Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Stankewitz v. People: Affirmation of Effective Counsel and Competency Procedures

Stankewitz v. People: Affirmation of Effective Counsel and Competency Procedures

Date: Jul 6, 1990
Stankewitz v. People: Affirmation of Effective Counsel and Competency Procedures Introduction Stankewitz v. People is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that reaffirmed critical...
Affirming the Use of Generic Testimony in Child Molestation Convictions: Jones v. The People (1990)

Affirming the Use of Generic Testimony in Child Molestation Convictions: Jones v. The People (1990)

Date: Jun 29, 1990
Affirming the Use of Generic Testimony in Child Molestation Convictions Introduction Jones v. The People (51 Cal.3d 294, 1990) is a seminal decision by the Supreme Court of California addressing the...
California Supreme Court Establishes Rights for Clinical Psychologists in Hospital Settings

California Supreme Court Establishes Rights for Clinical Psychologists in Hospital Settings

Date: Jun 26, 1990
California Supreme Court Establishes Rights for Clinical Psychologists in Hospital Settings Introduction In California Association of Psychology Providers et al. v. Peter Rank et al., the Supreme...
Admissibility of Prior Crimes and Declarant Statements in Capital Sentencing: People v. Gordon

Admissibility of Prior Crimes and Declarant Statements in Capital Sentencing: People v. Gordon

Date: Jun 22, 1990
Admissibility of Prior Crimes and Declarant Statements in Capital Sentencing: People v. Gordon Introduction People v. Patrick Bruce Gordon is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California,...
Ramirez v. The People: Reaffirming Standards for Death Penalty Sentencing

Ramirez v. The People: Reaffirming Standards for Death Penalty Sentencing

Date: Jun 15, 1990
Ramirez v. The People: Reaffirming Standards for Death Penalty Sentencing Introduction Ramirez v. The People, 50 Cal.3d 1158 (1990), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
Judicial Barriers to Tortious Interference: Protecting Access to Courts

Judicial Barriers to Tortious Interference: Protecting Access to Courts

Date: Jun 8, 1990
Judicial Barriers to Tortious Interference: Protecting Access to Courts Introduction In the landmark case of Pacific Gas and Electric Company v. Bear Stearns Company (1990), the Supreme Court of...
Strict Prejudice Standard in Juror Misconduct: Supreme Court of California Reverses Conviction in People v. Holloway

Strict Prejudice Standard in Juror Misconduct: Supreme Court of California Reverses Conviction in People v. Holloway

Date: Jun 1, 1990
Strict Prejudice Standard in Juror Misconduct: Supreme Court of California Reverses Conviction in People v. Holloway Introduction People v. Holloway, 50 Cal.3d 1098 (1990), is a landmark decision by...
Good Faith Settlements Bar Implied Contractual Indemnity Claims: Analysis of Bay Development v. Superior Court

Good Faith Settlements Bar Implied Contractual Indemnity Claims: Analysis of Bay Development v. Superior Court

Date: Jun 1, 1990
Good Faith Settlements Bar Implied Contractual Indemnity Claims: Analysis of Bay Development v. Superior Court Introduction Bay Development, Ltd., et al., Petitioners versus The Superior Court of San...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in People v. Miller: Adherence to Admissible Evidence Standards

Affirmation of Death Sentence in People v. Miller: Adherence to Admissible Evidence Standards

Date: May 22, 1990
Affirmation of Death Sentence in People v. Miller: Adherence to Admissible Evidence Standards 1. Introduction People v. Donald Miller is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California...
Affirmation of Death Penalty: Standards for Confession Voluntariness and Juror Instructions in In re Ryan Michael Marshall

Affirmation of Death Penalty: Standards for Confession Voluntariness and Juror Instructions in In re Ryan Michael Marshall

Date: May 18, 1990
Affirmation of Death Penalty: Standards for Confession Voluntariness and Juror Instructions in In re Ryan Michael Marshall Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Ryan Michael Marshall,...
Broad Protections Under California's Shield Law Affirmed: Balancing Journalistic Immunity and Defendant's Fair Trial Rights

Broad Protections Under California's Shield Law Affirmed: Balancing Journalistic Immunity and Defendant's Fair Trial Rights

Date: May 4, 1990
Broad Protections Under California's Shield Law Affirmed: Balancing Journalistic Immunity and Defendant's Fair Trial Rights Introduction Sean Patrick Delaney et al. v. The Superior Court of Los...
Enhancing Understanding of Penal Code Section 1538.5 and Confession Admissibility: Comment on PEOPLE v. MATTSON

Enhancing Understanding of Penal Code Section 1538.5 and Confession Admissibility: Comment on PEOPLE v. MATTSON

Date: May 4, 1990
Enhancing Understanding of Penal Code Section 1538.5 and Confession Admissibility: Comment on PEOPLE v. MATTSON Introduction PEOPLE v. MATTSON, decided by the Supreme Court of California on May 3,...
People v. Turner: Affirmation of Felony-Murder Robbery Conviction and Death Penalty

People v. Turner: Affirmation of Felony-Murder Robbery Conviction and Death Penalty

Date: Apr 27, 1990
People v. Turner: Affirmation of Felony-Murder Robbery Conviction and Death Penalty Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Thaddaeus Louis Turner, the Supreme Court of California upheld...
Stipulated Judgments and Collateral Estoppel under Insurance Code Section 790.03(h)

Stipulated Judgments and Collateral Estoppel under Insurance Code Section 790.03(h)

Date: Apr 20, 1990
Stipulated Judgments and Collateral Estoppel under Insurance Code Section 790.03(h) Introduction The Supreme Court of California, in the landmark case California State Automobile Association...
Defining "Explosive" in Capital Punishment: Analysis of People v. Clark (1990) 50 Cal.3d 583

Defining "Explosive" in Capital Punishment: Analysis of People v. Clark (1990) 50 Cal.3d 583

Date: Apr 6, 1990
Defining "Explosive" in Capital Punishment: Analysis of People v. Clark (1990) 50 Cal.3d 583 Introduction Case: The People v. William John Clark, 50 Cal.3d 583 (1990) Court: Supreme Court of...
Immunity Agreements and the Admissibility of Accomplice Testimony in Capital Cases: Insights from The People v. Fred Berre Douglas

Immunity Agreements and the Admissibility of Accomplice Testimony in Capital Cases: Insights from The People v. Fred Berre Douglas

Date: Apr 3, 1990
Immunity Agreements and the Admissibility of Accomplice Testimony in Capital Cases: Insights from The People v. Fred Berre Douglas Introduction The People of the State of California appealed the...
Improper Consideration of Probation Reports in Death Penalty Sentencing: People v. Robert Lewis, Jr.

Improper Consideration of Probation Reports in Death Penalty Sentencing: People v. Robert Lewis, Jr.

Date: Mar 2, 1990
Improper Consideration of Probation Reports in Death Penalty Sentencing: People v. Robert Lewis, Jr. Introduction People v. Robert Lewis, Jr. (50 Cal.3d 262, 1990) is a landmark decision by the...
Absolute Nature of Litigation Privilege Affirmed in Silberg v. Anderson

Absolute Nature of Litigation Privilege Affirmed in Silberg v. Anderson

Date: Feb 27, 1990
Absolute Nature of Litigation Privilege Affirmed in Silberg v. Anderson Introduction The case of Barry Neil Silberg, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Margaret Anderson, Defendant and Respondent (50 Cal.3d...
People v. Thompson: Upholding Death Penalty with Admissible Confessions and Felony Murder Rule

People v. Thompson: Upholding Death Penalty with Admissible Confessions and Felony Murder Rule

Date: Feb 9, 1990
People v. Thompson: Upholding Death Penalty with Admissible Confessions and Felony Murder Rule Introduction People v. Thompson is a seminal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California on...
Establishing Preliminary Showing Requirements for Discovery in Confidential Informant Cases: The People v. George Luttenberger

Establishing Preliminary Showing Requirements for Discovery in Confidential Informant Cases: The People v. George Luttenberger

Date: Jan 19, 1990
Establishing Preliminary Showing Requirements for Discovery in Confidential Informant Cases: The People v. George Luttenberger Introduction In The People v. George Luttenberger, the Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert