Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Alaska Case Commentaries

Clarifying the Application of Aggravating and Mitigating Factors in Presumptive Sentencing: Juneby v. State of Alaska

Clarifying the Application of Aggravating and Mitigating Factors in Presumptive Sentencing: Juneby v. State of Alaska

Date: Mar 12, 1982
Clarifying the Application of Aggravating and Mitigating Factors in Presumptive Sentencing: Juneby v. State of Alaska Introduction The case of Ivan Steven Juneby versus the State of Alaska addresses...
Impact of Prosecutorial Misconduct on Defendant's Rights: Analysis of Dorman v. State of Alaska

Impact of Prosecutorial Misconduct on Defendant's Rights: Analysis of Dorman v. State of Alaska

Date: Jan 24, 1981
Impact of Prosecutorial Misconduct on Defendant's Rights: Analysis of Dorman v. State of Alaska, 622 P.2d 448 (1981) Introduction Dorman v. State of Alaska is a seminal case decided by the Supreme...
Alaska Supreme Court Upholds Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act's Application to Debt Collectors

Alaska Supreme Court Upholds Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act's Application to Debt Collectors

Date: Mar 29, 1980
Alaska Supreme Court Upholds Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act's Application to Debt Collectors Introduction The case of State of Alaska v. O'Neill Investigations, Inc. (609 P.2d...
Admissibility of Experimental Evidence Through Substantial Similarity: Stumbaugh v. Alaska

Admissibility of Experimental Evidence Through Substantial Similarity: Stumbaugh v. Alaska

Date: Sep 8, 1979
Admissibility of Experimental Evidence Through Substantial Similarity: Stumbaugh v. Alaska Introduction The case of Ronald Stumbaugh v. State of Alaska (599 P.2d 166) presents a pivotal examination...
Prosecutorial Obligations in Grand Jury Proceedings: Insights from Frink v. State of Alaska

Prosecutorial Obligations in Grand Jury Proceedings: Insights from Frink v. State of Alaska

Date: Jun 30, 1979
Prosecutorial Obligations in Grand Jury Proceedings: Insights from Frink v. State of Alaska 1. Introduction The case of Glenn Matthew Frink v. State of Alaska (597 P.2d 154), adjudicated by the...
Insurer's Liability for Prejudgment Interest Limited to Policy Limits in Alaska

Insurer's Liability for Prejudgment Interest Limited to Policy Limits in Alaska

Date: Mar 17, 1979
Insurer's Liability for Prejudgment Interest Limited to Policy Limits in Alaska Introduction The case of Melba Guin v. Young H. Ha, M.D. (591 P.2d 1281) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Alaska on...
Affirmation of Reasonable Person Standard in Custodial Interrogation: Hunter v. State of Alaska

Affirmation of Reasonable Person Standard in Custodial Interrogation: Hunter v. State of Alaska

Date: Feb 17, 1979
Affirmation of Reasonable Person Standard in Custodial Interrogation: Hunter v. State of Alaska Introduction The case of Harvey Lee Hunter v. State of Alaska (590 P.2d 888, 1979) addresses critical...
Clarifying Narcotics Possession and Defense Representation: Insights from Moreau v. State of Alaska

Clarifying Narcotics Possession and Defense Representation: Insights from Moreau v. State of Alaska

Date: Dec 16, 1978
Defining Narcotics Possession and Ensuring Defense Integrity: Comprehensive Analysis of Moreau v. State of Alaska Introduction The Supreme Court of Alaska, in the landmark case of Moreau v. State of...
Enhanced Privacy Protections Under the Alaska Constitution: STATE OF ALASKA v. THEODORE GLASS

Enhanced Privacy Protections Under the Alaska Constitution: STATE OF ALASKA v. THEODORE GLASS

Date: Sep 16, 1978
Enhanced Privacy Protections Under the Alaska Constitution: STATE OF ALASKA v. THEODORE GLASS Introduction The case of STATE OF ALASKA v. THEODORE GLASS (583 P.2d 872) adjudicated by the Supreme...
Substantial Compliance Suffices for Admissibility of Breathalyzer Results: Oveson v. Municipality of Anchorage

Substantial Compliance Suffices for Admissibility of Breathalyzer Results: Oveson v. Municipality of Anchorage

Date: Feb 4, 1978
Substantial Compliance Suffices for Admissibility of Breathalyzer Results: Oveson v. Municipality of Anchorage Introduction In the landmark case of Walter R. Oveson v. Municipality of Anchorage,...
Classification of Cocaine as a Narcotic: Upholding Equal Protection and Due Process in Alaska

Classification of Cocaine as a Narcotic: Upholding Equal Protection and Due Process in Alaska

Date: Jan 21, 1978
Classification of Cocaine as a Narcotic: Upholding Equal Protection and Due Process in Alaska Introduction In the landmark case of State of Alaska v. Erickson et al. (574 P.2d 1, 1978), the Supreme...
Enhanced Fourth Amendment Protections for Parolees Established in Roman v. State of Alaska

Enhanced Fourth Amendment Protections for Parolees Established in Roman v. State of Alaska

Date: Nov 11, 1977
Enhanced Fourth Amendment Protections for Parolees Established in Roman v. State of Alaska Introduction Robert L. Roman v. State of Alaska is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Insured Driver Exception in Uninsured Motorist Coverage: Analysis of Stordahl v. GEICO

Insured Driver Exception in Uninsured Motorist Coverage: Analysis of Stordahl v. GEICO

Date: May 14, 1977
Insured Driver Exception in Uninsured Motorist Coverage: Analysis of Stordahl v. Government Employees Insurance Company Introduction The Supreme Court of Alaska, in the landmark case of Dennis...
Consecutive Sentencing in Violent Assault Cases: Analysis of State v. Mutschler

Consecutive Sentencing in Violent Assault Cases: Analysis of State v. Mutschler

Date: Feb 17, 1977
Consecutive Sentencing in Violent Assault Cases: Analysis of State v. Mutschler Introduction State v. Mutschler is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Alaska on February 16, 1977. In this...
State Liability for Negligent Fire Inspection in Gold Rush Hotel Fire Case

State Liability for Negligent Fire Inspection in Gold Rush Hotel Fire Case

Date: Oct 2, 1976
State Liability for Negligent Fire Inspection in Gold Rush Hotel Fire Case Introduction The case of Thomas L. Adams et al. v. State of Alaska et al. (555 P.2d 235) arose from the tragic fire at the...
Coleman v. State of Alaska: Affirmation of Reasonable Investigative Stops and Prosecutorial Conduct in Grand Jury Proceedings

Coleman v. State of Alaska: Affirmation of Reasonable Investigative Stops and Prosecutorial Conduct in Grand Jury Proceedings

Date: Jul 15, 1976
Coleman v. State of Alaska: Affirmation of Reasonable Investigative Stops and Prosecutorial Conduct in Grand Jury Proceedings Introduction Coleman v. State of Alaska (553 P.2d 40, 1976) is a landmark...
Alaska Supreme Court Reinforces Procedural Safeguards in State Land Lease Sales

Alaska Supreme Court Reinforces Procedural Safeguards in State Land Lease Sales

Date: Jul 10, 1976
Alaska Supreme Court Reinforces Procedural Safeguards in State Land Lease Sales Introduction In the landmark case of Kenneth D. Moore et al. v. State of Alaska et al., decided on July 9, 1976, the...
Abolition of Privity in Implied Warranty Claims: An Analysis of Morrow v. New Moon Homes

Abolition of Privity in Implied Warranty Claims: An Analysis of Morrow v. New Moon Homes

Date: Mar 27, 1976
Abolition of Privity in Implied Warranty Claims: An Analysis of Morrow v. New Moon Homes Introduction The Supreme Court of Alaska, in the landmark case Joseph R. Morrow and Nikki Morrow v. New Moon...
Enhanced Sentencing Guidelines for Repeat Offenders Established in State v. Wortham

Enhanced Sentencing Guidelines for Repeat Offenders Established in State v. Wortham

Date: Jul 4, 1975
Enhanced Sentencing Guidelines for Repeat Offenders Established in State of Alaska v. Wortham Introduction The case of State of Alaska, Appellant, v. John Mathis Wortham, Appellee (537 P.2d 1117)...
Right to Privacy in Personal Marijuana Possession Affirmed: Ravin v. State of Alaska

Right to Privacy in Personal Marijuana Possession Affirmed: Ravin v. State of Alaska

Date: May 29, 1975
Right to Privacy in Personal Marijuana Possession Affirmed: Ravin v. State of Alaska Introduction In the landmark case of Ravin v. State of Alaska, 537 P.2d 494 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1975), the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert