Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Exclusive Remedy Provisions of Workers' Compensation Act Preempt Emotional Distress Claims: Apostol Livitsanos v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Exclusive Remedy Provisions of Workers' Compensation Act Preempt Emotional Distress Claims: Apostol Livitsanos v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Date: May 19, 1992
Exclusive Remedy Provisions of Workers' Compensation Act Preempt Emotional Distress Claims: Apostol Livitsanos v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County Introduction Apostol Livitsanos, an employee of...
Kenneth Clair v. The People: Affirmation of Death Sentence under California's Death Penalty Law

Kenneth Clair v. The People: Affirmation of Death Sentence under California's Death Penalty Law

Date: May 8, 1992
Kenneth Clair v. The People: Affirmation of Death Sentence under California's Death Penalty Law Introduction The case of The People v. Kenneth Clair, reported in 2 Cal.4th 629 by the Supreme Court of...
No Corroboration Required: California's Landmark Rape Case Jurisprudence

No Corroboration Required: California's Landmark Rape Case Jurisprudence

Date: May 8, 1992
No Corroboration Required: California's Landmark Rape Case Jurisprudence A Comprehensive Legal Commentary on The People v. Johnnie Vincent Gammage et al., 2 Cal.4th 693 (1992) Introduction The People...
Laird v. Blacker: Defining the Commencement of the Statute of Limitations in Legal Malpractice

Laird v. Blacker: Defining the Commencement of the Statute of Limitations in Legal Malpractice

Date: May 8, 1992
Laird v. Blacker: Defining the Commencement of the Statute of Limitations in Legal Malpractice Introduction Laird v. Blacker, 2 Cal.4th 606 (1992), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Retirement Contributions Subject to Constitutional Spending Limits: Insights from SAN FRANCISCO TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

Retirement Contributions Subject to Constitutional Spending Limits: Insights from SAN FRANCISCO TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

Date: May 5, 1992
Retirement Contributions Subject to Constitutional Spending Limits: Insights from SAN FRANCISCO TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Introduction SAN FRANCISCO TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION v. BOARD...
Limitation of Joint and Several Liability for Non-Economic Damages under Proposition 51: DaFonte v. Up-Right

Limitation of Joint and Several Liability for Non-Economic Damages under Proposition 51: DaFonte v. Up-Right

Date: May 5, 1992
Limitation of Joint and Several Liability for Non-Economic Damages under Proposition 51: DaFonte v. Up-Right Introduction The case Mark DaFonte, a Minor, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Up-Right,...
Police Recruits Excluded from Procedural Protections Under the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act: Burden v. Snowden (1992)

Police Recruits Excluded from Procedural Protections Under the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act: Burden v. Snowden (1992)

Date: May 1, 1992
Police Recruits Excluded from Procedural Protections Under the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act: Burden v. Snowden (1992) Introduction In the landmark case of Burden v. Snowden...
PEOPLE v. THOMAS: Sufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence for Capital Murder Conviction

PEOPLE v. THOMAS: Sufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence for Capital Murder Conviction

Date: Apr 24, 1992
PEOPLE v. THOMAS: Sufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence for Capital Murder Conviction Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Ralph International Thomas, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Supreme Court of California Establishes Application of Primary Jurisdiction Doctrine in Unfair Practices Act Actions

Supreme Court of California Establishes Application of Primary Jurisdiction Doctrine in Unfair Practices Act Actions

Date: Apr 7, 1992
Supreme Court of California Establishes Application of Primary Jurisdiction Doctrine in Unfair Practices Act Actions Introduction In the landmark case of Farmers Insurance Exchange et al. v. The...
Reinforcing Statutory Time Bars on Misdemeanor Convictions in Capital Cases: Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Bryan Joseph Mincey

Reinforcing Statutory Time Bars on Misdemeanor Convictions in Capital Cases: Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Bryan Joseph Mincey

Date: Apr 7, 1992
Reinforcing Statutory Time Bars on Misdemeanor Convictions in Capital Cases: Comprehensive Analysis of People v. Bryan Joseph Mincey Introduction People v. Bryan Joseph Mincey (2 Cal.4th 408, 1992)...
Enforcement of Termination and Recapture Clauses in Commercial Leases Confirmed under California Civil Code §1995.010

Enforcement of Termination and Recapture Clauses in Commercial Leases Confirmed under California Civil Code §1995.010

Date: Mar 31, 1992
Enforcement of Termination and Recapture Clauses in Commercial Leases Confirmed under California Civil Code §1995.010 Introduction The case of Carma Developers (California), Inc. v. Marathon...
Clarifying Proximate Cause and Foreseeability in Homicide Cases: People v. Roberts

Clarifying Proximate Cause and Foreseeability in Homicide Cases: People v. Roberts

Date: Mar 24, 1992
Clarifying Proximate Cause and Foreseeability in Homicide Cases: People v. Roberts Introduction In the landmark case The People v. Larry H. Roberts (2 Cal.4th 271, 1992), the Supreme Court of...
Comprehensive Analysis of Jury Selection and Procedural Standards in Capital Cases: The People v. Visciotti

Comprehensive Analysis of Jury Selection and Procedural Standards in Capital Cases: The People v. Visciotti

Date: Mar 13, 1992
Comprehensive Analysis of Jury Selection and Procedural Standards in Capital Cases: The People v. Visciotti Introduction The People v. John Louis Visciotti is a landmark decision rendered by the...
Comprehensive Commentary on People v. Hardy and Reilly: Establishing Precedents in Conspiracy and Multiple-Murder Special Circumstances

Comprehensive Commentary on People v. Hardy and Reilly: Establishing Precedents in Conspiracy and Multiple-Murder Special Circumstances

Date: Mar 13, 1992
Comprehensive Commentary on People v. Hardy and Reilly: Establishing Precedents in Conspiracy and Multiple-Murder Special Circumstances Introduction In the landmark case of People v. James Edward...
Affirmation of Tameny Exception: Wrongful Discharge for Retaliation in Sexual Harassment Context

Affirmation of Tameny Exception: Wrongful Discharge for Retaliation in Sexual Harassment Context

Date: Feb 28, 1992
Affirmation of Tameny Exception: Wrongful Discharge for Retaliation in Sexual Harassment Context Introduction In the landmark case of Vincent A. Gantt v. Sentry Insurance et al., decided by the...
Ensuring Fair Trial Practices: An Analysis of PEOPLE v. HOWARD

Ensuring Fair Trial Practices: An Analysis of PEOPLE v. HOWARD

Date: Feb 28, 1992
Ensuring Fair Trial Practices: An Analysis of PEOPLE v. HOWARD Introduction People v. Albert Cecil Howard, 1 Cal.4th 1132 (1992), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California, presents a pivotal...
Admissibility of Redacted Codefendant Statements Under Bruton in People v. Mitcham

Admissibility of Redacted Codefendant Statements Under Bruton in People v. Mitcham

Date: Feb 25, 1992
Admissibility of Redacted Codefendant Statements Under Bruton in People v. Mitcham Introduction People v. Stephan Louis Mitcham was a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of California on...
Enforcing Statutory Prevailing Wage Obligations on Public Works: A Comprehensive Analysis of Lusardi Construction Co. v. Aubry

Enforcing Statutory Prevailing Wage Obligations on Public Works: A Comprehensive Analysis of Lusardi Construction Co. v. Aubry

Date: Feb 25, 1992
Enforcing Statutory Prevailing Wage Obligations on Public Works: A Comprehensive Analysis of Lusardi Construction Co. v. Aubry Introduction The landmark case of Lusardi Construction Company v. Aubry...
Setback of Multiple-Murder Special Circumstances in People v. Pinholster

Setback of Multiple-Murder Special Circumstances in People v. Pinholster

Date: Feb 21, 1992
Setback of Multiple-Murder Special Circumstances in People v. Pinholster Introduction People v. Scott Lynn Pinholster is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of California on February 20,...
Recognition of Unwed Biological Fathers' Constitutional Rights in Adoption Proceedings

Recognition of Unwed Biological Fathers' Constitutional Rights in Adoption Proceedings

Date: Feb 21, 1992
Recognition of Unwed Biological Fathers' Constitutional Rights in Adoption Proceedings 1. Introduction The case of Adoption of KELSEY S., a Minor.STEVEN A. et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert