Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Proposition 8 Abrogates Disbrow: Implications for the Use of Miranda-Violative Statements in Impeachment Introduction In the landmark case The People v. Michael Dennis May (44 Cal.3d 309, 1988), the...
Secure Detention of Contemptuous Status Offenders: Insights from In re Michael G. Introduction In re Michael G., a Minor, on Habeas Corpus (44 Cal.3d 283, 1988) is a pivotal judgment from the Supreme...
Preemptory Challenge Misuse in Jury Selection: People v. Snow (1987) Introduction People v. Prentice Juan Snow, 44 Cal.3d 216 (1987), is a landmark Supreme Court of California decision addressing the...
Establishing the Limits of Dual Representation: People v. Miranda Introduction Case: The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Adam Miranda, Defendant and Appellant Court: Supreme Court of California...
Martín v. People: Enhancing Protections Against Prosecutorial Misconduct in Habeas Corpus Proceedings Introduction In re Herman G. Martin on Habeas Corpus (44 Cal.3d 1, 1987) represents a pivotal...
Limitations on Punitive Damages Under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act DYNA-MED, Inc. v. Fair Employment and Housing Commission (43 Cal.3d 1379) Court: Supreme Court of California Date:...
Retained Jurisdiction to Award Attorney Fees under CCP §1021.5 Despite Dismissal under §583(b): Maria P. v. Wilson Riles Introduction In the landmark case of Maria P., et al. v. Wilson Riles, et al.,...
California Supreme Court Upholds Sobriety Checkpoints: A New Administrative Search Precedent Introduction In the landmark case of WILLIAM INGERSOLL et al. v. ALFRED PALMER (43 Cal.3d 1321, 1987), the...
Private Insurance Decisions Separate from State Action: Analyzing King v. Meese Introduction In the landmark case of M.L. King et al. v. George Meese et al., the Supreme Court of California...
Enhancing Jury Discretion in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of People v. Gates (1987) Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Gates, decided on October 15, 1987, the Supreme Court of California...
Intent to Kill Not Required for Felony-Murder Special Circumstances in PEOPLE v. ANDERSON Introduction People v. James Phillip Anderson is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of California...
Interpreting 'Convicted' in Section 1732.5: The People v. Woodhead Establishes Current Conviction Limitation for Youth Authority Commitment Introduction The People v. Michael Woodhead (43 Cal.3d...
Sliding Scale Recovery Agreements Must Align with Proportional Liability to be Considered Good Faith Settlements Introduction The case of Abbott Ford, Inc. v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County...
Ensuring Due Process in Manslaughter Charges: Supreme Court Upholds Involuntary Manslaughter Conviction in People v. Thomas Introduction People v. Paul E. Thomas (43 Cal.3d 818) is a significant...
Limits on Discovery in Sexual Harassment Cases: Vinson v. Superior Court of Alameda County Introduction Katherine Vinson v. The Superior Court of Alameda County, Peralta Community College District et...
The People v. David L. Ghent, Jr.: Affirmation of Death Penalty under 1977 California Law Introduction The People v. David L. Ghent, Jr. is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California...
Reaffirming the Necessity of Specific Intent in Attempted Murder Charges Introduction THE PEOPLE v. CHARLES JOSEPH LEE (43 Cal.3d 666, 1987) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California...
Broad Waiver of Fourth Amendment Rights in Probation Conditions: Analysis of People v. Bravo (43 Cal.3d 600) Introduction People v. Robert Terry Bravo is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Juror Re-convening Rules in Sanity Hearings for Capital Sentencing: THE PEOPLE v. HENDRICKS Introduction THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. EDGAR M. HENDRICKS, Defendant and Appellant (43...
Speculative Nature of Loss Precludes Tort Claims in Horse Racing: Youst v. Longo (43 Cal.3d 64) Introduction In Harlan Youst v. Gerald Longo (43 Cal.3d 64), the Supreme Court of California addressed...