Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Ensuring Equal Access: California Supreme Court Establishes Right to Official Court Reporters for In Forma Pauperis Litigants

Ensuring Equal Access: California Supreme Court Establishes Right to Official Court Reporters for In Forma Pauperis Litigants

Date: Jul 6, 2018
Ensuring Equal Access: California Supreme Court Establishes Right to Official Court Reporters for In Forma Pauperis Litigants Introduction In the case of Barry S. Jameson v. Taddese Desta (5 Cal.5th...
Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Mora and Rangel: Upholding Convictions Despite Procedural Challenges

Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Mora and Rangel: Upholding Convictions Despite Procedural Challenges

Date: Jul 3, 2018
Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Mora and Rangel: Upholding Convictions Despite Procedural Challenges Introduction People v. Mora and Rangel is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
State of California v. Eric Anderson: Upholding the Death Penalty Amid Joint Trial Procedures

State of California v. Eric Anderson: Upholding the Death Penalty Amid Joint Trial Procedures

Date: Jun 29, 2018
State of California v. Eric Anderson: Upholding the Death Penalty Amid Joint Trial Procedures Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Eric Anderson (5 Cal.5th 372, 2018), the Supreme Court...
Overruling People v. Skidmore: Redefining Claim and Issue Preclusion in California

Overruling People v. Skidmore: Redefining Claim and Issue Preclusion in California

Date: Jun 26, 2018
Overruling People v. Skidmore: Redefining Claim and Issue Preclusion in California Introduction The Rana Samara v. Haitham Matar decision by the Supreme Court of California marks a pivotal shift in...
Unified Application of the Totality of Circumstances Test in Silent Record Cases: People v. Farwell

Unified Application of the Totality of Circumstances Test in Silent Record Cases: People v. Farwell

Date: Jun 22, 2018
Unified Application of the Totality of Circumstances Test in Silent Record Cases: People v. Farwell Introduction The landmark case of People v. Randolph D. Farwell (5 Cal.5th 295, 2018) addresses...
Felony Murder Conviction Affirmed Despite Omitted Lesser Included Offense Instructions: Analyzing People v. Gonzalez

Felony Murder Conviction Affirmed Despite Omitted Lesser Included Offense Instructions: Analyzing People v. Gonzalez

Date: Jun 5, 2018
Felony Murder Conviction Affirmed Despite Omitted Lesser Included Offense Instructions: Analyzing People v. Gonzalez Introduction In the landmark case of The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v....
People v. Hardy: Comprehensive Analysis of Capital Conviction and Jury Selection Practices

People v. Hardy: Comprehensive Analysis of Capital Conviction and Jury Selection Practices

Date: Jun 1, 2018
People v. Hardy: Comprehensive Analysis of Capital Conviction and Jury Selection Practices Introduction People v. Warren Justin Hardy is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California...
Miranda Violation and Evidentiary Admissibility in People v. Charles Edward Case

Miranda Violation and Evidentiary Admissibility in People v. Charles Edward Case

Date: Jun 1, 2018
Miranda Violation and Evidentiary Admissibility in People v. Charles Edward Case Introduction People v. Charles Edward Case (5 Cal.5th 1) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California...
Enhancing the Confrontation Clause Protections in Capital Cases: Insights from PEOPLE v. RICHard Penunuri

Enhancing the Confrontation Clause Protections in Capital Cases: Insights from PEOPLE v. RICHard Penunuri

Date: Jun 1, 2018
Enhancing the Confrontation Clause Protections in Capital Cases: Insights from PEOPLE v. RICHard Penunuri Introduction The case of The PEOPLE v. RICHard Penunuri (5 Cal.5th 126, 2018) marks a...
Imposition of Drug-Related Fees for Conspiracy Convictions: Affirming Penal Code Section 182(a)

Imposition of Drug-Related Fees for Conspiracy Convictions: Affirming Penal Code Section 182(a)

Date: May 18, 2018
Imposition of Drug-Related Fees for Conspiracy Convictions: Affirming Penal Code Section 182(a) Introduction The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Feliz Corral Ruiz II, Defendant and Appellant (4...
Interpretation of Dispute Exceptions in Prompt Payment Statutes: United Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. Coast Iron & Steel Co.

Interpretation of Dispute Exceptions in Prompt Payment Statutes: United Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. Coast Iron & Steel Co.

Date: May 15, 2018
Interpretation of Dispute Exceptions in Prompt Payment Statutes: United Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. Coast Iron & Steel Co. Introduction In United Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. Coast Iron & Steel Co. (4...
State Water Resources Control Board's Proper Adoption of Permit Fee Schedule Upheld

State Water Resources Control Board's Proper Adoption of Permit Fee Schedule Upheld

Date: May 8, 2018
State Water Resources Control Board's Proper Adoption of Permit Fee Schedule Upheld Introduction In the landmark case of California Building Industry Association v. State Water Resources Control...
Ineligibility for Resentencing Under Proposition 36: People v. Perez, 4 Cal.5th 1055

Ineligibility for Resentencing Under Proposition 36: People v. Perez, 4 Cal.5th 1055

Date: May 8, 2018
Ineligibility for Resentencing Under Proposition 36: People v. Perez, 4 Cal.5th 1055 Introduction People v. Alfredo Perez, Jr., decided by the Supreme Court of California on May 7, 2018, addresses...
Affirmation of Batson Protections and Standards for Eyewitness Identification in People v. Ennis Reed

Affirmation of Batson Protections and Standards for Eyewitness Identification in People v. Ennis Reed

Date: May 8, 2018
Affirmation of Batson Protections and Standards for Eyewitness Identification in People v. Ennis Reed Introduction In the landmark case of The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Ennis Reed,...
Employee Classification Standards in DYNAMEX OPERATIONS WEST, INC. v. Superior Court: Adoption of the ABC Test under California Wage Orders

Employee Classification Standards in DYNAMEX OPERATIONS WEST, INC. v. Superior Court: Adoption of the ABC Test under California Wage Orders

Date: May 1, 2018
Employee Classification Standards in DYNAMEX OPERATIONS WEST, INC. v. Superior Court: Adoption of the ABC Test under California Wage Orders Introduction DYNAMEX OPERATIONS WEST, INC. v. The SUPERIOR...
Voluntary Intoxication Evidence Limited in Self-Defense Claims: People v. Soto

Voluntary Intoxication Evidence Limited in Self-Defense Claims: People v. Soto

Date: May 1, 2018
Voluntary Intoxication Evidence Limited in Self-Defense Claims: People v. Soto. (4 Cal.5th 968) Introduction In People v. Soto, the Supreme Court of California addressed a pivotal issue concerning...
Dismissal of Criminal Actions Post-Probation: Insights from People v. Lorenzo Chavez

Dismissal of Criminal Actions Post-Probation: Insights from People v. Lorenzo Chavez

Date: Apr 27, 2018
Dismissal of Criminal Actions Post-Probation: Insights from People v. Lorenzo Chavez Introduction People v. Lorenzo Chavez is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that clarifies the...
Enhanced Due Process Safeguards for Truth-Incompetent Children's Hearsay Evidence in Juvenile Dependency Cases: In re I.C.

Enhanced Due Process Safeguards for Truth-Incompetent Children's Hearsay Evidence in Juvenile Dependency Cases: In re I.C.

Date: Apr 27, 2018
Enhanced Due Process Safeguards for Truth-Incompetent Children's Hearsay Evidence in Juvenile Dependency Cases: In re I.C. Introduction The Supreme Court of California's decision in In re I.C., a...
Affirmation of Joint Trial Procedures and Admissibility of Propensity Evidence in Capital Murder and Sexual Assault Case

Affirmation of Joint Trial Procedures and Admissibility of Propensity Evidence in Capital Murder and Sexual Assault Case

Date: Apr 27, 2018
Affirmation of Joint Trial Procedures and Admissibility of Propensity Evidence in Capital Murder and Sexual Assault Case Introduction The case of The PEOPLE v. James Anthony Daveggio and Michelle Lyn...
Recognizing Colleges' Duty to Protect Students from Foreseeable Campus Violence

Recognizing Colleges' Duty to Protect Students from Foreseeable Campus Violence

Date: Mar 23, 2018
Recognizing Colleges' Duty to Protect Students from Foreseeable Campus Violence Introduction In the landmark case The Regents of the University of California et al. v. The Superior Court of Los...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert