Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Alaska Case Commentaries

Attorney-Client Privilege and Civil Fraud: Insights from USAA v. Werley

Attorney-Client Privilege and Civil Fraud: Insights from USAA v. Werley

Date: Sep 10, 1974
Attorney-Client Privilege and Civil Fraud: Insights from USAA v. Werley Introduction The case of United Services Automobile Association v. Harley D. Werley et al., reported as (526 P.2d 28),...
Cooksey v. State of Alaska: Affirmation of Speedy Trial Rights under Criminal Rule 45

Cooksey v. State of Alaska: Affirmation of Speedy Trial Rights under Criminal Rule 45

Date: Jul 20, 1974
Cooksey v. State of Alaska: Affirmation of Speedy Trial Rights under Criminal Rule 45 Introduction John Charles Cooksey appealed his conviction to the Supreme Court of Alaska, challenging the...
Risher v. State of Alaska: Establishing the Two-Prong Test for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Risher v. State of Alaska: Establishing the Two-Prong Test for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Date: Jun 18, 1974
Risher v. State of Alaska: Establishing the Two-Prong Test for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Introduction Risher v. State of Alaska, 523 P.2d 421 (Alaska, 1974), is a landmark case in the realm...
Malvo v. J.C. Penney Co.: Strengthening Jury Selection Standards and Attorney Fee Limitations

Malvo v. J.C. Penney Co.: Strengthening Jury Selection Standards and Attorney Fee Limitations

Date: Jul 14, 1973
Malvo v. J.C. Penney Co.: Strengthening Jury Selection Standards and Attorney Fee Limitations Introduction Malvo v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc., 512 P.2d 575 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1973), is a landmark...
Erickson v. State of Alaska: Upholding Independent Source Exception in Search and Seizure Law

Erickson v. State of Alaska: Upholding Independent Source Exception in Search and Seizure Law

Date: Mar 6, 1973
Erickson v. State of Alaska: Upholding Independent Source Exception in Search and Seizure Law Introduction The case of Howard Charles Erickson and Malcolm Allen Erickson v. State of Alaska, decided...
Negligence in Highway Maintenance: State of Alaska v. Abbott Establishes Key Precedent

Negligence in Highway Maintenance: State of Alaska v. Abbott Establishes Key Precedent

Date: Jun 17, 1972
Negligence in Highway Maintenance: State of Alaska v. Abbott Establishes Key Precedent Introduction In the landmark case of State of Alaska v. Susan H. Abbott, Guardian of Brenda Vogt, a Minor (498...
Alaska Supreme Court Establishes Constitutional Right to Jury and Public Trial for Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings in RLR v. State of Alaska

Alaska Supreme Court Establishes Constitutional Right to Jury and Public Trial for Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings in RLR v. State of Alaska

Date: Jul 10, 1971
Alaska Supreme Court Establishes Constitutional Right to Jury and Public Trial for Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings in RLR v. State of Alaska Introduction RLR, a minor, appealed against the State of...
Strict Compliance with Cash Bonus Bidding in Oil and Gas Lease Awards: Insights from Kelly v. Zamarello

Strict Compliance with Cash Bonus Bidding in Oil and Gas Lease Awards: Insights from Kelly v. Zamarello

Date: Jul 7, 1971
Strict Compliance with Cash Bonus Bidding in Oil and Gas Lease Awards: Insights from Kelly v. Zamarello Introduction The case of Thomas E. Kelly, Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources,...
Reaffirmation of 'Zone of Reasonableness' in Sentencing for Drug and Concurrent Crimes: Waters v. State of Alaska

Reaffirmation of 'Zone of Reasonableness' in Sentencing for Drug and Concurrent Crimes: Waters v. State of Alaska

Date: Mar 26, 1971
Reaffirmation of 'Zone of Reasonableness' in Sentencing for Drug and Concurrent Crimes: Waters v. State of Alaska Introduction Leneal Osborne Waters v. State of Alaska, 483 P.2d 199 (1971),...
Double Jeopardy Protections in Alaska: Preventing Multiple Sentences for Concurrent Robbery Offenses

Double Jeopardy Protections in Alaska: Preventing Multiple Sentences for Concurrent Robbery Offenses

Date: Dec 24, 1970
Double Jeopardy Protections in Alaska: Preventing Multiple Sentences for Concurrent Robbery Offenses Introduction The case of Raymond David Whitton v. State of Alaska (479 P.2d 302) adjudicated by...
Establishing Appellate Oversight of Lenient Sentences: State of Alaska v. Chaney

Establishing Appellate Oversight of Lenient Sentences: State of Alaska v. Chaney

Date: Dec 8, 1970
Establishing Appellate Oversight of Lenient Sentences: State of Alaska v. Chaney Introduction State of Alaska v. Donald Scott Chaney is a landmark decision rendered by the Supreme Court of Alaska on...
Alaska Supreme Court Expands Right to Jury Trial for City Ordinance Violations

Alaska Supreme Court Expands Right to Jury Trial for City Ordinance Violations

Date: Jun 6, 1970
Alaska Supreme Court Expands Right to Jury Trial for City Ordinance Violations Introduction The case of Proctor J. Baker v. City of Fairbanks addresses a pivotal question regarding the constitutional...
Alaska Supreme Court Sets Specific Intent Requirement for Felony Murder

Alaska Supreme Court Sets Specific Intent Requirement for Felony Murder

Date: Jan 17, 1970
Alaska Supreme Court Sets Specific Intent Requirement for Felony Murder Introduction The case of Dewey Spencer Gray, Willie Lee Gray, Jr. v. State of Alaska adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Alaska...
Substantial Similarity in Conditions for Experimental Evidence: Supreme Court of Alaska's Decision in Love v. State of Alaska

Substantial Similarity in Conditions for Experimental Evidence: Supreme Court of Alaska's Decision in Love v. State of Alaska

Date: Aug 9, 1969
Substantial Similarity in Conditions for Experimental Evidence: Supreme Court of Alaska's Decision in Love v. State of Alaska Introduction The case of WILLIAM F. LOVE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF ALASKA,...
Comprehensive Commentary on RICHARD BEAULIEU v. JAMES V. ELLIOTT: Establishing Standards for Future Damages in Tort Law

Comprehensive Commentary on RICHARD BEAULIEU v. JAMES V. ELLIOTT: Establishing Standards for Future Damages in Tort Law

Date: Dec 6, 1967
Establishing Standards for Future Damages in Tort Law: Analysis of Richard Beaulieu v. James V. Elliott Introduction The Supreme Court of Alaska, in the case of Richard Beaulieu, Appellant, v. James...
Salinas v. State of Alaska: Standardizing Requirements for Motions for New Trial Based on Newly Discovered Evidence

Salinas v. State of Alaska: Standardizing Requirements for Motions for New Trial Based on Newly Discovered Evidence

Date: Aug 7, 1962
Salinas v. State of Alaska: Standardizing Requirements for Motions for New Trial Based on Newly Discovered Evidence Introduction Salinas v. State of Alaska is a seminal case decided by the Supreme...
Reuben H. Ransom v. Vic Haner and Marion Keyes: Establishing Liability of Supervisory Employees under Alaska Workmen's Compensation Act

Reuben H. Ransom v. Vic Haner and Marion Keyes: Establishing Liability of Supervisory Employees under Alaska Workmen's Compensation Act

Date: May 17, 1961
Reuben H. Ransom v. Vic Haner and Marion Keyes: Establishing Liability of Supervisory Employees under Alaska Workmen's Compensation Act Introduction The case of Reuben H. Ransom v. Vic Haner, Marion...
Previous
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert