Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Alaska Case Commentaries

Alaska Supreme Court Establishes Comprehensive Best Interest Analysis in Custody Determinations

Alaska Supreme Court Establishes Comprehensive Best Interest Analysis in Custody Determinations

Date: Oct 2, 2004
Alaska Supreme Court Establishes Comprehensive Best Interest Analysis in Custody Determinations Introduction The case of Faith M. Moeller-Prokosch v. Chuck F. Prokosch (99 P.3d 531) before the...
Alaska Supreme Court Affirms Superior Court's Contract Breach Ruling in Peterson v. Ek

Alaska Supreme Court Affirms Superior Court's Contract Breach Ruling in Peterson v. Ek

Date: Jun 26, 2004
Alaska Supreme Court Affirms Superior Court's Contract Breach Ruling in Peterson v. Ek Introduction Peterson v. Ek is a significant case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Alaska on June 25, 2004....
Limits of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith in Severance Agreements: Insights from Casey v. Semco Energy

Limits of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith in Severance Agreements: Insights from Casey v. Semco Energy

Date: Jun 12, 2004
Limits of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith in Severance Agreements: Insights from Casey v. Semco Energy Introduction Case Citation: Timothy J. Casey and David L. Sinclair, Appellants, v. Semco...
Best Interests of the Child: Upholding Departmental Discretion in Foster Care Placement

Best Interests of the Child: Upholding Departmental Discretion in Foster Care Placement

Date: May 5, 2004
Best Interests of the Child: Upholding Departmental Discretion in Foster Care Placement Introduction In the landmark case of Brynna B. v. State of Alaska, Department of Health Social Services,...
Exigent Circumstances and Warrantless Breath Tests: Analysis of STATE OF ALASKA v. LAURA A. BLANK

Exigent Circumstances and Warrantless Breath Tests: Analysis of STATE OF ALASKA v. LAURA A. BLANK

Date: May 1, 2004
Exigent Circumstances and Warrantless Breath Tests: Analysis of STATE OF ALASKA v. LAURA A. BLANK Introduction In the landmark case STATE OF ALASKA v. LAURA A. BLANK, 90 P.3d 156 (Alaska 2004), the...
Duty of Licensing Bond Sureties: O’Connors v. Star Insurance Company Establishes Limits on Tort Liability

Duty of Licensing Bond Sureties: O’Connors v. Star Insurance Company Establishes Limits on Tort Liability

Date: Dec 27, 2003
Duty of Licensing Bond Sureties: O’Connors v. Star Insurance Company Establishes Limits on Tort Liability Introduction The case of Kevin and Yvette O'Connor v. Star Insurance Company (83 P.3d 1),...
Alaska Appellate Rule 214: Unpublished Decisions as Persuasive Authority

Alaska Appellate Rule 214: Unpublished Decisions as Persuasive Authority

Date: Nov 23, 2002
Alaska Appellate Rule 214: Unpublished Decisions as Persuasive Authority Introduction Christopher J. McCoy, Sr. v. State of Alaska, 80 P.3d 757 (Alaska App. 2002), is a pivotal case addressing the...
Supreme Court of Alaska Rules Interim Support and Imputed Rental Value Not Marital Property

Supreme Court of Alaska Rules Interim Support and Imputed Rental Value Not Marital Property

Date: May 11, 2002
Supreme Court of Alaska Rules Interim Support and Imputed Rental Value Not Marital Property: Paula Korn v. Larry Korn Introduction The case of Paula Korn v. Larry Korn (46 P.3d 1021), adjudicated by...
E.A. v. State of Alaska: Upholding ICWA's Active Efforts and Child's Best Interest in Parental Rights Termination

E.A. v. State of Alaska: Upholding ICWA's Active Efforts and Child's Best Interest in Parental Rights Termination

Date: May 11, 2002
E.A. v. State of Alaska: Upholding ICWA's Active Efforts and Child's Best Interest in Parental Rights Termination Introduction The case of E.A., Appellant v. State of Alaska, Division of Family and...
Adverse Possession and Oral Gifts: Supreme Court of Alaska's Decision in Vezey v. Green

Adverse Possession and Oral Gifts: Supreme Court of Alaska's Decision in Vezey v. Green

Date: Nov 17, 2001
Adverse Possession and Oral Gifts: Supreme Court of Alaska's Decision in Vezey v. Green Introduction In the landmark case of Allen Vezey v. Angela Green (35 P.3d 14), the Supreme Court of Alaska...
Harmless Error in Factual Findings: Sonja Alvarez v. Ketchikan Gateway Borough

Harmless Error in Factual Findings: Sonja Alvarez v. Ketchikan Gateway Borough

Date: Aug 18, 2001
Harmless Error in Factual Findings: Sonja Alvarez v. Ketchikan Gateway Borough Introduction Sonja Alvarez v. Ketchikan Gateway Borough, 28 P.3d 935 (Supreme Court of Alaska, 2001), is a pivotal case...
Objective Standards and Due Process in Probationary Employment Terminations: Cassel v. State of Alaska

Objective Standards and Due Process in Probationary Employment Terminations: Cassel v. State of Alaska

Date: Dec 16, 2000
Objective Standards and Due Process in Probationary Employment Terminations: Cassel v. State of Alaska Introduction The case of James R. Cassel v. State of Alaska addresses critical issues...
Due Process and Evidentiary Standards in Termination of Parental Rights: Analysis of D.M. v. State of Alaska

Due Process and Evidentiary Standards in Termination of Parental Rights: Analysis of D.M. v. State of Alaska

Date: Jan 15, 2000
Due Process and Evidentiary Standards in Termination of Parental Rights: Analysis of D.M. v. State of Alaska Introduction The case of D.M. v. State of Alaska, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Termination of Parental Rights Under ICWA: Analysis of A.A. v. State of Alaska

Termination of Parental Rights Under ICWA: Analysis of A.A. v. State of Alaska

Date: Jun 26, 1999
Termination of Parental Rights Under ICWA: Analysis of A.A. v. State of Alaska Introduction A.A. v. State of Alaska, Department of Family Youth Services is a landmark case decided by the Supreme...
Alaska Supreme Court Adopts Daubert Standard for Scientific Evidence Admissibility

Alaska Supreme Court Adopts Daubert Standard for Scientific Evidence Admissibility

Date: Mar 6, 1999
Alaska Supreme Court Adopts Daubert Standard for Scientific Evidence Admissibility Introduction The State of Alaska petitioned the Supreme Court of Alaska in the case of State of Alaska v. George L....
Multiple Distinct Sexual Penetrations Leading to Separate Convictions: Erickson v. State Affirming Yearty Precedent

Multiple Distinct Sexual Penetrations Leading to Separate Convictions: Erickson v. State Affirming Yearty Precedent

Date: Dec 13, 1997
Multiple Distinct Sexual Penetrations Leading to Separate Convictions: Erickson v. State Affirming Yearty Precedent Introduction The case of Brian E. Erickson v. State of Alaska (950 P.2d 580)...
Right to Independent Chemical Testing in DWI Cases: Dennis SNYDER v. STATE of Alaska

Right to Independent Chemical Testing in DWI Cases: Dennis SNYDER v. STATE of Alaska

Date: Dec 28, 1996
Right to Independent Chemical Testing in DWI Cases: Dennis SNYDER v. STATE of Alaska Introduction Dennis SNYDER v. STATE of Alaska is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Alaska on...
Protecting Employee Rights: A Comprehensive Analysis of Romulus v. Anchorage School District

Protecting Employee Rights: A Comprehensive Analysis of Romulus v. Anchorage School District

Date: Feb 3, 1996
Protecting Employee Rights: A Comprehensive Analysis of Romulus v. Anchorage School District 1. Introduction Richard Romulus v. Anchorage School District, 910 P.2d 610 (Alaska 1996), is a pivotal...
Enforceability of Worker’s Compensation Benefits Assignment in Divorce Settlements: Albert Morris v. Donna Morris

Enforceability of Worker’s Compensation Benefits Assignment in Divorce Settlements: Albert Morris v. Donna Morris

Date: Dec 16, 1995
Enforceability of Worker’s Compensation Benefits Assignment in Divorce Settlements: Albert Morris v. Donna Morris Introduction The case of Albert Morris v. Donna Morris, decided by the Supreme Court...
Clarifying the Application of the Wanberg Method in Marital Property Division: Cox v. Cox

Clarifying the Application of the Wanberg Method in Marital Property Division: Cox v. Cox

Date: Sep 10, 1994
Clarifying the Application of the Wanberg Method in Marital Property Division: Cox v. Cox Introduction The case of Charles B. Cox, Appellant, v. Vicki M. Cox, Appellee (882 P.2d 909) adjudicated by...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert