Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Defining 'Other Officers' under the National Bank Act: Implications for State Law Preemption in Wrongful Termination Claims

Defining 'Other Officers' under the National Bank Act: Implications for State Law Preemption in Wrongful Termination Claims

Date: Jun 28, 1991
Defining 'Other Officers' under the National Bank Act: Implications for State Law Preemption in Wrongful Termination Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Wells Fargo Bank, Petitioner, v. The...
No Duty of Care for Lenders in Property Appraisals: Analysis of Nymark v. Heart Federal Savings Loan Association

No Duty of Care for Lenders in Property Appraisals: Analysis of Nymark v. Heart Federal Savings Loan Association

Date: Jun 28, 1991
No Duty of Care for Lenders in Property Appraisals: Analysis of Nymark v. Heart Federal Savings Loan Association Introduction The case of Hans S. Nymark v. Heart Federal Savings Loan Association (231...
State of the Art Evidence Admissible in Strict Liability Failure-to-Warn Cases: Carl Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation

State of the Art Evidence Admissible in Strict Liability Failure-to-Warn Cases: Carl Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation

Date: May 31, 1991
State of the Art Evidence Admissible in Strict Liability Failure-to-Warn Cases: Carl Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation Introduction Carl Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation...
Defining Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Jury Instructions in Felony Murder Cases: Analysis of People v. Duncan (1991)

Defining Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Jury Instructions in Felony Murder Cases: Analysis of People v. Duncan (1991)

Date: May 24, 1991
Defining Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Jury Instructions in Felony Murder Cases: Analysis of People v. Duncan (1991) Introduction People v. Henry Earl Duncan is a landmark...
The People v. Cooper: Clarifying the Invited Error Doctrine and Change of Venue in Capital Cases

The People v. Cooper: Clarifying the Invited Error Doctrine and Change of Venue in Capital Cases

Date: May 7, 1991
The People v. Cooper: Clarifying the Invited Error Doctrine and Change of Venue in Capital Cases Introduction The People v. Kevin Cooper is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California,...
Strict Interpretation of "Drive" in California's Implied Consent DUI Statute

Strict Interpretation of "Drive" in California's Implied Consent DUI Statute

Date: May 7, 1991
Strict Interpretation of "Drive" in California's Implied Consent DUI Statute Introduction The case of Barrie Gray Mercer v. Department of Motor Vehicles (53 Cal.3d 753, 1991) serves as a pivotal...
Affirmation of Death Penalty in PEOPLE v. FRIERSON: A Comprehensive Commentary

Affirmation of Death Penalty in PEOPLE v. FRIERSON: A Comprehensive Commentary

Date: May 3, 1991
Affirmation of Death Penalty in PEOPLE v. FRIERSON: A Comprehensive Commentary Introduction People v. Lavell Frierson is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California delivered on May 2,...
Establishing Standards on Jury Conduct and Effective Counsel: A Comprehensive Commentary on People v. Tiequon Aundray Cox (1991)

Establishing Standards on Jury Conduct and Effective Counsel: A Comprehensive Commentary on People v. Tiequon Aundray Cox (1991)

Date: May 3, 1991
Establishing Standards on Jury Conduct and Effective Counsel: A Comprehensive Commentary on People v. Tiequon Aundray Cox (1991) Introduction In the landmark case of The People, Plaintiff and...
Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege and Capital Sentencing: Analyzing People v. Wharton

Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege and Capital Sentencing: Analyzing People v. Wharton

Date: Apr 30, 1991
Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege and Capital Sentencing: Analyzing People v. Wharton (53 Cal.3d 522) Introduction People v. George Herbert Wharton is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Dix v. Superior Court: Clarifying Victim Standing and Expanding Scope of Penal Code Section 1170(d)

Dix v. Superior Court: Clarifying Victim Standing and Expanding Scope of Penal Code Section 1170(d)

Date: Apr 19, 1991
Dix v. Superior Court: Clarifying Victim Standing and Expanding Scope of Penal Code Section 1170(d) Introduction Dix v. Superior Court of Humboldt County, 53 Cal.3d 442 (1991), is a landmark case...
Defendant Can Stipulate to Prior Felony under Penal Code §666

Defendant Can Stipulate to Prior Felony under Penal Code §666

Date: Apr 19, 1991
Defendant Can Stipulate to Prior Felony under Penal Code §666 Introduction The case The People v. Robert Bouzas (53 Cal.3d 467) addressed a pivotal issue in California criminal law: whether a...
Notice Requirements for Default Judgments in Personal Injury Actions: Schwab v. Rondel Homes Establishes Strict Adherence to CCP §§425.10 & 425.11

Notice Requirements for Default Judgments in Personal Injury Actions: Schwab v. Rondel Homes Establishes Strict Adherence to CCP §§425.10 & 425.11

Date: Apr 16, 1991
Notice Requirements for Default Judgments in Personal Injury Actions: Schwab v. Rondel Homes Establishes Strict Adherence to CCP §§425.10 & 425.11 Introduction Schwab et al. v. Rondel Homes, Inc., 53...
Establishing Corpus Delicti in Capital Cases: People v. Jennings

Establishing Corpus Delicti in Capital Cases: People v. Jennings

Date: Apr 12, 1991
Establishing Corpus Delicti in Capital Cases: People v. Jennings Introduction Case: The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Wilbur Jennings, Defendant and Appellant. Court: Supreme Court of...
Tolling of Statute of Limitations Under MICRA: Analysis of VARETTA WOODS v. WILLIAM YOUNG et al.

Tolling of Statute of Limitations Under MICRA: Analysis of VARETTA WOODS v. WILLIAM YOUNG et al.

Date: Apr 5, 1991
Tolling of Statute of Limitations Under MICRA: Analysis of VARETTA WOODS v. WILLIAM YOUNG et al. Introduction The case of Varetta Woods v. William Young et al. (53 Cal.3d 315) adjudicated by the...
Supreme Court of California Clarifies Jurisdictional Transfer under CCP §396

Supreme Court of California Clarifies Jurisdictional Transfer under CCP §396

Date: Apr 2, 1991
Supreme Court of California Clarifies Jurisdictional Transfer under CCP §396 Introduction The Supreme Court of California in Michael Walker and Charline White v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles...
Prospectivity of Proposition 115’s Provisions in Criminal Prosecutions

Prospectivity of Proposition 115’s Provisions in Criminal Prosecutions

Date: Apr 2, 1991
Prospectivity of Proposition 115’s Provisions in Criminal Prosecutions Introduction In the landmark case of Robert Alan Tapia v. The Superior Court of Tulare County (1991), the Supreme Court of...
Government Code §818 Does Not Exempt State-Operated Long-Term Care Facilities from Statutory Civil Penalties: Kizer v. County of San Mateo

Government Code §818 Does Not Exempt State-Operated Long-Term Care Facilities from Statutory Civil Penalties: Kizer v. County of San Mateo

Date: Mar 29, 1991
Government Code §818 Does Not Exempt State-Operated Long-Term Care Facilities from Statutory Civil Penalties: Kizer v. County of San Mateo Introduction In Kenneth W. Kizer, as Director, etc.,...
Upholding the Death Penalty: Comprehensive Commentary on People v. Bruce Wayne Morris

Upholding the Death Penalty: Comprehensive Commentary on People v. Bruce Wayne Morris

Date: Mar 29, 1991
Upholding the Death Penalty: Comprehensive Commentary on People v. Bruce Wayne Morris Introduction People v. Bruce Wayne Morris, 53 Cal.3d 152 (1991), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California...
Limits on Special Circumstances: Supreme Court of California Affirms Death Penalty with Adjusted Findings in People v. Beardslee

Limits on Special Circumstances: Supreme Court of California Affirms Death Penalty with Adjusted Findings in People v. Beardslee

Date: Mar 26, 1991
Limits on Special Circumstances: Supreme Court of California Affirms Death Penalty with Adjusted Findings in People v. Beardslee Introduction In People v. Beardslee (53 Cal.3d 68, 1991), the Supreme...
Establishing Murder in the Course of Kidnapping: Insights from People v. Pensinger

Establishing Murder in the Course of Kidnapping: Insights from People v. Pensinger

Date: Mar 1, 1991
Establishing Murder in the Course of Kidnapping: Insights from People v. Pensinger Introduction Case Citation: In re Brett Patrick Pensinger on Habeas Corpus, 52 Cal.3d 1210 (1991) This landmark case...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert