Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

9th Circuit Case Commentaries

Clarifying Affirmative Defenses and Jury Trial Rights in CERCLA Cost Recovery Actions: State of California v. Alco Pacific, Inc.

Clarifying Affirmative Defenses and Jury Trial Rights in CERCLA Cost Recovery Actions: State of California v. Alco Pacific, Inc.

Date: Jul 10, 2002
Clarifying Affirmative Defenses and Jury Trial Rights in CERCLA Cost Recovery Actions: State of California v. Alco Pacific, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of State of California Department of...
Adoption of Good Cause Standard over Notaro Test for Expedited Discovery in Patent Litigation – Semitool, Inc. v. Tokyo Electron

Adoption of Good Cause Standard over Notaro Test for Expedited Discovery in Patent Litigation – Semitool, Inc. v. Tokyo Electron

Date: Apr 20, 2002
Adoption of Good Cause Standard over Notaro Test for Expedited Discovery in Patent Litigation Introduction The case of Semitool, Inc. v. Tokyo Electron America, Inc. was adjudicated in the United...
Foreclosure and Debt Collection: Key Legal Principles from Hulse v. Ocwen Federal Bank

Foreclosure and Debt Collection: Key Legal Principles from Hulse v. Ocwen Federal Bank

Date: Feb 28, 2002
Foreclosure and Debt Collection: Key Legal Principles from Hulse v. Ocwen Federal Bank Introduction The case of Gary A. Hulse and Judith A. Hulse v. Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB et al., decided on...
Affirming Disability Benefit Denial: Substantial Evidence and Credibility Evaluation in Thomas v. Barnhart

Affirming Disability Benefit Denial: Substantial Evidence and Credibility Evaluation in Thomas v. Barnhart

Date: Jan 25, 2002
Affirming Disability Benefit Denial: Substantial Evidence and Credibility Evaluation in Thomas v. Barnhart Introduction The case of Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart centers on the denial of...
Establishing the Threshold for Substantial Similarity in Copyright Infringement: Idema v. DreamWorks

Establishing the Threshold for Substantial Similarity in Copyright Infringement: Idema v. DreamWorks

Date: Sep 11, 2001
Establishing the Threshold for Substantial Similarity in Copyright Infringement: Idema v. DreamWorks Introduction In the landmark case J. Keith Idema; Gary Scurka; Kathy Scurka; and Jim Morris v....
Municipal Liability for Deliberate Indifference under §1983: Mary Sanders LEE v. City of Los Angeles and NYSDCS

Municipal Liability for Deliberate Indifference under §1983: Mary Sanders LEE v. City of Los Angeles and NYSDCS

Date: May 5, 2001
Municipal Liability for Deliberate Indifference under §1983: Mary Sanders LEE v. City of Los Angeles and NYSDCS Introduction Mary Sanders LEE, individually and as the Conservator for the Estate of...
Westlands Water District v. United States: Establishing Full-Cost Water Pricing

Westlands Water District v. United States: Establishing Full-Cost Water Pricing

Date: Mar 14, 2001
Westlands Water District v. United States: Establishing Full-Cost Water Pricing Introduction Westlands Water District v. United States, decided on March 13, 2001, by the United States District Court...
Shurgard Storage Centers v. Safeguard Self Storage: Broadening the Scope of the CFAA in Trade Secret Protection

Shurgard Storage Centers v. Safeguard Self Storage: Broadening the Scope of the CFAA in Trade Secret Protection

Date: Oct 31, 2000
Shurgard Storage Centers v. Safeguard Self Storage: Broadening the Scope of the CFAA in Trade Secret Protection Introduction In the landmark case of Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. v. Safeguard Self...
Denial of Defendants' Motions in In re 2THEMART.COM, Inc. Securities Litigation Establishes Strong Standards for Securities Fraud Claims

Denial of Defendants' Motions in In re 2THEMART.COM, Inc. Securities Litigation Establishes Strong Standards for Securities Fraud Claims

Date: Jul 18, 2000
Denial of Defendants' Motions in In re 2THEMART.COM, Inc. Securities Litigation Establishes Strong Standards for Securities Fraud Claims Introduction The case of In re 2THEMART.COM, Inc. Securities...
Expanding Private Plaintiff Standing in ADA Compliance Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis

Expanding Private Plaintiff Standing in ADA Compliance Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: May 17, 2000
Expanding Private Plaintiff Standing in ADA Compliance Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction The case of Eric Parr v. L L Drive-Inn Restaurant addresses significant issues under the Americans...
Preservation of District Courts' Discretion to Grant Leave to Amend under the PLRA

Preservation of District Courts' Discretion to Grant Leave to Amend under the PLRA

Date: Feb 11, 2000
Preservation of District Courts' Discretion to Grant Leave to Amend under the Prison Litigation Reform Act Introduction In the landmark case of Max Lopez, Jr. v. G.A. Smith et al., adjudicated by the...
Mandatory Use of Vocational Experts in SSDI Claims Involving Non-Exertional Limitations: Tackett v. Apfel

Mandatory Use of Vocational Experts in SSDI Claims Involving Non-Exertional Limitations: Tackett v. Apfel

Date: Jun 26, 1999
Mandatory Use of Vocational Experts in SSDI Claims Involving Non-Exertional Limitations: Tackett v. Apfel Introduction Parties Involved: Plaintiff-Appellant: Richard Tackett Defendant-Appellee:...
California CCP §2019(d) Applies in Federal Trade Secret Litigation: Analysis of Computer Economics, Inc. v. Gartner Group, Inc.

California CCP §2019(d) Applies in Federal Trade Secret Litigation: Analysis of Computer Economics, Inc. v. Gartner Group, Inc.

Date: May 26, 1999
California CCP §2019(d) Applies in Federal Trade Secret Litigation: Analysis of Computer Economics, Inc. v. Gartner Group, Inc. Introduction The case of Computer Economics, Inc. (CEI) v. Gartner...
Limits on Personal Jurisdiction Based on Interactive Websites

Limits on Personal Jurisdiction Based on Interactive Websites

Date: Jan 5, 1999
Limits on Personal Jurisdiction Based on Interactive Websites: A Comprehensive Analysis of Millennium Enterprises, Inc. v. Millennium Music, LP Introduction In the landmark case Millennium...
Conley v. Crabtree: Establishing Precedents for Habeas Corpus Petitions Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Conley v. Crabtree: Establishing Precedents for Habeas Corpus Petitions Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Date: Jul 25, 1998
Conley v. Crabtree: Establishing Precedents for Habeas Corpus Petitions Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Introduction Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203 (D. Or. 1998), is a pivotal case in the landscape...
Federal Preemption of State Anti-Deficiency Statutes in FmHA Loan Deficiency Actions

Federal Preemption of State Anti-Deficiency Statutes in FmHA Loan Deficiency Actions

Date: Jul 7, 1998
Federal Preemption of State Anti-Deficiency Statutes in FmHA Loan Deficiency Actions Introduction The case of United States of America v. Louis E. Rezzonico and Phyllis I. Rezzonico (32 F. Supp. 2d...
Ja v. Mora: Reinforcing Notice Obligations under FMLA and CFRA

Ja v. Mora: Reinforcing Notice Obligations under FMLA and CFRA

Date: Jul 2, 1998
Ja v. Mora: Reinforcing Notice Obligations under FMLA and CFRA Introduction Ja v. Chem-tronics, Inc. is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States District Court for the Southern District of...
Reaffirmation of Judicial and Sovereign Immunity in Ricotta v. State of California

Reaffirmation of Judicial and Sovereign Immunity in Ricotta v. State of California

Date: Apr 16, 1998
Reaffirmation of Judicial and Sovereign Immunity in Ricotta v. State of California Introduction Thomas Daniel Ricotta, the plaintiff, initiated a lawsuit against the State of California and several...
Strict Pleading Standards for Defamation and Product Disparagement Claims: An Analysis of Isuzu Motors Ltd. v. Consumers Union

Strict Pleading Standards for Defamation and Product Disparagement Claims: An Analysis of Isuzu Motors Ltd. v. Consumers Union

Date: Apr 10, 1998
Strict Pleading Standards for Defamation and Product Disparagement Claims: An Analysis of Isuzu Motors Ltd. v. Consumers Union Introduction In the case of Isuzu Motors Limited, et al. v. Consumers...
In re Stratosphere Corporation Securities Litigation: Enhanced Pleading Standards Under PSLRA Affirmed

In re Stratosphere Corporation Securities Litigation: Enhanced Pleading Standards Under PSLRA Affirmed

Date: Apr 8, 1998
In re Stratosphere Corporation Securities Litigation: Enhanced Pleading Standards Under PSLRA Affirmed Introduction The case of In re Stratosphere Corporation Securities Litigation is a pivotal...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert