Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Reinforcing Employee Responsibility and Burden of Proof in Disability and Discrimination Claims: Hein v. All America Plywood Co.

Reinforcing Employee Responsibility and Burden of Proof in Disability and Discrimination Claims: Hein v. All America Plywood Co.

Date: Nov 15, 2000
Reinforcing Employee Responsibility and Burden of Proof in Disability and Discrimination Claims: Hein v. All America Plywood Co. Introduction The case of Wayne Hein v. All America Plywood Company,...
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Vienna Convention Application and Apprendi's Influence on Drug Conspiracy Sentences in United States v. Har

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Vienna Convention Application and Apprendi's Influence on Drug Conspiracy Sentences in United States v. Har

Date: Nov 10, 2000
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Vienna Convention Application and Apprendi's Influence on Drug Conspiracy Sentences in United States v. Har Introduction In United States of America v. Har (232 F.3d 536), the...
Revisiting Prima Facie Standards in Employment Discrimination: Insights from Dews v. A.B. Dick Company

Revisiting Prima Facie Standards in Employment Discrimination: Insights from Dews v. A.B. Dick Company

Date: Nov 9, 2000
Revisiting Prima Facie Standards in Employment Discrimination: Insights from Dews v. A.B. Dick Company Introduction Charlie DEWS v. A.B. Dick Company, 231 F.3d 1016 (6th Cir. 2000), is a landmark...
Establishing the Deliberate Indifference Standard in Student-On-Student Sexual Harassment Cases: Ste v. Vance

Establishing the Deliberate Indifference Standard in Student-On-Student Sexual Harassment Cases: Ste v. Vance

Date: Nov 7, 2000
Establishing the Deliberate Indifference Standard in Student-On-Student Sexual Harassment Cases: Ste v. Vance Introduction Ste v. Vance, Minor, by and through his mother, Deborah Vance; Alma McGowen,...
Relation-Back of Amended Complaints Under Rule 15(c)(2): The Miller v. American Heavy Lift Shipping Decision

Relation-Back of Amended Complaints Under Rule 15(c)(2): The Miller v. American Heavy Lift Shipping Decision

Date: Nov 4, 2000
Relation-Back of Amended Complaints Under Rule 15(c)(2): The Miller v. American Heavy Lift Shipping Decision Introduction In Miller v. American Heavy Lift Shipping, et al. (231 F.3d 242, 6th Cir....
Medical Device Amendments Preempt State Law Claims: Kemp v. Medtronic Establishes Limits on Negligence Per Se and Fraud Claims in FDA-Regulated Devices

Medical Device Amendments Preempt State Law Claims: Kemp v. Medtronic Establishes Limits on Negligence Per Se and Fraud Claims in FDA-Regulated Devices

Date: Nov 2, 2000
Medical Device Amendments Preempt State Law Claims: Kemp v. Medtronic Establishes Limits on Negligence Per Se and Fraud Claims in FDA-Regulated Devices Introduction In Elizabeth and Clifford Kemp v....
Gall v. Parker: Upholding Due Process in Death Penalty Proceedings

Gall v. Parker: Upholding Due Process in Death Penalty Proceedings

Date: Oct 31, 2000
Gall v. Parker: Upholding Due Process in Death Penalty Proceedings Introduction Gall v. Parker, 231 F.3d 265 (6th Cir. 2000), is a pivotal case that reaffirms the constitutional safeguards in capital...
Jurisdictional Determination at Removal and Limitations on Rule 41(d) Costs: Rogers v. Wal-Mart Stores

Jurisdictional Determination at Removal and Limitations on Rule 41(d) Costs: Rogers v. Wal-Mart Stores

Date: Oct 27, 2000
Jurisdictional Determination at Removal and Limitations on Rule 41(d) Costs: Rogers v. Wal-Mart Stores Introduction The case Shirley K. Rogers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (230 F.3d 868) adjudicated by...
Secured Claim Integrity Preserved: Sixth Circuit Declines Reclassification under Chapter 13 §1329(a)

Secured Claim Integrity Preserved: Sixth Circuit Declines Reclassification under Chapter 13 §1329(a)

Date: Oct 25, 2000
Secured Claim Integrity Preserved: Sixth Circuit Declines Reclassification under Chapter 13 §1329(a) Introduction The appellate case In re: Sahnica Denise Nolan, Debtor v. Chrysler Financial...
Establishing the Necessity of Application in Failure to Promote Discrimination Claims: Nguyen v. City of Cleveland

Establishing the Necessity of Application in Failure to Promote Discrimination Claims: Nguyen v. City of Cleveland

Date: Oct 12, 2000
Establishing the Necessity of Application in Failure to Promote Discrimination Claims: Nguyen v. City of Cleveland Introduction Nguyen v. City of Cleveland, 229 F.3d 559 (6th Cir. 2000), is a pivotal...
HECK v. HUMPHREY Reaffirmed: Restricting §1983 Claims in Prison Disciplinary Actions – Huey v. Stine

HECK v. HUMPHREY Reaffirmed: Restricting §1983 Claims in Prison Disciplinary Actions – Huey v. Stine

Date: Oct 12, 2000
HECK v. HUMPHREY Reaffirmed: Restricting §1983 Claims in Prison Disciplinary Actions – Huey v. Stine Introduction In the case of Joseph T. Huey v. Daniel Stine, the United States Court of Appeals for...
Recognition of Direct Evidence in Reverse Racial Discrimination Claims under §1983: WEberg v. Franks

Recognition of Direct Evidence in Reverse Racial Discrimination Claims under §1983: WEberg v. Franks

Date: Oct 11, 2000
Recognition of Direct Evidence in Reverse Racial Discrimination Claims under §1983: WEberg v. Franks Introduction In WEberg v. Franks, 229 F.3d 514 (6th Cir. 2000), the United States Court of Appeals...
Antitrust Injury and Standing in Indeck Energy Services v. Consumers Energy Co.

Antitrust Injury and Standing in Indeck Energy Services v. Consumers Energy Co.

Date: Oct 7, 2000
Antitrust Injury and Standing in Indeck Energy Services v. Consumers Energy Co. Introduction Indeck Energy Services, Inc. and Indeck Saginaw Limited Partnership ("Indeck") appealed the dismissal of...
Revitalizing Due Process: Prosecutorial Misconduct and Counsel Ineffectiveness in Washington v. Hofbauer

Revitalizing Due Process: Prosecutorial Misconduct and Counsel Ineffectiveness in Washington v. Hofbauer

Date: Oct 7, 2000
Revitalizing Due Process: Prosecutorial Misconduct and Counsel Ineffectiveness in Washington v. Hofbauer Introduction Washington v. Hofbauer, 228 F.3d 689 (6th Cir. 2000), represents a pivotal...
Zero Tolerance Policies and Substantive Due Process: Insights from Seal v. Knox County Board of Education

Zero Tolerance Policies and Substantive Due Process: Insights from Seal v. Knox County Board of Education

Date: Oct 7, 2000
Zero Tolerance Policies and Substantive Due Process: Insights from Seal v. Knox County Board of Education Introduction The case of Dustin W. Seal v. Allen Morgan et al. adjudicated in the United...
Redacted Confessions and the Confrontation Clause: Insights from McGhee v. Yukins

Redacted Confessions and the Confrontation Clause: Insights from McGhee v. Yukins

Date: Oct 7, 2000
Redacted Confessions and the Confrontation Clause: Insights from McGhee v. Yukins Introduction Darnita McGhee v. Joan Yukins, Warden is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals,...
Procedural Limitations and Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Habeas Petitions: Analysis of McMeans v. Brigano

Procedural Limitations and Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Habeas Petitions: Analysis of McMeans v. Brigano

Date: Oct 6, 2000
Procedural Limitations and Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Habeas Petitions: Analysis of McMeans v. Brigano Introduction McMeans v. Brigano is a significant case decided by the...
Balancing Access to Justice and Fiscal Responsibility: The Sixth Circuit’s Upholding of §803(d)(3) under the PLRA

Balancing Access to Justice and Fiscal Responsibility: The Sixth Circuit’s Upholding of §803(d)(3) under the PLRA

Date: Oct 5, 2000
Balancing Access to Justice and Fiscal Responsibility: The Sixth Circuit’s Upholding of §803(d)(3) under the PLRA Introduction The case of E v. Rett Hadix, et al. (96-2567/2568; Mary Glo 230 F.3d...
Enforcement of Settlement Agreements: McAlpin v. Lexington 76 Auto Truck Stop

Enforcement of Settlement Agreements: McAlpin v. Lexington 76 Auto Truck Stop

Date: Oct 4, 2000
Enforcement of Settlement Agreements: McAlpin v. Lexington 76 Auto Truck Stop Introduction The case of Dottie Renee McAlpin v. Lexington 76 Auto Truck Stop, Inc. revolves around the enforceability of...
Ensuring Fairness in ERISA Disability Claims: Arbitrary and Capricious Review in Williams v. International Paper

Ensuring Fairness in ERISA Disability Claims: Arbitrary and Capricious Review in Williams v. International Paper

Date: Sep 28, 2000
Ensuring Fairness in ERISA Disability Claims: Arbitrary and Capricious Review in Williams v. International Paper Introduction The case of Robert E. Williams v. International Paper Company (227 F.3d...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert