Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Affirming the Right to Self-Representation in Capital Cases: People v. Robert M. Bloom, Jr.

Affirming the Right to Self-Representation in Capital Cases: People v. Robert M. Bloom, Jr.

Date: Jun 27, 1989
Affirming the Right to Self-Representation in Capital Cases: People v. Robert M. Bloom, Jr. Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Robert M. Bloom, Jr., decided by the Supreme Court of...
Bittaker v. The People: Upholding Death Penalty with Extensive Special Circumstances in California Supreme Court

Bittaker v. The People: Upholding Death Penalty with Extensive Special Circumstances in California Supreme Court

Date: Jun 23, 1989
Bittaker v. The People: Upholding Death Penalty with Extensive Special Circumstances in California Supreme Court Introduction Bittaker v. The People (48 Cal.3d 1046) is a landmark decision by the...
Retroactive Limitation of Tort Remedies in Employment Termination: Newman v. Emerson Radio Corp.

Retroactive Limitation of Tort Remedies in Employment Termination: Newman v. Emerson Radio Corp.

Date: May 26, 1989
Retroactive Limitation of Tort Remedies in Employment Termination: Newman v. Emerson Radio Corp. Introduction Newman v. Emerson Radio Corporation (48 Cal.3d 973, 1989) is a seminal case in California...
Sheldon v. The People (1989): Clarifying Jury Instructions and Sentencing Procedures in Death Penalty Cases

Sheldon v. The People (1989): Clarifying Jury Instructions and Sentencing Procedures in Death Penalty Cases

Date: May 16, 1989
Sheldon v. The People (1989): Clarifying Jury Instructions and Sentencing Procedures in Death Penalty Cases Introduction Sheldon v. The People is a landmark 1989 decision by the Supreme Court of...
Admissibility of Juvenile Records in Death Penalty Sentencing: Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Burton

Admissibility of Juvenile Records in Death Penalty Sentencing: Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Burton

Date: May 9, 1989
Admissibility of Juvenile Records in Death Penalty Sentencing: Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Burton Introduction People v. Burton, 48 Cal.3d 843 (1989), is a pivotal judgment from the Supreme...
Severability of Unconstitutional Clauses in California's Proposition 103: A Detailed Judicial Analysis

Severability of Unconstitutional Clauses in California's Proposition 103: A Detailed Judicial Analysis

Date: May 5, 1989
Severability of Unconstitutional Clauses in California's Proposition 103: A Detailed Judicial Analysis Introduction The case of CalFarm Insurance Company et al. v. George Deukmejian, as Governor,...
Reaffirmation of Jury's Express Degree Finding Under Penal Code § 1157

Reaffirmation of Jury's Express Degree Finding Under Penal Code § 1157

Date: May 2, 1989
Reaffirmation of Jury's Express Degree Finding Under Penal Code § 1157 Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Louis Lujan Bonillas, the Supreme Court of California addressed a critical...
Public-Interest Privilege Not Available for News Media in Defamation Cases Against Private Individuals: Shirley Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.

Public-Interest Privilege Not Available for News Media in Defamation Cases Against Private Individuals: Shirley Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.

Date: Apr 28, 1989
Public-Interest Privilege Not Available for News Media in Defamation Cases Against Private Individuals Introduction In the landmark case of Shirley Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Company et al. (48...
Establishing Strict Criteria for Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress Claims: Maria E. Thing v. James V. La Chusa

Establishing Strict Criteria for Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress Claims: Maria E. Thing v. James V. La Chusa

Date: Apr 28, 1989
Establishing Strict Criteria for Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress Claims: Maria E. Thing v. James V. La Chusa Introduction The landmark case Maria E. Thing v. James V. La Chusa (48 Cal.3d...
Severance of Jointly Charged Rape Counts: Burden of Proof on Defendant to Demonstrate Prejudice

Severance of Jointly Charged Rape Counts: Burden of Proof on Defendant to Demonstrate Prejudice

Date: Apr 21, 1989
Severance of Jointly Charged Rape Counts: Burden of Proof on Defendant to Demonstrate Prejudice Introduction In the landmark case of Kenneth Frank v. The Superior Court of Kern County (48 Cal.3d 632,...
Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress in Familial Therapeutic Settings: Analysis of MARLENE F. et al. v. Affiliated PsychiatricMedical Clinic, Inc.

Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress in Familial Therapeutic Settings: Analysis of MARLENE F. et al. v. Affiliated PsychiatricMedical Clinic, Inc.

Date: Apr 11, 1989
Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress in Familial Therapeutic Settings: Analysis of MARLENE F. et al. v. Affiliated PsychiatricMedical Clinic, Inc. Introduction The landmark case of Marlene F....
Ensuring Jury Representation: A Comprehensive Analysis of The People v. Michael Angelo Morales

Ensuring Jury Representation: A Comprehensive Analysis of The People v. Michael Angelo Morales

Date: Apr 7, 1989
Ensuring Jury Representation: A Comprehensive Analysis of The People v. Michael Angelo Morales Introduction The People v. Michael Angelo Morales (48 Cal.3d 527, 1989) is a landmark judgment from the...
Strict Causation Standard for Presentence Custody Credits in Concurrent Sentencing: In re Eric W. Joyner

Strict Causation Standard for Presentence Custody Credits in Concurrent Sentencing: In re Eric W. Joyner

Date: Apr 4, 1989
Strict Causation Standard for Presentence Custody Credits in Concurrent Sentencing: In re Eric W. Joyner Introduction The case of In re Eric W. Joyner addressed critical issues surrounding the...
Respondeat Superior Doctrine Not Applicable in Teacher-Student Abuse Case

Respondeat Superior Doctrine Not Applicable in Teacher-Student Abuse Case

Date: Mar 31, 1989
Respondeat Superior Doctrine Not Applicable in Teacher-Student Abuse Case Introduction In John R., et al. v. Oakland Unified School District (48 Cal.3d 438, 1989), the Supreme Court of California...
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Garvey: Clarifying Coverage Under "All Risk" Homeowner's Insurance Policies

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Garvey: Clarifying Coverage Under "All Risk" Homeowner's Insurance Policies

Date: Mar 31, 1989
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Garvey: Clarifying Coverage Under "All Risk" Homeowner's Insurance Policies Introduction In the landmark case of State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. Jack I. Garvey...
Establishing the Borello Test: S.G. Borello Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations

Establishing the Borello Test: S.G. Borello Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations

Date: Mar 24, 1989
Establishing the Borello Test: S.G. Borello Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations Introduction S.G. Borello Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations (48 Cal.3d 341, 1989) is a...
Affirmation of Multiple Convictions for Sequential Sexual Penetrations under Penal Code §289(a) and §654

Affirmation of Multiple Convictions for Sequential Sexual Penetrations under Penal Code §289(a) and §654

Date: Mar 21, 1989
Affirmation of Multiple Convictions for Sequential Sexual Penetrations under Penal Code §289(a) and §654 Introduction The case of The People v. Daryl Harrison, 48 Cal.3d 321 (1989), addressed pivotal...
People v. Boyer: Strengthening Fourth Amendment and Miranda Protections

People v. Boyer: Strengthening Fourth Amendment and Miranda Protections

Date: Mar 14, 1989
People v. Boyer: Strengthening Fourth Amendment and Miranda Protections Introduction People v. Richard Delmer Boyer, 48 Cal.3d 247 (1989), is a landmark case in California’s legal landscape that...
Defining the Boundaries of Special Circumstances in Death Penalty Sentencing: Analysis of People v. Coleman, 48 Cal.3d 112

Defining the Boundaries of Special Circumstances in Death Penalty Sentencing: Analysis of People v. Coleman, 48 Cal.3d 112

Date: Mar 3, 1989
Defining the Boundaries of Special Circumstances in Death Penalty Sentencing: Analysis of People v. Coleman, 48 Cal.3d 112 Introduction The case of The People v. Calvin Coleman, Jr., decided by the...
Affirmation of Death Penalty in PEOPLE v. ROBERTSON: Jurisdiction, Jury Waiver, and Admissibility of Prior Criminal Activity

Affirmation of Death Penalty in PEOPLE v. ROBERTSON: Jurisdiction, Jury Waiver, and Admissibility of Prior Criminal Activity

Date: Feb 24, 1989
Affirmation of Death Penalty in PEOPLE v. ROBERTSON: Jurisdiction, Jury Waiver, and Admissibility of Prior Criminal Activity Introduction People v. Andrew Edward Robertson (48 Cal.3d 18) is a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert