Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

9th Circuit Case Commentaries

Cecala v. Newman: Establishing Causation Standards in Arizona Legal Malpractice

Cecala v. Newman: Establishing Causation Standards in Arizona Legal Malpractice

Date: May 3, 2007
Cecala v. Newman: Establishing Causation Standards in Arizona Legal Malpractice Introduction Renee Cecala v. David B. Newman; Cooperman Levitt Winikoff Lester Newman, P.C. is a pivotal case decided...
Exhaustion of State Remedies for Life Sentences in Arizona: Establishing a New Precedent in Crowell v. Knowles

Exhaustion of State Remedies for Life Sentences in Arizona: Establishing a New Precedent in Crowell v. Knowles

Date: Apr 13, 2007
Exhaustion of State Remedies for Life Sentences in Arizona: Establishing a New Precedent in Crowell v. Knowles Introduction Crowell v. Knowles, 483 F. Supp. 2d 925 (D. Ariz. 2007), is a landmark case...
Procedural Protections for Defendants in Plaintiff-Prisoner §1983 Actions: Teahan v. Wilhelm

Procedural Protections for Defendants in Plaintiff-Prisoner §1983 Actions: Teahan v. Wilhelm

Date: Mar 29, 2007
Procedural Protections for Defendants in Plaintiff-Prisoner §1983 Actions: Teahan v. Wilhelm Introduction In the landmark case Paul Michael Teahan v. S. Wilhelm, et al., adjudicated on March 28,...
Sanctions for Spoliation of Evidence in Copyright Litigation: Analysis of In re Napster, Inc. Copyright Litigation

Sanctions for Spoliation of Evidence in Copyright Litigation: Analysis of In re Napster, Inc. Copyright Litigation

Date: Oct 25, 2006
Sanctions for Spoliation of Evidence in Copyright Litigation: Analysis of In re Napster, Inc. Copyright Litigation Introduction The case of UMG Recordings, Inc. et al. v. Hummer Winblad Venture...
Application of the Good Samaritan Doctrine to Economic Harm under Arizona Law: Analysis of Sergio Renteria v. United States

Application of the Good Samaritan Doctrine to Economic Harm under Arizona Law: Analysis of Sergio Renteria v. United States

Date: Sep 12, 2006
Application of the Good Samaritan Doctrine to Economic Harm under Arizona Law: Analysis of Sergio Renteria v. United States Introduction Case Citation: Sergio Renteria, et al., Plaintiffs, v. United...
EEOC v. Caesars Entertainment: Upholding Rule 30(b)(6) Depositions in Employment Discrimination Cases

EEOC v. Caesars Entertainment: Upholding Rule 30(b)(6) Depositions in Employment Discrimination Cases

Date: Aug 23, 2006
EEOC v. Caesars Entertainment: Upholding Rule 30(b)(6) Depositions in Employment Discrimination Cases Introduction The case of U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) v. Caesars...
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Bankruptcy Court: Insights from Hawaiian Airlines v. Mesa Air Group

Jurisdictional Boundaries in Bankruptcy Court: Insights from Hawaiian Airlines v. Mesa Air Group

Date: Aug 1, 2006
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Bankruptcy Court: Insights from Hawaiian Airlines v. Mesa Air Group Introduction The case of Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. Mesa Air Group, Inc. adjudicated in the United...
Establishing Title IX Retaliation and §1983 Supervisory Liability: Insights from Burch v. Regents of UC

Establishing Title IX Retaliation and §1983 Supervisory Liability: Insights from Burch v. Regents of UC

Date: Jun 6, 2006
Establishing Title IX Retaliation and §1983 Supervisory Liability: Insights from Burch v. Regents of UC Introduction In the case of Michael D. Burch and The Bankruptcy Estate of Michael D. Burch v....
Reaffirming the Enforceability of Confidentiality Agreements Amid Employee Disclosure Claims: Baljit Saini v. International Game Technology

Reaffirming the Enforceability of Confidentiality Agreements Amid Employee Disclosure Claims: Baljit Saini v. International Game Technology

Date: May 17, 2006
Reaffirming the Enforceability of Confidentiality Agreements Amid Employee Disclosure Claims: Baljit Saini v. International Game Technology Introduction The case of Baljit Saini v. International Game...
Strict Application of FRCP 59(e) Standards and Statutory Interpretation Upheld in Denial of Motion for Reconsideration

Strict Application of FRCP 59(e) Standards and Statutory Interpretation Upheld in Denial of Motion for Reconsideration

Date: Mar 25, 2006
Strict Application of FRCP 59(e) Standards and Statutory Interpretation Upheld in Denial of Motion for Reconsideration Introduction In the case of SARAH C. WHITE, Indi v. 3090 Incorporated (424 F....
Application of Eitel Factors in Granting Default Judgment: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Steve Streeter

Application of Eitel Factors in Granting Default Judgment: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Steve Streeter

Date: Mar 22, 2006
Application of Eitel Factors in Granting Default Judgment: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Steve Streeter Introduction The case of Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation v. Steve Streeter...
Good Cause Standard for Stay and Abeyance in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Analysis of Riner v. Crawford

Good Cause Standard for Stay and Abeyance in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Analysis of Riner v. Crawford

Date: Feb 4, 2006
Good Cause Standard for Stay and Abeyance in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Analysis of Riner v. Crawford Introduction Riner v. Crawford, 415 F. Supp. 2d 1207 (D. Nev. 2006), is a significant case that...
Restricting Overbroad Subpoenas: Insights from Joon S. Moon v. SCP Pool Corporation

Restricting Overbroad Subpoenas: Insights from Joon S. Moon v. SCP Pool Corporation

Date: Dec 8, 2005
Restricting Overbroad Subpoenas: Insights from Joon S. Moon v. SCP Pool Corporation Introduction The case of Joon S. Moon, et al. v. SCP Pool Corporation, et al. (232 F.R.D. 633) presents a...
Consolidation and Defendant Limitation under Title VII and the Rehabilitation Act: Insights from Hill v. Secretary of the Navy

Consolidation and Defendant Limitation under Title VII and the Rehabilitation Act: Insights from Hill v. Secretary of the Navy

Date: Nov 9, 2005
Consolidation and Defendant Limitation under Title VII and the Rehabilitation Act: Insights from Hill v. Secretary of the Navy Introduction In the case of Bryan L. Hill v. Gordon R. England,...
Access to Internet-Generated Legal Materials by Inmates: Insights from Nelson v. Giubrino

Access to Internet-Generated Legal Materials by Inmates: Insights from Nelson v. Giubrino

Date: Oct 21, 2005
Access to Internet-Generated Legal Materials by Inmates: Insights from Nelson v. Giubrino Introduction In the landmark case Floyd Nelson v. G.J. Giubrino, decided on October 20, 2005, the United...
Limitations on §1983 Retaliation Claims for Whistleblowing: Neveau v. City of Fresno

Limitations on §1983 Retaliation Claims for Whistleblowing: Neveau v. City of Fresno

Date: Jul 16, 2005
Limitations on §1983 Retaliation Claims for Whistleblowing: Neveau v. City of Fresno Introduction Neveau v. City of Fresno is a significant civil rights case adjudicated in the United States District...
Assessment of Best Price Rule Applicability and Nevada RICO Claims in Brown et al. v. Kinross Gold

Assessment of Best Price Rule Applicability and Nevada RICO Claims in Brown et al. v. Kinross Gold

Date: May 28, 2005
Assessment of Best Price Rule Applicability and Nevada RICO Claims in Brown et al. v. Kinross Gold 1. Introduction The case ROBERT A. BROWN; GLENBROOK CAPITAL L.P.; GEORGE P. DRAKE; CNL INVESTMENT...
Meissl v. Barnhart: Affirming DOT Reasoning Level Two in Disability Determinations

Meissl v. Barnhart: Affirming DOT Reasoning Level Two in Disability Determinations

Date: May 26, 2005
Meissl v. Barnhart: Affirming DOT Reasoning Level Two in Disability Determinations Introduction Glenda Meissl, the plaintiff, initiated a legal action against Jo Anne B. Barnhart, the defendant,...
Facilitating Venue Transfers in Class Actions with Foreign Plaintiffs: Analyzing SALEH v. CACI

Facilitating Venue Transfers in Class Actions with Foreign Plaintiffs: Analyzing SALEH v. CACI

Date: Mar 22, 2005
Facilitating Venue Transfers in Class Actions with Foreign Plaintiffs: Analyzing SALEH v. CACI Introduction The case of SALEH, et al. v. TITAN CORPORATION, et al. (361 F. Supp. 2d 1152) adjudicated...
Section 301 Jurisdiction and Declaratory Judgment in Labor Loan Disputes: Commentary on Hawaii Stevedores, Inc. v. HTT Company

Section 301 Jurisdiction and Declaratory Judgment in Labor Loan Disputes: Commentary on Hawaii Stevedores, Inc. v. HTT Company

Date: Feb 25, 2005
Section 301 Jurisdiction and Declaratory Judgment in Labor Loan Disputes: Commentary on Hawaii Stevedores, Inc. v. HTT Company Introduction The case of Hawaii Stevedores, Inc. v. HTT Company revolves...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert