Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Establishing "Lying in Wait" as a Special Circumstance in California Death Penalty Cases

Establishing "Lying in Wait" as a Special Circumstance in California Death Penalty Cases

Date: Nov 26, 1991
Establishing "Lying in Wait" as a Special Circumstance in California Death Penalty Cases Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Thomas Francis Edwards (54 Cal.3d 787, 1991), the Supreme Court...
Balanced Standards for Forum Non Conveniens in Cross-Border Litigation: Mellet Stangvik v. Shiley Incorporated

Balanced Standards for Forum Non Conveniens in Cross-Border Litigation: Mellet Stangvik v. Shiley Incorporated

Date: Nov 22, 1991
Balanced Standards for Forum Non Conveniens in Cross-Border Litigation Introduction The case of Mellet Stangvik et al. v. Shiley Incorporated et al. (54 Cal.3d 744) adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Clarification of Coemployee Immunity under California Labor Code Section 3601: John Hendy v. Gary Losse

Clarification of Coemployee Immunity under California Labor Code Section 3601: John Hendy v. Gary Losse

Date: Nov 19, 1991
Clarification of Coemployee Immunity under California Labor Code Section 3601: John Hendy v. Gary Losse Introduction The case of John Hendy et al. v. Gary Losse et al. (54 Cal.3d 723, 1991) addresses...
Comprehensive Commentary on The People v. Douglas Scott Mickey (54 Cal.3d 612)

Comprehensive Commentary on The People v. Douglas Scott Mickey (54 Cal.3d 612)

Date: Nov 1, 1991
Establishing the Boundaries of Penal Code §190.3: A Detailed Analysis of The People v. Douglas Scott Mickey Introduction The case of The People v. Douglas Scott Mickey (54 Cal.3d 612) presents a...
Fuentes v. The People: Reinforcing the Right to a Representative Jury and Curtailing Racially Motivated Peremptory Challenges

Fuentes v. The People: Reinforcing the Right to a Representative Jury and Curtailing Racially Motivated Peremptory Challenges

Date: Nov 1, 1991
Fuentes v. The People: Reinforcing the Right to a Representative Jury and Curtailing Racially Motivated Peremptory Challenges Introduction In The People v. Jose Leon Fuentes (54 Cal.3d 707, 1991),...
Clarifying the Good Faith Exception: People v. Camarella (1991)

Clarifying the Good Faith Exception: People v. Camarella (1991)

Date: Oct 29, 1991
Clarifying the Good Faith Exception: People v. Camarella (1991) Introduction People v. Camarella is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California, decided on October 28, 1991. This case...
California Supreme Court Upholds Proposition 140 with Reservations on Pension Limitations

California Supreme Court Upholds Proposition 140 with Reservations on Pension Limitations

Date: Oct 11, 1991
California Supreme Court Upholds Proposition 140 with Reservations on Pension Limitations Introduction In the landmark case Legislature of the State of California et al. v. March Fong Eu et al....
Beryl Weiner v. William O. Fleischman: Establishing the Standard of Proof for Oral Joint Ventures

Beryl Weiner v. William O. Fleischman: Establishing the Standard of Proof for Oral Joint Ventures

Date: Oct 8, 1991
Beryl Weiner v. William O. Fleischman: Establishing the Standard of Proof for Oral Joint Ventures Introduction Beryl Weiner v. William O. Fleischman et al. (54 Cal.3d 476, 1991) is a landmark case...
Establishing Vicarious Liability: Public Entities Held Responsible for Police Officers' Sexual Assaults on Duty

Establishing Vicarious Liability: Public Entities Held Responsible for Police Officers' Sexual Assaults on Duty

Date: Sep 6, 1991
Establishing Vicarious Liability: Public Entities Held Responsible for Police Officers' Sexual Assaults on Duty Introduction The landmark case of Mary M. v. City of Los Angeles (54 Cal.3d 202, 1991)...
Reciprocal Discovery in Criminal Procedure: Comprehensive Commentary on Valle Izazaga v. Superior Court of Tulare County

Reciprocal Discovery in Criminal Procedure: Comprehensive Commentary on Valle Izazaga v. Superior Court of Tulare County

Date: Aug 31, 1991
Reciprocal Discovery in Criminal Procedure: Comprehensive Commentary on Valle Izazaga v. Superior Court of Tulare County Introduction Valle Izazaga v. Superior Court of Tulare County is a landmark...
Clarifying 'Immediate Presence' in Robbery and Special Circumstances in Death Penalty Sentencing: People v. Webster

Clarifying 'Immediate Presence' in Robbery and Special Circumstances in Death Penalty Sentencing: People v. Webster

Date: Aug 31, 1991
Clarifying 'Immediate Presence' in Robbery and Special Circumstances in Death Penalty Sentencing: People v. Webster Introduction People v. Larry Junior Webster (54 Cal.3d 411, 1991) is a landmark...
Admissibility of Prior Convictions for Impeachment in Death Penalty Cases under Proposition 8: People v. Denny Mickle

Admissibility of Prior Convictions for Impeachment in Death Penalty Cases under Proposition 8: People v. Denny Mickle

Date: Aug 20, 1991
Admissibility of Prior Convictions for Impeachment in Death Penalty Cases under Proposition 8: People v. Denny Mickle Introduction Case: The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Denny Mickle,...
Mandate for Plaintiff to Prove Defendant's Financial Condition in Punitive Damages Awards

Mandate for Plaintiff to Prove Defendant's Financial Condition in Punitive Damages Awards

Date: Aug 16, 1991
Mandate for Plaintiff to Prove Defendant's Financial Condition in Punitive Damages Awards Introduction In the landmark case Myretta Adams, as Conservator, etc., Plaintiff and Respondent v. Clifford...
Implied Stipulation to Trial by Court Commissioner in Capital Cases: Analysis of In re James F. Horton II

Implied Stipulation to Trial by Court Commissioner in Capital Cases: Analysis of In re James F. Horton II

Date: Aug 13, 1991
Implied Stipulation to Trial by Court Commissioner in Capital Cases: Analysis of In re James F. Horton II Introduction In re James F. Horton II (54 Cal.3d 82) is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Equal Consent under Civil Code Section 5127 for Community Real Property Transfers

Affirmation of Equal Consent under Civil Code Section 5127 for Community Real Property Transfers

Date: Jul 30, 1991
Affirmation of Equal Consent under Civil Code Section 5127 for Community Real Property Transfers Introduction In the landmark case of John E. Droeger v. Friedman, Sloan Ross (54 Cal.3d 26, 1991), the...
Public Interest vs. Transparency: Upholding Executive Privilege in Governor's Schedules under California Public Records Act

Public Interest vs. Transparency: Upholding Executive Privilege in Governor's Schedules under California Public Records Act

Date: Jul 23, 1991
Public Interest vs. Transparency: Upholding Executive Privilege in Governor's Schedules under California Public Records Act Introduction The case of Times Mirror Company v. The Superior Court of...
Admissibility of Expert and Character Evidence in Child Molestation Cases: Analysis of People v. McAlpin

Admissibility of Expert and Character Evidence in Child Molestation Cases: Analysis of People v. McAlpin

Date: Jul 19, 1991
Admissibility of Expert and Character Evidence in Child Molestation Cases: Analysis of People v. McAlpin Introduction In People v. McAlpin (53 Cal.3d 1289), the Supreme Court of California addressed...
Establishing the Reliability of Accomplice Testimony in Capital Cases: Insights from The People v. Anthony John Sully

Establishing the Reliability of Accomplice Testimony in Capital Cases: Insights from The People v. Anthony John Sully

Date: Jul 12, 1991
Establishing the Reliability of Accomplice Testimony in Capital Cases: Insights from The People v. Anthony John Sully Introduction The People v. Anthony John Sully is a landmark case adjudicated by...
Aiding and Abetting Liability for Getaway Drivers: Insights from THE PEOPLE v. LARRY COOPER

Aiding and Abetting Liability for Getaway Drivers: Insights from THE PEOPLE v. LARRY COOPER

Date: Jun 28, 1991
Aiding and Abetting Liability for Getaway Drivers: Insights from THE PEOPLE v. LARRY COOPER Introduction THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LARRY COOPER, Defendant and Appellant (53 Cal.3d...
Setback of Multiple-Murder Special Circumstances in People v. Jones

Setback of Multiple-Murder Special Circumstances in People v. Jones

Date: Jun 28, 1991
Setback of Multiple-Murder Special Circumstances in People v. Jones Introduction People v. Earl Preston Jones (53 Cal.3d 1115, 1991) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert