Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Nedlloyd Lines B.V. v. Superior Court of San Mateo County: Enforcing Choice-of-Law Clauses in International Commercial Contracts

Nedlloyd Lines B.V. v. Superior Court of San Mateo County: Enforcing Choice-of-Law Clauses in International Commercial Contracts

Date: Sep 1, 1992
Nedlloyd Lines B.V. v. Superior Court of San Mateo County Enforcing Choice-of-Law Clauses in International Commercial Contracts Introduction The case of Nedlloyd Lines B.V. et al. v. The Superior...
In re Earl Lloyd Jackson: Evaluating the Prejudicial Impact of Prosecution's Non-Disclosure of Informant Inducements in Capital Sentencing

In re Earl Lloyd Jackson: Evaluating the Prejudicial Impact of Prosecution's Non-Disclosure of Informant Inducements in Capital Sentencing

Date: Sep 1, 1992
In re Earl Lloyd Jackson: Evaluating the Prejudicial Impact of Prosecution's Non-Disclosure of Informant Inducements in Capital Sentencing Introduction The case of In re Earl Lloyd Jackson on Habeas...
Diaz v. The People: Affirmation of Death Sentence and Clarification on Special Circumstances in Multiple-Murder Cases

Diaz v. The People: Affirmation of Death Sentence and Clarification on Special Circumstances in Multiple-Murder Cases

Date: Sep 1, 1992
Diaz v. The People: Affirmation of Death Sentence and Clarification on Special Circumstances in Multiple-Murder Cases Introduction In The People v. Robert Rubane Diaz (3 Cal.4th 495), the Supreme...
Auditor Liability Limited to Clients: Comprehensive Analysis of Bily v. Arthur Young

Auditor Liability Limited to Clients: Comprehensive Analysis of Bily v. Arthur Young

Date: Aug 28, 1992
Auditor Liability Limited to Clients: Comprehensive Analysis of Bily v. Arthur Young 1. Introduction Bily v. Arthur Young is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of California on August 27,...
Primary Assumption of Risk Affirmed as Complete Defense in Comparative Fault Context

Primary Assumption of Risk Affirmed as Complete Defense in Comparative Fault Context

Date: Aug 25, 1992
Primary Assumption of Risk Affirmed as Complete Defense in Comparative Fault Context Introduction The case of Kendra Knight v. Michael Jewett (3 Cal.4th 296) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Capital Conviction in People v. Pride: Juror Selection and Evidentiary Considerations

Affirmation of Capital Conviction in People v. Pride: Juror Selection and Evidentiary Considerations

Date: Aug 7, 1992
Affirmation of Capital Conviction in People v. Pride: Juror Selection and Evidentiary Considerations Introduction People v. Pride is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California on...
Central Pathology Service v. Superior Court: Clarifying the Scope of Punitive Damages in Medical Negligence Cases

Central Pathology Service v. Superior Court: Clarifying the Scope of Punitive Damages in Medical Negligence Cases

Date: Aug 1, 1992
Central Pathology Service v. Superior Court: Clarifying the Scope of Punitive Damages in Medical Negligence Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Central Pathology Service Medical Clinic, Inc....
Moncharsh v. Heily Blase: Solidifying the Finality of Arbitration Awards and Limiting Judicial Review

Moncharsh v. Heily Blase: Solidifying the Finality of Arbitration Awards and Limiting Judicial Review

Date: Jul 31, 1992
Moncharsh v. Heily Blase: Solidifying the Finality of Arbitration Awards and Limiting Judicial Review Introduction In Moncharsh v. Heily Blase et al., 3 Cal.4th 1 (1992), the Supreme Court of...
Clarifying Insurance Coverage Limits: Unfair Business Practices Act Excluded from Advertising Injury Under CGL Policies

Clarifying Insurance Coverage Limits: Unfair Business Practices Act Excluded from Advertising Injury Under CGL Policies

Date: Jul 31, 1992
Clarifying Insurance Coverage Limits: Unfair Business Practices Act Excluded from Advertising Injury Under CGL Policies Introduction In the landmark case of Bank of the West v. Superior Court of...
Clarifying the Limits of Self-Representation: PEOPLE v. CLARK and the Termination of Faretta Rights

Clarifying the Limits of Self-Representation: PEOPLE v. CLARK and the Termination of Faretta Rights

Date: Jul 31, 1992
Clarifying the Limits of Self-Representation: PEOPLE v. CLARK and the Termination of Faretta Rights Introduction The case of The PEOPLE v. DOUGLAS Daniel Clark (3 Cal.4th 41), adjudicated by the...
Affirmation of Accomplice Testimony Admissibility and Jury Instruction Standards in People v. DeSantis (1992)

Affirmation of Accomplice Testimony Admissibility and Jury Instruction Standards in People v. DeSantis (1992)

Date: Jul 14, 1992
Affirmation of Accomplice Testimony Admissibility and Jury Instruction Standards in People v. DeSantis (1992) Introduction People v. DeSantis is a significant case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Robbery-Murder Conviction and Death Sentence: Upholding Standards in Competency, Evidence, and Sentencing Procedures

Affirmation of Robbery-Murder Conviction and Death Sentence: Upholding Standards in Competency, Evidence, and Sentencing Procedures

Date: Jul 14, 1992
Affirmation of Robbery-Murder Conviction and Death Sentence: Upholding Standards in Competency, Evidence, and Sentencing Procedures Introduction In the case of THE PEOPLE v. RONALD AVERY McPETERS (2...
Reaffirmation of Premeditation and Deliberation Standards in The People v. Perez

Reaffirmation of Premeditation and Deliberation Standards in The People v. Perez

Date: Jul 10, 1992
Reaffirmation of Premeditation and Deliberation Standards in The People v. Perez Introduction The People v. Arthur Richard Perez, 2 Cal.4th 1117 (1992), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Recognizing Direct Victim Status for Mothers in Medical Malpractice: Julia Burgess v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Recognizing Direct Victim Status for Mothers in Medical Malpractice: Julia Burgess v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Date: Jul 10, 1992
Recognizing Direct Victim Status for Mothers in Medical Malpractice: Julia Burgess v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County Introduction The landmark case of Julia Burgess v. The Superior Court of Los...
California Supreme Court Establishes Restriction on Unlicensed Use of "Accountant" Terminology

California Supreme Court Establishes Restriction on Unlicensed Use of "Accountant" Terminology

Date: Jul 3, 1992
California Supreme Court Establishes Restriction on Unlicensed Use of "Accountant" Terminology Introduction In the landmark case of Bonnie Moore et al. v. California State Board of Accountancy (2...
Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital District: Scope of Government Code Section 815.6 in Prevailing Wage Enforcement

Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital District: Scope of Government Code Section 815.6 in Prevailing Wage Enforcement

Date: Jun 26, 1992
Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital District: Scope of Government Code Section 815.6 in Prevailing Wage Enforcement Introduction The case of Lloyd W. Aubry, Jr., as Labor Commissioner, etc., v. Tri-City...
Impact of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel on Plea Bargaining Decisions: Analysis of In re John P. Alvernaz

Impact of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel on Plea Bargaining Decisions: Analysis of In re John P. Alvernaz

Date: Jun 23, 1992
Impact of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel on Plea Bargaining Decisions: Analysis of In re John P. Alvernaz Introduction In re John P. Alvernaz on Habeas Corpus, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Fauber: Reinforcing Standards on Pretrial Publicity, Witness Credibility, and Penalty Phase Procedures

Affirmation of Death Sentence in Fauber: Reinforcing Standards on Pretrial Publicity, Witness Credibility, and Penalty Phase Procedures

Date: Jun 19, 1992
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Fauber: Reinforcing Standards on Pretrial Publicity, Witness Credibility, and Penalty Phase Procedures Introduction The case of The People v. Curtis Lynn Fauber (2...
People v. Raley: Affirmation of Torture Murder Convictions and Reversal of Attempted Oral Copulation Charge

People v. Raley: Affirmation of Torture Murder Convictions and Reversal of Attempted Oral Copulation Charge

Date: Jun 19, 1992
People v. Raley: Affirmation of Torture Murder Convictions and Reversal of Attempted Oral Copulation Charge Introduction People v. Raley, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California on June 18,...
Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction and Procedural Standards in People v. Livaditis

Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction and Procedural Standards in People v. Livaditis

Date: Jun 19, 1992
Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction and Procedural Standards in People v. Livaditis Introduction People v. Steven Livaditis (2 Cal.4th 759) is a seminal judgment delivered by the Supreme Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert