Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

People v. Michael Leon Bell: Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction

People v. Michael Leon Bell: Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction

Date: May 3, 2019
People v. Michael Leon Bell: Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction Introduction In the landmark case People v. Michael Leon Bell (7 Cal.5th 70, 2019), the Supreme Court of California affirmed the...
Affirmation in People v. Sanchez: Upholding Standards for Minor Witness Testimony and Confession Admissibility in Capital Cases

Affirmation in People v. Sanchez: Upholding Standards for Minor Witness Testimony and Confession Admissibility in Capital Cases

Date: Apr 30, 2019
Affirmation in People v. Sanchez: Upholding Standards for Minor Witness Testimony and Confession Admissibility in Capital Cases Introduction The case of The People v. Juan Sanchez, decided by the...
Application of Proposition 47 to Initial Sentencing in Vehicle Code Offenses: Analysis of People v. Henry Arsenio Lara II

Application of Proposition 47 to Initial Sentencing in Vehicle Code Offenses: Analysis of People v. Henry Arsenio Lara II

Date: Apr 12, 2019
Application of Proposition 47 to Initial Sentencing in Vehicle Code Offenses: Analysis of People v. Henry Arsenio Lara II Introduction People v. Henry Arsenio Lara II (6 Cal.5th 1128, 2019) is a...
Affirmation of Death Sentence and Removal of Elderly Victim Enhancements in People v. Potts

Affirmation of Death Sentence and Removal of Elderly Victim Enhancements in People v. Potts

Date: Mar 29, 2019
Affirmation of Death Sentence and Removal of Elderly Victim Enhancements in People v. Potts (6 Cal.5th 1012) Introduction PEOPLE v. THOMAS Potts is a significant decision by the Supreme Court of...
Sweetwater Union High School District v. Gilbane Building Company: Affirming the Use of Criminal Plea and Grand Jury Transcripts in Anti-SLAPP Motions

Sweetwater Union High School District v. Gilbane Building Company: Affirming the Use of Criminal Plea and Grand Jury Transcripts in Anti-SLAPP Motions

Date: Mar 1, 2019
Sweetwater Union High School District v. Gilbane Building Company: Affirming the Use of Criminal Plea and Grand Jury Transcripts in Anti-SLAPP Motions Introduction In Sweetwater Union High School...
Affirmation of Search Warrant Standards in Capital Murder Cases: People v. Westerfield

Affirmation of Search Warrant Standards in Capital Murder Cases: People v. Westerfield

Date: Feb 5, 2019
Affirmation of Search Warrant Standards in Capital Murder Cases: People v. Westerfield Introduction In People v. Westerfield, the Supreme Court of California addressed significant issues surrounding...
Affirmation of Strict Standards for Juror Exclusion in Capital Punishment Cases: People v. Armstrong

Affirmation of Strict Standards for Juror Exclusion in Capital Punishment Cases: People v. Armstrong

Date: Feb 5, 2019
Affirmation of Strict Standards for Juror Exclusion in Capital Punishment Cases: People v. Armstrong Introduction People v. Armstrong (6 Cal.5th 735, 2019) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Rand Resources v. City of Carson: Clarifying the Scope of California's Anti-SLAPP Statute

Rand Resources v. City of Carson: Clarifying the Scope of California's Anti-SLAPP Statute

Date: Feb 5, 2019
Rand Resources v. City of Carson: Clarifying the Scope of California's Anti-SLAPP Statute Introduction The Supreme Court of California, in Rand Resources, LLC v. City of Carson (6 Cal.5th 610, 2019),...
Mandatory Ability to Pay Hearings Before Imposing Court Assessments on Indigent Defendants: People v. Dueñas

Mandatory Ability to Pay Hearings Before Imposing Court Assessments on Indigent Defendants: People v. Dueñas

Date: Jan 9, 2019
Mandatory Ability to Pay Hearings Before Imposing Court Assessments on Indigent Defendants: People v. Dueñas Introduction In People v. Dueñas (30 Cal.App.5th 1157, 2019), the Court of Appeal of...
Defining 'Deadly Weapon' Usage: In re B.M. Establishes 'Capable and Likely to Produce' Standard

Defining 'Deadly Weapon' Usage: In re B.M. Establishes 'Capable and Likely to Produce' Standard

Date: Dec 28, 2018
Defining 'Deadly Weapon' Usage: In re B.M. Establishes 'Capable and Likely to Produce' Standard Introduction The case of In re B.M., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law serves as a pivotal...
Perfection of Title Required Before Serving Notice to Quit in Unlawful Detainer Actions: Dr. Leevil, LLC v. Westlake Health Care Center

Perfection of Title Required Before Serving Notice to Quit in Unlawful Detainer Actions: Dr. Leevil, LLC v. Westlake Health Care Center

Date: Dec 18, 2018
Perfection of Title Required Before Serving Notice to Quit in Unlawful Detainer Actions Introduction In the landmark case of Dr. Leevil, LLC v. Westlake Health Care Center, the California Supreme...
Impact of Improper Juror Excusal Based on Death Penalty Views in People v. Buenrostro

Impact of Improper Juror Excusal Based on Death Penalty Views in People v. Buenrostro

Date: Dec 4, 2018
Impact of Improper Juror Excusal Based on Death Penalty Views in People v. Buenrostro Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Dora Buenrostro (6 Cal.5th 367, 2018), the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Death Penalty Conviction in People v. Ruben Perez Gomez: An In-Depth Analysis

Affirmation of Death Penalty Conviction in People v. Ruben Perez Gomez: An In-Depth Analysis

Date: Nov 30, 2018
Affirmation of Death Penalty Conviction in People v. Ruben Perez Gomez: An In-Depth Analysis Introduction In the landmark case People v. Ruben Perez Gomez, the Supreme Court of California affirmed...
Conflicts of Interest in Legal Representation: Unenforceable Engagement Agreements and Compensation Implications – Sheppard Mullin v. J-M Manufacturing

Conflicts of Interest in Legal Representation: Unenforceable Engagement Agreements and Compensation Implications – Sheppard Mullin v. J-M Manufacturing

Date: Aug 31, 2018
Conflicts of Interest in Legal Representation: Unenforceable Engagement Agreements and Compensation Implications Introduction In the landmark case of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP v. J-M...
Bianka M. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County: Jurisdiction Over Absent Parents in Special Immigrant Juvenile Proceedings

Bianka M. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County: Jurisdiction Over Absent Parents in Special Immigrant Juvenile Proceedings

Date: Aug 17, 2018
Bianka M. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County: Jurisdiction Over Absent Parents in Special Immigrant Juvenile Proceedings Introduction In the landmark case of Bianka M., a Minor, etc.,...
Merger Doctrine Inapplicable to First-Degree Felony Murder Cases Involving Torture and Mayhem: People v. Powell

Merger Doctrine Inapplicable to First-Degree Felony Murder Cases Involving Torture and Mayhem: People v. Powell

Date: Aug 14, 2018
Merger Doctrine Inapplicable to First-Degree Felony Murder Cases Involving Torture and Mayhem: People v. Powell Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Troy Lincoln Powell (5 Cal.5th 921,...
Duty to Meet and Confer in Public Employment Relations: Boling v. PERB

Duty to Meet and Confer in Public Employment Relations: Boling v. PERB

Date: Aug 3, 2018
Duty to Meet and Confer in Public Employment Relations: Boling v. PERB Introduction Boling v. Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
Prop 47's Retroactive Effect on Sentencing Enhancements: Analyzing People v. Buycks, Valenzuela, and Guiomar

Prop 47's Retroactive Effect on Sentencing Enhancements: Analyzing People v. Buycks, Valenzuela, and Guiomar

Date: Jul 31, 2018
Prop 47's Retroactive Effect on Sentencing Enhancements: Analyzing People v. Buycks, Valenzuela, and Guiomar Introduction The landmark decision in People v. Buycks, Valenzuela, and In re Guiomar...
De Minimis Doctrine Not Adopted Under California Wage Laws in Troester v. Starbucks

De Minimis Doctrine Not Adopted Under California Wage Laws in Troester v. Starbucks

Date: Jul 27, 2018
De Minimis Doctrine Not Adopted Under California Wage Laws in Troester v. Starbucks Introduction In Douglas Troester v. Starbucks Corporation (5 Cal.5th 829, 2018), the Supreme Court of California...
Reversal in People v. Woodruff: Improper Jury Selection Leading to Witt Error

Reversal in People v. Woodruff: Improper Jury Selection Leading to Witt Error

Date: Jul 20, 2018
Reversal in People v. Woodruff: Improper Jury Selection Leading to Witt Error Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Woodruff (5 Cal.5th 697, 2018), the Supreme Court of California...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert