Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Arizona Case Commentaries

State v. Hall (2003): Standards for Juror Misconduct Due to Extrinsic Evidence in Capital Proceedings

State v. Hall (2003): Standards for Juror Misconduct Due to Extrinsic Evidence in Capital Proceedings

Date: Mar 26, 2003
State v. Hall (2003): Standards for Juror Misconduct Due to Extrinsic Evidence in Capital Proceedings Introduction State of Arizona v. Henry William Hall is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Premeditation in First Degree Murder

Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Premeditation in First Degree Murder

Date: Mar 13, 2003
Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Premeditation in First Degree Murder Introduction The Arizona Supreme Court, in the landmark case of State of Arizona v. Larry D. Thompson (2003), addressed the...
Clarifying the Implied Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege in Excess Liability Bad Faith Actions: Twin City Fire Insurance Co. v. Burke

Clarifying the Implied Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege in Excess Liability Bad Faith Actions: Twin City Fire Insurance Co. v. Burke

Date: Feb 19, 2003
Clarifying the Implied Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege in Excess Liability Bad Faith Actions: Twin City Fire Insurance Co. v. Burke Supreme Court of Arizona, February 18, 2003 Introduction The...
Termination of Parental Rights under A.R.S. § 8-533: Comprehensive Analysis of JESUS M. and YOLANDA M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security

Termination of Parental Rights under A.R.S. § 8-533: Comprehensive Analysis of JESUS M. and YOLANDA M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security

Date: Sep 6, 2002
Termination of Parental Rights under A.R.S. § 8-533: Comprehensive Analysis of JESUS M. and YOLANDA M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security Introduction In the landmark case of JESUS M. and...
Clarifying Waiver Standards: Arizona Supreme Court's Ruling on Rule 32.2(a)(3)

Clarifying Waiver Standards: Arizona Supreme Court's Ruling on Rule 32.2(a)(3)

Date: May 31, 2002
Clarifying Waiver Standards: Arizona Supreme Court's Ruling on Rule 32.2(a)(3) Introduction In the landmark case TERRY L. STEWART, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Petitioner, v. ROBERT...
State of Arizona v. Arturo Anda Canez: Affirmation and Partial Reversal of Capital Sentencing

State of Arizona v. Arturo Anda Canez: Affirmation and Partial Reversal of Capital Sentencing

Date: Feb 15, 2002
State of Arizona v. Arturo Anda Canez: Affirmation and Partial Reversal of Capital Sentencing Introduction In the landmark case of State of Arizona v. Arturo Anda Canez, the Supreme Court of Arizona...
State v. Lehr: Reinforcing Defendant's Right to Confront Adverse Witnesses in the Context of DNA Evidence

State v. Lehr: Reinforcing Defendant's Right to Confront Adverse Witnesses in the Context of DNA Evidence

Date: Jan 31, 2002
State v. Lehr: Reinforcing Defendant's Right to Confront Adverse Witnesses in the Context of DNA Evidence Introduction State of Arizona v. Scott Alan Lehr is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Arizona Supreme Court Reaffirms Invited Error Doctrine in Jury Instruction Challenges

Arizona Supreme Court Reaffirms Invited Error Doctrine in Jury Instruction Challenges

Date: Sep 7, 2001
Arizona Supreme Court Reaffirms Invited Error Doctrine in Jury Instruction Challenges Introduction In the case of State of Arizona v. Michael Philip Logan (2001), the Supreme Court of Arizona...
Arizona Supreme Court Establishes 120-Hour Survival Rule for Life Insurance Beneficiaries in UNUM Life Insurance Co. v. Craig

Arizona Supreme Court Establishes 120-Hour Survival Rule for Life Insurance Beneficiaries in UNUM Life Insurance Co. v. Craig

Date: Jul 18, 2001
Arizona Supreme Court Establishes 120-Hour Survival Rule for Life Insurance Beneficiaries in UNUM Life Insurance Company of America v. Craig Introduction The case of UNUM Life Insurance Company of...
State v. Nordstrom: Affirmation of Death Sentence and Upholding Evidentiary Standards in Capital Murder

State v. Nordstrom: Affirmation of Death Sentence and Upholding Evidentiary Standards in Capital Murder

Date: Jun 22, 2001
State v. Nordstrom: Affirmation of Death Sentence and Upholding Evidentiary Standards in Capital Murder Introduction In the landmark case of State of Arizona v. Scott Douglas Nordstrom, the Supreme...
Reaffirmation of Pecuniary Gain as an Aggravating Factor in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of State v. Hoskins

Reaffirmation of Pecuniary Gain as an Aggravating Factor in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of State v. Hoskins

Date: Dec 30, 2000
Reaffirmation of Pecuniary Gain as an Aggravating Factor in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of State of Arizona v. Aaron Scott Hoskins Introduction In State of Arizona v. Aaron Scott Hoskins (199 Ariz....
Revisiting Hearsay and Confrontation Rights: State v. Stephanie Bass

Revisiting Hearsay and Confrontation Rights: State v. Stephanie Bass

Date: Nov 10, 2000
Revisiting Hearsay and Confrontation Rights: State of Arizona v. Stephanie Lynn Bass Introduction State of Arizona v. Stephanie Lynn Bass is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Arizona...
Defendant's Right to Effective Counsel in Plea Bargaining and Judicial Remedies in Arizona

Defendant's Right to Effective Counsel in Plea Bargaining and Judicial Remedies in Arizona

Date: Sep 27, 2000
Defendant's Right to Effective Counsel in Plea Bargaining and Judicial Remedies in Arizona Introduction The case of State of Arizona v. Victor Gene Donald, adjudicated by the Court of Appeals of...
Equitable Division of CSRS and Social Security Benefits: Arizona Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling

Equitable Division of CSRS and Social Security Benefits: Arizona Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling

Date: Sep 15, 2000
Equitable Division of CSRS and Social Security Benefits: Arizona Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling Introduction The case of In re the Marriage of Byron Kelly v. Corinne Kelly, decided by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Convictions and Admissibility of Prior Consistent Statements in STATE v. JONES

Affirmation of Convictions and Admissibility of Prior Consistent Statements in STATE v. JONES

Date: Jun 16, 2000
Affirmation of Convictions and Admissibility of Prior Consistent Statements in State of Arizona v. Robert Glen Jones, Jr. Introduction State of Arizona v. Robert Glen Jones, Jr., 197 Ariz. 290, is a...
Abandonment Defined as Conduct-Based in Parental Rights Severance: MICHAEL J. v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECurity

Abandonment Defined as Conduct-Based in Parental Rights Severance: MICHAEL J. v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECurity

Date: Mar 31, 2000
Abandonment Defined as Conduct-Based in Parental Rights Severance: MICHAEL J. v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECurity Introduction The case of MICHAEL J. v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECurity...
Arizona Supreme Court Reaffirms Insurer's Duty of Good Faith Beyond Fair Debatability in First-Party Bad Faith Claims

Arizona Supreme Court Reaffirms Insurer's Duty of Good Faith Beyond Fair Debatability in First-Party Bad Faith Claims

Date: Mar 4, 2000
Arizona Supreme Court Reaffirms Insurer's Duty of Good Faith Beyond Fair Debatability in First-Party Bad Faith Claims Introduction The case of Kimberly K. Zilisch v. State Farm Mutual Automobile...
State of Arizona v. Greg David Templin: Clarifying the Insanity Defense

State of Arizona v. Greg David Templin: Clarifying the Insanity Defense

Date: Aug 28, 1999
State of Arizona v. Greg David Templin: Clarifying the Insanity Defense Introduction In State of Arizona v. Greg David Templin (1999), the Court of Appeals of Arizona addressed pivotal issues...
Arizona Supreme Court Rules Restrictive Covenants Between Physicians Unenforceable on Public Policy Grounds

Arizona Supreme Court Rules Restrictive Covenants Between Physicians Unenforceable on Public Policy Grounds

Date: Jun 19, 1999
Arizona Supreme Court Rules Restrictive Covenants Between Physicians Unenforceable on Public Policy Grounds Introduction In the landmark case of VALLEY MEDICAL SPECIALISTS v. FARBER, the Supreme...
Reaffirming Standards for Admissibility of Prior Conduct and DNA Evidence in Capital Murder Cases

Reaffirming Standards for Admissibility of Prior Conduct and DNA Evidence in Capital Murder Cases

Date: Jun 19, 1999
Reaffirming Standards for Admissibility of Prior Conduct and DNA Evidence in Capital Murder Cases Introduction In the landmark case State of Arizona v. James Van Adams (194 Ariz. 408), decided on...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert