Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Economic Discrimination Under the Unruh Act: Insights from Tamela Harris v. Capital Growth Investors Introduction The landmark case of Tamela Harris et al. v. Capital Growth Investors XIV et al.,...
Enhancing Procedural Due Process for Constructive Resignation: Stanley Coleman Jr. v. Department of Personnel Administration (1991) Introduction In Stanley Coleman Jr. v. Department of Personnel...
Exclusion of Insurance Coverage for Intentional Acts: J.C. Penney Casualty Insurance Co. v. M.K. et al. Introduction The case of J.C. Penney Casualty Insurance Company v. M.K., a Minor, etc.,...
Strict Application of Business and Professions Code Section 7031: No Exceptions for Unlicensed Contractors in California Introduction The case of Hydrotech Systems, Ltd. v. Oasis Waterpark et al....
Consolidation of Multiple-Murder Charges and Evidentiary Standards in Capital Sentencing: Insights from People v. Mason Introduction People v. David Edwin Mason (52 Cal.3d 909) is a landmark decision...
People v. Jackson Chambers Daniels, Jr.: Establishing Standards for Counsel Conflicts and Penalty Phase Procedures Introduction People v. Jackson Chambers Daniels, Jr. (52 Cal.3d 815, Supreme Court...
People v. Pieters: Implied Exception to Double-Base-Term Limitation for Drug Quantity Enhancements Introduction People v. Pieters (52 Cal.3d 894, 1991) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Kaurish v. The People: Establishing Precedents in Capital Punishment and Evidentiary Standards Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Jay Charles Kaurish, adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Invalidation of Growth-Limiting Initiatives Conflicting with General Plans: Lesher Communications, Inc. v. City of Walnut Creek Introduction Lesher Communications, Inc., et al. v. City of Walnut...
Clarifying 'Immediate Presence': California Supreme Court's Precedent in People v. Blufford Hayes, Jr. Introduction People v. Blufford Hayes, Jr., 52 Cal.3d 577, is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Substantial Evidence Supports County's Rejection of Project Alternatives in EIR: Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors Introduction In the landmark case of Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of...
Invalidation of "Witness-Killing Special Circumstances" in Continuous Transaction Double Homicide Cases Introduction The People v. Richard Allen Benson (52 Cal.3d 754) is a landmark decision by the...
Comprehensive Commentary on PEOPLE v. WRIGHT: Juror Selection and Special Circumstance Errors Introduction People v. Bronte Lamont Wright (52 Cal.3d 367, 1990) is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
PEOPLE v. ANDERSON (1990): Reevaluation of Intent in Felony-Murder Special Circumstances Introduction PEOPLE v. ANDERSON, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California on December 27, 1990,...
California Supreme Court Upholds Proposition 115 with Severance of Revision-Provision Introduction The case of Robert D. Raven et al. v. George Deukmejian, as Governor, etc. (52 Cal.3d 336) was...
FEHA Does Not Supplant Common Law: California Supreme Court Upholds Concurrent Remedies for Employment Sex Discrimination Introduction The landmark decision in EMMA ROJO et al. v. ERWIN H. KLIGER et...
PEOPLE v. HASKETT (1990): Court’s Adherence to Mitigating Evidence Standards in Capital Sentencing Introduction PEOPLE v. HASKETT, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California on December 20, 1990,...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in People v. Gallego: Insights on Self-Representation, Admissibility of "Other Crimes" Evidence, and Special Circumstances in Capital Cases Introduction In People v....
Exclusive Remedy Provisions in Workers' Compensation: Insights from Jack Shoemaker v. Myers Introduction Jack Shoemaker v. Beverlee A. Myers et al., 52 Cal.3d 1 (1990) is a pivotal case in California...
Due Process Requires Specific Requests in Default Child Support Orders: In re Marriage of Lippel Introduction The case In re the Marriage of Angela and Ronald Lippel, decided by the Supreme Court of...