Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Arizona Case Commentaries

Severability of Aggravating Circumstances in Death Penalty Sentencing: STATE v. PANDELI

Severability of Aggravating Circumstances in Death Penalty Sentencing: STATE v. PANDELI

Date: Jul 13, 2007
Severability of Aggravating Circumstances in Death Penalty Sentencing: STATE v. PANDELI Introduction State of Arizona v. Darrel Peter Pandeli is a landmark judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Death Penalty Sentencing Standards in Ruben Garza Case

Affirmation of Death Penalty Sentencing Standards in Ruben Garza Case

Date: Jun 30, 2007
Affirmation of Death Penalty Sentencing Standards in Ruben Garza Case Introduction The case of STATE of Arizona v. Ruben Garza revolves around the conviction and sentencing of Ruben Garza for two...
State v. Cory Deonn Morris: Affirmation of Death Sentence and Validation of Corpus Delicti Doctrine

State v. Cory Deonn Morris: Affirmation of Death Sentence and Validation of Corpus Delicti Doctrine

Date: Jun 19, 2007
State v. Cory Deonn Morris: Affirmation of Death Sentence and Validation of Corpus Delicti Doctrine Introduction The case of State of Arizona v. Cory Deonn Morris (215 Ariz. 324) represents a...
State of Arizona v. Tucker: Affirming Capital Sentencing Standards and Harmless Error Doctrine

State of Arizona v. Tucker: Affirming Capital Sentencing Standards and Harmless Error Doctrine

Date: Jun 14, 2007
State of Arizona v. Tucker: Affirming Capital Sentencing Standards and Harmless Error Doctrine Introduction The case State of Arizona, Appellee, v. Eugene Robert Tucker, Appellant (215 Ariz. 298)...
Legislative Authority in Restitution Payments: Insights from STATE v. HANSEN

Legislative Authority in Restitution Payments: Insights from STATE v. HANSEN

Date: May 31, 2007
Legislative Authority in Restitution Payments: Insights from STATE v. HANSEN Introduction State of Arizona v. Karen Marie Hansen, 215 Ariz. 287 (2007), addressed a significant conflict between...
Ensuring Voluntary Admissions: The Imperative of Plea-Type Colloquy Under Arizona Rule 17.6 in Stipulated Prior Convictions

Ensuring Voluntary Admissions: The Imperative of Plea-Type Colloquy Under Arizona Rule 17.6 in Stipulated Prior Convictions

Date: May 9, 2007
Ensuring Voluntary Admissions: The Imperative of Plea-Type Colloquy Under Arizona Rule 17.6 in Stipulated Prior Convictions Introduction The case of State of Arizona v. Mauricio Morales represents a...
Reynaga v. Rayes: Establishing Boundaries for Reinstatement of Expired Plea Offers

Reynaga v. Rayes: Establishing Boundaries for Reinstatement of Expired Plea Offers

Date: Mar 21, 2007
Reynaga v. Rayes: Establishing Boundaries for Reinstatement of Expired Plea Offers Introduction Reynaga v. Rayes, decided by the Supreme Court of Arizona on March 20, 2007, addresses a pivotal issue...
Deer Valley Unified SD No. 97 v. McDonald: Enforcing Specific Settlement Amounts in Notice of Claim Letters

Deer Valley Unified SD No. 97 v. McDonald: Enforcing Specific Settlement Amounts in Notice of Claim Letters

Date: Feb 27, 2007
Deer Valley Unified SD No. 97 v. McDonald: Enforcing Specific Settlement Amounts in Notice of Claim Letters Introduction Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. McDonald is a landmark case...
Establishing Duty of Care in Prescription Drug Distribution: Insights from GIPSON v. KASEY

Establishing Duty of Care in Prescription Drug Distribution: Insights from GIPSON v. KASEY

Date: Jan 23, 2007
Establishing Duty of Care in Prescription Drug Distribution: Insights from GIPSON v. KASEY Introduction The Supreme Court of Arizona in Susan Gipson, Individually and as Surviving Parent of Nathan...
Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel: Bennett v. State of Arizona Establishes New Precedent

Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel: Bennett v. State of Arizona Establishes New Precedent

Date: Nov 10, 2006
Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel: Bennett v. State of Arizona Establishes New Precedent Introduction In State of Arizona v. Donna Jean Bennett (213 Ariz. 562, 2006), the Supreme Court of...
Proper Service of Notice of Claim on Chief Executive Officers of Public Entities: Insights from Guadalupe FALCON v. MARICOPA COUNTY

Proper Service of Notice of Claim on Chief Executive Officers of Public Entities: Insights from Guadalupe FALCON v. MARICOPA COUNTY

Date: Oct 27, 2006
Proper Service of Notice of Claim on Chief Executive Officers of Public Entities: Insights from Guadalupe FALCON v. MARICOPA COUNTY Introduction The case of Guadalupe Falcon, Deceased, by and through...
State of Arizona v. Tracy Allen Hampton: Upholding Death Sentences in Multiple Homicides

State of Arizona v. Tracy Allen Hampton: Upholding Death Sentences in Multiple Homicides

Date: Aug 16, 2006
State of Arizona v. Tracy Allen Hampton: Upholding Death Sentences in Multiple Homicides Introduction State of Arizona v. Tracy Allen Hampton is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Arizona...
Affirmation of Rebuttal Hearsay Admissibility in Capital Sentencing: State v. McGill (213 Ariz. 147)

Affirmation of Rebuttal Hearsay Admissibility in Capital Sentencing: State v. McGill (213 Ariz. 147)

Date: Aug 15, 2006
Affirmation of Rebuttal Hearsay Admissibility in Capital Sentencing: State v. McGill (213 Ariz. 147) Introduction Case Overview: State of Arizona v. Leroy Dean McGill, 213 Ariz. 147 (2006), is a...
State v. Frank Silva Roque: Clarifying Expert Testimony Disclosure and Aggravating Circumstances in Capital Sentencing

State v. Frank Silva Roque: Clarifying Expert Testimony Disclosure and Aggravating Circumstances in Capital Sentencing

Date: Aug 15, 2006
State v. Frank Silva Roque: Clarifying Expert Testimony Disclosure and Aggravating Circumstances in Capital Sentencing Introduction In the landmark case of State v. Frank Silva Roque, the Supreme...
State of Arizona v. Charles Ellison: Affirmation of Death Sentence and Upholding of Post-Ring II Sentencing Procedures

State of Arizona v. Charles Ellison: Affirmation of Death Sentence and Upholding of Post-Ring II Sentencing Procedures

Date: Aug 10, 2006
State of Arizona v. Charles Ellison: Affirmation of Death Sentence and Upholding of Post-Ring II Sentencing Procedures Introduction State of Arizona v. Charles David Ellison is a pivotal case...
Proportionate Sentencing in Child Pornography Cases: An Analysis of STATE v. BERGER

Proportionate Sentencing in Child Pornography Cases: An Analysis of STATE v. BERGER

Date: May 11, 2006
Proportionate Sentencing in Child Pornography Cases: An Analysis of State of Arizona v. Morton Robert Berger Introduction The case of State of Arizona v. Morton Robert Berger, decided by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Capital Sentence in STATE of Arizona v. Johnson: Establishing Witness Elimination as a Sufficient Aggravating Factor

Affirmation of Capital Sentence in STATE of Arizona v. Johnson: Establishing Witness Elimination as a Sufficient Aggravating Factor

Date: May 10, 2006
Affirmation of Capital Sentence in STATE of Arizona v. Johnson: Establishing Witness Elimination as a Sufficient Aggravating Factor Introduction In STATE of Arizona v. Ruben Myran Johnson (212 Ariz....
Expansion of Legislative Removal Powers: Da v. d Burnell Smith

Expansion of Legislative Removal Powers: Da v. d Burnell Smith

Date: May 4, 2006
Expansion of Legislative Removal Powers: Da v. d Burnell Smith Introduction In the landmark case of Da v. d Burnell Smith, the Supreme Court of Arizona addressed pivotal issues surrounding the...
State v. Ste: Upholding Miranda Standards and Capital Sentencing in Arizona

State v. Ste: Upholding Miranda Standards and Capital Sentencing in Arizona

Date: Apr 27, 2006
State v. Ste: Upholding Miranda Standards and Capital Sentencing in Arizona Introduction In the landmark case of STATE of Arizona v. Ste (212 Ariz. 389), the Supreme Court of Arizona addressed...
Defending the Right to Lesser-Included Offense Instructions: Insights from State v. Wall

Defending the Right to Lesser-Included Offense Instructions: Insights from State v. Wall

Date: Jan 13, 2006
Defending the Right to Lesser-Included Offense Instructions: Insights from State of Arizona v. Emmet Darnell Wall Introduction The Supreme Court of Arizona's decision in State of Arizona v. Emmet...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert