Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Reaffirming AEDPA's Strict Standards on Habeas Review: The Lorraine v. Coyle Decision

Reaffirming AEDPA's Strict Standards on Habeas Review: The Lorraine v. Coyle Decision

Date: May 24, 2002
Reaffirming AEDPA's Strict Standards on Habeas Review: The Lorraine v. Coyle Decision Introduction In the landmark case of Charles L. Lorraine v. Ralph Coyle, Warden (291 F.3d 416, 6th Cir. 2002),...
Foster v. Ludwick: Upholding Procedural Defaults and Interpretations of IAD in Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Foster v. Ludwick: Upholding Procedural Defaults and Interpretations of IAD in Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Date: May 23, 2002
Foster v. Ludwick: Upholding Procedural Defaults and Interpretations of IAD in Habeas Corpus Proceedings Introduction Foster v. Ludwick is a landmark 2002 decision by the United States District Court...
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction in Cybersquatting Cases: Insights from Bird v. Parsons et al.

Establishing Personal Jurisdiction in Cybersquatting Cases: Insights from Bird v. Parsons et al.

Date: May 22, 2002
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction in Cybersquatting Cases: Insights from Bird v. Parsons et al. Introduction The case of Darrell J. Bird v. Marshall Parsons, Stephen Vincent, George DeCarlo,...
Affirmation of Residual Disability Benefits Under ERISA: Hoover v. Provident Life

Affirmation of Residual Disability Benefits Under ERISA: Hoover v. Provident Life

Date: May 22, 2002
Affirmation of Residual Disability Benefits Under ERISA: Hoover v. Provident Life Introduction Mary Moore Hoover filed a lawsuit against Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company after her...
Protected Speech Must Address Matters of Public Concern: Gragg v. Kentucky Cabinet Establishes Key Retaliation Immunity Principles

Protected Speech Must Address Matters of Public Concern: Gragg v. Kentucky Cabinet Establishes Key Retaliation Immunity Principles

Date: May 21, 2002
Protected Speech Must Address Matters of Public Concern: Gragg v. Kentucky Cabinet Establishes Key Retaliation Immunity Principles Introduction In the landmark case Sharon L. Gragg v. Kentucky...
Morse v. McWhorter: Establishing Standards for Post-Judgment Amendments in Securities Litigation

Morse v. McWhorter: Establishing Standards for Post-Judgment Amendments in Securities Litigation

Date: May 21, 2002
Morse v. McWhorter: Establishing Standards for Post-Judgment Amendments in Securities Litigation Introduction Morse v. McWhorter, 290 F.3d 795 (6th Cir. 2002), is a pivotal case in securities...
Establishing Exclusive Federal Jurisdiction for NFIA Standard Flood Insurance Policy Claims: Gibson v. American Bankers Insurance Co.

Establishing Exclusive Federal Jurisdiction for NFIA Standard Flood Insurance Policy Claims: Gibson v. American Bankers Insurance Co.

Date: May 17, 2002
Establishing Exclusive Federal Jurisdiction for NFIA Standard Flood Insurance Policy Claims: Gibson v. American Bankers Insurance Co. Introduction Edgar Allen Gibson and Leslie Gibson v. American...
Enforcement of Medicaid Program Requirements Under §1983: Westside Mothers v. Haveman

Enforcement of Medicaid Program Requirements Under §1983: Westside Mothers v. Haveman

Date: May 16, 2002
Enforcement of Medicaid Program Requirements Under §1983: Westside Mothers v. Haveman 1. Introduction In Westside Mothers, a Michigan Welfare Rights Organization; Michigan League for Human Services,...
Monopolization and Exclusionary Practices: Analysis of Conwood v. United States Tobacco Company

Monopolization and Exclusionary Practices: Analysis of Conwood v. United States Tobacco Company

Date: May 16, 2002
Monopolization and Exclusionary Practices: Analysis of Conwood v. United States Tobacco Company Introduction The legal landscape surrounding antitrust laws plays a pivotal role in maintaining...
Apprendi Non-Retroactivity in Initial §2255 Motions: Analysis of Ke v. Goode

Apprendi Non-Retroactivity in Initial §2255 Motions: Analysis of Ke v. Goode

Date: May 11, 2002
Apprendi Non-Retroactivity in Initial §2255 Motions: Analysis of Ke v. Goode Introduction Kevin Antonio Goode, the petitioner-appellant in Ke v. Goode, appealed his life imprisonment sentence related...
Affirmation of AEDPA Deference in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: The Schoenberger v. Russell Decision

Affirmation of AEDPA Deference in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: The Schoenberger v. Russell Decision

Date: May 10, 2002
Affirmation of AEDPA Deference in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: The Schoenberger v. Russell Decision Introduction In the landmark case of Earnest Schoenberger, Sr. v. Harry Russell, 290 F.3d 831 (6th...
Affirmation of Default Judgment in General Star v. Astra: Implications for Sovereign Immunity and Service of Process

Affirmation of Default Judgment in General Star v. Astra: Implications for Sovereign Immunity and Service of Process

Date: May 8, 2002
Affirmation of Default Judgment in General Star v. Astra: Implications for Sovereign Immunity and Service of Process Introduction In the case of General Star National Insurance Company v....
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Prater v. City of Burnside Establishes Limits on Religious Land Use Claims

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Prater v. City of Burnside Establishes Limits on Religious Land Use Claims

Date: May 8, 2002
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Prater v. City of Burnside Establishes Limits on Religious Land Use Claims Introduction The case of Prater, Hollis, and Sowder v. City of Burnside, Kentucky...
Affirmation of Implied Certification Theory Under the False Claims Act: U.S. v. Century Health Services, Inc.

Affirmation of Implied Certification Theory Under the False Claims Act: U.S. v. Century Health Services, Inc.

Date: May 8, 2002
Affirmation of Implied Certification Theory Under the False Claims Act: U.S. v. Century Health Services, Inc. Introduction The case of United States of America, ex rel.; Edward T. Augustine,...
Establishing Reasonable Suspicion in Prostitution-Related Vehicle Stops: United States v. Timothy Martin

Establishing Reasonable Suspicion in Prostitution-Related Vehicle Stops: United States v. Timothy Martin

Date: May 7, 2002
Establishing Reasonable Suspicion in Prostitution-Related Vehicle Stops: United States v. Timothy Martin Introduction United States v. Timothy Martin, 289 F.3d 392 (6th Cir. 2002), is a pivotal case...
Significant Relationship and Choice of Law Principles in Venue Transfer: Analysis of Jamhour v. Scottsdale Insurance

Significant Relationship and Choice of Law Principles in Venue Transfer: Analysis of Jamhour v. Scottsdale Insurance

Date: May 4, 2002
Significant Relationship and Choice of Law Principles in Venue Transfer: Analysis of Jamhour v. Scottsdale Insurance Introduction Jamhour v. Scottsdale Insurance Company, et al. (211 F. Supp. 2d 941)...
Sixth Circuit Upholds Michigan Statute of Repose in Construction Negligence Case

Sixth Circuit Upholds Michigan Statute of Repose in Construction Negligence Case

Date: May 4, 2002
Sixth Circuit Upholds Michigan Statute of Repose in Construction Negligence Case Introduction The case of ROSKAM BAKING COMPANY, INC. v. LANHAM MACHINERY COMPANY, INC.; APV Consolidated, Inc....
Establishing Arbitration in Michigan: A Comprehensive Analysis of Simons v. Great Earth Companies

Establishing Arbitration in Michigan: A Comprehensive Analysis of Simons v. Great Earth Companies

Date: May 2, 2002
Establishing Arbitration in Michigan: A Comprehensive Analysis of Simons v. Great Earth Companies Introduction The appellate case Simons v. Great Earth Companies, Inc. (288 F.3d 878) presents a...
Collateral Estoppel and Prosecutorial Immunity in §1983 Claims: Higgason v. Stephens

Collateral Estoppel and Prosecutorial Immunity in §1983 Claims: Higgason v. Stephens

Date: May 2, 2002
Collateral Estoppel and Prosecutorial Immunity in §1983 Claims: Higgason v. Stephens Introduction The case of Gary L. Higgason, M.D. v. Robert F. Stephens et al. (288 F.3d 868), adjudicated by the...
Qualified Immunity and Substantive Due Process: Analysis of Sheets v. Mullins (287 F.3d 581)

Qualified Immunity and Substantive Due Process: Analysis of Sheets v. Mullins (287 F.3d 581)

Date: Apr 26, 2002
Qualified Immunity and Substantive Due Process: Analysis of Sheets v. Mullins (287 F.3d 581) Introduction Theresa Sheets, as the Administrator for the Estate of Tiffany Jean Montgomery, Deceased,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert