Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Binding Arbitration Requires Client Consent: Insights from Blanton v. Womancare Introduction Harriette Blanton v. Womancare, Inc., 38 Cal.3d 396 (1985), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Administrative Overreach: DDS Spending Priorities Void under the Lanterman Act Introduction The case of Association for Retarded Citizens — California et al. v. Department of Developmental Services...
Single Instance Accountability in Felony Drunk Driving: Wilkoff v. Superior Court of Orange County Introduction Wilkoff v. Superior Court of Orange County is a landmark case decided by the Supreme...
Expansion of Privacy Protections: Broad Interpretation of Penal Code §631(a) Affirmed Introduction In the landmark case Richard M. Ribas v. Joan Clark (38 Cal.3d 355), the Supreme Court of California...
Substantial Compliance Doctrine Affirmed in Asdourian v. Araj: Implications for Contractor Licensing and Contract Enforcement Introduction Krikor Asdourian, a licensed contractor operating under the...
Enhancing Witness Credibility: The Castro Decision and the Role of Moral Turpitude in Admitting Prior Convictions 1. Introduction In THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARIA J. CASTRO,...
California Supreme Court Establishes Right to Cash Benefits over In-Kind Welfare Assistance Requiring Residency Introduction In the landmark case of Arthur Robbins et al. v. The Superior Court of...
Robert C. Elston v. City of Turlock: Application of Code of Civil Procedure §473 in Setting Aside Deemed Admissions due to Excusable Neglect Introduction In Robert C. Elston et al. v. City of Turlock...
California Supreme Court Upholds MICRA's Limitations on Noneconomic Damages in Medical Malpractice Cases Introduction The case of Lawrence Fein v. Permanente Medical Group (38 Cal.3d 137) represents...
Foreseeability in Landowner Liability: Insights from Isaacs v. Huntington Memorial Hospital Introduction Isaacs v. Huntington Memorial Hospital, 38 Cal.3d 112 (1985), is a seminal case in California...
Safeguarding Against Prejudicial Hearsay: Insights from People v. Coleman Introduction In the landmark case The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Ralph Terry Coleman, Defendant and Appellant (38...
Flexibility in Summary Judgment Procedures and Expert Witness Qualifications Affirmed in Zelvern Mann v. Cracchiolo Introduction Zelvern W. Mann, as Administrator, etc., et al., Plaintiffs and...
Abrogation of California's Exclusionary Rules by Proposition 8: A Comprehensive Analysis of In re Lance W. Introduction In re Lance W. is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California,...
Attorney's Fees Recoverable in Tortious Insurance Practices: ALBERT BRANDT v. Standard Insurance Company Introduction The case of Albert Brandt v. The Superior Court of San Diego County; Standard...
Clarifying Serious Felony Enhancements for Residential Burglary in People v. Jackson Introduction People v. Jackson is a seminal case heard by the Supreme Court of California on January 28, 1985. The...
Preservation of Use Immunity in Juvenile Fitness Hearings Post Proposition 8 Introduction In the landmark case of Ramona R. v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County, the Supreme Court of...
People v. Courts: Upholding the Defendant’s Right to Chosen Counsel and Continuance Introduction In the landmark case People v. Philip Courts (37 Cal.3d 784, 1985), the Supreme Court of California...
Reimbursement for Community Contributions to Education in Marital Dissolution Introduction The landmark case of In re the Marriage of Janet Linnea and Mark Jaye Sullivan (37 Cal.3d 762) addressed the...
Advisory Counsel in Capital Cases: Insights from People v. Bigelow (1984) Introduction Case Title: The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Jerry Douglas Bigelow, Defendant and Appellant (37 Cal.3d...
Balancing Police Powers and Antitrust Principles: Supreme Court of California Upholds Berkeley's Rent Control Ordinance Introduction In the landmark case of ALEXANDRA FISHER et al. v. CITY OF...