Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Arizona Case Commentaries

BENNETT v. BROWNLOW: Standing and First Amendment Implications in Public Forum Ordinances

BENNETT v. BROWNLOW: Standing and First Amendment Implications in Public Forum Ordinances

Date: Sep 10, 2005
BENNETT v. BROWNLOW: Standing and First Amendment Implications in Public Forum Ordinances Introduction BENNETT v. BROWNLOW is a significant case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Arizona on...
Cromwell v. Arizona: Upholding the 'Heinous, Cruel or Depraved' Aggravator and Counsel Substitution Standards

Cromwell v. Arizona: Upholding the 'Heinous, Cruel or Depraved' Aggravator and Counsel Substitution Standards

Date: Aug 18, 2005
Cromwell v. Arizona: Upholding the 'Heinous, Cruel or Depraved' Aggravator and Counsel Substitution Standards Introduction In the landmark case of State of Arizona v. Robert Louis Cromwell (211 Ariz....
Affirmation of Death Sentencing and Procedural Standards in State of Arizona v. Richard J. Glassel

Affirmation of Death Sentencing and Procedural Standards in State of Arizona v. Richard J. Glassel

Date: Aug 11, 2005
Affirmation of Death Sentencing and Procedural Standards in State of Arizona v. Richard J. Glassel Introduction State of Arizona v. Richard J. Glassel is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
No Right to Compel Discovery Without Filed Petition: CANION v. COLE

No Right to Compel Discovery Without Filed Petition: CANION v. COLE

Date: Jul 22, 2005
No Right to Compel Discovery Without Filed Petition: CANION v. COLE Introduction In the landmark case of Dennis Wayne Canion v. The Honorable David R. Cole, the Supreme Court of Arizona addressed a...
Martinez v. Arizona: Balancing Jury Findings and Judicial Discretion in Felony Sentencing

Martinez v. Arizona: Balancing Jury Findings and Judicial Discretion in Felony Sentencing

Date: Jul 9, 2005
Martinez v. Arizona: Balancing Jury Findings and Judicial Discretion in Felony Sentencing Introduction State of Arizona v. Pablo Arciniega Martinez, 210 Ariz. 578, is a landmark decision by the...
Fundamental Error Review in Sentencing: The Precedent Set by STATE of Arizona v. Robert Allen Henderson

Fundamental Error Review in Sentencing: The Precedent Set by STATE of Arizona v. Robert Allen Henderson

Date: Jul 9, 2005
Fundamental Error Review in Sentencing: The Precedent Set by STATE of Arizona v. Robert Allen Henderson Introduction The case of STATE of Arizona v. Robert Allen Henderson, decided by the Supreme...
Arizona Supreme Court Reinforces First Amendment Protections Against Tort Claims for Media Publications

Arizona Supreme Court Reinforces First Amendment Protections Against Tort Claims for Media Publications

Date: Jul 2, 2005
Arizona Supreme Court Reinforces First Amendment Protections Against Tort Claims for Media Publications Introduction In the landmark case CITIZEN PUBLISHING CO. v. Hon. Leslie Miller, the Supreme...
Affirmation of Capital Sentencing Procedures and Aggravating Factors Evaluation in Arizona: STATE v. ANDERSON

Affirmation of Capital Sentencing Procedures and Aggravating Factors Evaluation in Arizona: STATE v. ANDERSON

Date: May 5, 2005
Affirmation of Capital Sentencing Procedures and Aggravating Factors Evaluation in Arizona: STATE v. ANDERSON Introduction In the landmark case State of Arizona v. Frank Winfield Anderson, the...
Standard of Proof in Parental Rights Termination: Insights from Kent K. v. Bobby M.

Standard of Proof in Parental Rights Termination: Insights from Kent K. v. Bobby M.

Date: Apr 29, 2005
Standard of Proof in Parental Rights Termination: Insights from Kent K. v. Bobby M. Introduction The case of Kent K. and Sherry K., Appellants, v. Bobby M. and Leeh M., Appellees, adjudicated by the...
Arizona Supreme Court Protects Attorneys Negotiating Morris Agreements from Tortious Interference Claims

Arizona Supreme Court Protects Attorneys Negotiating Morris Agreements from Tortious Interference Claims

Date: Feb 25, 2005
Arizona Supreme Court Protects Attorneys Negotiating Morris Agreements from Tortious Interference Claims Introduction The case of Safeway Insurance Company, Inc. v. Peter A. Guerrero (210 Ariz. 5,...
Separate Convictions for Resisting Arrest and Escape Affirmed in State of Arizona v. Sudden Rio Stroud

Separate Convictions for Resisting Arrest and Escape Affirmed in State of Arizona v. Sudden Rio Stroud

Date: Jan 8, 2005
Separate Convictions for Resisting Arrest and Escape Affirmed in State of Arizona v. Sudden Rio Stroud Introduction State of Arizona v. Sudden Rio Stroud is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Termination of Parental Rights: ADES v. Oscar O. Establishes Clear Precedent for Severance in Best Interests of Child

Termination of Parental Rights: ADES v. Oscar O. Establishes Clear Precedent for Severance in Best Interests of Child

Date: Dec 1, 2004
Termination of Parental Rights: ADES v. Oscar O. Establishes Clear Precedent for Severance in Best Interests of Child Introduction The case of Arizona Department of Economic Security (ADES) and two...
Expansion of Rule 404(c): Admissibility of Sexual Assaults Against Adults in Aberrant Sexual Propensity Cases in Arizona

Expansion of Rule 404(c): Admissibility of Sexual Assaults Against Adults in Aberrant Sexual Propensity Cases in Arizona

Date: Sep 17, 2004
Expansion of Rule 404(c): Admissibility of Sexual Assaults Against Adults in Aberrant Sexual Propensity Cases in Arizona Introduction In State of Arizona v. Aguilar, 209 Ariz. 40 (2004), the Supreme...
Ensuring Jury Participation in Death Penalty Sentencing: STATE v. MOODY

Ensuring Jury Participation in Death Penalty Sentencing: STATE v. MOODY

Date: Aug 10, 2004
Ensuring Jury Participation in Death Penalty Sentencing: STATE v. MOODY Introduction State of Arizona v. Robert Joe Moody, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Arizona en banc on August 9, 2004, is a...
Remand for Hearing on Substitution of Counsel: STATE v. Victor Torres

Remand for Hearing on Substitution of Counsel: STATE v. Victor Torres

Date: Jul 2, 2004
Remand for Hearing on Substitution of Counsel: STATE v. Victor Torres Introduction In STATE of Arizona v. Victor Torres, 208 Ariz. 340 (2004), the Supreme Court of Arizona addressed a critical issue...
Individualized Assessment Mandated for Juvenile Death Penalty Eligibility under Arizona's Automatic Filing Statute

Individualized Assessment Mandated for Juvenile Death Penalty Eligibility under Arizona's Automatic Filing Statute

Date: Feb 18, 2004
Individualized Assessment Mandated for Juvenile Death Penalty Eligibility under Arizona's Automatic Filing Statute Introduction In the landmark case State of Arizona v. James Edward Davolt II (207...
Same Cause Doctrine in Parental Rights Termination: Mary Lou C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security

Same Cause Doctrine in Parental Rights Termination: Mary Lou C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security

Date: Jan 28, 2004
Same Cause Doctrine in Parental Rights Termination: Mary Lou C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security Introduction The case of Mary Lou C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, adjudicated...
Accrual of Legal Malpractice Cause of Action in Criminal Litigation: GLAZE v. LARSEN

Accrual of Legal Malpractice Cause of Action in Criminal Litigation: GLAZE v. LARSEN

Date: Jan 15, 2004
Accrual of Legal Malpractice Cause of Action in Criminal Litigation: GLAZE v. LARSEN Introduction GLAZE v. LARSEN is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of Arizona on January 14, 2004. The...
Arizona Supreme Court Reinforces Strict Standing Requirements for Legislative Challenges to Executive Vetoes

Arizona Supreme Court Reinforces Strict Standing Requirements for Legislative Challenges to Executive Vetoes

Date: Dec 5, 2003
Arizona Supreme Court Reinforces Strict Standing Requirements for Legislative Challenges to Executive Vetoes 1. Introduction The case of Bennett et al. v. Napolitano, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Broad Interpretation of Interlocutory Appeals under A.R.S. § 12-2101(G): Bilke et al. v. Dually – A New Precedent

Broad Interpretation of Interlocutory Appeals under A.R.S. § 12-2101(G): Bilke et al. v. Dually – A New Precedent

Date: Dec 5, 2003
Broad Interpretation of Interlocutory Appeals under A.R.S. § 12-2101(G): Bilke et al. v. Dually – A New Precedent Introduction The case Bilke et al. v. Dually before the Supreme Court of Arizona,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert