Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

7th Circuit Case Commentaries

Seventh Circuit reaffirms: Treatment disagreements and unsupported delay allegations do not establish Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference absent verifying harm

Seventh Circuit reaffirms: Treatment disagreements and unsupported delay allegations do not establish Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference absent verifying harm

Date: May 8, 2025
Seventh Circuit reaffirms: Treatment disagreements and unsupported delay allegations do not establish Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference absent verifying harm Case: Jatavious Webster v. Barry...
Ollison v. Gossett: Seventh Circuit tightens limits on constructive amendments at summary judgment and demands fact‑specific pleadings for systemic deliberate indifference against wardens

Ollison v. Gossett: Seventh Circuit tightens limits on constructive amendments at summary judgment and demands fact‑specific pleadings for systemic deliberate indifference against wardens

Date: May 8, 2025
Ollison v. Gossett: Seventh Circuit tightens limits on constructive amendments at summary judgment and demands fact‑specific pleadings for systemic deliberate indifference against wardens...
Ferrari v. Link: Permissibility of Police‐Escort Requirements in Public Buildings Absent Viewpoint Discrimination

Ferrari v. Link: Permissibility of Police‐Escort Requirements in Public Buildings Absent Viewpoint Discrimination

Date: May 6, 2025
Ferrari v. Link: Permissibility of Police‐Escort Requirements in Public Buildings Absent Viewpoint Discrimination Introduction In Patrick M. Ferrari v. Todd Link, the Seventh Circuit addressed...
Establishing Knowing Possession of Child Pornography Through Cached Thumbnails and Circumstantial Evidence

Establishing Knowing Possession of Child Pornography Through Cached Thumbnails and Circumstantial Evidence

Date: May 6, 2025
Establishing Knowing Possession of Child Pornography Through Cached Thumbnails and Circumstantial Evidence 1. Introduction This commentary examines the Seventh Circuit’s decision in United States v....
Cached Thumbnails as Evidence of Knowing Possession in Child Pornography Prosecutions

Cached Thumbnails as Evidence of Knowing Possession in Child Pornography Prosecutions

Date: May 6, 2025
Cached Thumbnails as Evidence of Knowing Possession in Child Pornography Prosecutions Introduction United States v. Edward C. Brown is a Seventh Circuit decision upholding a conviction for possession...
Consent Threshold for Eighth Amendment Prison Sexual Abuse Claims

Consent Threshold for Eighth Amendment Prison Sexual Abuse Claims

Date: May 3, 2025
Consent Threshold for Eighth Amendment Prison Sexual Abuse Claims Introduction David C.L. Walton, a state prisoner in Wisconsin, sued prison nurse Ashley Nehls under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that...
Clarifying Attorney Disclosure Obligations and Proximate Cause in Legal Malpractice: Signal Funding v. Sugar Felsenthal

Clarifying Attorney Disclosure Obligations and Proximate Cause in Legal Malpractice: Signal Funding v. Sugar Felsenthal

Date: May 3, 2025
Clarifying Attorney Disclosure Obligations and Proximate Cause in Legal Malpractice: Signal Funding v. Sugar Felsenthal Introduction Signal Funding, LLC (“Signal”) is a pre-settlement...
Clarifying Insurer Duty to Defend BIPA Claims: Access or Disclosure vs. Statutory Violations Exclusions

Clarifying Insurer Duty to Defend BIPA Claims: Access or Disclosure vs. Statutory Violations Exclusions

Date: May 3, 2025
Clarifying Insurer Duty to Defend BIPA Claims: Access or Disclosure vs. Statutory Violations Exclusions Introduction This commentary examines Citizens Insurance Company of America v. Mullins Food...
Signal Funding v. Sugar Felsenthal: Clarifying Fraudulent Concealment and Disclosure Duties in Attorney-Client Relations

Signal Funding v. Sugar Felsenthal: Clarifying Fraudulent Concealment and Disclosure Duties in Attorney-Client Relations

Date: May 3, 2025
Signal Funding v. Sugar Felsenthal: Clarifying Fraudulent Concealment and Disclosure Duties in Attorney-Client Relations Introduction In Signal Funding, LLC v. Sugar Felsenthal Grais & Helsinger LLP,...
Reaffirming Deference to Sentencing Guidelines Commentary under Stinson: Inclusion of Intended Loss in U.S.S.G. §2B1.1 Calculations

Reaffirming Deference to Sentencing Guidelines Commentary under Stinson: Inclusion of Intended Loss in U.S.S.G. §2B1.1 Calculations

Date: May 1, 2025
Reaffirming Deference to Sentencing Guidelines Commentary under Stinson: Inclusion of Intended Loss in U.S.S.G. §2B1.1 Calculations Introduction United States v. Eric Upchurch is a Seventh Circuit...
Jurisdictional Boundaries for Voluntary Dismissals and Contractual Fee Awards Post-Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i)

Jurisdictional Boundaries for Voluntary Dismissals and Contractual Fee Awards Post-Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i)

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Jurisdictional Boundaries for Voluntary Dismissals and Contractual Fee Awards Post-Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) Introduction AAA Gaming LLC and Illinois Gaming Investments, LLC (“Plaintiffs”) entered into a...
Harmless Procedural Error and Sentencing Discretion Under §3553(a) and §5G1.2: United States v. Rogers

Harmless Procedural Error and Sentencing Discretion Under §3553(a) and §5G1.2: United States v. Rogers

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Harmless Procedural Error and Sentencing Discretion Under §3553(a) and §5G1.2: United States v. Rogers Introduction In United States v. Patrick D. Rogers, No. 24-2125 (7th Cir. Apr. 29, 2025), the...
Qualified Immunity Shields Child Protective Workers and Medical Consultants in Emergency Seizures

Qualified Immunity Shields Child Protective Workers and Medical Consultants in Emergency Seizures

Date: Apr 29, 2025
Qualified Immunity Shields Child Protective Workers and Medical Consultants in Emergency Seizures Introduction Erika Mabes and Brian Mabes brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 after the Indiana...
Qualified Immunity in Child Welfare Proceedings: Individualized Analysis of Medical Consultants and Caseworkers

Qualified Immunity in Child Welfare Proceedings: Individualized Analysis of Medical Consultants and Caseworkers

Date: Apr 29, 2025
Qualified Immunity in Child Welfare Proceedings: Individualized Analysis of Medical Consultants and Caseworkers Introduction Erika Mabes v. Angela McFeeley is a Seventh Circuit decision clarifying...
Expanding “Consumer” in Lanham Act False Advertising & Reinforcing Trade Dress Protections: Republic Technologies v. BBK Tobacco & Foods

Expanding “Consumer” in Lanham Act False Advertising & Reinforcing Trade Dress Protections: Republic Technologies v. BBK Tobacco & Foods

Date: Apr 26, 2025
Expanding “Consumer” in Lanham Act False Advertising & Reinforcing Trade Dress Protections: Republic Technologies v. BBK Tobacco & Foods Introduction In Republic Technologies (NA), LLC v. BBK Tobacco...
Expanding “Consumer” in False Advertising & Affirming Trade Dress Infringement: Republic Technologies v. BBK Tobacco

Expanding “Consumer” in False Advertising & Affirming Trade Dress Infringement: Republic Technologies v. BBK Tobacco

Date: Apr 26, 2025
Expanding “Consumer” in False Advertising & Affirming Trade Dress Infringement: Republic Technologies (NA), LLC v. BBK Tobacco & Foods, LLP Introduction In Republic Technologies (NA), LLC v. BBK...
Amendment to U.S.S.G. §4A1.3(b)(1) Advisory: No Mandate for Downward Variance Based on Minor Marijuana Conviction

Amendment to U.S.S.G. §4A1.3(b)(1) Advisory: No Mandate for Downward Variance Based on Minor Marijuana Conviction

Date: Apr 26, 2025
Amendment to U.S.S.G. §4A1.3(b)(1) Advisory: No Mandate for Downward Variance Based on Minor Marijuana Conviction Introduction United States v. Carlos Estrada, Nos. 23-3370 & 23-3378 (7th Cir. Apr....
Application Note 1 Remains Authoritative: Upholding Auer Deference to Sentencing Guidelines Commentary After Kisor and Loper Bright

Application Note 1 Remains Authoritative: Upholding Auer Deference to Sentencing Guidelines Commentary After Kisor and Loper Bright

Date: Apr 26, 2025
Application Note 1 Remains Authoritative: Upholding Auer Deference to Sentencing Guidelines Commentary After Kisor and Loper Bright Introduction United States v. Raymond Poore is a Seventh Circuit...
Clarifying Downward Variances Under Revised U.S.S.G. §4A1.3: United States v. Carlos Estrada

Clarifying Downward Variances Under Revised U.S.S.G. §4A1.3: United States v. Carlos Estrada

Date: Apr 26, 2025
Clarifying Downward Variances Under Revised U.S.S.G. §4A1.3: United States v. Carlos Estrada Introduction This commentary examines the Seventh Circuit’s April 25, 2025 decision in United States v....
Physician Retaliation under EMTALA: Objective Reasonableness and Scope Clarified in Partin v. Baptist Health

Physician Retaliation under EMTALA: Objective Reasonableness and Scope Clarified in Partin v. Baptist Health

Date: Apr 25, 2025
Physician Retaliation under EMTALA: Objective Reasonableness and Scope Clarified in Partin v. Baptist Health Introduction In William R. Partin v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc., the Seventh Circuit...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert