Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Establishing Prima Facie Race Discrimination in Commercial Establishments: Insights from Christian v. Wal-Mart

Establishing Prima Facie Race Discrimination in Commercial Establishments: Insights from Christian v. Wal-Mart

Date: Jun 7, 2001
Establishing Prima Facie Race Discrimination in Commercial Establishments: Insights from Christian v. Wal-Mart Introduction In Christian v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (252 F.3d 862, 6th Cir. 2001), the...
Balancing Public Employee Speech and Employer Efficiency: Brandenburg v. Housing Authority of Irvine

Balancing Public Employee Speech and Employer Efficiency: Brandenburg v. Housing Authority of Irvine

Date: Jun 7, 2001
Balancing Public Employee Speech and Employer Efficiency: Brandenburg v. Housing Authority of Irvine Introduction Brandenburg v. Housing Authority of Irvine is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Grendell v. Ohio Supreme Court: Standing and Due Process under Rule XIV, § 5

Grendell v. Ohio Supreme Court: Standing and Due Process under Rule XIV, § 5

Date: Jun 6, 2001
Grendell v. Ohio Supreme Court: Standing and Due Process under Rule XIV, § 5 Introduction In the case of Grendell v. Ohio Supreme Court, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Affirmation of Felon-In-Posession Under §922(g)(1) Despite State Civil Rights Restoration: United States v. Ormsby

Affirmation of Felon-In-Posession Under §922(g)(1) Despite State Civil Rights Restoration: United States v. Ormsby

Date: Jun 5, 2001
Affirmation of Felon-In-Posession Under §922(g)(1) Despite State Civil Rights Restoration: United States v. Ormsby Introduction In United States v. Larry Arthur Ormsby, 252 F.3d 844 (6th Cir. 2001),...
Impact of Judicially Declared Unconstitutionality on Habeas Corpus Applications: Ricardo DIAZ v. KINKELA

Impact of Judicially Declared Unconstitutionality on Habeas Corpus Applications: Ricardo DIAZ v. KINKELA

Date: Jun 5, 2001
Impact of Judicially Declared Unconstitutionality on Habeas Corpus Applications: Ricardo DIAZ v. KINKELA 1. Introduction The case of Ricardo DIAZ v. KINKELA presents a pivotal examination of the...
Strong Inference Standard Under PSLRA: HELWIG v. VENCOR, INC. Commentary

Strong Inference Standard Under PSLRA: HELWIG v. VENCOR, INC. Commentary

Date: Jun 1, 2001
Strong Inference Standard Under PSLRA: HELWIG v. VENCOR, INC. Commentary Introduction HELWIG v. VENCOR, INC. is a seminal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit...
Revolutionizing “True Threats” and Obscenity Standards in Interstate Communications: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. William M. Landham

Revolutionizing “True Threats” and Obscenity Standards in Interstate Communications: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. William M. Landham

Date: May 26, 2001
Revolutionizing “True Threats” and Obscenity Standards in Interstate Communications: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. William M. Landham Introduction In the case of United States of...
Retaliatory Transfer in Prison Settings: Smith v. Campbell Establishes Critical Precedent

Retaliatory Transfer in Prison Settings: Smith v. Campbell Establishes Critical Precedent

Date: May 25, 2001
Retaliatory Transfer in Prison Settings: Smith v. Campbell Establishes Critical Precedent Introduction Robert L. Smith, Jr. v. Donal Campbell, Warden; Janice Buchanan; Kay Winkler (250 F.3d 1032) is...
Affirmation of Search Warrant Validity Under Fourth Amendment Standards: Greene v. United States

Affirmation of Search Warrant Validity Under Fourth Amendment Standards: Greene v. United States

Date: May 24, 2001
Affirmation of Search Warrant Validity Under Fourth Amendment Standards: Greene v. United States Introduction Case: United States of America v. Phillip James Greene Court: United States Court of...
Affirmation of Trustee's Right to Avoid Defectively Executed Mortgage Under 11 U.S.C. § 544(a)(3)

Affirmation of Trustee's Right to Avoid Defectively Executed Mortgage Under 11 U.S.C. § 544(a)(3)

Date: May 23, 2001
Affirmation of Trustee's Right to Avoid Defectively Executed Mortgage Under 11 U.S.C. § 544(a)(3) Introduction In re Bernard L. Zaptocky and Gloria J. Zaptocky, Debtors is a pivotal case decided by...
Affirmation of Conspiracy Convictions Reinforcing Co-Conspirator Testimony Admissibility and Circumstantial Evidence Sufficiency

Affirmation of Conspiracy Convictions Reinforcing Co-Conspirator Testimony Admissibility and Circumstantial Evidence Sufficiency

Date: May 19, 2001
Affirmation of Conspiracy Convictions Reinforcing Co-Conspirator Testimony Admissibility and Circumstantial Evidence Sufficiency Introduction In the case of UNITED STATES of America v. Luis Salgado...
Procedural and Substantive Due Process Affirmed in Special Use Permit Case: Brody v. City of Mason

Procedural and Substantive Due Process Affirmed in Special Use Permit Case: Brody v. City of Mason

Date: May 18, 2001
Procedural and Substantive Due Process Affirmed in Special Use Permit Case: Brody v. City of Mason Introduction The case of Bonita Brody, Mary Lou Keenon, and Alex Lebedovych v. City of Mason and...
Affirming the Balance of Speedy Trial Rights and Defendant Evasion: Wilson v. Mitchell

Affirming the Balance of Speedy Trial Rights and Defendant Evasion: Wilson v. Mitchell

Date: May 15, 2001
Affirming the Balance of Speedy Trial Rights and Defendant Evasion: Wilson v. Mitchell Introduction Charles Wilson, the petitioner-appellant, appeals the denial of his habeas corpus petition by the...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination Claim: Da v. Jinks and Green

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination Claim: Da v. Jinks and Green

Date: May 15, 2001
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination Claim: Da v. Jinks and Green Introduction In the case of Da v. d M. Jinks and Elizabeth M. Green, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Affirmation of No-Trespass Policies in Public Housing Under Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments

Affirmation of No-Trespass Policies in Public Housing Under Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments

Date: May 15, 2001
Affirmation of No-Trespass Policies in Public Housing Under Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments Introduction The case of Albert Thompson v. Mayor Victor Ashe, et al. (250 F.3d 399) adjudicated by the...
Affirmation of False Claims and Obstruction of Justice Convictions: Insights from United States v. Logan & Laws

Affirmation of False Claims and Obstruction of Justice Convictions: Insights from United States v. Logan & Laws

Date: May 12, 2001
Affirmation of False Claims and Obstruction of Justice Convictions: Insights from United States v. Logan & Laws Introduction The case of United States of America v. John M. Logan and Alan Michael...
Clarifying Nondischargeability of Defamation Claims under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6): Analysis of In re Kennedy

Clarifying Nondischargeability of Defamation Claims under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6): Analysis of In re Kennedy

Date: May 11, 2001
Clarifying Nondischargeability of Defamation Claims under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6): Analysis of In re Kennedy Introduction The case In re Thomas Joseph Kennedy and Diane Michelle Kennedy, Debtors (249...
Trademark Priority and Geographic Scope: Insights from Allard Enterprises, Inc. v. Advanced Programming Resources, Inc.

Trademark Priority and Geographic Scope: Insights from Allard Enterprises, Inc. v. Advanced Programming Resources, Inc.

Date: May 9, 2001
Trademark Priority and Geographic Scope: Insights from Allard Enterprises, Inc. v. Advanced Programming Resources, Inc. Introduction Allard Enterprises, Inc. v. Advanced Programming Resources, Inc.,...
Equitable Tolling Applied to § 2255 Habeas Petitions: Insights from Dunlap v. United States

Equitable Tolling Applied to § 2255 Habeas Petitions: Insights from Dunlap v. United States

Date: May 8, 2001
Equitable Tolling Applied to § 2255 Habeas Petitions: Insights from Dunlap v. United States Introduction Horace Lee Dunlap v. United States, 250 F.3d 1001 (6th Cir. 2001), is a pivotal case that...
Limitation of Scope and Timing in Retaliation Claims: Analysis of Strouss v. Michigan Department of Corrections

Limitation of Scope and Timing in Retaliation Claims: Analysis of Strouss v. Michigan Department of Corrections

Date: May 5, 2001
Limitation of Scope and Timing in Retaliation Claims: Analysis of Strouss v. Michigan Department of Corrections Introduction Strouss v. Michigan Department of Corrections is a pivotal case...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert