Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Coram Nobis Appeals Classified as Civil Under Federal Rules: Sixth Circuit's Decision in Johnson v. United States

Coram Nobis Appeals Classified as Civil Under Federal Rules: Sixth Circuit's Decision in Johnson v. United States

Date: Jan 26, 2001
Coram Nobis Appeals Classified as Civil Under Federal Rules: Sixth Circuit's Decision in Johnson v. United States Introduction The case of United States of America v. Conrad Lee Johnson (237 F.3d...
Knable v. Bexley City School District: Upholding Procedural Compliance and Parental Reimbursement under the IDEA

Knable v. Bexley City School District: Upholding Procedural Compliance and Parental Reimbursement under the IDEA

Date: Jan 25, 2001
Knable v. Bexley City School District: Upholding Procedural Compliance and Parental Reimbursement under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Introduction The case of Justin Knable v....
Affirming Procedures Under Ohio Evid. R. 606(B) in Habeas Corpus Petition: An In-depth Analysis of Doan v. Brigano

Affirming Procedures Under Ohio Evid. R. 606(B) in Habeas Corpus Petition: An In-depth Analysis of Doan v. Brigano

Date: Jan 20, 2001
Affirming Procedures Under Ohio Evid. R. 606(B) in Habeas Corpus Petition: An In-depth Analysis of Doan v. Brigano Introduction James Doan v. Anthony J. Brigano, 237 F.3d 722 (6th Cir. 2001),...
Res Judicata and Procedural Defaults in Capital Habeas Corpus: A Commentary on Van Hook v. Anderson

Res Judicata and Procedural Defaults in Capital Habeas Corpus: A Commentary on Van Hook v. Anderson

Date: Jan 20, 2001
Res Judicata and Procedural Defaults in Capital Habeas Corpus: A Commentary on Van Hook v. Anderson Introduction In Robert Van Hook v. Carl Anderson, the United States District Court for the Southern...
Prosecutorial Misconduct in Closing Arguments: Sixth Circuit Reverses Conviction in United States v. Carter

Prosecutorial Misconduct in Closing Arguments: Sixth Circuit Reverses Conviction in United States v. Carter

Date: Jan 19, 2001
Prosecutorial Misconduct in Closing Arguments: Sixth Circuit Reverses Conviction in United States v. Carter Introduction United States of America v. Roquel Allen Carter, 236 F.3d 777 (6th Cir. 2001),...
Enhancements in Sentencing for Obstruction and Computer Use in Child Pornography Cases: Brown v. United States

Enhancements in Sentencing for Obstruction and Computer Use in Child Pornography Cases: Brown v. United States

Date: Jan 17, 2001
Enhancements in Sentencing for Obstruction and Computer Use in Child Pornography Cases: Brown v. United States Introduction The case of United States of America v. Daniel Brown (237 F.3d 625) serves...
Proper Application of Criminal History Points Based on Served Time in United States v. Murphy

Proper Application of Criminal History Points Based on Served Time in United States v. Murphy

Date: Jan 17, 2001
Proper Application of Criminal History Points Based on Served Time in United States v. Murphy Introduction In the case of United States v. Vernon L. Murphy, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Campbell Soup Co. v. Dale Ross: Reversing Summary Judgment on Disability Discrimination Claims under the ADA

Campbell Soup Co. v. Dale Ross: Reversing Summary Judgment on Disability Discrimination Claims under the ADA

Date: Jan 11, 2001
Campbell Soup Co. v. Dale Ross: Reversing Summary Judgment on Disability Discrimination Claims under the ADA Introduction In the landmark case of Dale Ross v. Campbell Soup Company, 237 F.3d 701 (6th...
Proper Standards of Review in Supervised Release Revocation Proceedings: United States v. Curtis

Proper Standards of Review in Supervised Release Revocation Proceedings: United States v. Curtis

Date: Jan 11, 2001
Proper Standards of Review in Supervised Release Revocation Proceedings: United States v. Curtis Introduction United States of America v. Richard Perry Curtis, 237 F.3d 598 (6th Cir. 2001), is a...
Deliberate Indifference in Denial of Medical Treatment: Napier v. Madison County

Deliberate Indifference in Denial of Medical Treatment: Napier v. Madison County

Date: Jan 5, 2001
Deliberate Indifference in Denial of Medical Treatment: Napier v. Madison County Introduction In the landmark case of Jeffrey L. Napier v. Madison County, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Eligibility Thresholds for Cancellation of Removal and the Limits of Counsel’s Discretion: Huicochea-Gomez v. INS

Eligibility Thresholds for Cancellation of Removal and the Limits of Counsel’s Discretion: Huicochea-Gomez v. INS

Date: Jan 3, 2001
Eligibility Thresholds for Cancellation of Removal and the Limits of Counsel’s Discretion: Huicochea-Gomez v. INS Introduction The case of Carlos Huicochea-Gomez and Margot Huicochea-Reza v....
Parry v. Mohawk Motors: Affirming Limited Private Remedies under FOTETA and Bivens in Employment Termination Cases

Parry v. Mohawk Motors: Affirming Limited Private Remedies under FOTETA and Bivens in Employment Termination Cases

Date: Dec 30, 2000
Parry v. Mohawk Motors: Affirming Limited Private Remedies under FOTETA and Bivens in Employment Termination Cases Introduction In the case of Christopher J. Parry v. Mohawk Motors of Michigan, Inc.,...
Establishing Criteria for Venue Transfer under 28 USC §1404(a): Analysis of SKY Technology Partners v. Midwest Research Institute

Establishing Criteria for Venue Transfer under 28 USC §1404(a): Analysis of SKY Technology Partners v. Midwest Research Institute

Date: Dec 22, 2000
Establishing Criteria for Venue Transfer under 28 USC §1404(a): Analysis of SKY Technology Partners v. Midwest Research Institute 1. Introduction SKY Technology Partners, LLC v. Midwest Research...
Affirmation of No Constitutional Violation in §1983 Claims: Weeks v. Portage County

Affirmation of No Constitutional Violation in §1983 Claims: Weeks v. Portage County

Date: Dec 20, 2000
Affirmation of No Constitutional Violation in §1983 Claims: Weeks v. Portage County Introduction Weeks v. Portage County Executive Offices is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Expanded Interpretation of § 2244(d): Sixth Circuit Reverses Time-Bar Dismissal in Bronaugh v. State of Ohio

Expanded Interpretation of § 2244(d): Sixth Circuit Reverses Time-Bar Dismissal in Bronaugh v. State of Ohio

Date: Dec 20, 2000
Expanded Interpretation of § 2244(d): Sixth Circuit Reverses Time-Bar Dismissal in Bronaugh v. State of Ohio 1. Introduction The case of D'Juan Bronaugh v. State of Ohio serves as a pivotal decision...
Enhancing Religious Neutrality in School Vouchers: Sixth Circuit Affirms Ohio’s Program Violates the Establishment Clause

Enhancing Religious Neutrality in School Vouchers: Sixth Circuit Affirms Ohio’s Program Violates the Establishment Clause

Date: Dec 12, 2000
Enhancing Religious Neutrality in School Vouchers: Sixth Circuit Affirms Ohio’s Program Violates the Establishment Clause Introduction The case of Doris Simmons-Harris et al. v. Susan Tave Zelman et...
Affirmation of Procedural Default Application under AEDPA in Simpson v. Jones

Affirmation of Procedural Default Application under AEDPA in Simpson v. Jones

Date: Dec 6, 2000
Affirmation of Procedural Default Application under AEDPA in Simpson v. Jones Introduction Simpson v. Jones, 238 F.3d 399 (6th Cir. 2000), is a pivotal case addressing the application of procedural...
Supervised Release Revocation: Upholding Sentencing Guidelines and Probation Officers' Authority in United States v. Cofield

Supervised Release Revocation: Upholding Sentencing Guidelines and Probation Officers' Authority in United States v. Cofield

Date: Nov 23, 2000
Supervised Release Revocation: Upholding Sentencing Guidelines and Probation Officers' Authority in United States v. Cofield Introduction The case of United States v. Keenan Kester Cofield delves...
Reaffirmation Agreement Violations: No Implied Private Right of Action under 11 U.S.C. § 524 – Da v. Pertuso

Reaffirmation Agreement Violations: No Implied Private Right of Action under 11 U.S.C. § 524 – Da v. Pertuso

Date: Nov 23, 2000
Reaffirmation Agreement Violations: No Implied Private Right of Action under 11 U.S.C. § 524 – Da v. Pertuso Introduction In the landmark case of Da v. Pertuso, decided by the United States Court of...
Enhanced Standards for Admissibility of Veterinary Expert Testimony: Jahn v. Equine Services

Enhanced Standards for Admissibility of Veterinary Expert Testimony: Jahn v. Equine Services

Date: Nov 22, 2000
Enhanced Standards for Admissibility of Veterinary Expert Testimony: Jahn v. Equine Services 1. Introduction In Deborah Jahn v. Equine Services, PSC, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert