Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Ensuring Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of Ledesma v. The People

Ensuring Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of Ledesma v. The People

Date: Jan 3, 1987
Ensuring Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of Ledesma v. The People Introduction The landmark case of Ledesma v. The People (43 Cal.3d 171, 1987) addresses...
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: People v. Dale Michael Bloyd

Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: People v. Dale Michael Bloyd

Date: Jan 3, 1987
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: People v. Dale Michael Bloyd Introduction People v. Dale Michael Bloyd is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California in 1987 that...
Exclusive Remedy Doctrine Reinforced: Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire Protection District

Exclusive Remedy Doctrine Reinforced: Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire Protection District

Date: Jan 3, 1987
Exclusive Remedy Doctrine Reinforced: Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire Protection District Introduction Leonard Cole et al. v. Fair Oaks Fire Protection District et al., 43 Cal.3d 148 (1987), is a pivotal case...
Affirming Death Penalty: Special Circumstances and Fair Plea Agreements in The People v. Clarence Ray Allen

Affirming Death Penalty: Special Circumstances and Fair Plea Agreements in The People v. Clarence Ray Allen

Date: Jan 1, 1987
Affirming Death Penalty: Special Circumstances and Fair Plea Agreements in The People v. Clarence Ray Allen Introduction The case of The People v. Clarence Ray Allen (42 Cal.3d 1222) scrutinizes the...
Privilege of Judicial Statements in Abuse of Process: Oren Royal Oaks Venture v. Greenberg et al.

Privilege of Judicial Statements in Abuse of Process: Oren Royal Oaks Venture v. Greenberg et al.

Date: Jan 1, 1987
Privilege of Judicial Statements in Abuse of Process: Oren Royal Oaks Venture v. Greenberg et al. Introduction The case of Oren Royal Oaks Venture, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Greenberg, Bernhard,...
Safeway Stores Inc. Liability for Misconduct in Reporting Counterfeit Currency: A Landmark in Merchant Negligence

Safeway Stores Inc. Liability for Misconduct in Reporting Counterfeit Currency: A Landmark in Merchant Negligence

Date: Dec 30, 1986
Safeway Stores Inc. Liability for Misconduct in Reporting Counterfeit Currency: A Landmark in Merchant Negligence Introduction In the pivotal case of George Lloyd Pool v. City of Oakland et al. (42...
First Amendment Protections in Media Omissions: Blatty v. New York Times Company

First Amendment Protections in Media Omissions: Blatty v. New York Times Company

Date: Dec 30, 1986
First Amendment Protections in Media Omissions: Blatty v. New York Times Company Introduction The case of William Peter Blatty v. New York Times Company, 42 Cal.3d 1033 (1986), addressed a critical...
Right of Confrontation: Impact of People v. Vincent Louis on Witness Testimony

Right of Confrontation: Impact of People v. Vincent Louis on Witness Testimony

Date: Dec 12, 1986
Right of Confrontation: Impact of People v. Vincent Louis on Witness Testimony Introduction People v. Vincent Louis (42 Cal.3d 969, Supreme Court of California, 1986) stands as a pivotal case in the...
Protecting Due Process: Penal Code §872(b) Declared Unconstitutional in Johnnie Mills v. Superior Court

Protecting Due Process: Penal Code §872(b) Declared Unconstitutional in Johnnie Mills v. Superior Court

Date: Dec 12, 1986
Protecting Due Process: Penal Code §872(b) Declared Unconstitutional in Johnnie Mills v. Superior Court Introduction In the landmark case of Johnnie Mills v. Superior Court of the City and County of...
Limits on Trial Court Authority in Mandatory Arbitration: Lyons v. Wickhorst

Limits on Trial Court Authority in Mandatory Arbitration: Lyons v. Wickhorst

Date: Dec 2, 1986
Limits on Trial Court Authority in Mandatory Arbitration: Lyons v. Wickhorst Introduction Edward J. Lyons, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Erwin Wickhorst et al. is a landmark 1986 decision by the...
Limiting Default Judgments in Discovery Sanctions: Clarifying Section 580 in Greenup v. Rodman

Limiting Default Judgments in Discovery Sanctions: Clarifying Section 580 in Greenup v. Rodman

Date: Nov 14, 1986
Limiting Default Judgments in Discovery Sanctions: Clarifying Section 580 in Greenup v. Rodman Introduction Greenup v. Rodman et al., 42 Cal.3d 822 (1986), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Interpretation of 'Pending Trial' in Penal Code Section 12022.1: Enhancements Not Applicable Post-Guilt Determination

Interpretation of 'Pending Trial' in Penal Code Section 12022.1: Enhancements Not Applicable Post-Guilt Determination

Date: Nov 14, 1986
Interpretation of 'Pending Trial' in Penal Code Section 12022.1: Enhancements Not Applicable Post-Guilt Determination Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Freddie Lee Overstreet,...
Overruling PEOPLE v. COOK: Implications for Judicial Comments in Deadlocked Jury Deliberations

Overruling PEOPLE v. COOK: Implications for Judicial Comments in Deadlocked Jury Deliberations

Date: Oct 24, 1986
Overruling PEOPLE v. COOK: Implications for Judicial Comments in Deadlocked Jury Deliberations Introduction The Supreme Court of California, in the landmark case of People v. Rodriguez (42 Cal.3d...
Systematic Exclusion of Black Jurors and the Right to a Representative Jury: An Analysis of People v. Turner

Systematic Exclusion of Black Jurors and the Right to a Representative Jury: An Analysis of People v. Turner

Date: Oct 24, 1986
Systematic Exclusion of Black Jurors and the Right to a Representative Jury: An Analysis of People v. Turner Introduction People v. Melvin Turner is a landmark 1986 decision by the Supreme Court of...
Privacy vs. Public Right to Know: CBS v. Sherman Block and the Disclosure of Concealed Weapons Licenses under the California Public Records Act

Privacy vs. Public Right to Know: CBS v. Sherman Block and the Disclosure of Concealed Weapons Licenses under the California Public Records Act

Date: Oct 10, 1986
Privacy vs. Public Right to Know: CBS v. Sherman Block and the Disclosure of Concealed Weapons Licenses under the California Public Records Act Introduction The case of CBS, Inc. v. Sherman Block, 42...
Primacy of Best Interests in Child Custody: Ana Marie Burchard v. William Garay

Primacy of Best Interests in Child Custody: Ana Marie Burchard v. William Garay

Date: Sep 23, 1986
Primacy of Best Interests in Child Custody: Ana Marie Burchard v. William Garay Introduction Ana Marie Burchard v. William Garay is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California, rendered on...
Condominium Associations and Landlord's Duty of Care: Establishing Precedent in Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Association

Condominium Associations and Landlord's Duty of Care: Establishing Precedent in Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Association

Date: Sep 5, 1986
Condominium Associations and Landlord's Duty of Care: Establishing Precedent in Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Association Introduction The case of Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Association,...
Impeachment of Witnesses by Prior Felony Convictions: Insights from People v. Collins (1986)

Impeachment of Witnesses by Prior Felony Convictions: Insights from People v. Collins (1986)

Date: Aug 12, 1986
Impeachment of Witnesses by Prior Felony Convictions: Insights from People v. Collins (1986) Introduction People v. Alonzo Collins (42 Cal.3d 378, 1986) marks a significant development in the...
Double Conviction in Sexual Offenses: Affirmation of Multiple Convictions in People v. Pearson

Double Conviction in Sexual Offenses: Affirmation of Multiple Convictions in People v. Pearson

Date: Aug 8, 1986
Double Conviction in Sexual Offenses: Affirmation of Multiple Convictions in People v. Pearson Introduction The case of The People v. Lawrence D. Pearson, decided by the Supreme Court of California...
Elimination of Resistance Requirement in Rape Convictions: Analysis of People v. Barnes (1986)

Elimination of Resistance Requirement in Rape Convictions: Analysis of People v. Barnes (1986)

Date: Aug 1, 1986
Elimination of Resistance Requirement in Rape Convictions: Analysis of People v. Barnes (1986) Introduction People v. Joaquin Barnes, 42 Cal.3d 284 (1986), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert