v. Thomas Introduction The case of Helen Yost et al. v. Richard D. Thomas, heard by the Supreme Court of...
Reasonable Mistake of Age Not a Defense in Lewd Conduct with Minors Under 14: California Supreme Court Decision

Reasonable Mistake of Age Not a Defense in Lewd Conduct with Minors Under 14: California Supreme Court Decision

Date: Aug 24, 1984
Reasonable Mistake of Age Not a Defense in Lewd Conduct with Minors Under 14: California Supreme Court Decision Introduction In The People v. Edward Einar Olsen (36 Cal.3d 638, 1984), the California...
Admissibility of Prior Crimes in Rodney Alcala Case: A Comprehensive Legal Commentary

Admissibility of Prior Crimes in Rodney Alcala Case: A Comprehensive Legal Commentary

Date: Aug 24, 1984
Admissibility of Prior Crimes in Rodney Alcala Case: A Comprehensive Legal Commentary Introduction The People v. Rodney James Alcala case, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California on August 23,...
Establishing the Intent Requirement for Felony-Murder Special Circumstances: An Analysis of People v. Garcia

Establishing the Intent Requirement for Felony-Murder Special Circumstances: An Analysis of People v. Garcia

Date: Aug 7, 1984
Establishing the Intent Requirement for Felony-Murder Special Circumstances: An Analysis of People v. Garcia Introduction People v. Lawrence Richard Garcia (36 Cal.3d 539) is a landmark decision by...
Interpreting Insurance Policy Terms and Third-Party Beneficiary Rights: The Truck Insurance Exchange Decision

Interpreting Insurance Policy Terms and Third-Party Beneficiary Rights: The Truck Insurance Exchange Decision

Date: Jul 17, 1984
Interpreting Insurance Policy Terms and Third-Party Beneficiary Rights: The Truck Insurance Exchange Decision Introduction The case of Dora Garcia et al. v. Truck Insurance Exchange (36 Cal.3d 426)...
Severance of Joint Murder Charges to Prevent Defense Prejudice: Williams v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Severance of Joint Murder Charges to Prevent Defense Prejudice: Williams v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Date: Jul 17, 1984
Severance of Joint Murder Charges to Prevent Defense Prejudice: Williams v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County Introduction Williams v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County is a landmark decision...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert