Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Bridgestone Securities Fraud Judgment: Implications for Corporate Disclosure Obligations

Bridgestone Securities Fraud Judgment: Implications for Corporate Disclosure Obligations

Date: Feb 5, 2005
Bridgestone Securities Fraud Judgment: Implications for Corporate Disclosure Obligations Introduction The case City of Monroe Employees Retirement System v. Bridgestone Corporation (399 F.3d 651)...
Booker and the Sixth Amendment: Federal Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. Oliver

Booker and the Sixth Amendment: Federal Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. Oliver

Date: Feb 3, 2005
Booker and the Sixth Amendment: Federal Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. Oliver Introduction In United States v. Oliver, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit grappled...
Independent Source Doctrine Affirmed in Jenkins v. United States: Implications for Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence

Independent Source Doctrine Affirmed in Jenkins v. United States: Implications for Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence

Date: Jan 29, 2005
Independent Source Doctrine Affirmed in United States v. Jenkins: Implications for Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence Introduction The case of United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Andre...
No Property Interest in Alternative Education Program: Insights from Daniels v. Woodside

No Property Interest in Alternative Education Program: Insights from Daniels v. Woodside

Date: Jan 25, 2005
No Property Interest in Alternative Education Program: Insights from Daniels v. Woodside Introduction Matthew J. Daniels v. Leonard Woodside et al. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
Enhanced Due Process in Indictments: Valentine v. Konteh

Enhanced Due Process in Indictments: Valentine v. Konteh

Date: Jan 25, 2005
Enhanced Due Process in Indictments: Valentine v. Konteh Introduction Case: Michael E. Valentine v. Khelleh Konteh Citation: 395 F.3d 626 (6th Cir. 2005) Court: United States Court of Appeals, Sixth...
Enhanced Consideration of Country Conditions in Convention Against Torture Claims: Insights from Mostafa and Alsaf v. Ashcroft

Enhanced Consideration of Country Conditions in Convention Against Torture Claims: Insights from Mostafa and Alsaf v. Ashcroft

Date: Jan 25, 2005
Enhanced Consideration of Country Conditions in Convention Against Torture Claims: Insights from Mostafa and Alsaf v. Ashcroft Introduction The case of Hoda Mostafa and Abdolmajid Alsaf v. John...
Affirmation of OMVI Per Se Conviction: Limitations on Challenging Breathalyzer Reliability Upheld

Affirmation of OMVI Per Se Conviction: Limitations on Challenging Breathalyzer Reliability Upheld

Date: Jan 25, 2005
Affirmation of OMVI Per Se Conviction: Limitations on Challenging Breathalyzer Reliability Upheld Introduction The case of Traci Miskel v. James A. Karnes and Dwayne Maynard revolves around the...
Ensuring Ex Post Facto Compliance: Analysis of U.S. v. Davis and Sentencing Guidelines Post-Booker

Ensuring Ex Post Facto Compliance: Analysis of U.S. v. Davis and Sentencing Guidelines Post-Booker

Date: Jan 22, 2005
Ensuring Ex Post Facto Compliance: Analysis of United States v. Davis and Sentencing Guidelines Post-Booker Introduction United States of America v. William J. Davis, 397 F.3d 340 (6th Cir. 2005),...
Affirmation of Employer Liability in Sexual Harassment Under Title VII and Ohio Law

Affirmation of Employer Liability in Sexual Harassment Under Title VII and Ohio Law

Date: Jan 20, 2005
Affirmation of Employer Liability in Sexual Harassment Under Title VII and Ohio Law Introduction The case of Amber McCombs v. Meijer, Inc. (395 F.3d 346) adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Refinement of Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel Claims: Strickland Replaces Sullivan in Successive Representation Cases

Refinement of Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel Claims: Strickland Replaces Sullivan in Successive Representation Cases

Date: Jan 20, 2005
Strickland Supersedes Sullivan in Successive Representation Ineffective Assistance Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Maurice Whiting v. Sherry Burt, decided by the United States Court of...
Establishing an Actual Innocence Exception to AEDPA's One-Year Limitations Period: Souter v. Jones

Establishing an Actual Innocence Exception to AEDPA's One-Year Limitations Period: Souter v. Jones

Date: Jan 19, 2005
Establishing an Actual Innocence Exception to AEDPA's One-Year Limitations Period: Souter v. Jones Introduction The case of Larry Pat Souter v. Kurt Jones, Warden, decided by the United States Court...
Complete Preemption Doctrine Under the Railway Labor Act: Analysis of Roddy v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad

Complete Preemption Doctrine Under the Railway Labor Act: Analysis of Roddy v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad

Date: Jan 15, 2005
Complete Preemption Doctrine Under the Railway Labor Act: Analysis of Roddy v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad 1. Introduction The case of James T. Roddy v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Incorporated et...
Probable Cause and Qualified Immunity in Police Arrest of Tenant for Burglary: Sixth Circuit Sets New Precedent

Probable Cause and Qualified Immunity in Police Arrest of Tenant for Burglary: Sixth Circuit Sets New Precedent

Date: Jan 15, 2005
Probable Cause and Qualified Immunity in Police Arrest of Tenant for Burglary: Sixth Circuit Sets New Precedent Introduction In the landmark case of Geoffrey M. Radvansky v. City of Olmsted Falls et...
Qualified Immunity Reinforced in Hale v. Kart: A New Precedent for Search Warrant Challenges

Qualified Immunity Reinforced in Hale v. Kart: A New Precedent for Search Warrant Challenges

Date: Jan 14, 2005
Qualified Immunity Reinforced in Hale v. Kart: A New Precedent for Search Warrant Challenges Introduction The case of Leonard Hale, Individually and as Next Friend of Sean Lysher and Shanna Lysher v....
Tumblebus Inc. v. Cranmer: Upholding Service Mark Protection and Refining Trade Dress Injunction Standards

Tumblebus Inc. v. Cranmer: Upholding Service Mark Protection and Refining Trade Dress Injunction Standards

Date: Jan 14, 2005
Tumblebus Inc. v. Meredith Cranmer: Upholding Service Mark Protection and Refining Trade Dress Injunction Standards Introduction In the landmark case of Tumblebus Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v....
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Webster v. United Auto Workers: Implications for Union Discipline and Retaliation Claims

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Webster v. United Auto Workers: Implications for Union Discipline and Retaliation Claims

Date: Jan 13, 2005
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Webster v. United Auto Workers: Implications for Union Discipline and Retaliation Claims Introduction The case of Richard Webster v. United Auto Workers, Local 51,...
Enforceability of Arbitration Clauses in Fraudulent Inducement Claims: Glazer v. Lehman Brothers, 394 F.3d 444 (6th Cir. 2005)

Enforceability of Arbitration Clauses in Fraudulent Inducement Claims: Glazer v. Lehman Brothers, 394 F.3d 444 (6th Cir. 2005)

Date: Jan 13, 2005
Enforceability of Arbitration Clauses in Fraudulent Inducement Claims: Glazer v. Lehman Brothers, 394 F.3d 444 (6th Cir. 2005) Introduction In the landmark case of Samuel Glazer v. Lehman Brothers,...
Complete Preemption Doctrine in Copyright Disputes: Kid Rock v. Williams Group

Complete Preemption Doctrine in Copyright Disputes: Kid Rock v. Williams Group

Date: Jan 12, 2005
Complete Preemption Doctrine in Copyright Disputes: Kid Rock v. Williams Group Introduction The case of Robert Ritchie, known professionally as Kid Rock; Top Dog Records, Inc., and Kid Rock...
Confidential Policymaking Employees and First Amendment Protections: Insights from Latham v. Ohio AG

Confidential Policymaking Employees and First Amendment Protections: Insights from Latham v. Ohio AG

Date: Jan 11, 2005
Confidential Policymaking Employees and First Amendment Protections: Insights from Latham v. Office of the Attorney General of Ohio Introduction The case of Mary Patrick Latham v. Office of the...
Affirmation of Non-Willful FMLA Violation in HOFFMAN v. PROFESSIONAL MED TEAM

Affirmation of Non-Willful FMLA Violation in HOFFMAN v. PROFESSIONAL MED TEAM

Date: Jan 8, 2005
Affirmation of Non-Willful FMLA Violation in HOFFMAN v. PROFESSIONAL MED TEAM Introduction The case of Lynn Hoffman, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Professional Med Team (PMT), Defendant-Appellee revolves...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert