Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Vertical Exhaustion Rule in Excess Insurance: MONTROSE CHEMICAL CORP. v. SUPERIOR COURT

Vertical Exhaustion Rule in Excess Insurance: MONTROSE CHEMICAL CORP. v. SUPERIOR COURT

Date: Apr 7, 2020
Vertical Exhaustion Rule in Excess Insurance: MONTROSE CHEMICAL CORP. v. SUPERIOR COURT Introduction Montrose Chemical Corporation of California v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County is a landmark...
Waiver of Formal Service of Process in Arbitration Agreements Preempts the Hague Service Convention in California

Waiver of Formal Service of Process in Arbitration Agreements Preempts the Hague Service Convention in California

Date: Apr 3, 2020
Waiver of Formal Service of Process in Arbitration Agreements Preempts the Hague Service Convention in California Introduction In the landmark case of Rockefeller Technology Investments (Asia) VII v....
Affirmation of Admissibility of Jailhouse Confessions and Handling of Special Circumstances in The People v. Fayed

Affirmation of Admissibility of Jailhouse Confessions and Handling of Special Circumstances in The People v. Fayed

Date: Apr 3, 2020
Affirmation of Admissibility of Jailhouse Confessions and Handling of Special Circumstances in The People v. Fayed 1. Introduction In The People v. James Michael Fayed (9 Cal.5th 147, 2020), the...
Application of Proposition 47 to Vehicle-Taking Offenses: People v. Bullard

Application of Proposition 47 to Vehicle-Taking Offenses: People v. Bullard

Date: Mar 24, 2020
Application of Proposition 47 to Vehicle-Taking Offenses: People v. Bullard Supreme Court of California, 2020 Introduction People v. Bullard is a seminal case in California jurisprudence that...
Preservation of PAGA Standing Post-Settlement: Analysis of Justin Kim v. Reins International California, Inc.

Preservation of PAGA Standing Post-Settlement: Analysis of Justin Kim v. Reins International California, Inc.

Date: Mar 13, 2020
Preservation of PAGA Standing Post-Settlement: Analysis of Justin Kim v. Reins International California, Inc. Introduction The Supreme Court of California, in Justin Kim v. Reins International...
Proposition 47 Does Not Permit Reduction of Felony Misuse of Personal Identifying Information to Misdemeanor Shoplifting

Proposition 47 Does Not Permit Reduction of Felony Misuse of Personal Identifying Information to Misdemeanor Shoplifting

Date: Mar 3, 2020
Proposition 47 Does Not Permit Reduction of Felony Misuse of Personal Identifying Information to Misdemeanor Shoplifting Introduction In People v. Miguel Angel Jimenez (9 Cal.5th 53, 2020), the...
Reaffirmation of Expert Testimony Standards in Hearsay Analysis: People v. Veamatahau

Reaffirmation of Expert Testimony Standards in Hearsay Analysis: People v. Veamatahau

Date: Feb 28, 2020
Reaffirmation of Expert Testimony Standards in Hearsay Analysis: People v. Veamatahau Introduction Case: The People v. Joseph Veamatahau Court: Supreme Court of California Date: February 27, 2020 The...
Retroactive Application of Ameliorative Statutory Amendments in Probation Revocations: Analysis of THE PEOPLE v. DOUGLAS EDWARD MCKENZIE

Retroactive Application of Ameliorative Statutory Amendments in Probation Revocations: Analysis of THE PEOPLE v. DOUGLAS EDWARD MCKENZIE

Date: Feb 28, 2020
Retroactive Application of Ameliorative Statutory Amendments in Probation Revocations: Analysis of The People v. Douglas Edward McKenzie Introduction The People v. Douglas Edward McKenzie (9 Cal.5th...
Reversing Forfeiture: Confrontation Clause and Expert Basis Hearsay in PEOPLE v. CHAVEZ et al.

Reversing Forfeiture: Confrontation Clause and Expert Basis Hearsay in PEOPLE v. CHAVEZ et al.

Date: Feb 28, 2020
Reversing Forfeiture: Confrontation Clause and Expert Basis Hearsay in PEOPLE v. CHAVEZ et al. Introduction The case of PEOPLE v. CHAVEZ et al. (9 Cal.5th 1) addresses critical issues surrounding the...
Finality and Timeliness in Juvenile Court Dispositions: Insights from In re G.C.

Finality and Timeliness in Juvenile Court Dispositions: Insights from In re G.C.

Date: Feb 21, 2020
Finality and Timeliness in Juvenile Court Dispositions: Insights from In re G.C. Introduction The case of In re G.C., adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California in 2020, addresses critical issues...
Kenneth Earl Gay v. State: Redefining Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Kenneth Earl Gay v. State: Redefining Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Date: Feb 14, 2020
Kenneth Earl Gay v. State: Redefining Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Habeas Corpus Proceedings Introduction In re KENNETH EARL GAY on Habeas Corpus (8 Cal.5th 1059), decided...
Mandatory Exit Searches Classified as Compensable 'Hours Worked' under California Wage Order 7

Mandatory Exit Searches Classified as Compensable 'Hours Worked' under California Wage Order 7

Date: Feb 14, 2020
Mandatory Exit Searches Classified as Compensable 'Hours Worked' under California Wage Order 7 Introduction In the landmark case of Amanda Frlekin et al. v. Apple Inc. (8 Cal.5th 1038), the Supreme...
Affirmation of Penal Code §1018: Balancing Self-Representation and Eighth Amendment Reliability in Capital Cases

Affirmation of Penal Code §1018: Balancing Self-Representation and Eighth Amendment Reliability in Capital Cases

Date: Feb 4, 2020
Affirmation of Penal Code §1018: Balancing Self-Representation and Eighth Amendment Reliability in Capital Cases Introduction In the case of THE PEOPLE v. DANIEL CARL FREDERICKSON (8 Cal.5th 963),...
Inclusion of Omitted Attorneys in Notices of Appeal: K.J. v. Los Angeles Unified School District

Inclusion of Omitted Attorneys in Notices of Appeal: K.J. v. Los Angeles Unified School District

Date: Jan 31, 2020
Inclusion of Omitted Attorneys in Notices of Appeal: K.J. v. Los Angeles Unified School District Introduction The case of K.J., a Minor, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Los Angeles Unified School District et...
A Comprehensive Commentary on People v. Hoyt: Affirmation of State Jurisdiction and Death Penalty in a Kidnap-Murder Case

A Comprehensive Commentary on People v. Hoyt: Affirmation of State Jurisdiction and Death Penalty in a Kidnap-Murder Case

Date: Jan 31, 2020
Affirmation of State Jurisdiction and Death Penalty in Kidnap-Murder Case Introduction People v. Hoyt, 8 Cal.5th 892 (2020), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California on January 30, 2020,...
Affirmation of Conviction: Miranda Waiver Validated Despite Consular Notification Violations in People v. Leon

Affirmation of Conviction: Miranda Waiver Validated Despite Consular Notification Violations in People v. Leon

Date: Jan 24, 2020
Affirmation of Conviction: Miranda Waiver Validated Despite Consular Notification Violations in People v. Leon Introduction In People v. Jose Luis Leon (2020), the Supreme Court of California...
Barefoot v. Jennings: Expanding Beneficiary Standing Under Probate Code §17200

Barefoot v. Jennings: Expanding Beneficiary Standing Under Probate Code §17200

Date: Jan 24, 2020
Barefoot v. Jennings: Expanding Beneficiary Standing Under Probate Code §17200 Introduction Barefoot v. Jennings (8 Cal.5th 822, 2020) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
California Supreme Court Recognizes Psychotherapist-Patient Privacy in Mandatory Reporting of Online Child Pornography: Mathews v. Becerra

California Supreme Court Recognizes Psychotherapist-Patient Privacy in Mandatory Reporting of Online Child Pornography: Mathews v. Becerra

Date: Dec 27, 2019
California Supreme Court Recognizes Psychotherapist-Patient Privacy in Mandatory Reporting of Online Child Pornography: Mathews et al. v. Becerra Introduction Mathews et al. v. Becerra is a seminal...
People v. Beck and Cruz: Clarifying Death Sentences Based on Conspiracy to Commit Murder

People v. Beck and Cruz: Clarifying Death Sentences Based on Conspiracy to Commit Murder

Date: Dec 3, 2019
People v. Beck and Cruz: Clarifying Death Sentences Based on Conspiracy to Commit Murder Introduction In People v. James David Beck and Gerald Dean Cruz (8 Cal.5th 548, 2019), the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Rhoades Case Establishes Robust Standards for Penal Punishment

Affirmation of Death Sentence in Rhoades Case Establishes Robust Standards for Penal Punishment

Date: Nov 26, 2019
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Rhoades Case Establishes Robust Standards for Penal Punishment Introduction In the landmark case of The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Robert Boyd Rhoades,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert