Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Alaska Case Commentaries

Manning v. Alaska Railroad Corporation: Reinterpreting Appellate Rule 602(a)(2) for Administrative Appeals

Manning v. Alaska Railroad Corporation: Reinterpreting Appellate Rule 602(a)(2) for Administrative Appeals

Date: Jul 10, 1993
Manning v. Alaska Railroad Corporation: Reinterpreting Appellate Rule 602(a)(2) for Administrative Appeals Introduction Manning v. Alaska Railroad Corporation, 853 P.2d 1120 (Alaska 1993), addresses...
Fraudulent Residency Verification and Permanent Fund Dividend Eligibility: Handley v. State of Alaska

Fraudulent Residency Verification and Permanent Fund Dividend Eligibility: Handley v. State of Alaska

Date: Sep 19, 1992
Fraudulent Residency Verification and Permanent Fund Dividend Eligibility: Handley v. State of Alaska Introduction In the landmark case of Joseph E. Handley v. State of Alaska, Department of Revenue...
Application of Presumption of Compensability and Evidentiary Rules in Alaska Workers' Compensation Cases: Adamson v. University of Alaska

Application of Presumption of Compensability and Evidentiary Rules in Alaska Workers' Compensation Cases: Adamson v. University of Alaska

Date: Nov 2, 1991
Application of Presumption of Compensability and Evidentiary Rules in Alaska Workers' Compensation Cases: Adamson v. University of Alaska Introduction Connie Adamson v. University of Alaska (819 P.2d...
Economic Necessity Validates Summary Judgment in Wrongful Termination: Braun v. Alaska Commercial

Economic Necessity Validates Summary Judgment in Wrongful Termination: Braun v. Alaska Commercial

Date: Aug 3, 1991
Economic Necessity Validates Summary Judgment in Wrongful Termination: Braun v. Alaska Commercial Introduction Donald J. Braun, Appellant, v. Alaska Commercial Fishing and Agriculture Bank, Appellee...
Material Misrepresentations and Good Faith in Insurance Claims: A Comprehensive Analysis of Petersen v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York

Material Misrepresentations and Good Faith in Insurance Claims: A Comprehensive Analysis of Petersen v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York

Date: Dec 15, 1990
Material Misrepresentations and Good Faith in Insurance Claims: A Comprehensive Analysis of Petersen v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York Introduction The case A. Lee Petersen v. Mutual Life...
Broadening the Crime-Fraud Exception: Analysis of CENTRAL CONSTRUCTION v. THE HOME INDEMNITY COMPANY

Broadening the Crime-Fraud Exception: Analysis of CENTRAL CONSTRUCTION v. THE HOME INDEMNITY COMPANY

Date: Jul 3, 1990
Broadening the Crime-Fraud Exception: Analysis of CENTRAL CONSTRUCTION v. THE HOME INDEMNITY COMPANY Introduction The case of CENTRAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Manson Construction Engineering Company,...
State Farm v. Nicholson: Alaska Recognizes Breach of Good Faith as Tort in First-Party Insurance Claims

State Farm v. Nicholson: Alaska Recognizes Breach of Good Faith as Tort in First-Party Insurance Claims

Date: Aug 25, 1989
State Farm v. Nicholson: Alaska Recognizes Breach of Good Faith as Tort in First-Party Insurance Claims Introduction In the landmark case of State Farm Fire Casualty Company v. David G. Nicholson and...
Inapplicability of Laches and Enhanced Criteria for Rule 56(f) in Summary Judgment Proceedings: Insights from Munn v. Bristol Bay Housing Authority

Inapplicability of Laches and Enhanced Criteria for Rule 56(f) in Summary Judgment Proceedings: Insights from Munn v. Bristol Bay Housing Authority

Date: Jul 1, 1989
Inapplicability of Laches and Enhanced Criteria for Rule 56(f) in Summary Judgment Proceedings: Insights from Munn v. Bristol Bay Housing Authority Introduction The case of Steven Munn and Jeannie...
Preservation of Sobriety Test Videotapes as a Due Process Requirement in Alaska Administrative Hearings

Preservation of Sobriety Test Videotapes as a Due Process Requirement in Alaska Administrative Hearings

Date: Jun 16, 1989
Preservation of Sobriety Test Videotapes as a Due Process Requirement in Alaska Administrative Hearings Introduction In the landmark case of Mark J. Thorne v. Department of Public Safety, State of...
State of Alaska v. Darnell Jones: Upholding the Risher Standard and Procedural Integrity in Claims of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

State of Alaska v. Darnell Jones: Upholding the Risher Standard and Procedural Integrity in Claims of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Date: Jul 30, 1988
State of Alaska v. Darnell Jones: Upholding the Risher Standard and Procedural Integrity in Claims of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Introduction In the landmark case of State of Alaska,...
Supreme Court of Alaska Confirms APUC's Comprehensive Jurisdiction Over Refined and Crude Oil Movements

Supreme Court of Alaska Confirms APUC's Comprehensive Jurisdiction Over Refined and Crude Oil Movements

Date: Dec 5, 1987
Supreme Court of Alaska Confirms APUC's Comprehensive Jurisdiction Over Refined and Crude Oil Movements Introduction The case of Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Company v. Kenai Pipe Line Company and State...
Legislative Immunity and Qualified Immunity: Insights from Breck v. Assembly Members

Legislative Immunity and Qualified Immunity: Insights from Breck v. Assembly Members

Date: Nov 7, 1987
Legislative Immunity and Qualified Immunity: Insights from Breck v. Assembly Members Introduction In the landmark case of Breck v. Frances Anne Ulmer et al., decided by the Supreme Court of Alaska on...
Unconscionability of Exculpatory Clauses in Public Utility Advertising Contracts: Anchorage Telephone Utility v. Phillip Locker

Unconscionability of Exculpatory Clauses in Public Utility Advertising Contracts: Anchorage Telephone Utility v. Phillip Locker

Date: Aug 23, 1986
Unconscionability of Exculpatory Clauses in Public Utility Advertising Contracts: Anchorage Telephone Utility v. Phillip Locker Introduction The case of Municipality of Anchorage, d/b/a The Anchorage...
Mandatory Electronic Recording of Custodial Interrogations: Upholding Due Process in Alaska

Mandatory Electronic Recording of Custodial Interrogations: Upholding Due Process in Alaska

Date: Dec 7, 1985
Mandatory Electronic Recording of Custodial Interrogations: Upholding Due Process in Alaska Introduction The landmark case of Donald Stephan, Petitioner, v. State of Alaska, along with Malcolm Scott...
Discretionary Application of Consecutive Sentences in Multiple Sexual Assault Convictions: Alaska Court of Appeals Decision

Discretionary Application of Consecutive Sentences in Multiple Sexual Assault Convictions: Alaska Court of Appeals Decision

Date: Sep 7, 1985
Discretionary Application of Consecutive Sentences in Multiple Sexual Assault Convictions: Alaska Court of Appeals Decision Introduction In the pivotal case of State of Alaska v. Peter Andrews, Sr....
Zeman v. Lufthansa: Redefining Oral Contracts and Promissory Estoppel in Alaska's Supreme Court

Zeman v. Lufthansa: Redefining Oral Contracts and Promissory Estoppel in Alaska's Supreme Court

Date: May 18, 1985
Zeman v. Lufthansa: Redefining Oral Contracts and Promissory Estoppel in Alaska's Supreme Court Introduction The case of Adolf Zeman, d/b/a A.Z. Construction, versus Lufthansa German Airlines, A...
Supreme Court of Alaska Overrules Crisp: Redefining Attorney's Fees under Appellate Rule 508(e)

Supreme Court of Alaska Overrules Crisp: Redefining Attorney's Fees under Appellate Rule 508(e)

Date: Oct 6, 1984
Supreme Court of Alaska Overrules Crisp: Redefining Attorney's Fees under Appellate Rule 508(e) Introduction In the landmark case Edward Joel Rosen, CPA., Appellant, v. State Board of Public...
Limitation of Dual Burden and Merger of Aggravating Factors in Presumptive Sentencing: JUNEBY v. STATE of Alaska

Limitation of Dual Burden and Merger of Aggravating Factors in Presumptive Sentencing: JUNEBY v. STATE of Alaska

Date: Jun 21, 1983
Limitation of Dual Burden and Merger of Aggravating Factors in Presumptive Sentencing: JUNEBY v. STATE of Alaska Introduction JUNEBY v. STATE of Alaska, 665 P.2d 30 (Alaska Court of Appeals, 1983),...
Equitable Division of Pre-Marital Assets Treated as Joint Property in Wanberg v. Wanberg

Equitable Division of Pre-Marital Assets Treated as Joint Property in Wanberg v. Wanberg

Date: May 14, 1983
Equitable Division of Pre-Marital Assets Treated as Joint Property in Wanberg v. Wanberg Introduction Wanberg v. Wanberg is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Alaska that addresses the...
Alaska Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Protections Against Dedicated Taxes and Improper Tax Delegation in State v. Alex

Alaska Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Protections Against Dedicated Taxes and Improper Tax Delegation in State v. Alex

Date: Apr 24, 1982
Alaska Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Protections Against Dedicated Taxes and Improper Tax Delegation in State of Alaska v. Alex Introduction The case of State of Alaska, Northern Southeast...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert