Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Arizona Case Commentaries

Termination of Parental Rights: ADES v. Oscar O. Establishes Clear Precedent for Severance in Best Interests of Child

Termination of Parental Rights: ADES v. Oscar O. Establishes Clear Precedent for Severance in Best Interests of Child

Date: Dec 1, 2004
Termination of Parental Rights: ADES v. Oscar O. Establishes Clear Precedent for Severance in Best Interests of Child Introduction The case of Arizona Department of Economic Security (ADES) and two...
Expansion of Rule 404(c): Admissibility of Sexual Assaults Against Adults in Aberrant Sexual Propensity Cases in Arizona

Expansion of Rule 404(c): Admissibility of Sexual Assaults Against Adults in Aberrant Sexual Propensity Cases in Arizona

Date: Sep 17, 2004
Expansion of Rule 404(c): Admissibility of Sexual Assaults Against Adults in Aberrant Sexual Propensity Cases in Arizona Introduction In State of Arizona v. Aguilar, 209 Ariz. 40 (2004), the Supreme...
Ensuring Jury Participation in Death Penalty Sentencing: STATE v. MOODY

Ensuring Jury Participation in Death Penalty Sentencing: STATE v. MOODY

Date: Aug 10, 2004
Ensuring Jury Participation in Death Penalty Sentencing: STATE v. MOODY Introduction State of Arizona v. Robert Joe Moody, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Arizona en banc on August 9, 2004, is a...
Remand for Hearing on Substitution of Counsel: STATE v. Victor Torres

Remand for Hearing on Substitution of Counsel: STATE v. Victor Torres

Date: Jul 2, 2004
Remand for Hearing on Substitution of Counsel: STATE v. Victor Torres Introduction In STATE of Arizona v. Victor Torres, 208 Ariz. 340 (2004), the Supreme Court of Arizona addressed a critical issue...
Individualized Assessment Mandated for Juvenile Death Penalty Eligibility under Arizona's Automatic Filing Statute

Individualized Assessment Mandated for Juvenile Death Penalty Eligibility under Arizona's Automatic Filing Statute

Date: Feb 18, 2004
Individualized Assessment Mandated for Juvenile Death Penalty Eligibility under Arizona's Automatic Filing Statute Introduction In the landmark case State of Arizona v. James Edward Davolt II (207...
Same Cause Doctrine in Parental Rights Termination: Mary Lou C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security

Same Cause Doctrine in Parental Rights Termination: Mary Lou C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security

Date: Jan 28, 2004
Same Cause Doctrine in Parental Rights Termination: Mary Lou C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security Introduction The case of Mary Lou C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, adjudicated...
Accrual of Legal Malpractice Cause of Action in Criminal Litigation: GLAZE v. LARSEN

Accrual of Legal Malpractice Cause of Action in Criminal Litigation: GLAZE v. LARSEN

Date: Jan 15, 2004
Accrual of Legal Malpractice Cause of Action in Criminal Litigation: GLAZE v. LARSEN Introduction GLAZE v. LARSEN is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of Arizona on January 14, 2004. The...
Arizona Supreme Court Reinforces Strict Standing Requirements for Legislative Challenges to Executive Vetoes

Arizona Supreme Court Reinforces Strict Standing Requirements for Legislative Challenges to Executive Vetoes

Date: Dec 5, 2003
Arizona Supreme Court Reinforces Strict Standing Requirements for Legislative Challenges to Executive Vetoes 1. Introduction The case of Bennett et al. v. Napolitano, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Broad Interpretation of Interlocutory Appeals under A.R.S. § 12-2101(G): Bilke et al. v. Dually – A New Precedent

Broad Interpretation of Interlocutory Appeals under A.R.S. § 12-2101(G): Bilke et al. v. Dually – A New Precedent

Date: Dec 5, 2003
Broad Interpretation of Interlocutory Appeals under A.R.S. § 12-2101(G): Bilke et al. v. Dually – A New Precedent Introduction The case Bilke et al. v. Dually before the Supreme Court of Arizona,...
Arizona Supreme Court Limits Mandatory Sentencing for Sexual Misconduct with Minors

Arizona Supreme Court Limits Mandatory Sentencing for Sexual Misconduct with Minors

Date: Oct 31, 2003
Arizona Supreme Court Limits Mandatory Sentencing for Sexual Misconduct with Minors Introduction In the landmark case of State of Arizona v. Anthony Charles Davis (206 Ariz. 377, 2003), the Arizona...
Jury Coercion and Improper Court Instructions: Insights from State v. Huerstel

Jury Coercion and Improper Court Instructions: Insights from State v. Huerstel

Date: Sep 3, 2003
Jury Coercion and Improper Court Instructions: Insights from State v. Huerstel Introduction State of Arizona, Appellee, v. Christopher Bo Huerstel is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Arizona Supreme Court Reaffirms Felony Murder Rule While Reversing Premeditated Murder Convictions: State of Arizona v. Brian Jeffrey Dann

Arizona Supreme Court Reaffirms Felony Murder Rule While Reversing Premeditated Murder Convictions: State of Arizona v. Brian Jeffrey Dann

Date: Aug 15, 2003
Arizona Supreme Court Reaffirms Felony Murder Rule While Reversing Premeditated Murder Convictions: State of Arizona v. Brian Jeffrey Dann Introduction In the landmark case of State of Arizona v....
Affirming Judicial Discretion in Denying Continuance for Self-Representation: Insights from State v. Lamar

Affirming Judicial Discretion in Denying Continuance for Self-Representation: Insights from State v. Lamar

Date: Jul 18, 2003
Affirming Judicial Discretion in Denying Continuance for Self-Representation: Insights from State v. Lamar Introduction State of Arizona v. Christopher George Theodore Lamar (2003) is a seminal case...
Arizona Supreme Court Holds Strict Compliance Mandatory for Exercising Lease Purchase Options; Equitable Relief Limited

Arizona Supreme Court Holds Strict Compliance Mandatory for Exercising Lease Purchase Options; Equitable Relief Limited

Date: May 21, 2003
Arizona Supreme Court Holds Strict Compliance Mandatory for Exercising Lease Purchase Options; Equitable Relief Limited Introduction In the landmark case of Jeffrey L. Andrews v. Leslie W. Blake and...
Arizona Supreme Court Abolishes Huerta: Embracing Harmless Error in Peremptory Challenge Usage

Arizona Supreme Court Abolishes Huerta: Embracing Harmless Error in Peremptory Challenge Usage

Date: May 20, 2003
Arizona Supreme Court Abolishes Huerta: Embracing Harmless Error in Peremptory Challenge Usage Introduction In the landmark case of State of Arizona v. Robert Dwight Hickman, the Arizona Supreme...
Arizona Supreme Court Establishes Stricter Standards for Capital Sentencing: State v. Eugene Robert Tucker

Arizona Supreme Court Establishes Stricter Standards for Capital Sentencing: State v. Eugene Robert Tucker

Date: May 6, 2003
Arizona Supreme Court Establishes Stricter Standards for Capital Sentencing: State v. Eugene Robert Tucker Introduction In the landmark case of State of Arizona v. Eugene Robert Tucker, decided on...
Sanctions in Child Custody Cases: Balancing Court Authority and Child's Best Interests

Sanctions in Child Custody Cases: Balancing Court Authority and Child's Best Interests

Date: Apr 26, 2003
Sanctions in Child Custody Cases: Balancing Court Authority and Child's Best Interests Introduction The case of Elizabeth K. Hays v. The Honorable J. Richard Gama delves into the complex interplay...
Arizona Supreme Court Establishes Precedent for Enhancing Sentences with Low-Level Narcotics Convictions

Arizona Supreme Court Establishes Precedent for Enhancing Sentences with Low-Level Narcotics Convictions

Date: Apr 19, 2003
Arizona Supreme Court Establishes Precedent for Enhancing Sentences with Low-Level Narcotics Convictions Introduction In the landmark case of State of Arizona v. James Earl Christian, the Supreme...
Arizona Supreme Court Affirms Admissibility of Entire Prior Inconsistent Statements under Rule 613(b) in State v. Rutledge

Arizona Supreme Court Affirms Admissibility of Entire Prior Inconsistent Statements under Rule 613(b) in State v. Rutledge

Date: Apr 8, 2003
Arizona Supreme Court Affirms Admissibility of Entire Prior Inconsistent Statements under Rule 613(b) in State of Arizona v. Sherman Lee Rutledge Introduction In State of Arizona v. Sherman Lee...
Requiring Jury Findings in Capital Sentencing: Arizona Supreme Court's Interpretation Post Ring II

Requiring Jury Findings in Capital Sentencing: Arizona Supreme Court's Interpretation Post Ring II

Date: Apr 4, 2003
Requiring Jury Findings in Capital Sentencing: Arizona Supreme Court's Interpretation Post Ring II Introduction The case of State of Arizona v. Timothy Stuart Ring et al. (2003) addressed pivotal...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert