Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

9th Circuit Case Commentaries

Default Judgment in Copyright Infringement: Elektra Entertainment Group Inc. v. Joel A. Crawford

Default Judgment in Copyright Infringement: Elektra Entertainment Group Inc. v. Joel A. Crawford

Date: Feb 12, 2005
Default Judgment in Copyright Infringement: Elektra Entertainment Group Inc. v. Joel A. Crawford Introduction The case of Elektra Entertainment Group Inc., UMG Recordings Inc., Capitol Records Inc.,...
Credibility Assessment and Obesity Consideration in Disability Claims: Insights from Burch v. Barnhart

Credibility Assessment and Obesity Consideration in Disability Claims: Insights from Burch v. Barnhart

Date: Jan 21, 2005
Credibility Assessment and Obesity Consideration in Disability Claims: Insights from Burch v. Barnhart Introduction Deborah L. Burch, the plaintiff-appellant, challenged the decision of the...
Clarifying the Amount in Controversy Requirement in Diversity Jurisdiction: Burk v. Medical Savings Insurance Co.

Clarifying the Amount in Controversy Requirement in Diversity Jurisdiction: Burk v. Medical Savings Insurance Co.

Date: Dec 9, 2004
Clarifying the Amount in Controversy Requirement in Diversity Jurisdiction: Burk v. Medical Savings Insurance Co. Introduction In the case of Dennis Ray Burk; Betty Burk v. Medical Savings Insurance...
Total Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies for Mixed Prison Litigation Claims: Nichols v. Logan et al.

Total Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies for Mixed Prison Litigation Claims: Nichols v. Logan et al.

Date: Nov 24, 2004
Total Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies for Mixed Prison Litigation Claims: Nichols v. Logan et al. Introduction Joseph Nichols, a California state prisoner, filed a civil rights lawsuit under 42...
Assessing §1983 Claims in Prison Trust Account Disputes: Comprehensive Analysis of Abney v. Alameida

Assessing §1983 Claims in Prison Trust Account Disputes: Comprehensive Analysis of Abney v. Alameida

Date: Aug 21, 2004
Assessing §1983 Claims in Prison Trust Account Disputes: Comprehensive Analysis of Abney v. Alameida Introduction The case of Thomas William Abney v. Edward S. Alameida presents a nuanced exploration...
Conditional Certification of FLSA Class Action in Leuthold v. Destination America: Implications and Legal Reasoning

Conditional Certification of FLSA Class Action in Leuthold v. Destination America: Implications and Legal Reasoning

Date: Aug 17, 2004
Conditional Certification of FLSA Class Action in Leuthold v. Destination America: Implications and Legal Reasoning Introduction The case of Mark Leuthold et al. v. Destination America, Inc et al....
J'Aire Test Application in Negligence Claims for Economic Loss: Platte Anchor Bolt, Inc. v. IHI, Inc.

J'Aire Test Application in Negligence Claims for Economic Loss: Platte Anchor Bolt, Inc. v. IHI, Inc.

Date: Apr 20, 2004
J'Aire Test Application in Negligence Claims for Economic Loss: Platte Anchor Bolt, Inc. v. IHI, Inc. Introduction In the case of Platte Anchor Bolt, Inc. v. IHI, Inc., decided on April 19, 2004, the...
Enforcement of FERC License Conditions: Insights from United States v. Southern California Edison Company

Enforcement of FERC License Conditions: Insights from United States v. Southern California Edison Company

Date: Jan 10, 2004
Enforcement of FERC License Conditions: Insights from United States v. Southern California Edison Company Introduction The case of United States of America v. Southern California Edison Company,...
Final Approval of Class Action Settlement in NRTC v. DIRECTV Establishes Key Standards for Settlement Fairness

Final Approval of Class Action Settlement in NRTC v. DIRECTV Establishes Key Standards for Settlement Fairness

Date: Jan 6, 2004
Final Approval of Class Action Settlement in NRTC v. DIRECTV Establishes Key Standards for Settlement Fairness Introduction The case of National Rural Telecommunications Cooperative (NRTC) v....
Default Judgment in Trademark Infringement: Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Castworld Products Inc.

Default Judgment in Trademark Infringement: Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Castworld Products Inc.

Date: Dec 31, 2003
Default Judgment in Trademark Infringement: Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Castworld Products Inc. Introduction In the case of Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Castworld Products Inc. (219 F.R.D. 494), the...
Refining Aiding and Abetting Liability and Alter Ego Doctrine in Bankruptcy Fraud Litigation: A Comprehensive Analysis of the 2003 C.D. California District Court Judgment

Refining Aiding and Abetting Liability and Alter Ego Doctrine in Bankruptcy Fraud Litigation: A Comprehensive Analysis of the 2003 C.D. California District Court Judgment

Date: Oct 21, 2003
Refining Aiding and Abetting Liability and Alter Ego Doctrine in Bankruptcy Fraud Litigation: A Comprehensive Analysis of the 2003 C.D. California District Court Judgment Introduction On October 20,...
Imposition of Sanctions for Insufficient Representation at Settlement Conference in Pitman v. Brinker International

Imposition of Sanctions for Insufficient Representation at Settlement Conference in Pitman v. Brinker International

Date: Jul 9, 2003
Imposition of Sanctions for Insufficient Representation at Settlement Conference in Pitman v. Brinker International Introduction The case of Carl E. Pitman v. Brinker International, Inc. addresses...
Finality of Unobjected Magistrate Recommendations under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)

Finality of Unobjected Magistrate Recommendations under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)

Date: Jun 19, 2003
Finality of Unobjected Magistrate Recommendations under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) Introduction The case of Diellind Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219 (D. Ariz. 2003), addresses the procedural...
Adoption of Central District of California’s Standard for Motion for Reconsideration in Interlocutory Orders: Motorola Inc. v. J.B. Rodgers Mechanical Contractors, Inc.

Adoption of Central District of California’s Standard for Motion for Reconsideration in Interlocutory Orders: Motorola Inc. v. J.B. Rodgers Mechanical Contractors, Inc.

Date: Jun 19, 2003
Adoption of Central District of California’s Standard for Motion for Reconsideration in Interlocutory Orders: Motorola Inc. v. J.B. Rodgers Mechanical Contractors, Inc. Introduction In the case of...
Enhanced Role of Magistrate Judges in Felony Plea Colloquies: Insights from United States v. Reyna-Tapia

Enhanced Role of Magistrate Judges in Felony Plea Colloquies: Insights from United States v. Reyna-Tapia

Date: May 10, 2003
Enhanced Role of Magistrate Judges in Felony Plea Colloquies: Insights from United States v. Reyna-Tapia Introduction The case of United States v. Reyna-Tapia, decided by the United States Court of...
Contingent Fee Award Under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b): Analysis of Robert E. Hearn v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart

Contingent Fee Award Under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b): Analysis of Robert E. Hearn v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart

Date: May 1, 2003
Contingent Fee Award Under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b): Analysis of Robert E. Hearn v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart Introduction The case of Robert E. Hearn v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security,...
Frasure v. United States: Defining Accrual of FTCA Claims and Discretionary Function Exception

Frasure v. United States: Defining Accrual of FTCA Claims and Discretionary Function Exception

Date: Mar 29, 2003
Frasure v. United States: Defining Accrual of FTCA Claims and Discretionary Function Exception Introduction Frasure v. United States of America is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States...
Default Judgment and Injunctive Relief in Trademark Counterfeiting: PepsiCo, Inc. v. California Security Cans

Default Judgment and Injunctive Relief in Trademark Counterfeiting: PepsiCo, Inc. v. California Security Cans

Date: Dec 28, 2002
Default Judgment and Injunctive Relief in Trademark Counterfeiting: PepsiCo, Inc. v. California Security Cans Introduction In the landmark case of PepsiCo, Inc., et al. v. California Security Cans,...
Protecting Inmate First Amendment Rights: Insights from Frank Clement v. California Dept. of Corrections

Protecting Inmate First Amendment Rights: Insights from Frank Clement v. California Dept. of Corrections

Date: Sep 10, 2002
Protecting Inmate First Amendment Rights: Insights from Frank Clement v. California Department of Corrections Introduction In the landmark case Frank Clement v. California Department of Corrections...
Granting Leave to Amend in Patent Litigation: Insights from SAES Getters S.p.A. v. Aeronex, Inc.

Granting Leave to Amend in Patent Litigation: Insights from SAES Getters S.p.A. v. Aeronex, Inc.

Date: Aug 16, 2002
Granting Leave to Amend in Patent Litigation: Insights from SAES Getters S.p.A. v. Aeronex, Inc. Introduction The case of SAES Getters S.p.A. v. Aeronex, Inc. (219 F. Supp. 2d 1081) revolves around...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert