Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Reversal of Thrifty Rent-A-Car’s Insurance Liability: A New Precedent in Michigan Insurance Law

Reversal of Thrifty Rent-A-Car’s Insurance Liability: A New Precedent in Michigan Insurance Law

Date: May 4, 2001
Reversal of Thrifty Rent-A-Car’s Insurance Liability: A New Precedent in Michigan Insurance Law 1. Introduction The case of Allstate Insurance Company; American Express, Property and Casualty...
Finality of Judicial Decisions in Light of Constitutional Challenges: Blue Diamond Coal Co. v. Trustees of the UMWA Combined Benefit Fund

Finality of Judicial Decisions in Light of Constitutional Challenges: Blue Diamond Coal Co. v. Trustees of the UMWA Combined Benefit Fund

Date: May 4, 2001
Finality of Judicial Decisions in Light of Constitutional Challenges: Blue Diamond Coal Co. v. Trustees of the UMWA Combined Benefit Fund Introduction Blue Diamond Coal Co. v. Trustees of the UMWA...
United States v. Peterman: Establishing Limits on Habeas Corpus Relief under 28 U.S.C. §2241

United States v. Peterman: Establishing Limits on Habeas Corpus Relief under 28 U.S.C. §2241

Date: May 1, 2001
United States v. Peterman: Establishing Limits on Habeas Corpus Relief under 28 U.S.C. §2241 Introduction The case of United States of America v. Darrell Peterman et al., reported in 249 F.3d 458...
Sixth Circuit Upholds Mandatory Exhaustion under PLRA and Reinvigorates Deliberate Indifference Claims in Inmates' Eighth Amendment Suit

Sixth Circuit Upholds Mandatory Exhaustion under PLRA and Reinvigorates Deliberate Indifference Claims in Inmates' Eighth Amendment Suit

Date: May 1, 2001
Sixth Circuit Upholds Mandatory Exhaustion under PLRA and Reinvigorates Deliberate Indifference Claims in Inmates' Eighth Amendment Suit Introduction Greg Curry, et al. v. David Scott, et al. is a...
Recognition of Six-Year Statute of Limitations for Ohio Age Discrimination Claims in Ziegler v. IBP Hog Market

Recognition of Six-Year Statute of Limitations for Ohio Age Discrimination Claims in Ziegler v. IBP Hog Market

Date: May 1, 2001
Recognition of Six-Year Statute of Limitations for Ohio Age Discrimination Claims in Ziegler v. IBP Hog Market Introduction The appellate decision in Ziegler v. IBP Hog Market, Inc. marks a...
6th Circuit Holds Ohio Track Clearance Regulation Not Preempted by Federal Railroad Statutes: Tyrrell v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

6th Circuit Holds Ohio Track Clearance Regulation Not Preempted by Federal Railroad Statutes: Tyrrell v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

Date: Apr 26, 2001
6th Circuit Holds Ohio Track Clearance Regulation Not Preempted by Federal Railroad Statutes: Tyrrell v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co., 248 F.3d 517 (6th Cir. 2001) Introduction The case of Frederick...
Sixth Amendment Speedy Trial Right, Safety Valve Sentencing, and Forfeiture Ownership Determined in United States v. O'Dell, III

Sixth Amendment Speedy Trial Right, Safety Valve Sentencing, and Forfeiture Ownership Determined in United States v. O'Dell, III

Date: Apr 25, 2001
Sixth Amendment Speedy Trial Right, Safety Valve Sentencing, and Forfeiture Ownership Determined in United States v. O'Dell, III Introduction In United States of America v. Jackson C. O'Dell, III,...
Interpreting "Regarded as Disabled" under the ADA: Analyzing Henderson v. Ardco, Inc.

Interpreting "Regarded as Disabled" under the ADA: Analyzing Henderson v. Ardco, Inc.

Date: Apr 25, 2001
Interpreting "Regarded as Disabled" under the ADA: Analyzing Henderson v. Ardco, Inc. Introduction Henderson v. Ardco, Inc. is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Protective Sweeps and Double Jeopardy: Insights from United States v. Joseph B. Taylor III

Protective Sweeps and Double Jeopardy: Insights from United States v. Joseph B. Taylor III

Date: Apr 25, 2001
Protective Sweeps and Double Jeopardy: Insights from United States v. Joseph B. Taylor III Introduction The case of United States of America v. Joseph Benjamin Taylor III (248 F.3d 506) adjudicated...
Kostrzewa v. City of Troy: Establishing New Standards for Excessive Force and Handcuffing Policies

Kostrzewa v. City of Troy: Establishing New Standards for Excessive Force and Handcuffing Policies

Date: Apr 24, 2001
Kostrzewa v. City of Troy: Establishing New Standards for Excessive Force and Handcuffing Policies Introduction The case of Charles Kostrzewa v. City of Troy was adjudicated in the United States...
Clarifying ADA Notice Pleading Requirements: EEOC v. Routh Packing Co.

Clarifying ADA Notice Pleading Requirements: EEOC v. Routh Packing Co.

Date: Apr 20, 2001
Clarifying ADA Notice Pleading Requirements: EEOC v. Routh Packing Co. Introduction In Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) v. J.H. Routh Packing Company, the United States Court of Appeals...
Affirmation of ICARA's Expeditious Return Provisions in Child Abduction Case: March v. Levine

Affirmation of ICARA's Expeditious Return Provisions in Child Abduction Case: March v. Levine

Date: Apr 20, 2001
Affirmation of ICARA's Expeditious Return Provisions in Child Abduction Case: March v. Levine Introduction March v. Levine is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Sixth Circuit Establishes Uniform Standard for § 1983 Malicious Prosecution Claims Under the Fourth Amendment

Sixth Circuit Establishes Uniform Standard for § 1983 Malicious Prosecution Claims Under the Fourth Amendment

Date: Apr 19, 2001
Sixth Circuit Establishes Uniform Standard for § 1983 Malicious Prosecution Claims Under the Fourth Amendment Introduction The case of Jack Frantz, et al. v. Village of Bradford, et al., Shane Duffey...
Collateral Nature of Delayed Rule 33 Motions and AEDPA §2255 Limitations: Sixth Circuit’s Decision in Joe Johnson v. United States

Collateral Nature of Delayed Rule 33 Motions and AEDPA §2255 Limitations: Sixth Circuit’s Decision in Joe Johnson v. United States

Date: Apr 17, 2001
Collateral Nature of Delayed Rule 33 Motions and AEDPA §2255 Limitations: Sixth Circuit’s Decision in Joe Johnson v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of Joe I v. Ry Johnson, 246 F.3d...
Assault on Federal Officer Defined as General Intent Crime: Implications from United States v. Kimes

Assault on Federal Officer Defined as General Intent Crime: Implications from United States v. Kimes

Date: Apr 14, 2001
Assault on Federal Officer Defined as General Intent Crime: Implications from United States v. Kimes Introduction United States v. James A. Kimes (246 F.3d 800) is a pivotal case decided by the...
Buxton v. Halter: Establishing Standards for Disability Evaluation in Chronic Illness Cases

Buxton v. Halter: Establishing Standards for Disability Evaluation in Chronic Illness Cases

Date: Apr 13, 2001
Buxton v. Halter: Establishing Standards for Disability Evaluation in Chronic Illness Cases Introduction In the case of Frances Buxton v. William A. Halter, Commissioner of Social Security, the...
National Guard Technicians Must Pursue Military Channels for Discrimination Claims: Analysis of Fisher v. Peters, 249 F.3d 433 (6th Cir. 2001)

National Guard Technicians Must Pursue Military Channels for Discrimination Claims: Analysis of Fisher v. Peters, 249 F.3d 433 (6th Cir. 2001)

Date: Apr 10, 2001
National Guard Technicians Must Pursue Military Channels for Discrimination Claims: Analysis of Fisher v. Peters, 249 F.3d 433 (6th Cir. 2001) Introduction Tracy D. Fisher, Plaintiff-Appellant,...
Perkins v. American Electric Power: Implications for Negligence and Seaworthiness under the Jones Act

Perkins v. American Electric Power: Implications for Negligence and Seaworthiness under the Jones Act

Date: Apr 7, 2001
Perkins v. American Electric Power: Implications for Negligence and Seaworthiness under the Jones Act Introduction Perkins v. American Electric Power Fuel Supply, Inc. is a landmark case adjudicated...
Limited Tolling of AEDPA Statute of Limitations through Delayed Appeals: Parrish Searcy v. Harold Carter

Limited Tolling of AEDPA Statute of Limitations through Delayed Appeals: Parrish Searcy v. Harold Carter

Date: Apr 6, 2001
Limited Tolling of AEDPA Statute of Limitations through Delayed Appeals Introduction In the landmark case of Parrish Searcy v. Harold Carter, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Rehabilitation Act Retaliation Claim: Gribcheck v. USPS (6th Cir. 2001)

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Rehabilitation Act Retaliation Claim: Gribcheck v. USPS (6th Cir. 2001)

Date: Mar 31, 2001
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Rehabilitation Act Retaliation Claim: Gribcheck v. USPS (6th Cir. 2001) Introduction Gribcheck v. Marvin T. Runyon, Jr., Postmaster General, United States Postal...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert