Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Effective Assistance of Counsel in Penalty Phase: Insights from In re Gonzalo Marquez Marquez

Effective Assistance of Counsel in Penalty Phase: Insights from In re Gonzalo Marquez Marquez

Date: Jan 24, 1992
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Penalty Phase: Insights from In re Gonzalo Marquez Marquez Introduction The case of In re Gonzalo Marquez Marquez presents a pivotal examination of the right to...
People v. Gonzalo Marquez Marquez: A Landmark Decision on Arrest Procedures and Defendant Rights

People v. Gonzalo Marquez Marquez: A Landmark Decision on Arrest Procedures and Defendant Rights

Date: Jan 24, 1992
People v. Gonzalo Marquez Marquez: A Landmark Decision on Arrest Procedures and Defendant Rights Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Gonzalo Marquez Marquez (1 Cal.4th 553, 1992), the...
Revisiting Felony-Murder Rule: Insights from The People v. Horace Edwards Kelly

Revisiting Felony-Murder Rule: Insights from The People v. Horace Edwards Kelly

Date: Jan 17, 1992
Revisiting Felony-Murder Rule: Insights from The People v. Horace Edwards Kelly Introduction The People v. Horace Edwards Kelly is a landmark 1992 decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
Affirmation of Trial Court Discretion in Jury Selection and Miranda Waiver in People v. Breaux

Affirmation of Trial Court Discretion in Jury Selection and Miranda Waiver in People v. Breaux

Date: Dec 31, 1991
Affirmation of Trial Court Discretion in Jury Selection and Miranda Waiver in People v. Breaux Introduction People v. David Anthony Breaux (1 Cal.4th 281), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction: Territorial Jurisdiction and Organized Gang Conspiracy under Sections 781 and 790

Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction: Territorial Jurisdiction and Organized Gang Conspiracy under Sections 781 and 790

Date: Dec 31, 1991
Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction: Territorial Jurisdiction and Organized Gang Conspiracy under Sections 781 and 790 Introduction In the case of The People v. Curtis Floyd Price (1 Cal.4th...
Exclusivity of Writ of Mandate for Appellate Review of Unsuccessful Peremptory Challenges under CCP §170.3(d)

Exclusivity of Writ of Mandate for Appellate Review of Unsuccessful Peremptory Challenges under CCP §170.3(d)

Date: Dec 27, 1991
Exclusivity of Writ of Mandate for Appellate Review of Unsuccessful Peremptory Challenges under CCP §170.3(d) Introduction The People v. Alma Mae Hull, 1 Cal.4th 266 (1991), is a landmark decision by...
Comprehensive Commentary on People v. Fierro: Scope of "Circumstances of the Crime" in Capital Sentencing

Comprehensive Commentary on People v. Fierro: Scope of "Circumstances of the Crime" in Capital Sentencing

Date: Dec 27, 1991
Comprehensive Commentary on People v. Fierro: Scope of "Circumstances of the Crime" in Capital Sentencing Introduction People v. Fierro, 1 Cal.4th 173 (1991), is a pivotal decision by the Supreme...
Double Jeopardy Protections Affirmed in PEOPLE v. MARKS

Double Jeopardy Protections Affirmed in PEOPLE v. MARKS

Date: Dec 20, 1991
Double Jeopardy Protections Affirmed in PEOPLE v. MARKS Introduction PEOPLE v. MARKS is a pivotal case where the Supreme Court of California addressed the intersection of the double jeopardy clause...
Abolition of Diminished Capacity: Implications for Voluntary Manslaughter in People v. Saille

Abolition of Diminished Capacity: Implications for Voluntary Manslaughter in People v. Saille

Date: Dec 13, 1991
Abolition of Diminished Capacity: Implications for Voluntary Manslaughter in People v. Saille Introduction People v. Saille (54 Cal.3d 1103) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California...
Affirming Probation Modification for Nonwillful Failure to Pay Restitution: Cookson v. The People

Affirming Probation Modification for Nonwillful Failure to Pay Restitution: Cookson v. The People

Date: Dec 13, 1991
Affirming Probation Modification for Nonwillful Failure to Pay Restitution: Cookson v. The People Introduction In The People v. Cookson (54 Cal.3d 1091, 1991), the Supreme Court of California...
Establishing Dependency Through Parental Substance Abuse and Neglect: Insights from In re Rocco M.

Establishing Dependency Through Parental Substance Abuse and Neglect: Insights from In re Rocco M.

Date: Dec 12, 1991
Establishing Dependency Through Parental Substance Abuse and Neglect: Insights from In re Rocco M. Introduction In re Rocco M., a decision rendered by the Court of Appeal of California, First...
Affirmation of Long-Term Foster Care and Reasonableness of Services: In re Misako R. et al.

Affirmation of Long-Term Foster Care and Reasonableness of Services: In re Misako R. et al.

Date: Dec 10, 1991
Affirmation of Long-Term Foster Care and Reasonableness of Services: In re Misako R. et al. Introduction The case of In re Misako R. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law involves a...
Disapproval of BAJI No. 3.75 and Endorsement of BAJI No. 3.76: Shaping Causation in California Negligence Law

Disapproval of BAJI No. 3.75 and Endorsement of BAJI No. 3.76: Shaping Causation in California Negligence Law

Date: Dec 10, 1991
Disapproval of BAJI No. 3.75 and Endorsement of BAJI No. 3.76: Shaping Causation in California Negligence Law Introduction In the landmark case of James Mitchell et al. v. Jose L. Gonzales et al. (54...
Limiting Hearsay Evidence by Non-Investigating Officers at Preliminary Hearings: Insights from Whitman v. Superior Court

Limiting Hearsay Evidence by Non-Investigating Officers at Preliminary Hearings: Insights from Whitman v. Superior Court

Date: Dec 10, 1991
Limiting Hearsay Evidence by Non-Investigating Officers at Preliminary Hearings: Insights from Whitman v. Superior Court Introduction The case of Thomas Paul Whitman v. The Superior Court of Santa...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Bacigalupo: Exigent Circumstances and Aggravating Factors under California Law

Affirmation of Death Sentence in Bacigalupo: Exigent Circumstances and Aggravating Factors under California Law

Date: Dec 10, 1991
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Bacigalupo: Exigent Circumstances and Aggravating Factors under California Law Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Miguel Angel Bacigalupo, 1 Cal.4th...
Gross Negligence in Vehicular Manslaughter: Integrating Intoxication Levels

Gross Negligence in Vehicular Manslaughter: Integrating Intoxication Levels

Date: Dec 6, 1991
Gross Negligence in Vehicular Manslaughter: Integrating Intoxication Levels Introduction The People of California v. John Bennett, Jr. is a pivotal 1991 decision by the Supreme Court of California...
Restitution Fine Adjustments in Plea Bargain Discrepancies: People v. Dexter M. Walker

Restitution Fine Adjustments in Plea Bargain Discrepancies: People v. Dexter M. Walker

Date: Dec 6, 1991
Restitution Fine Adjustments in Plea Bargain Discrepancies: People v. Dexter M. Walker Introduction People v. Dexter M. Walker is a seminal decision by the Supreme Court of California, rendered on...
People v. Ashmus: Affirmation of Death Sentence and Clarifications on Jury Selection and Penal Code §190.3

People v. Ashmus: Affirmation of Death Sentence and Clarifications on Jury Selection and Penal Code §190.3

Date: Dec 6, 1991
People v. Ashmus: Affirmation of Death Sentence and Clarifications on Jury Selection and Penal Code §190.3 Introduction People v. Troy Adam Ashmus is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Expansion of Standing in Emotional Distress Claims in Christensen v. Superior Court

Expansion of Standing in Emotional Distress Claims in Christensen v. Superior Court

Date: Dec 3, 1991
Expansion of Standing in Emotional Distress Claims in Christensen v. Superior Court Introduction Donald Paul Christensen et al. v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County et al. (54 Cal.3d 868,...
Jurisdiction of Temporary Judges in Juvenile Cases: Comprehensive Analysis of In re Richard S. (1991)

Jurisdiction of Temporary Judges in Juvenile Cases: Comprehensive Analysis of In re Richard S. (1991)

Date: Dec 3, 1991
Jurisdiction of Temporary Judges in Juvenile Cases: Comprehensive Analysis of In re Richard S. (1991) Introduction In re Richard S., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law, 54 Cal.3d 857...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert