Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Economic Discrimination Under the Unruh Act: Insights from Tamela Harris v. Capital Growth Investors

Economic Discrimination Under the Unruh Act: Insights from Tamela Harris v. Capital Growth Investors

Date: Mar 1, 1991
Economic Discrimination Under the Unruh Act: Insights from Tamela Harris v. Capital Growth Investors Introduction The landmark case of Tamela Harris et al. v. Capital Growth Investors XIV et al.,...
Enhancing Procedural Due Process for Constructive Resignation: Stanley Coleman Jr. v. Department of Personnel Administration (1991)

Enhancing Procedural Due Process for Constructive Resignation: Stanley Coleman Jr. v. Department of Personnel Administration (1991)

Date: Feb 26, 1991
Enhancing Procedural Due Process for Constructive Resignation: Stanley Coleman Jr. v. Department of Personnel Administration (1991) Introduction In Stanley Coleman Jr. v. Department of Personnel...
Exclusion of Insurance Coverage for Intentional Acts: J.C. Penney Casualty Insurance Co. v. M.K. et al.

Exclusion of Insurance Coverage for Intentional Acts: J.C. Penney Casualty Insurance Co. v. M.K. et al.

Date: Feb 6, 1991
Exclusion of Insurance Coverage for Intentional Acts: J.C. Penney Casualty Insurance Co. v. M.K. et al. Introduction The case of J.C. Penney Casualty Insurance Company v. M.K., a Minor, etc.,...
Strict Application of Business and Professions Code Section 7031: No Exceptions for Unlicensed Contractors in California

Strict Application of Business and Professions Code Section 7031: No Exceptions for Unlicensed Contractors in California

Date: Jan 25, 1991
Strict Application of Business and Professions Code Section 7031: No Exceptions for Unlicensed Contractors in California Introduction The case of Hydrotech Systems, Ltd. v. Oasis Waterpark et al....
Consolidation of Multiple-Murder Charges and Evidentiary Standards in Capital Sentencing: Insights from People v. Mason

Consolidation of Multiple-Murder Charges and Evidentiary Standards in Capital Sentencing: Insights from People v. Mason

Date: Jan 11, 1991
Consolidation of Multiple-Murder Charges and Evidentiary Standards in Capital Sentencing: Insights from People v. Mason Introduction People v. David Edwin Mason (52 Cal.3d 909) is a landmark decision...
People v. Jackson Chambers Daniels, Jr.: Establishing Standards for Counsel Conflicts and Penalty Phase Procedures

People v. Jackson Chambers Daniels, Jr.: Establishing Standards for Counsel Conflicts and Penalty Phase Procedures

Date: Jan 8, 1991
People v. Jackson Chambers Daniels, Jr.: Establishing Standards for Counsel Conflicts and Penalty Phase Procedures Introduction People v. Jackson Chambers Daniels, Jr. (52 Cal.3d 815, Supreme Court...
People v. Pieters: Implied Exception to Double-Base-Term Limitation for Drug Quantity Enhancements

People v. Pieters: Implied Exception to Double-Base-Term Limitation for Drug Quantity Enhancements

Date: Jan 8, 1991
People v. Pieters: Implied Exception to Double-Base-Term Limitation for Drug Quantity Enhancements Introduction People v. Pieters (52 Cal.3d 894, 1991) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Kaurish v. The People: Establishing Precedents in Capital Punishment and Evidentiary Standards

Kaurish v. The People: Establishing Precedents in Capital Punishment and Evidentiary Standards

Date: Jan 1, 1991
Kaurish v. The People: Establishing Precedents in Capital Punishment and Evidentiary Standards Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Jay Charles Kaurish, adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Invalidation of Growth-Limiting Initiatives Conflicting with General Plans: Lesher Communications, Inc. v. City of Walnut Creek

Invalidation of Growth-Limiting Initiatives Conflicting with General Plans: Lesher Communications, Inc. v. City of Walnut Creek

Date: Jan 1, 1991
Invalidation of Growth-Limiting Initiatives Conflicting with General Plans: Lesher Communications, Inc. v. City of Walnut Creek Introduction Lesher Communications, Inc., et al. v. City of Walnut...
Clarifying 'Immediate Presence': California Supreme Court's Precedent in People v. Blufford Hayes, Jr.

Clarifying 'Immediate Presence': California Supreme Court's Precedent in People v. Blufford Hayes, Jr.

Date: Jan 1, 1991
Clarifying 'Immediate Presence': California Supreme Court's Precedent in People v. Blufford Hayes, Jr. Introduction People v. Blufford Hayes, Jr., 52 Cal.3d 577, is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Substantial Evidence Supports County's Rejection of Project Alternatives in EIR: Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors

Substantial Evidence Supports County's Rejection of Project Alternatives in EIR: Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors

Date: Jan 1, 1991
Substantial Evidence Supports County's Rejection of Project Alternatives in EIR: Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors Introduction In the landmark case of Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of...
Invalidation of "Witness-Killing Special Circumstances" in Continuous Transaction Double Homicide Cases

Invalidation of "Witness-Killing Special Circumstances" in Continuous Transaction Double Homicide Cases

Date: Jan 1, 1991
Invalidation of "Witness-Killing Special Circumstances" in Continuous Transaction Double Homicide Cases Introduction The People v. Richard Allen Benson (52 Cal.3d 754) is a landmark decision by the...
Comprehensive Commentary on PEOPLE v. WRIGHT: Juror Selection and Special Circumstance Errors

Comprehensive Commentary on PEOPLE v. WRIGHT: Juror Selection and Special Circumstance Errors

Date: Dec 28, 1990
Comprehensive Commentary on PEOPLE v. WRIGHT: Juror Selection and Special Circumstance Errors Introduction People v. Bronte Lamont Wright (52 Cal.3d 367, 1990) is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
PEOPLE v. ANDERSON (1990): Reevaluation of Intent in Felony-Murder Special Circumstances

PEOPLE v. ANDERSON (1990): Reevaluation of Intent in Felony-Murder Special Circumstances

Date: Dec 28, 1990
PEOPLE v. ANDERSON (1990): Reevaluation of Intent in Felony-Murder Special Circumstances Introduction PEOPLE v. ANDERSON, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California on December 27, 1990,...
California Supreme Court Upholds Proposition 115 with Severance of Revision-Provision

California Supreme Court Upholds Proposition 115 with Severance of Revision-Provision

Date: Dec 25, 1990
California Supreme Court Upholds Proposition 115 with Severance of Revision-Provision Introduction The case of Robert D. Raven et al. v. George Deukmejian, as Governor, etc. (52 Cal.3d 336) was...
FEHA Does Not Supplant Common Law: California Supreme Court Upholds Concurrent Remedies for Employment Sex Discrimination

FEHA Does Not Supplant Common Law: California Supreme Court Upholds Concurrent Remedies for Employment Sex Discrimination

Date: Dec 21, 1990
FEHA Does Not Supplant Common Law: California Supreme Court Upholds Concurrent Remedies for Employment Sex Discrimination Introduction The landmark decision in EMMA ROJO et al. v. ERWIN H. KLIGER et...
PEOPLE v. HASKETT (1990): Court’s Adherence to Mitigating Evidence Standards in Capital Sentencing

PEOPLE v. HASKETT (1990): Court’s Adherence to Mitigating Evidence Standards in Capital Sentencing

Date: Dec 21, 1990
PEOPLE v. HASKETT (1990): Court’s Adherence to Mitigating Evidence Standards in Capital Sentencing Introduction PEOPLE v. HASKETT, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California on December 20, 1990,...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in People v. Gallego: Insights on Self-Representation, Admissibility of "Other Crimes" Evidence, and Special Circumstances in Capital Cases

Affirmation of Death Sentence in People v. Gallego: Insights on Self-Representation, Admissibility of "Other Crimes" Evidence, and Special Circumstances in Capital Cases

Date: Dec 21, 1990
Affirmation of Death Sentence in People v. Gallego: Insights on Self-Representation, Admissibility of "Other Crimes" Evidence, and Special Circumstances in Capital Cases Introduction In People v....
Exclusive Remedy Provisions in Workers' Compensation: Insights from Jack Shoemaker v. Myers

Exclusive Remedy Provisions in Workers' Compensation: Insights from Jack Shoemaker v. Myers

Date: Dec 21, 1990
Exclusive Remedy Provisions in Workers' Compensation: Insights from Jack Shoemaker v. Myers Introduction Jack Shoemaker v. Beverlee A. Myers et al., 52 Cal.3d 1 (1990) is a pivotal case in California...
Due Process Requires Specific Requests in Default Child Support Orders: In re Marriage of Lippel

Due Process Requires Specific Requests in Default Child Support Orders: In re Marriage of Lippel

Date: Dec 18, 1990
Due Process Requires Specific Requests in Default Child Support Orders: In re Marriage of Lippel Introduction The case In re the Marriage of Angela and Ronald Lippel, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert