Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Death Sentence Upholding Batson/Wheeler and Miranda Standards in Rex Allan Krebs Case

Affirmation of Death Sentence Upholding Batson/Wheeler and Miranda Standards in Rex Allan Krebs Case

Date: Nov 22, 2019
Affirmation of Death Sentence Upholding Batson/Wheeler and Miranda Standards in Rex Allan Krebs Case Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Rex Allan Krebs (8 Cal.5th 265, 2019), the...
California Supreme Court Upholds Exempt Status of Insurers from Compound Interest Limitations: Wishnev v. Northwestern Mutual

California Supreme Court Upholds Exempt Status of Insurers from Compound Interest Limitations: Wishnev v. Northwestern Mutual

Date: Nov 15, 2019
California Supreme Court Upholds Exempt Status of Insurers from Compound Interest Limitations Introduction In the landmark case of Wishnev v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company (8 Cal.5th...
Excluding Unpaid Wages from PAGA Civil Penalties: A Comprehensive Analysis of ZB, N.A. v. Superior Court of San Diego County

Excluding Unpaid Wages from PAGA Civil Penalties: A Comprehensive Analysis of ZB, N.A. v. Superior Court of San Diego County

Date: Sep 13, 2019
Excluding Unpaid Wages from PAGA Civil Penalties: A Comprehensive Analysis of ZB, N.A. v. Superior Court of San Diego County Introduction The case of ZB, N.A., and Zions Bancorporation v. Superior...
California Recognizes Notice-Prejudice Rule as Fundamental Public Policy in First Party Insurance Contracts

California Recognizes Notice-Prejudice Rule as Fundamental Public Policy in First Party Insurance Contracts

Date: Aug 30, 2019
California Recognizes Notice-Prejudice Rule as Fundamental Public Policy in First Party Insurance Contracts Introduction In the landmark case of Pitzer College v. Indian Harbor Insurance Company, the...
Unconscionability of Arbitration Agreements in Wage Disputes: OTO v. Kho

Unconscionability of Arbitration Agreements in Wage Disputes: OTO v. Kho

Date: Aug 30, 2019
Unconscionability of Arbitration Agreements in Wage Disputes: OTO, L.L.C. v. Kho Introduction In the landmark decision of OTO, L.L.C. v. Kho, the Supreme Court of California grappled with the...
Alternative-Theory Error Subject to 'Beyond a Reasonable Doubt' Standard: People v. Yazan Aledamat

Alternative-Theory Error Subject to 'Beyond a Reasonable Doubt' Standard: People v. Yazan Aledamat

Date: Aug 27, 2019
Alternative-Theory Error Subject to 'Beyond a Reasonable Doubt' Standard: People v. Yazan Aledamat Introduction People v. Yazan Aledamat (8 Cal.5th 1, 2019) is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Supreme Court of California Invalidates Overbroad Electronics Search Conditions in Juvenile Probation

Supreme Court of California Invalidates Overbroad Electronics Search Conditions in Juvenile Probation

Date: Aug 16, 2019
Supreme Court of California Invalidates Overbroad Electronics Search Conditions in Juvenile Probation Introduction In the landmark case In re Ricardo P., the Supreme Court of California addressed the...
Clarifying the Ascertainability Requirement for Class Certification: Noel v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.

Clarifying the Ascertainability Requirement for Class Certification: Noel v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.

Date: Jul 30, 2019
Clarifying the Ascertainability Requirement for Class Certification: Noel v. Thrifty Payless, Inc. Introduction Case: Diana Nieves Noel v. Thrifty Payless, Inc. Court: Supreme Court of California...
Improper Use of Offensive Character Evidence in Capital Sentencing: PEOPLE v. YOUNG

Improper Use of Offensive Character Evidence in Capital Sentencing: PEOPLE v. YOUNG

Date: Jul 26, 2019
Improper Use of Offensive Character Evidence in Capital Sentencing: PEOPLE v. YOUNG Introduction People v. Jeffrey Scott Young (7 Cal.5th 905, 2019) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Expanding Anti-SLAPP Protection: Application to Employment Discrimination and Retaliation Claims

Expanding Anti-SLAPP Protection: Application to Employment Discrimination and Retaliation Claims

Date: Jul 23, 2019
Expanding Anti-SLAPP Protection: Application to Employment Discrimination and Retaliation Claims Introduction The Supreme Court of California, in Stanley Wilson v. Cable News Network, Inc. (7 Cal.5th...
Enforcing Confidentiality Clauses on Counsel in Settlement Agreements: Insights from Monster Energy Co. v. Schechter

Enforcing Confidentiality Clauses on Counsel in Settlement Agreements: Insights from Monster Energy Co. v. Schechter

Date: Jul 12, 2019
Enforcing Confidentiality Clauses on Counsel in Settlement Agreements: Insights from Monster Energy Co. v. Schechter Introduction The case of Monster Energy Company v. Bruce L. Schechter et al. (7...
Miranda Waiver Validity Affirmed Despite Police Ruse and Reinitiated Interrogation in People v. Molano

Miranda Waiver Validity Affirmed Despite Police Ruse and Reinitiated Interrogation in People v. Molano

Date: Jun 28, 2019
Miranda Waiver Validity Affirmed Despite Police Ruse and Reinitiated Interrogation in People v. Molano Introduction People v. Carl Edward Molano is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Clarifying Jury Instruction Standards for First-Degree Murder in Death Penalty Cases: People v. Mitchell

Clarifying Jury Instruction Standards for First-Degree Murder in Death Penalty Cases: People v. Mitchell

Date: Jun 25, 2019
Clarifying Jury Instruction Standards for First-Degree Murder in Death Penalty Cases: People v. Mitchell Introduction People v. Louis Mitchell, Jr. (7 Cal.5th 561) is a significant judgment delivered...
Clarifying the Kill Zone Theory: People v. Canizales Establishes Strict Criteria for Attempted Murder Convictions

Clarifying the Kill Zone Theory: People v. Canizales Establishes Strict Criteria for Attempted Murder Convictions

Date: Jun 25, 2019
Clarifying the Kill Zone Theory: People v. Canizales Establishes Strict Criteria for Attempted Murder Convictions Introduction In People v. Michael Rafael Canizales et al. (7 Cal.5th 591, 2019), the...
Affirming Juror Selection Standards and Protecting Defendant's Rights During Medical Interrogations: People v. Caro

Affirming Juror Selection Standards and Protecting Defendant's Rights During Medical Interrogations: People v. Caro

Date: Jun 14, 2019
Affirming Juror Selection Standards and Protecting Defendant's Rights During Medical Interrogations: People v. Caro Introduction People v. Caro is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Evidence Preservation in Final Judgments for Juvenile Offenders: In re Anthony Maurice Cook, Jr.

Evidence Preservation in Final Judgments for Juvenile Offenders: In re Anthony Maurice Cook, Jr.

Date: Jun 4, 2019
Evidence Preservation in Final Judgments for Juvenile Offenders: In re Anthony Maurice Cook, Jr. Introduction In the case of In re Anthony Maurice Cook, Jr., on Habeas Corpus (7 Cal.5th 439, 2019),...
Reassessment of Enhancements Under Proposition 47: Implications from People v. Valenzuela

Reassessment of Enhancements Under Proposition 47: Implications from People v. Valenzuela

Date: Jun 4, 2019
Reassessment of Enhancements Under Proposition 47: Implications from People v. Valenzuela Introduction In People v. Valenzuela (7 Cal.5th 415, 2019), the Supreme Court of California addressed the...
Reaffirming Standards for First-Degree Murder and Gang-Related Enhancements: People v. Rivera

Reaffirming Standards for First-Degree Murder and Gang-Related Enhancements: People v. Rivera

Date: May 24, 2019
Reaffirming Standards for First-Degree Murder and Gang-Related Enhancements: People v. Rivera Introduction In the Supreme Court of California case The People v. Cuitlahuac Tahua Rivera (7 Cal.5th...
People v. Dalton: Supreme Court of California Limits Death Penalty Eligibility in Conspiracy to Commit Murder Cases

People v. Dalton: Supreme Court of California Limits Death Penalty Eligibility in Conspiracy to Commit Murder Cases

Date: May 17, 2019
People v. Dalton: Supreme Court of California Limits Death Penalty Eligibility in Conspiracy to Commit Murder Cases Introduction In People v. Dalton (7 Cal.5th 166, 2019), the Supreme Court of...
Contextual Relevance in Anti-SLAPP Protection: FilmOn.com Inc. v. DoubleVerify Inc.

Contextual Relevance in Anti-SLAPP Protection: FilmOn.com Inc. v. DoubleVerify Inc.

Date: May 7, 2019
Contextual Relevance in Anti-SLAPP Protection: FilmOn.com Inc. v. DoubleVerify Inc. Introduction In the landmark case FilmOn.com Inc. v. DoubleVerify Inc., the Supreme Court of California addressed...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert