Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Interpretation of Contractual Tax Liability: Goodrich v. Filter

Interpretation of Contractual Tax Liability: Goodrich v. Filter

Date: Mar 30, 2001
Interpretation of Contractual Tax Liability: Goodrich v. Filter Introduction The case of B.F. Goodrich Company v. United States Filter Corporation addresses a critical dispute arising from the...
Enforceability and Limitations of Sentencing Agreements: United States v. Ross

Enforceability and Limitations of Sentencing Agreements: United States v. Ross

Date: Mar 30, 2001
Enforceability and Limitations of Sentencing Agreements: United States v. Ross Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Daniel P. Ross, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
ERISA Preemption of State Insurance Law Upheld by Sixth Circuit in MMO v. deSoto

ERISA Preemption of State Insurance Law Upheld by Sixth Circuit in MMO v. deSoto

Date: Mar 28, 2001
ERISA Preemption of State Insurance Law Upheld by Sixth Circuit in MMO v. deSoto Introduction In the case of Medical Mutual of Ohio, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Denise deSOTO; Jose deSoto,...
Procedural Default and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Coleman v. Mitchell, 244 F.3d 533 (6th Cir. 2001)

Procedural Default and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Coleman v. Mitchell, 244 F.3d 533 (6th Cir. 2001)

Date: Mar 27, 2001
Procedural Default and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Coleman v. Mitchell, 244 F.3d 533 (6th Cir. 2001) Introduction Coleman v. Mitchell is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Affirmation of the Sequential Process in Disability Claims: Heston v. Commissioner of Social Security

Affirmation of the Sequential Process in Disability Claims: Heston v. Commissioner of Social Security

Date: Mar 27, 2001
Affirmation of the Sequential Process in Disability Claims: Heston v. Commissioner of Social Security Introduction In the case of Ruby E. Heston v. Commissioner of Social Security, the United States...
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Death Sentencing: Cone v. Bell

Effective Assistance of Counsel in Death Sentencing: Cone v. Bell

Date: Mar 23, 2001
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Death Sentencing: Cone v. Bell Introduction Cone v. Bell, 243 F.3d 961 (6th Cir. 2001), is a pivotal case in the realm of criminal justice, particularly concerning...
Reversal of Expert Testimony Exclusion in FELA Case: Hardyman v. Norfolk Western Railway

Reversal of Expert Testimony Exclusion in FELA Case: Hardyman v. Norfolk Western Railway

Date: Mar 14, 2001
Reversal of Expert Testimony Exclusion in FELA Case: Hardyman v. Norfolk Western Railway Introduction In the case of Gary W. Hardyman, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Norfolk Western Railway Company et al....
Enhanced Gatekeeping Standards in Expert Testimony: Insights from Nelson v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.

Enhanced Gatekeeping Standards in Expert Testimony: Insights from Nelson v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.

Date: Mar 10, 2001
Enhanced Gatekeeping Standards in Expert Testimony: Insights from Nelson v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. Introduction In the landmark case of Nelson v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., the United States...
Retroactive Application of the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act: Singleton v. Smith and Ross

Retroactive Application of the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act: Singleton v. Smith and Ross

Date: Mar 3, 2001
Retroactive Application of the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act: Singleton v. Smith and Ross Introduction The case of Alphonso Singleton v. Lee Edward Smith and Eric Ross (241 F.3d 534) adjudicated by...
Affirmation on Off-Duty Police Conduct Not Acting Under Color of Law: Redding v. St. Eward

Affirmation on Off-Duty Police Conduct Not Acting Under Color of Law: Redding v. St. Eward

Date: Mar 2, 2001
Affirmation on Off-Duty Police Conduct Not Acting Under Color of Law: Redding v. St. Eward Introduction The case of Vivian D. Redding v. Beverly St. Eward revolves around allegations of unlawful...
Balancing First Amendment Rights and Institutional Obligations in Academia: Bonnell v. Lorenzo et al.

Balancing First Amendment Rights and Institutional Obligations in Academia: Bonnell v. Lorenzo et al.

Date: Mar 2, 2001
Balancing First Amendment Rights and Institutional Obligations in Academia: Bonnell v. Lorenzo et al. Introduction In the landmark case of John C. Bonnell and Nancy L. Bonnell v. Albert Lorenzo,...
Substantial Evidence Standard Affirmed in Disability Benefits Denial: Thomas v. Halter

Substantial Evidence Standard Affirmed in Disability Benefits Denial: Thomas v. Halter

Date: Feb 28, 2001
Substantial Evidence Standard Affirmed in Disability Benefits Denial: Thomas v. Halter Introduction In the landmark case Thomas v. Halter, decided on February 27, 2001, the United States District...
Defining 'Color of State Law' and Qualified Immunity: Insights from Waters v. City of Morristown

Defining 'Color of State Law' and Qualified Immunity: Insights from Waters v. City of Morristown

Date: Feb 23, 2001
Defining 'Color of State Law' and Qualified Immunity: Insights from Waters v. City of Morristown Introduction Waters v. City of Morristown is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of...
Qualified Immunity and Religious Rights in Prison: Flagner v. Wilkinson

Qualified Immunity and Religious Rights in Prison: Flagner v. Wilkinson

Date: Feb 23, 2001
Qualified Immunity and Religious Rights in Prison: Flagner v. Wilkinson Introduction The case Flagner v. Wilkinson, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on February 22,...
Sixth Circuit Establishes New Precedent on Qualified Immunity and First Amendment Retaliation in McCurdy v. Montgomery County

Sixth Circuit Establishes New Precedent on Qualified Immunity and First Amendment Retaliation in McCurdy v. Montgomery County

Date: Feb 17, 2001
Sixth Circuit Establishes New Precedent on Qualified Immunity and First Amendment Retaliation in McCurdy v. Montgomery County Introduction In the landmark case James E. McCurdy v. Montgomery County,...
Adherence to Apprendi in Sentencing Multiple-Object Drug Conspiracies: Neuhausser v. United States

Adherence to Apprendi in Sentencing Multiple-Object Drug Conspiracies: Neuhausser v. United States

Date: Feb 15, 2001
Adherence to Apprendi in Sentencing Multiple-Object Drug Conspiracies: Neuhausser v. United States Introduction The case of United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randall R. Neuhausser and...
Demand Futility in Shareholder Derivative Actions: Insights from McCall v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp.

Demand Futility in Shareholder Derivative Actions: Insights from McCall v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp.

Date: Feb 14, 2001
Demand Futility in Shareholder Derivative Actions: Insights from McCall v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp. Introduction The case of H. Carl McCall, as Comptroller of the State of New York and Trustee...
Intentional Misrepresentation and State Employee Immunity: Insights from Minger v. Murray State University

Intentional Misrepresentation and State Employee Immunity: Insights from Minger v. Murray State University

Date: Feb 10, 2001
Intentional Misrepresentation and State Employee Immunity: Insights from Minger v. Murray State University Introduction The case of Minger v. Murray State University (239 F.3d 793, 6th Cir. 2001)...
Plea Agreement Precludes Appeal Rights: An Analysis of United States v. Fleming

Plea Agreement Precludes Appeal Rights: An Analysis of United States v. Fleming

Date: Feb 6, 2001
Plea Agreement Precludes Appeal Rights: An Analysis of United States v. Fleming Introduction The case of United States of America v. Donelle Fleming, 239 F.3d 761 (6th Cir. 2001), presents a pivotal...
Application of the Discovery Rule in FELA: Campbell v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Co.

Application of the Discovery Rule in FELA: Campbell v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Co.

Date: Jan 30, 2001
Application of the Discovery Rule in FELA: Campbell v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Co. Introduction Robert Campbell filed a lawsuit against his former employer, Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert