Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

U.S. Trustee Discretion in Panel Membership Affirmed: Limited Judicial Review under APA

U.S. Trustee Discretion in Panel Membership Affirmed: Limited Judicial Review under APA

Date: Jun 25, 1996
U.S. Trustee Discretion in Panel Membership Affirmed: Limited Judicial Review under APA Introduction The case of Philip R. Joelson v. United States of America, et al. (86 F.3d 1413) adjudicated by...
Expanded Definition of "Legal Mail" in Prisoners' Rights: Kensu v. Haigh

Expanded Definition of "Legal Mail" in Prisoners' Rights: Kensu v. Haigh

Date: Jun 20, 1996
Expanded Definition of "Legal Mail" in Prisoners' Rights: Kensu v. Haigh Introduction Kensu v. Haigh is a landmark case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on June 19,...
Enhancing Title VII Protections: Turic v. Holland Hospitality and the Inclusion of Contemplated Abortion

Enhancing Title VII Protections: Turic v. Holland Hospitality and the Inclusion of Contemplated Abortion

Date: Jun 18, 1996
Enhancing Title VII Protections: Turic v. Holland Hospitality and the Inclusion of Contemplated Abortion Introduction Turic v. Holland Hospitality, Inc. is a landmark case adjudicated by the United...
Affirmation of 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(1): Reinforcing Commerce Clause Authority Post-Lopez

Affirmation of 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(1): Reinforcing Commerce Clause Authority Post-Lopez

Date: Jun 15, 1996
Affirmation of 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(1): Reinforcing Commerce Clause Authority Post-Lopez Introduction The case of United States of America v. Gary E. Chesney adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Duty of Disclosure in ERISA Contracts: McConocha v. BCBSO

Duty of Disclosure in ERISA Contracts: McConocha v. BCBSO

Date: Jun 15, 1996
Duty of Disclosure in ERISA Contracts: McConocha v. BCBSO Introduction The case of Jeffrey McConocha, et al. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Mutual of Ohio (BCBSO) addresses the critical issue of...
Noble v. Schmitt & Stevens: Affirming Due Process and Free Speech Rights Under Qualified Immunity

Noble v. Schmitt & Stevens: Affirming Due Process and Free Speech Rights Under Qualified Immunity

Date: Jun 15, 1996
Noble v. Schmitt & Stevens: Affirming Due Process and Free Speech Rights Under Qualified Immunity Introduction In the landmark case of Sherman L. G. Noble v. Janice Schmitt and Connie Stevens,...
Sixth Circuit Establishes Workday Basis for WARN Act Damages in Saxion v. Titan-C Manufacturing

Sixth Circuit Establishes Workday Basis for WARN Act Damages in Saxion v. Titan-C Manufacturing

Date: Jun 8, 1996
Sixth Circuit Establishes Workday Basis for WARN Act Damages in Saxion v. Titan-C Manufacturing Introduction In the landmark case Beatrice D. Saxion, et al. v. Titan-C Manufacturing, Inc., et al.,...
Discretion in Public Bidding: EnergyTech Electrical v. Mahoning County Affirmed

Discretion in Public Bidding: EnergyTech Electrical v. Mahoning County Affirmed

Date: Jun 8, 1996
Discretion in Public Bidding: EnergyTech Electrical v. Mahoning County Affirmed Introduction In EnergyTech Electrical, Inc. v. Mahoning County Commissioners, the United States Court of Appeals for...
Fourth Amendment Protections in Consensual Encounters: Insights from United States v. Caicedo and Ryan

Fourth Amendment Protections in Consensual Encounters: Insights from United States v. Caicedo and Ryan

Date: Jun 7, 1996
Fourth Amendment Protections in Consensual Encounters: Insights from United States v. Caicedo and Ryan Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit delivered a pivotal...
Affirmation of Total Liability and Equitable Subrogation in Aviation Disaster: POLEC et al. v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. and McDonnell Douglas Corporation

Affirmation of Total Liability and Equitable Subrogation in Aviation Disaster: POLEC et al. v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. and McDonnell Douglas Corporation

Date: Jun 7, 1996
Affirmation of Total Liability and Equitable Subrogation in Aviation Disaster: POLEC et al. v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. and McDonnell Douglas Corporation Introduction The case of POLEC et al. v....
Expanding 'Related To' Jurisdiction: Sixth Circuit's Landmark Decision in Dow Corning Bankruptcy Case

Expanding 'Related To' Jurisdiction: Sixth Circuit's Landmark Decision in Dow Corning Bankruptcy Case

Date: Jun 4, 1996
Expanding 'Related To' Jurisdiction: Sixth Circuit's Landmark Decision in Dow Corning Bankruptcy Case Introduction In the complex landscape of bankruptcy litigation, jurisdictional determinations...
Establishing the "More than a Scintilla" Standard in FELA Claims: Aparicio v. Norfolk Western Railway Company

Establishing the "More than a Scintilla" Standard in FELA Claims: Aparicio v. Norfolk Western Railway Company

Date: May 31, 1996
Establishing the "More than a Scintilla" Standard in FELA Claims: Aparicio v. Norfolk Western Railway Company Introduction Aparicio v. Norfolk Western Railway Company, 84 F.3d 803 (6th Cir. 1996), is...
Affirmation of Employer's Duty in Providing Reasonable Accommodations under ADA: Hankins v. The Gap, Inc.

Affirmation of Employer's Duty in Providing Reasonable Accommodations under ADA: Hankins v. The Gap, Inc.

Date: May 30, 1996
Affirmation of Employer's Duty in Providing Reasonable Accommodations under ADA: Hankins v. The Gap, Inc. 1. Introduction Frances Hankins filed a lawsuit against her former employer, The Gap, Inc.,...
Res Judicata in Federal Diversity Jurisdiction: Analysis of J.Z.G. Resources, Inc. v. Shelby Insurance Company

Res Judicata in Federal Diversity Jurisdiction: Analysis of J.Z.G. Resources, Inc. v. Shelby Insurance Company

Date: May 29, 1996
Res Judicata in Federal Diversity Jurisdiction: Analysis of J.Z.G. Resources, Inc. v. Shelby Insurance Company Introduction The case J.Z.G. Resources, Inc. v. Shelby Insurance Company, 84 F.3d 211...
Affirmation of Suppression: Exigent Circumstances Unjustified in Knock-and-Announce Requirement

Affirmation of Suppression: Exigent Circumstances Unjustified in Knock-and-Announce Requirement

Date: May 29, 1996
Affirmation of Suppression: Exigent Circumstances Unjustified in Knock-and-Announce Requirement Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Rondell Bates, 84 F.3d 790 (6th Cir. 1996), the...
Defining Standards for Substitution of Counsel and Drug Quantity Assessment in Sentencing: Insights from UNITED STATES v. JENNINGS & Stepp

Defining Standards for Substitution of Counsel and Drug Quantity Assessment in Sentencing: Insights from UNITED STATES v. JENNINGS & Stepp

Date: May 9, 1996
Defining Standards for Substitution of Counsel and Drug Quantity Assessment in Sentencing: Insights from UNITED STATES v. JENNINGS & Stepp Introduction The appellate case United States of America v....
Deliberate Indifference in Procedural Due Process: HOWARD v. GRINAGE

Deliberate Indifference in Procedural Due Process: HOWARD v. GRINAGE

Date: May 4, 1996
Deliberate Indifference in Procedural Due Process: HOWARD v. GRINAGE Introduction HOWARD v. GRINAGE, 82 F.3d 1343 (6th Cir. 1996), is a pivotal case in the realm of procedural due process under the...
Attorneys' Fees Recoverable in Section 301 Actions: Sixth Circuit Affirms and Clarifies

Attorneys' Fees Recoverable in Section 301 Actions: Sixth Circuit Affirms and Clarifies

Date: May 3, 1996
Attorneys' Fees Recoverable in Section 301 Actions: Sixth Circuit Affirms and Clarifies Introduction The case of James Wilson v. The International Brotherhood of Teamsters et al. adjudicated by the...
Affirmation of Disability Benefits Denial: Implications for New Evidence and Procedural Due Process

Affirmation of Disability Benefits Denial: Implications for New Evidence and Procedural Due Process

Date: May 2, 1996
Affirmation of Disability Benefits Denial: Implications for New Evidence and Procedural Due Process Introduction The case of Wayne Cline v. Commissioner of Social Security, adjudicated by the United...
Affirmation of Pre-Death Pain and Suffering Damages under DOHSA: Bickel v. Korean Air Lines

Affirmation of Pre-Death Pain and Suffering Damages under DOHSA: Bickel v. Korean Air Lines

Date: Apr 30, 1996
Affirmation of Pre-Death Pain and Suffering Damages under DOHSA: Bickel v. Korean Air Lines Introduction BICKEL v. KOREAN AIR LINES COmpany, Ltd., 96 F.3d 151 (6th Cir. 1996), is a pivotal case that...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert