Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Protective Sweeps in Arrests Outside the Home: Clarifying Articulable Suspicion Requirements

Protective Sweeps in Arrests Outside the Home: Clarifying Articulable Suspicion Requirements

Date: Feb 27, 1996
Protective Sweeps in Arrests Outside the Home: Clarifying Articulable Suspicion Requirements Introduction The case of United States of America v. Lorenzo Cortez Colbert, 76 F.3d 773 (6th Cir. 1996),...
Limitations on Relitigating Sentencing Issues in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Analysis of DuPont v. United States

Limitations on Relitigating Sentencing Issues in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Analysis of DuPont v. United States

Date: Feb 23, 1996
Limitations on Relitigating Sentencing Issues in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Analysis of DuPont v. United States Introduction Alberto DuPont v. United States is a significant case decided by the United...
Establishing Attorneys as "Debt Collectors" Under the FDCPA: Insights from Wadlington v. Credit Acceptance Corp.

Establishing Attorneys as "Debt Collectors" Under the FDCPA: Insights from Wadlington v. Credit Acceptance Corp.

Date: Feb 22, 1996
Establishing Attorneys as "Debt Collectors" Under the FDCPA: Insights from Wadlington v. Credit Acceptance Corp. Introduction The case of Alan H. Wadlington, Tammy M. Berry, and Chip C. Brunette v....
Lillard v. Shelby County: Establishing a One-Year Statute of Limitations for Title IX Claims in Tennessee

Lillard v. Shelby County: Establishing a One-Year Statute of Limitations for Title IX Claims in Tennessee

Date: Feb 22, 1996
Lillard v. Shelby County: Establishing a One-Year Statute of Limitations for Title IX Claims in Tennessee Introduction In the landmark case of Thomas D. Lillard and Nell P. Lillard, individually and...
Rigorous Adherence to Fed. Rules 23 in Class Action Certification: Sixth Circuit Decertifies In Re: AMS; Pfizer, Inc.

Rigorous Adherence to Fed. Rules 23 in Class Action Certification: Sixth Circuit Decertifies In Re: AMS; Pfizer, Inc.

Date: Feb 16, 1996
Rigorous Adherence to Fed. Rules 23 in Class Action Certification: Sixth Circuit Decertifies In Re: AMS; Pfizer, Inc. Introduction The case of In Re: American Medical Systems, Inc.; Pfizer, Inc. (75...
Access to Legal Assistance for Female Prisoners: GLOVER v. JOHNSON Reversed

Access to Legal Assistance for Female Prisoners: GLOVER v. JOHNSON Reversed

Date: Feb 15, 1996
Access to Legal Assistance for Female Prisoners: GLOVER v. JOHNSON Reversed Introduction GLOVER v. JOHNSON is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit...
Younger Abstention Doctrine in Lawyer Disciplinary Proceedings: Fieger v. Thomas

Younger Abstention Doctrine in Lawyer Disciplinary Proceedings: Fieger v. Thomas

Date: Feb 9, 1996
Younger Abstention Doctrine in Lawyer Disciplinary Proceedings: Fieger v. Thomas Introduction The case of Geoffrey N. Fieger v. Philip J. Thomas revolved around the application of the Younger...
Establishing Duty to Warn in Product Liability: Schaffer v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.

Establishing Duty to Warn in Product Liability: Schaffer v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.

Date: Feb 7, 1996
Establishing Duty to Warn in Product Liability: Schaffer v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc. Introduction The case of Schaffer v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc. addressed critical issues in...
Reaffirmation of Strict Compliance with Permanent Injunctions in Trademark Enforcement: Insights from Rolex Watch U.S.A. v. Crowley

Reaffirmation of Strict Compliance with Permanent Injunctions in Trademark Enforcement: Insights from Rolex Watch U.S.A. v. Crowley

Date: Feb 3, 1996
Reaffirmation of Strict Compliance with Permanent Injunctions in Trademark Enforcement: Insights from Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Crowley Introduction Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Thomas D. Crowley...
Affirmation of Sentences and Proper Application of Sentencing Guidelines in a 'Bustout' Scheme Fraud Case

Affirmation of Sentences and Proper Application of Sentencing Guidelines in a 'Bustout' Scheme Fraud Case

Date: Feb 3, 1996
Affirmation of Sentences and Proper Application of Sentencing Guidelines in a 'Bustout' Scheme Fraud Case Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Cobleigh et al. (94-2219, 94-2221,...
Jury Instruction Standards for Post-Arrest Excessive Force Claims under the Fourth Amendment – Cox v. Treadway Analysis

Jury Instruction Standards for Post-Arrest Excessive Force Claims under the Fourth Amendment – Cox v. Treadway Analysis

Date: Jan 26, 1996
Jury Instruction Standards for Post-Arrest Excessive Force Claims under the Fourth Amendment – Cox v. Treadway Analysis Introduction The case of Joseph Walter Cox and Bennie Burgan, Jr.,...
Reaffirming the Constitutionality of the 100:1 Sentencing Ratio for Cocaine Base: Insights from United States v. Smith

Reaffirming the Constitutionality of the 100:1 Sentencing Ratio for Cocaine Base: Insights from United States v. Smith

Date: Jan 26, 1996
Reaffirming the Constitutionality of the 100:1 Sentencing Ratio for Cocaine Base: Insights from United States v. Smith Introduction United States v. Lewis J. Smith, 73 F.3d 1414 (6th Cir. 1996), is a...
Preservation of Lifetime Retiree Health Benefits under Collective Bargaining Agreements: Analysis of Golden v. Kelsey-Hayes Co.

Preservation of Lifetime Retiree Health Benefits under Collective Bargaining Agreements: Analysis of Golden v. Kelsey-Hayes Co.

Date: Jan 19, 1996
Preservation of Lifetime Retiree Health Benefits under Collective Bargaining Agreements: Analysis of Golden v. Kelsey-Hayes Co. Introduction In the landmark case of Joseph Golden et al. v....
Affirming the Admissibility of Co-defendant Testimony and Dual Roles of Expert and Fact Witnesses in Drug Distribution Cases: United States v. Thomas

Affirming the Admissibility of Co-defendant Testimony and Dual Roles of Expert and Fact Witnesses in Drug Distribution Cases: United States v. Thomas

Date: Jan 17, 1996
Affirming the Admissibility of Co-defendant Testimony and Dual Roles of Expert and Fact Witnesses in Drug Distribution Cases: United States v. Thomas Introduction In United States v. Malcolm Earl...
Establishing Limits on Claims of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: West v. Seabold

Establishing Limits on Claims of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: West v. Seabold

Date: Jan 10, 1996
Establishing Limits on Claims of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: West v. Seabold Introduction Charles Howard West v. William Seabold, Warden (73 F.3d 81) is a pivotal...
Federal Immunity under Kentucky No-Fault Statute Affirmed in Grange Mutual Insurance v. United States

Federal Immunity under Kentucky No-Fault Statute Affirmed in Grange Mutual Insurance v. United States

Date: Dec 28, 1995
Federal Immunity under Kentucky No-Fault Statute Affirmed in Grange Mutual Insurance v. United States Introduction The case of Grange Mutual Insurance Company v. United States addresses the nuanced...
Bankruptcy Court’s Authority to Modify Leases Without Lessor Consent: City of Covington v. Covington Landing Limited Partnership

Bankruptcy Court’s Authority to Modify Leases Without Lessor Consent: City of Covington v. Covington Landing Limited Partnership

Date: Dec 23, 1995
Bankruptcy Court’s Authority to Modify Leases Without Lessor Consent: City of Covington v. Covington Landing Limited Partnership Introduction City of Covington v. Covington Landing Limited...
Glenn v. Tate: Affirming the Right to Effective Counsel in Capital Sentencing

Glenn v. Tate: Affirming the Right to Effective Counsel in Capital Sentencing

Date: Dec 22, 1995
Glenn v. Tate: Affirming the Right to Effective Counsel in Capital Sentencing Introduction In the landmark case of John Glenn v. Arthur Tate, Jr., Warden, 71 F.3d 1204 (6th Cir. 1995), the United...
Affirmative Action and Reverse Discrimination: Insights from Plott v. General Motors Corporation

Affirmative Action and Reverse Discrimination: Insights from Plott v. General Motors Corporation

Date: Dec 21, 1995
Affirmative Action and Reverse Discrimination: Insights from Plott v. General Motors Corporation Introduction The case of Chris R. Plott v. General Motors Corporation, Packard Electric Division,...
Enhanced Fourth Amendment Protections: Reversing Conspiracies Due to Unlawful Seizures in United States v. Buchanon & Reed

Enhanced Fourth Amendment Protections: Reversing Conspiracies Due to Unlawful Seizures in United States v. Buchanon & Reed

Date: Dec 15, 1995
Enhanced Fourth Amendment Protections: Reversing Conspiracies Due to Unlawful Seizures in United States v. Buchanon & Reed Introduction The case of United States of America v. James Buchanon and...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert