Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Maki v. The People: Establishing Standards for Documentary Hearsay in Probation Revocation

Maki v. The People: Establishing Standards for Documentary Hearsay in Probation Revocation

Date: Sep 4, 1985
Maki v. The People: Establishing Standards for Documentary Hearsay in Probation Revocation Introduction The People v. Donald L. Maki (39 Cal.3d 707) is a seminal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Systematic Exclusion of ‘Spanish Surnamed’ Jurors Violates Representative Cross-section Requirement: People v. Trevino – A Comprehensive Commentary

Systematic Exclusion of ‘Spanish Surnamed’ Jurors Violates Representative Cross-section Requirement: People v. Trevino – A Comprehensive Commentary

Date: Aug 30, 1985
Systematic Exclusion of ‘Spanish Surnamed’ Jurors Violates Representative Cross-section Requirement: People v. Trevino – A Comprehensive Commentary Introduction In the landmark case of The People,...
People v. Wright (1985): Admissibility of Defense Evidence under Evidence Code Section 352

People v. Wright (1985): Admissibility of Defense Evidence under Evidence Code Section 352

Date: Aug 16, 1985
People v. Wright (1985): Admissibility of Defense Evidence under Evidence Code Section 352 Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Wright, 39 Cal.3d 576 (1985), the Supreme Court of California...
Section 877's Applicability to Alter Ego Tort Actions: The Wesley G. Mesler v. Bragg Management Company Decision

Section 877's Applicability to Alter Ego Tort Actions: The Wesley G. Mesler v. Bragg Management Company Decision

Date: Aug 2, 1985
Section 877's Applicability to Alter Ego Tort Actions: The Wesley G. Mesler v. Bragg Management Company Decision Introduction The landmark case of Wesley G. Mesler, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Bragg...
Reversal Due to Failure to Instruct on Lesser Included Offense in Ramkeesoon v. The People

Reversal Due to Failure to Instruct on Lesser Included Offense in Ramkeesoon v. The People

Date: Aug 2, 1985
Reversal Due to Failure to Instruct on Lesser Included Offense in Ramkeesoon v. The People Introduction The People v. Michael John Ramkeesoon is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Noerr-Pennington Doctrine Affirmed in Application of the Cartwright Act

Noerr-Pennington Doctrine Affirmed in Application of the Cartwright Act

Date: Aug 2, 1985
Noerr-Pennington Doctrine Affirmed in Application of the Cartwright Act Introduction Blank v. Kirwan et al. is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California in 1985 that explores the...
Exclusive Statutory Procedures in Nonjudicial Foreclosure: I.E. Associates v. Safeco Title Insurance Co. Analysis

Exclusive Statutory Procedures in Nonjudicial Foreclosure: I.E. Associates v. Safeco Title Insurance Co. Analysis

Date: Aug 2, 1985
Exclusive Statutory Procedures in Nonjudicial Foreclosure: I.E. Associates v. Safeco Title Insurance Co. Analysis Introduction The case of I.E. Associates, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Safeco Title...
Relation-Back Doctrine and Section 581a: Establishing Service Timelines for Amended Complaints

Relation-Back Doctrine and Section 581a: Establishing Service Timelines for Amended Complaints

Date: Jul 30, 1985
Relation-Back Doctrine and Section 581a: Establishing Service Timelines for Amended Complaints Introduction Cheryl Barrington v. A.H. Robins Company is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Expansion of Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress Liability: Ochoa v. Superior Court

Expansion of Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress Liability: Ochoa v. Superior Court

Date: Jul 30, 1985
Expansion of Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress Liability: Ochoa v. Superior Court Introduction The case of Gloria Ochoa et al. v. The Superior Court of Santa Clara County (39 Cal.3d 159,...
Reversal of Convictions Under Amended Penal Code Section 593e: People v. Babylon et al.

Reversal of Convictions Under Amended Penal Code Section 593e: People v. Babylon et al.

Date: Jul 26, 1985
Reversal of Convictions Under Amended Penal Code Section 593e: People v. Babylon et al. (39 Cal.3d 719) Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Babylon et al., the Supreme Court of California...
Estoppel and Fraud in Unlicensed Finder's Fee Agreements: Tenzer v. Superscope, Inc.

Estoppel and Fraud in Unlicensed Finder's Fee Agreements: Tenzer v. Superscope, Inc.

Date: Jul 26, 1985
Estoppel and Fraud in Unlicensed Finder's Fee Agreements: Tenzer v. Superscope, Inc. Introduction The case of Michael L. Tenzer v. Superscope, Inc. (39 Cal.3d 18) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Establishing Equal Partnership in Drug Copurchase as a Defense Against Furnishing Charges: People v. Edwards

Establishing Equal Partnership in Drug Copurchase as a Defense Against Furnishing Charges: People v. Edwards

Date: Jul 26, 1985
Establishing Equal Partnership in Drug Copurchase as a Defense Against Furnishing Charges: People v. Edwards Introduction Case Citation: The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Dennis William...
Unconscionable NSF Charges: Perdue v. Crocker National Bank - A Comprehensive Analysis

Unconscionable NSF Charges: Perdue v. Crocker National Bank - A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Jul 19, 1985
Unconscionable NSF Charges: Perdue v. Crocker National Bank - A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction Perdue v. Crocker National Bank, 38 Cal.3d 913 (1985), is a landmark case decided by the Supreme...
Strict Compliance Required for Granting New Trials: Insights from Sanchez-Corea v. Bank of America (1985)

Strict Compliance Required for Granting New Trials: Insights from Sanchez-Corea v. Bank of America (1985)

Date: Jul 12, 1985
Strict Compliance Required for Granting New Trials: Insights from Sanchez-Corea v. Bank of America (1985) Introduction The case of Sanchez-Corea v. Bank of America (38 Cal.3d 892, 1985) presents a...
Prosecutorial Vindictiveness under Due Process: In re Jackie Lee Bower

Prosecutorial Vindictiveness under Due Process: In re Jackie Lee Bower

Date: Jun 25, 1985
Prosecutorial Vindictiveness under Due Process: In re Jackie Lee Bower Introduction In re Jackie Lee Bower on Habeas Corpus (38 Cal.3d 865, 1985) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Memro v. The People: Landmark Ruling on Discovery Rights and Coerced Confessions

Memro v. The People: Landmark Ruling on Discovery Rights and Coerced Confessions

Date: Jun 7, 1985
Memro v. The People: Landmark Ruling on Discovery Rights and Coerced Confessions Introduction Memro v. The People (38 Cal.3d 658, 1985) is a seminal California Supreme Court decision that...
Proper Instruction on Intent in Felony-Murder and Evidence Admissibility at Penalty Phase: People v. Boyd

Proper Instruction on Intent in Felony-Murder and Evidence Admissibility at Penalty Phase: People v. Boyd

Date: Jun 7, 1985
Proper Instruction on Intent in Felony-Murder and Evidence Admissibility at Penalty Phase: People v. Boyd Introduction People v. Juan Anthony Boyd is a seminal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Strict Enforcement of Government Code Section 1090: Forfeiture as Remedy for Conflict of Interest in Public Contracts

Strict Enforcement of Government Code Section 1090: Forfeiture as Remedy for Conflict of Interest in Public Contracts

Date: May 24, 1985
Strict Enforcement of Government Code Section 1090: Forfeiture as Remedy for Conflict of Interest in Public Contracts Introduction The case of Bruce Thomson et al. v. Hubert Call et al.; City of...
California Supreme Court Clarifies 'Good Faith' in Settlements: Tech-Bilt v. Woodward-Clyde

California Supreme Court Clarifies 'Good Faith' in Settlements: Tech-Bilt v. Woodward-Clyde

Date: May 3, 1985
California Supreme Court Clarifies 'Good Faith' in Settlements: Tech-Bilt v. Woodward-Clyde Introduction The landmark decision in Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde Associates (38 Cal.3d 488)...
Clarifying Suicide Exclusion in Life Insurance: Burden of Proof and Policy Interpretation

Clarifying Suicide Exclusion in Life Insurance: Burden of Proof and Policy Interpretation

Date: Apr 5, 1985
Clarifying Suicide Exclusion in Life Insurance: Burden of Proof and Policy Interpretation Introduction Alice M. Searle v. Allstate Life Insurance Company (38 Cal.3d 425, 1985) is a landmark case...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert