Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Qualified Immunity Reinforced in Child Pornography Investigations: Greene v. Reeves

Qualified Immunity Reinforced in Child Pornography Investigations: Greene v. Reeves

Date: Apr 9, 1996
Qualified Immunity Reinforced in Child Pornography Investigations: Greene v. Reeves Introduction In the landmark case of David Greene and Starna Hill v. William B. Reeves et al., decided by the...
Enforcement of Consent Decrees in Employment Discrimination: Harrison v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville

Enforcement of Consent Decrees in Employment Discrimination: Harrison v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville

Date: Apr 9, 1996
Enforcement of Consent Decrees in Employment Discrimination: Harrison v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville Introduction Robert Dale Harrison, a former employee of the Metropolitan Government of...
Affirmation of Agency Discretion: Vareda Madison-Hughes v. Donna E. Shalala

Affirmation of Agency Discretion: Vareda Madison-Hughes v. Donna E. Shalala

Date: Apr 9, 1996
Affirmation of Agency Discretion: Vareda Madison-Hughes v. Donna E. Shalala Introduction The case of Vareda Madison-Hughes; Tennessee Interfaith Coalition for Justice in Health Care v. Donna E....
Affirmation and Modification in EEOC v. Kentucky State Police: Equitable Tolling and Prejudgment Interest under ADEA

Affirmation and Modification in EEOC v. Kentucky State Police: Equitable Tolling and Prejudgment Interest under ADEA

Date: Apr 2, 1996
Affirmation and Modification in EEOC v. Kentucky State Police: Equitable Tolling and Prejudgment Interest under ADEA Introduction The case Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) v. Kentucky...
Clarifying the Limits of 'Relevant Conduct' Under U.S.S.G. Section 1B1.3: United States v. Hill

Clarifying the Limits of 'Relevant Conduct' Under U.S.S.G. Section 1B1.3: United States v. Hill

Date: Mar 29, 1996
Clarifying the Limits of 'Relevant Conduct' Under U.S.S.G. Section 1B1.3: United States v. Hill Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. Kenneth Joseph Hill (79 F.3d 1477, 6th...
Reversing Qualified Immunity: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Fourth Amendment Protections in Overnight Police Detention

Reversing Qualified Immunity: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Fourth Amendment Protections in Overnight Police Detention

Date: Mar 27, 1996
Reversing Qualified Immunity: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Fourth Amendment Protections in Overnight Police Detention Introduction The case of Robert P. Brennan v. Township of Northville et al.,...
Strict Unconscionability Standard for HEAL Loan Discharge Affirmed by Sixth Circuit

Strict Unconscionability Standard for HEAL Loan Discharge Affirmed by Sixth Circuit

Date: Mar 26, 1996
Strict Unconscionability Standard for HEAL Loan Discharge Affirmed by Sixth Circuit Introduction In the case of In re Ronald L. Rice and Deborah F. Rice, Debtors, 78 F.3d 1144 (6th Cir. 1996), the...
CDA Preemption Affirmed in RMI Titanium v. Westinghouse

CDA Preemption Affirmed in RMI Titanium v. Westinghouse

Date: Mar 23, 1996
Contract Disputes Act Preemption Affirmed in RMI Titanium Company v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation Introduction The case of RMI Titanium Company v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation et al....
Champions Golf Club v. Champions Golf Club: Re-evaluating Service Mark Infringement under the Lanham Act

Champions Golf Club v. Champions Golf Club: Re-evaluating Service Mark Infringement under the Lanham Act

Date: Mar 22, 1996
Champions Golf Club v. Champions Golf Club: Re-evaluating Service Mark Infringement under the Lanham Act Introduction The legal dispute between Champions Golf Club, Inc. of Houston, Texas...
Rule of Reason Applied to Medical Antitrust and Discrimination Claims: Insights from Mangala v. Betkerur

Rule of Reason Applied to Medical Antitrust and Discrimination Claims: Insights from Mangala v. Betkerur

Date: Mar 16, 1996
Rule of Reason Applied to Medical Antitrust and Discrimination Claims: Insights from Mangala v. Betkerur Introduction Mangala v. Betkerur, M.D.; Canton Neonatology, Inc. is a pivotal judicial...
Strict Adherence to Evidence Rule 404(b) Upholds Fair Trial Standards

Strict Adherence to Evidence Rule 404(b) Upholds Fair Trial Standards

Date: Mar 15, 1996
Strict Adherence to Evidence Rule 404(b) Upholds Fair Trial Standards Introduction The case of United States of America v. Jamal T. Merriweather serves as a pivotal example in the interpretation and...
Partial Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege in Grand Jury Proceedings

Partial Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege in Grand Jury Proceedings

Date: Mar 15, 1996
Partial Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege in Grand Jury Proceedings Introduction The case In Re: Grand Jury Proceedings October 12, 1995 (78 F.3d 251) adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Limits of Selective Enforcement Claims under Section 1983: Futernick v. Sumpter Township

Limits of Selective Enforcement Claims under Section 1983: Futernick v. Sumpter Township

Date: Mar 14, 1996
Limits of Selective Enforcement Claims under Section 1983: Futernick v. Sumpter Township Introduction In the case of Sheldon M. Futernick, D/B/A Holiday West Mobile Home Park and D/B/A Holiday Woods...
FRIEDRICH v. FRIEDRICH: Clarifying Custody Rights and Grave Harm Exceptions under the Hague Convention

FRIEDRICH v. FRIEDRICH: Clarifying Custody Rights and Grave Harm Exceptions under the Hague Convention

Date: Mar 14, 1996
FRIEDRICH v. FRIEDRICH: Clarifying Custody Rights and Grave Harm Exceptions under the Hague Convention Introduction FRIEDRICH v. FRIEDRICH, 78 F.3d 1060 (6th Cir. 1996), is a pivotal appellate...
Reversal of New Trial and Vacating Sanctions in Excessive Force Claim - Holmes v. City of Massillon

Reversal of New Trial and Vacating Sanctions in Excessive Force Claim - Holmes v. City of Massillon

Date: Mar 14, 1996
Reversal of New Trial and Vacating Sanctions in Excessive Force Claim - Holmes v. City of Massillon Introduction The case of Linda Holmes, et al. v. City of Massillon, Ohio, et al., adjudicated by...
Establishing Quid Pro Quo in Private-Participant Extortion under the Hobbs Act: Collins v. United States

Establishing Quid Pro Quo in Private-Participant Extortion under the Hobbs Act: Collins v. United States

Date: Mar 12, 1996
Establishing Quid Pro Quo in Private-Participant Extortion under the Hobbs Act: Collins v. United States Introduction Collins v. United States, 78 F.3d 1021 (6th Cir. 1996), is a landmark case that...
Fiduciary Duties in Limited Partnerships: Insights from Life Care Centers of America, Inc. v. Charles Town Associates Limited Partnership

Fiduciary Duties in Limited Partnerships: Insights from Life Care Centers of America, Inc. v. Charles Town Associates Limited Partnership

Date: Mar 12, 1996
Fiduciary Duties in Limited Partnerships: Insights from Life Care Centers of America, Inc. v. Charles Town Associates Limited Partnership Introduction The case of Life Care Centers of America, Inc....
Sixth Circuit Establishes Unambiguous Interpretation of "Treatment by Physical Means" under ERISA

Sixth Circuit Establishes Unambiguous Interpretation of "Treatment by Physical Means" under ERISA

Date: Mar 9, 1996
Sixth Circuit Establishes Unambiguous Interpretation of "Treatment by Physical Means" under ERISA Introduction The case of Chaim Schachner v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Ohio and Mutual Health...
Prior Restraint and the First Amendment: Analysis of Procter & Gamble v. Bankers Trust Company

Prior Restraint and the First Amendment: Analysis of Procter & Gamble v. Bankers Trust Company

Date: Mar 6, 1996
Prior Restraint and the First Amendment: Analysis of Procter & Gamble v. Bankers Trust Company Introduction The case of Procter & Gamble Company v. Bankers Trust Company revolves around a significant...
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Tenure Denial and Grievance Proceedings: Purisch v. Tennessee Technological University

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Tenure Denial and Grievance Proceedings: Purisch v. Tennessee Technological University

Date: Mar 2, 1996
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Tenure Denial and Grievance Proceedings: Purisch v. Tennessee Technological University Introduction The case Steven Purisch v. Tennessee Technological University,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert