Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Supreme Court Affirms Constitutionality of Per Se DUI Standards under Vehicle Code Section 23152(b)

Supreme Court Affirms Constitutionality of Per Se DUI Standards under Vehicle Code Section 23152(b)

Date: Dec 23, 1983
Supreme Court Affirms Constitutionality of Per Se DUI Standards under Vehicle Code Section 23152(b) Introduction In the landmark case Richard Joseph Burg v. The Municipal Court for the Santa Clara...
Intent Requirement Affirmed in Felony Murder Special Circumstances under California's 1978 Death Penalty Initiative

Intent Requirement Affirmed in Felony Murder Special Circumstances under California's 1978 Death Penalty Initiative

Date: Dec 13, 1983
Intent Requirement Affirmed in Felony Murder Special Circumstances under California's 1978 Death Penalty Initiative Introduction In the case of Celestino Mark Carlos v. The Superior Court of Los...
Systematic Exclusion of Black Jurors: The People v. Miguel Hall (1983)

Systematic Exclusion of Black Jurors: The People v. Miguel Hall (1983)

Date: Dec 13, 1983
Systematic Exclusion of Black Jurors: The People v. Miguel Hall (1983) Introduction The People v. Miguel Hall is a landmark 1983 decision by the Supreme Court of California that addresses the...
Establishing Reasonable Suspicion: The People v. Allan Dale Loewen

Establishing Reasonable Suspicion: The People v. Allan Dale Loewen

Date: Dec 9, 1983
Establishing Reasonable Suspicion: The People v. Allan Dale Loewen Introduction The People v. Allan Dale Loewen (35 Cal.3d 117) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California on...
Balancing Public and Private Harms in Preliminary Injunctions: IT Corp. v. County of Imperial

Balancing Public and Private Harms in Preliminary Injunctions: IT Corp. v. County of Imperial

Date: Nov 26, 1983
Balancing Public and Private Harms in Preliminary Injunctions: IT Corp. v. County of Imperial Introduction IT Corporation v. County of Imperial (35 Cal.3d 63) is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Right to Self-Representation in Capital Cases: Analysis of People v. Mariney Joseph

Right to Self-Representation in Capital Cases: Analysis of People v. Mariney Joseph

Date: Nov 11, 1983
Right to Self-Representation in Capital Cases: Analysis of People v. Mariney Joseph Introduction People v. Mariney Joseph, 34 Cal.3d 936 (1983), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Ensuring Fair Sentencing: The Importance of Proper Jury Instructions in Death Penalty Cases

Ensuring Fair Sentencing: The Importance of Proper Jury Instructions in Death Penalty Cases

Date: Nov 8, 1983
Ensuring Fair Sentencing: The Importance of Proper Jury Instructions in Death Penalty Cases Introduction In the landmark case of The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Elbert Lee Easley, Defendant...
Enhanced Fourth Amendment Protections in Airport Searches: Clerow Wilson v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Enhanced Fourth Amendment Protections in Airport Searches: Clerow Wilson v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Date: Oct 21, 1983
Enhanced Fourth Amendment Protections in Airport Searches: Clerow Wilson v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County Introduction In the landmark case of Clerow Wilson v. Superior Court of Los Angeles...
Rejection of the "Accelerated Booking Search" Exception: Comprehensive Analysis of THE PEOPLE v. RAYMOND LAIWA III

Rejection of the "Accelerated Booking Search" Exception: Comprehensive Analysis of THE PEOPLE v. RAYMOND LAIWA III

Date: Oct 7, 1983
Rejection of the "Accelerated Booking Search" Exception: Comprehensive Analysis of THE PEOPLE v. RAYMOND LAIWA III Introduction THE PEOPLE v. RAYMOND LAIWA III, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Enhancing Procedural Dismissal: Insights from Wilson v. Sunshine Meat and Liquor Company

Enhancing Procedural Dismissal: Insights from Wilson v. Sunshine Meat and Liquor Company

Date: Sep 9, 1983
Enhancing Procedural Dismissal: Insights from Wilson v. Sunshine Meat and Liquor Company Introduction The Supreme Court of California's decision in David W. Wilson v. Sunshine Meat and Liquor...
Establishing the Duty of Effective Assistance of Counsel: People v. McKenzie

Establishing the Duty of Effective Assistance of Counsel: People v. McKenzie

Date: Sep 9, 1983
Establishing the Duty of Effective Assistance of Counsel: People v. McKenzie Introduction People v. Elliot Cornace McKenzie (34 Cal.3d 616), decided by the Supreme Court of California on September 8,...
Balancing the Felony-Murder Rule and Constitutional Protections: California Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in The People v. Dillon

Balancing the Felony-Murder Rule and Constitutional Protections: California Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in The People v. Dillon

Date: Sep 2, 1983
Balancing the Felony-Murder Rule and Constitutional Protections: California Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in The People v. Dillon Introduction The People v. Norman Jay Dillon is a seminal case...
Reinforcing Psychotherapist Privilege and Confrontation Rights in Child Abuse Litigation: People v. Stritzinger

Reinforcing Psychotherapist Privilege and Confrontation Rights in Child Abuse Litigation: People v. Stritzinger

Date: Sep 2, 1983
Reinforcing Psychotherapist Privilege and Confrontation Rights in Child Abuse Litigation: People v. Stritzinger Introduction People v. Carl William Stritzinger is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Mandatory Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies and the Reasonableness of Appeal Fees: Insights from SEA AND SAGE Audubon Society v. City of Anaheim

Mandatory Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies and the Reasonableness of Appeal Fees: Insights from SEA AND SAGE Audubon Society v. City of Anaheim

Date: Aug 30, 1983
Mandatory Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies and the Reasonableness of Appeal Fees: Insights from SEA AND SAGE Audubon Society v. City of Anaheim Introduction The case of SEA AND SAGE Audubon...
Sentencing Discretion under Penal Code Section 667.6(c): Insights from The People v. Belmontes

Sentencing Discretion under Penal Code Section 667.6(c): Insights from The People v. Belmontes

Date: Aug 19, 1983
Sentencing Discretion under Penal Code Section 667.6(c): Insights from The People v. Belmontes Introduction The People v. Belmontes (34 Cal.3d 335), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California on...
Enforcement of Fundamental Rights and Attorney Fee Awards: Insights from Bill Press v. Lucky Stores

Enforcement of Fundamental Rights and Attorney Fee Awards: Insights from Bill Press v. Lucky Stores

Date: Aug 19, 1983
Enforcement of Fundamental Rights and Attorney Fee Awards: Insights from Bill Press v. Lucky Stores Introduction Bill Press et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants v. Lucky Stores, Inc., Defendant and...
Standards for 'Package-Deal' Plea Bargains: Insights from In re David Ibarra

Standards for 'Package-Deal' Plea Bargains: Insights from In re David Ibarra

Date: Aug 9, 1983
Standards for 'Package-Deal' Plea Bargains: Insights from In re David Ibarra on Habeas Corpus Introduction In re David Ibarra on Habeas Corpus, 34 Cal.3d 277 (1983), is a landmark decision by the...
Limited Retroactivity of Proposition 8 in California Criminal Proceedings: An Analysis of The People v. Kevin Leroy Smith

Limited Retroactivity of Proposition 8 in California Criminal Proceedings: An Analysis of The People v. Kevin Leroy Smith

Date: Aug 9, 1983
Limited Retroactivity of Proposition 8 in California Criminal Proceedings: An Analysis of The People v. Kevin Leroy Smith Introduction The People v. Kevin Leroy Smith (34 Cal.3d 251, 1983) is a...
Reimbursement for Self-Procured Medical Treatment in Workers' Compensation: Braewood Convalescent Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

Reimbursement for Self-Procured Medical Treatment in Workers' Compensation: Braewood Convalescent Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

Date: Jul 29, 1983
Reimbursement for Self-Procured Medical Treatment in Workers' Compensation: Braewood Convalescent Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Introduction Braewood Convalescent Hospital et al.,...
Conflict of Interest and Recusal Standards in Prosecution: The People v. James Edward Conner

Conflict of Interest and Recusal Standards in Prosecution: The People v. James Edward Conner

Date: Jul 22, 1983
Conflict of Interest and Recusal Standards in Prosecution: The People v. James Edward Conner Introduction The People v. James Edward Conner (34 Cal.3d 141, Supreme Court of California, 1983) is a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert