Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Clarifying Implied Malice: The Dellinger Decision's Impact on Jury Instructions

Clarifying Implied Malice: The Dellinger Decision's Impact on Jury Instructions

Date: Dec 19, 1989
Clarifying Implied Malice: The Dellinger Decision's Impact on Jury Instructions Introduction The People of California appealed the conviction of Leland Dellinger, arguing that the jury instructions...
Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Conviction in People v. Jackson: Implications for Special Circumstances and Evidentiary Standards

Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Conviction in People v. Jackson: Implications for Special Circumstances and Evidentiary Standards

Date: Dec 19, 1989
Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Conviction in People v. Jackson: Implications for Special Circumstances and Evidentiary Standards Introduction People v. Michael Anthony Jackson (49 Cal.3d 1170,...
Clarifying the Admissibility of Expert Character Evidence in Sexual Offense Cases: People v. Stoll

Clarifying the Admissibility of Expert Character Evidence in Sexual Offense Cases: People v. Stoll

Date: Dec 19, 1989
Clarifying the Admissibility of Expert Character Evidence in Sexual Offense Cases: People v. Stoll Introduction In People v. Stoll et al. (49 Cal.3d 1136, 1989), the Supreme Court of California...
People v. Hunter (1989): Affirmation of Death Penalty in Double Homicide Case

People v. Hunter (1989): Affirmation of Death Penalty in Double Homicide Case

Date: Dec 8, 1989
People v. Hunter (1989): Affirmation of Death Penalty in Double Homicide Case Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Michael Wayne Hunter, decided on December 7, 1989, the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Death Penalty: Admissibility of Out-of-State Felony Convictions as Moral Turpitude for Impeachment Purposes

Affirmation of Death Penalty: Admissibility of Out-of-State Felony Convictions as Moral Turpitude for Impeachment Purposes

Date: Dec 8, 1989
Affirmation of Death Penalty: Admissibility of Out-of-State Felony Convictions as Moral Turpitude for Impeachment Purposes Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Kenneth Burton Lang, Jr.,...
Clarifying Fixture Classification for Electronic Data Processing Equipment in Taxation: Crocker National Bank v. City and County of San Francisco

Clarifying Fixture Classification for Electronic Data Processing Equipment in Taxation: Crocker National Bank v. City and County of San Francisco

Date: Dec 1, 1989
Clarifying Fixture Classification for Electronic Data Processing Equipment in Taxation: Crocker National Bank v. City and County of San Francisco Introduction The landmark case of Crocker National...
Activation of Tort Claims Act Provisions through Notice of Intention to Sue: Phillips v. Desert Hospital District

Activation of Tort Claims Act Provisions through Notice of Intention to Sue: Phillips v. Desert Hospital District

Date: Oct 17, 1989
Activation of Tort Claims Act Provisions through Notice of Intention to Sue: Phillips v. Desert Hospital District Introduction Paula E. Phillips et al. v. Desert Hospital District, 49 Cal.3d 699...
California Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Union Use of Nonmember Service Fees under EERA

California Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Union Use of Nonmember Service Fees under EERA

Date: Sep 8, 1989
California Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Union Use of Nonmember Service Fees under EERA Introduction In the landmark case of Cumero v. Public Employment Relations Board (49 Cal.3d 575, 1989),...
Defining Inherent Dangerousness in Felony-Murder Doctrine: Insights from People v. Patterson

Defining Inherent Dangerousness in Felony-Murder Doctrine: Insights from People v. Patterson

Date: Sep 8, 1989
Defining Inherent Dangerousness in Felony-Murder Doctrine: Insights from People v. Patterson Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Patterson, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California...
Establishing Limits on Jury Selection Disparity Claims: People v. Ronald Lee Bell

Establishing Limits on Jury Selection Disparity Claims: People v. Ronald Lee Bell

Date: Sep 6, 1989
Establishing Limits on Jury Selection Disparity Claims: People v. Ronald Lee Bell Introduction People v. Ronald Lee Bell (49 Cal.3d 502), decided by the Supreme Court of California on September 5,...
Defining the Boundaries of Mandamus in Voter Outreach: An Analysis of Common Cause of California v. Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles County

Defining the Boundaries of Mandamus in Voter Outreach: An Analysis of Common Cause of California v. Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles County

Date: Aug 25, 1989
Defining the Boundaries of Mandamus in Voter Outreach: An Analysis of Common Cause of California v. Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles County Introduction The case of Common Cause of California et...
Equitable Estoppel in Administrative Hearings for Welfare Overpayments – Lentz v. McMahon

Equitable Estoppel in Administrative Hearings for Welfare Overpayments – Lentz v. McMahon

Date: Aug 18, 1989
Equitable Estoppel in Administrative Hearings for Welfare Overpayments – Lentz v. McMahon Introduction Lentz v. McMahon (49 Cal.3d 393) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
Affirmation of Death Penalty in Felony Murder-Robbery Case: People v. Carrera

Affirmation of Death Penalty in Felony Murder-Robbery Case: People v. Carrera

Date: Aug 18, 1989
Affirmation of Death Penalty in Felony Murder-Robbery Case: People v. Carrera Introduction In the landmark case People v. Carrera (49 Cal.3d 291, 1989), the Supreme Court of California upheld the...
Affirmation of Death Sentences and Striking of Duplicative Special Circumstances in People v. Andrews

Affirmation of Death Sentences and Striking of Duplicative Special Circumstances in People v. Andrews

Date: Aug 4, 1989
Affirmation of Death Sentences and Striking of Duplicative Special Circumstances in People v. Andrews Introduction People v. Jesse James Andrews is a landmark 1989 decision by the Supreme Court of...
Affidavits on Information and Belief Sufficient for Good Cause in Police Records Discovery: An Analysis of City of Santa Cruz v. Municipal Court

Affidavits on Information and Belief Sufficient for Good Cause in Police Records Discovery: An Analysis of City of Santa Cruz v. Municipal Court

Date: Jul 28, 1989
Affidavits on Information and Belief Sufficient for Good Cause in Police Records Discovery: An Analysis of City of Santa Cruz v. Municipal Court Introduction City of Santa Cruz v. Municipal Court is...
In re Rudy Harris: Formal Distinctiveness Required for Penal Code Section 667 Sentence Enhancements

In re Rudy Harris: Formal Distinctiveness Required for Penal Code Section 667 Sentence Enhancements

Date: Jul 28, 1989
In re Rudy Harris: Formal Distinctiveness Required for Penal Code Section 667 Sentence Enhancements Introduction In re Rudy Harris on Habeas Corpus (49 Cal.3d 131), decided by the Supreme Court of...
Truth-in-Evidence: California Supreme Court Aligns Confession Voluntariness Standard with Federal Preponderance of the Evidence Standard

Truth-in-Evidence: California Supreme Court Aligns Confession Voluntariness Standard with Federal Preponderance of the Evidence Standard

Date: Jul 25, 1989
Truth-in-Evidence: California Supreme Court Aligns Confession Voluntariness Standard with Federal Preponderance of the Evidence Standard Introduction In the landmark case The People v. Jerome Joseph...
Limitation of Conspiracy Liability in Insurance Claims: Insights from Doctors' Company v. Superior Court

Limitation of Conspiracy Liability in Insurance Claims: Insights from Doctors' Company v. Superior Court

Date: Jul 18, 1989
Limitation of Conspiracy Liability in Insurance Claims: Insights from Doctors' Company v. Superior Court Introduction The case of Doctors' Company et al. v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County,...
Refining the Application of Multiple-Murder Special Circumstances: Analysis of People v. Hamilton (1989)

Refining the Application of Multiple-Murder Special Circumstances: Analysis of People v. Hamilton (1989)

Date: Jun 27, 1989
Refining the Application of Multiple-Murder Special Circumstances: Analysis of People v. Hamilton (1989) Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Michael Allen Hamilton, decided by the...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Establishing Precedent in In re Felipe Evangelista Sixto

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Establishing Precedent in In re Felipe Evangelista Sixto

Date: Jun 27, 1989
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Establishing Precedent in In re Felipe Evangelista Sixto Introduction In re Felipe Evangelista Sixto on Habeas Corpus (48 Cal.3d 1247) is a landmark decision by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert