Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Remand Motions as Dispositive Actions: Insights from Vogel v. U.S. Office Products Company

Remand Motions as Dispositive Actions: Insights from Vogel v. U.S. Office Products Company

Date: Jul 26, 2001
Remand Motions as Dispositive Actions: Insights from Vogel v. U.S. Office Products Company Introduction In the landmark case of Gregory Vogel and Charles Cox v. U.S. Office Products Company, 258 F.3d...
Sixth Circuit Upholds PLRA's Attorney Fee Cap under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(d)(2) as Constitutional

Sixth Circuit Upholds PLRA's Attorney Fee Cap under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(d)(2) as Constitutional

Date: Jul 21, 2001
Sixth Circuit Upholds PLRA's Attorney Fee Cap under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(d)(2) as Constitutional Introduction In the case of William H. Walker, Jr. v. Thomas Bain, Guard; Janice Metzger, the United...
Standard for Proving Pretext in Employment Discrimination: Analysis of Braithwaite v. The Timken Company

Standard for Proving Pretext in Employment Discrimination: Analysis of Braithwaite v. The Timken Company

Date: Jul 19, 2001
Standard for Proving Pretext in Employment Discrimination: Analysis of Braithwaite v. The Timken Company Introduction In Harold F. Braithwaite v. The Timken Company, the plaintiff, Harold F....
Novation and Third-Party Beneficiary: Insights from Imperial Hotels Corp. v. Dore et al.

Novation and Third-Party Beneficiary: Insights from Imperial Hotels Corp. v. Dore et al.

Date: Jul 19, 2001
Novation and Third-Party Beneficiary: Insights from Imperial Hotels Corp. v. Dore et al. Introduction The case of Imperial Hotels Corporation v. Arthur P. Dore; Jay Ambe Corporation; and Dore...
Sixth Circuit Strengthens Individualized Review for Certificates of Appealability in Capital Cases Post Slack

Sixth Circuit Strengthens Individualized Review for Certificates of Appealability in Capital Cases Post Slack

Date: Jul 19, 2001
Sixth Circuit Strengthens Individualized Review for Certificates of Appealability in Capital Cases Post Slack Introduction Sidney Porterfield v. Ricky Bell, 258 F.3d 484 (6th Cir. 2001), is a pivotal...
Enforceability of §2255 Waivers in Plea Agreements: Davila v. United States

Enforceability of §2255 Waivers in Plea Agreements: Davila v. United States

Date: Jul 18, 2001
Enforceability of §2255 Waivers in Plea Agreements: Davila v. United States Introduction Edwin Davila v. United States of America, 258 F.3d 448 (6th Cir. 2001), is a pivotal case addressing the...
Admissibility of Motive Evidence in Criminal Trials: A Case Study of Clark v. O'Dea

Admissibility of Motive Evidence in Criminal Trials: A Case Study of Clark v. O'Dea

Date: Jul 17, 2001
Admissibility of Motive Evidence in Criminal Trials: A Case Study of Clark v. O'Dea Introduction In the criminal justice system, the admissibility of evidence is pivotal to ensuring a fair trial. The...
Sixth Circuit Rules MTA § 701 and § 310(7) Unconstitutional: Reinforcing Due Process in Telecommunications Rate Regulation

Sixth Circuit Rules MTA § 701 and § 310(7) Unconstitutional: Reinforcing Due Process in Telecommunications Rate Regulation

Date: Jul 14, 2001
Sixth Circuit Rules MTA § 701 and § 310(7) Unconstitutional: Reinforcing Due Process in Telecommunications Rate Regulation Introduction In the landmark case of MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, d/b/a...
Rugiero v. United States: Strengthening FOIA Exemption Standards and Source Confidentiality

Rugiero v. United States: Strengthening FOIA Exemption Standards and Source Confidentiality

Date: Jul 13, 2001
Rugiero v. United States: Strengthening FOIA Exemption Standards and Source Confidentiality Introduction The case of Patrick Rugiero v. United States Department of Justice; Department of Treasury...
Application of AEDPA's Statute of Limitations to Pre-AEDPA Convictions: Payton v. Brigano

Application of AEDPA's Statute of Limitations to Pre-AEDPA Convictions: Payton v. Brigano

Date: Jul 12, 2001
Application of AEDPA's Statute of Limitations to Pre-AEDPA Convictions: Payton v. Brigano Introduction William H. Payton was convicted of murder on August 10, 1993, and subsequently imprisoned....
Limits of Habeas Corpus Review on Sentencing Within Statutory Bounds: Allen v. Stovall

Limits of Habeas Corpus Review on Sentencing Within Statutory Bounds: Allen v. Stovall

Date: Jul 10, 2001
Limits of Habeas Corpus Review on Sentencing Within Statutory Bounds: Allen v. Stovall Introduction In Allen v. Stovall, 2001, Angela Allen, the petitioner, sought the issuance of a writ of habeas...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Juror Bias: Hughes v. United States

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Juror Bias: Hughes v. United States

Date: Jul 10, 2001
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Juror Bias: Hughes v. United States Introduction Marshall Dwayne Hughes v. United States of America is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Prisoner Civil Rights Litigation: Insights from Da v. Dellis

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Prisoner Civil Rights Litigation: Insights from Da v. Dellis

Date: Jul 9, 2001
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Prisoner Civil Rights Litigation: Insights from Da v. Dellis Introduction The case of David K. Dellis v. Corrections Corporation of America et al.,...
Non-Preemption of Implied-in-Fact Contract Claims under the Copyright Act: Insights from WRENCH LLC v. TACO BELL CORP.

Non-Preemption of Implied-in-Fact Contract Claims under the Copyright Act: Insights from WRENCH LLC v. TACO BELL CORP.

Date: Jul 7, 2001
Disclaimer: This commentary provides an in-depth analysis of the judicial decision in WRENCH LLC v. TACO BELL CORP. It is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal...
Allocation of Settlement Costs under Directors and Officers Insurance: Owens Corning v. National Union Fire Insurance

Allocation of Settlement Costs under Directors and Officers Insurance: Owens Corning v. National Union Fire Insurance

Date: Jul 6, 2001
Allocation of Settlement Costs under Directors and Officers Insurance: Owens Corning v. National Union Fire Insurance Introduction Owens Corning, a Delaware corporation, entered into a Directors and...
Affirmation of Defendants' Qualified Immunity in Computer Search and Seizure Cases

Affirmation of Defendants' Qualified Immunity in Computer Search and Seizure Cases

Date: Jul 3, 2001
Affirmation of Defendants' Qualified Immunity in Computer Search and Seizure Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Ste v. n GUEST, et al., the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Affirmation of Objective Reasonableness and Limitations on Malicious Prosecution Claims in Section 1983 Actions: Darrah v. Bragg

Affirmation of Objective Reasonableness and Limitations on Malicious Prosecution Claims in Section 1983 Actions: Darrah v. Bragg

Date: Jun 23, 2001
Affirmation of Objective Reasonableness and Limitations on Malicious Prosecution Claims in Section 1983 Actions: Darrah v. Bragg Introduction In Lucinda Darrah v. City of Oak Park, et al., Russell...
AEDPA's Deferential Review Affirmed in Onifer v. Tyszkiewicz

AEDPA's Deferential Review Affirmed in Onifer v. Tyszkiewicz

Date: Jun 23, 2001
AEDPA's Deferential Review Affirmed in Onifer v. Tyszkiewicz Introduction The case of George F. Onifer v. Zbigniew Tyszkiewicz serves as a pivotal illustration of the application of the...
Enforcement of Administrative Subpoenas under HIPAA: Affirmation of the Reasonable Relevance Standard

Enforcement of Administrative Subpoenas under HIPAA: Affirmation of the Reasonable Relevance Standard

Date: Jun 15, 2001
Enforcement of Administrative Subpoenas under HIPAA: Affirmation of the Reasonable Relevance Standard Introduction The case In re Administrative Subpoena John DOE, D.P.M., Petitioner-Appellant,...
NSS v. Time Warner: Broadening 'Person Aggrieved' and Unauthorized Divulgence under §605(a)

NSS v. Time Warner: Broadening 'Person Aggrieved' and Unauthorized Divulgence under §605(a)

Date: Jun 12, 2001
NSS v. Time Warner: Broadening 'Person Aggrieved' and Unauthorized Divulgence under §605(a) Introduction The case of National Satellite Sports, Inc. (NSS) v. Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert