Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Waiver of Objections to Deficiencies in Statement of Decision under CCP §§ 632 and 634

Waiver of Objections to Deficiencies in Statement of Decision under CCP §§ 632 and 634

Date: Dec 14, 1990
Waiver of Objections to Deficiencies in Statement of Decision under CCP §§ 632 and 634 Introduction In the landmark case In re the Marriage of Gloria S. and John V. Arceneaux, 51 Cal.3d 1130 (1990),...
People v. Gonzalez: California Supreme Court Upholds Capital Murder Conviction Amid Informant Testimony and Limits on Post-Judgment Discovery

People v. Gonzalez: California Supreme Court Upholds Capital Murder Conviction Amid Informant Testimony and Limits on Post-Judgment Discovery

Date: Dec 4, 1990
People v. Gonzalez: California Supreme Court Upholds Capital Murder Conviction Amid Informant Testimony and Limits on Post-Judgment Discovery Introduction Case Citation: People v. Jesse Edward...
PEOPLE v. FIELDS: Defining Effective Counsel in Penalty Phase Investigations

PEOPLE v. FIELDS: Defining Effective Counsel in Penalty Phase Investigations

Date: Dec 4, 1990
PEOPLE v. FIELDS: Defining Effective Counsel in Penalty Phase Investigations Introduction In the landmark case of In re Stevie Lamar Fields on Habeas Corpus (51 Cal.3d 1063), decided by the Supreme...
Security Pacific National Bank v. Wozab: Precedence on Improper Setoff and Enforcement of Secured Duties under CCP § 726

Security Pacific National Bank v. Wozab: Precedence on Improper Setoff and Enforcement of Secured Duties under CCP § 726

Date: Nov 30, 1990
Security Pacific National Bank v. Anton J. Wozab: Precedence on Improper Setoff and Enforcement of Secured Duties under CCP § 726 Introduction Security Pacific National Bank v. Anton J. Wozab is a...
Expansion of Attorney Fee Recovery Under Government Code Section 31536

Expansion of Attorney Fee Recovery Under Government Code Section 31536

Date: Nov 27, 1990
Expansion of Attorney Fee Recovery Under Government Code Section 31536 Introduction Saad Morcos v. Board of Retirement of Los Angeles County Employees' Retirement Association is a landmark decision...
Affirmation of Defendant's Right to Discharge Indigent Counsel Without Showing Incompetence

Affirmation of Defendant's Right to Discharge Indigent Counsel Without Showing Incompetence

Date: Nov 27, 1990
Affirmation of Defendant's Right to Discharge Indigent Counsel Without Showing Incompetence Introduction The People v. Carlos Shawn Ortiz, 51 Cal.3d 975 (Supreme Court of California, 1990), is a...
Affirming Death Penalty Standards: Comprehensive Analysis of PEOPLE v. KELLY (51 Cal.3d 931)

Affirming Death Penalty Standards: Comprehensive Analysis of PEOPLE v. KELLY (51 Cal.3d 931)

Date: Nov 27, 1990
Affirming Death Penalty Standards: Comprehensive Analysis of PEOPLE v. KELLY (51 Cal.3d 931) Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Horace Edwards Kelly (51 Cal.3d 931), adjudicated by...
Presumption of Competence and Defendant's Burden of Proof: Insights from People v. Medina

Presumption of Competence and Defendant's Burden of Proof: Insights from People v. Medina

Date: Nov 20, 1990
Presumption of Competence and Defendant's Burden of Proof: Insights from People v. Medina Introduction People v. Teofilo Medina, Jr. is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California issued...
Coverage of Environmental Cleanup Costs Under Comprehensive General Liability Policies: AIU Insurance Co. v. Santa Clara County

Coverage of Environmental Cleanup Costs Under Comprehensive General Liability Policies: AIU Insurance Co. v. Santa Clara County

Date: Nov 16, 1990
Coverage of Environmental Cleanup Costs Under Comprehensive General Liability Policies: AIU Insurance Co. v. Santa Clara County Introduction The case of AIU Insurance Company et al. v. The Superior...
Delayed Discovery Rule and Equitable Tolling in Progressive Property Damage: Prudential-LMI v. Superior Court of San Diego County

Delayed Discovery Rule and Equitable Tolling in Progressive Property Damage: Prudential-LMI v. Superior Court of San Diego County

Date: Nov 2, 1990
Delayed Discovery Rule and Equitable Tolling in Progressive Property Damage: Prudential-LMI v. Superior Court of San Diego County Introduction In the landmark case of Prudential-LMI Commercial...
Affirmation of Death Penalty Proceedings and Mitigating Evidence: Analysis of PEOPLE v. WHITT

Affirmation of Death Penalty Proceedings and Mitigating Evidence: Analysis of PEOPLE v. WHITT

Date: Oct 26, 1990
Affirmation of Death Penalty Proceedings and Mitigating Evidence: Analysis of PEOPLE v. WHITT Introduction People v. Charles Edward Whitt is a significant case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Government Code §3303(f) Does Not Entitle Preinterrogation Discovery in Police Internal Affairs Investigations: Pasadena Police Officers Association v. City of Pasadena

Government Code §3303(f) Does Not Entitle Preinterrogation Discovery in Police Internal Affairs Investigations: Pasadena Police Officers Association v. City of Pasadena

Date: Oct 12, 1990
Government Code §3303(f) Does Not Entitle Preinterrogation Discovery in Police Internal Affairs Investigations: Pasadena Police Officers Association v. City of Pasadena Introduction The case of...
Reinforcing Fair Cross-Section in Jury Selection: Analysis of THE PEOPLE v. RONALD LEE SANDERS

Reinforcing Fair Cross-Section in Jury Selection: Analysis of THE PEOPLE v. RONALD LEE SANDERS

Date: Sep 28, 1990
Reinforcing Fair Cross-Section in Jury Selection: Analysis of THE PEOPLE v. RONALD LEE SANDERS Introduction Case: THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RONALD LEE SANDERS, Defendant and Appellant....
Collateral Estoppel Not Applicable to Subsequent Criminal Prosecutions Following Probation Revocation Hearings

Collateral Estoppel Not Applicable to Subsequent Criminal Prosecutions Following Probation Revocation Hearings

Date: Sep 7, 1990
Collateral Estoppel Not Applicable to Subsequent Criminal Prosecutions Following Probation Revocation Hearings Introduction In Arasimo Settemo Lucido v. The Superior Court of Mendocino County, The...
Admissibility of Social Studies in Juvenile Dependency Proceedings: In re Malinda S., 51 Cal.3d 368 (1990)

Admissibility of Social Studies in Juvenile Dependency Proceedings: In re Malinda S., 51 Cal.3d 368 (1990)

Date: Sep 7, 1990
Admissibility of Social Studies in Juvenile Dependency Proceedings: In re Malinda S., 51 Cal.3d 368 (1990) Introduction In re Malinda S. is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
Standard of Proof in Probation Revocation Hearings Established as Preponderance of Evidence

Standard of Proof in Probation Revocation Hearings Established as Preponderance of Evidence

Date: Sep 7, 1990
Standard of Proof in Probation Revocation Hearings Established as Preponderance of Evidence Introduction The People v. Juan Carlos Rodriguez (51 Cal.3d 437, 1990) serves as a pivotal case in...
Materiality as a Jury Determination in Perjury Prosecutions under the Political Reform Act

Materiality as a Jury Determination in Perjury Prosecutions under the Political Reform Act

Date: Sep 7, 1990
Materiality as a Jury Determination in Perjury Prosecutions under the Political Reform Act Introduction In the landmark case The People v. Roger Hedgecock, decided by the Supreme Court of California...
Express Declaration Required for Property Transmutation: Insights from Estate of Margery M. MacDonald

Express Declaration Required for Property Transmutation: Insights from Estate of Margery M. MacDonald

Date: Aug 10, 1990
Express Declaration Required for Property Transmutation: Insights from Estate of Margery M. MacDonald Introduction The case of Estate of Margery M. MacDonald, Deceased.JUDITH BOLTON, as Executrix,...
Supreme Court of California Limits Litigation Privilege: Unlawful Recordings Not Protected

Supreme Court of California Limits Litigation Privilege: Unlawful Recordings Not Protected

Date: Jul 13, 1990
Supreme Court of California Limits Litigation Privilege: Unlawful Recordings Not Protected Introduction The case of Daniel G. Kimmel et al. v. Margaret R. Goland et al. (51 Cal.3d 202) addressed the...
Establishing Fiduciary Duty in Medical Consent: Moore v. Regents of the University of California

Establishing Fiduciary Duty in Medical Consent: Moore v. Regents of the University of California

Date: Jul 10, 1990
Establishing Fiduciary Duty in Medical Consent: Moore v. Regents of the University of California Introduction Moore v. Regents of the University of California (51 Cal.3d 120, 1990) is a landmark...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert