Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Failure to Investigate Defense Witness: Parrish v. Da

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Failure to Investigate Defense Witness: Parrish v. Da

Date: Jan 8, 2005
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Failure to Investigate Defense Witness: Parrish v. Da Introduction Parrish v. Da is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Clarifying Hobbs Act Extortion Applicability and RICO Conspiracy Standards: Insights from United States v. Saadey

Clarifying Hobbs Act Extortion Applicability and RICO Conspiracy Standards: Insights from United States v. Saadey

Date: Jan 6, 2005
Clarifying Hobbs Act Extortion Applicability and RICO Conspiracy Standards: Insights from United States v. Saadey Introduction The case of United States v. Russell J. Saadey, Jr. (393 F.3d 669, 6th...
Reaffirming the Corroboration Requirement in Asylum Claims: Ganna Romani v. A Dorosh

Reaffirming the Corroboration Requirement in Asylum Claims: Ganna Romani v. A Dorosh

Date: Dec 21, 2004
Reaffirming the Corroboration Requirement in Asylum Claims: Ganna Romani v. A Dorosh Introduction Ganna Romanivna Dorosh v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General; Immigration and Naturalization Service is...
Harper v. AutoAlliance: Affirming Removal of Retaliatory Discharge Claims Under State Public Policy

Harper v. AutoAlliance: Affirming Removal of Retaliatory Discharge Claims Under State Public Policy

Date: Dec 17, 2004
Harper v. AutoAlliance: Affirming Removal of Retaliatory Discharge Claims Under State Public Policy Introduction In the case of Derrick E. Harper v. AutoAlliance International, Inc., adjudicated by...
Dixon v. Ashcroft: Affirming Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies for Retaliation Claims under Title VII in Federal Employment Discrimination

Dixon v. Ashcroft: Affirming Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies for Retaliation Claims under Title VII in Federal Employment Discrimination

Date: Dec 17, 2004
Dixon v. Ashcroft: Affirming Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies for Retaliation Claims under Title VII in Federal Employment Discrimination Introduction In James Dixon, Jr. v. John Ashcroft, the...
Establishing the 'Meaningful Educational Benefit' Standard under IDEA: Deals v. Hamilton County Board of Education

Establishing the 'Meaningful Educational Benefit' Standard under IDEA: Deals v. Hamilton County Board of Education

Date: Dec 17, 2004
Establishing the 'Meaningful Educational Benefit' Standard under IDEA: Deals v. Hamilton County Board of Education Introduction The case Maureen Deal; Phillip Deal, Parents, On Behalf of Zachary...
Re(defining Rule 60(b) Motions in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: A Functional Approach

Re(defining Rule 60(b) Motions in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: A Functional Approach

Date: Dec 14, 2004
Redefining Rule 60(b) Motions in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: A Functional Approach Introduction In the landmark case In re Abu-Ali ABDUR'RAHMAN, Mo v. nt. Abu-Ali Abdur'Rahman, 392 F.3d 174 (6th Cir....
Effective Assistance of Counsel and Procedural Defaults: The Deitz v. Money Decision

Effective Assistance of Counsel and Procedural Defaults: The Deitz v. Money Decision

Date: Dec 14, 2004
Effective Assistance of Counsel and Procedural Defaults: The Deitz v. Money Decision Introduction The case of Rafael Deitz v. Christine Money (391 F.3d 804, Sixth Circuit, December 13, 2004) presents...
Sixth Circuit Upholds District Court Ruling: Overly Restrictive Zoning Ordinances for Adult Bookstores Violate First Amendment Rights

Sixth Circuit Upholds District Court Ruling: Overly Restrictive Zoning Ordinances for Adult Bookstores Violate First Amendment Rights

Date: Dec 11, 2004
Sixth Circuit Upholds District Court Ruling: Overly Restrictive Zoning Ordinances for Adult Bookstores Violate First Amendment Rights Introduction In Executive Arts Studio, Inc., d/b/a Velvet Touch...
Eligibility is Crucial in FMLA Retaliation Claims: Sixth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment

Eligibility is Crucial in FMLA Retaliation Claims: Sixth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment

Date: Dec 9, 2004
Eligibility is Crucial in FMLA Retaliation Claims: Sixth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment Introduction The case Sandra HUMENNY v. GENEX CORPORATION, INC.; Carol Valentic ([390 F.3d...
Deliberate Indifference in Medical Care: Blackmore v. Kalamazoo County

Deliberate Indifference in Medical Care: Blackmore v. Kalamazoo County

Date: Dec 8, 2004
Deliberate Indifference in Medical Care: Blackmore v. Kalamazoo County Introduction The case of Tjymas Blackmore v. Kalamazoo County et al. (390 F.3d 890) represents a pivotal moment in the...
Affirmation of Sixth Amendment Counsel of Choice Rights in Habeas Corpus: Burton v. Renico

Affirmation of Sixth Amendment Counsel of Choice Rights in Habeas Corpus: Burton v. Renico

Date: Dec 7, 2004
Affirmation of Sixth Amendment Counsel of Choice Rights in Habeas Corpus: Burton v. Renico Introduction Case: Kumal Burton, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Paul Renico, Warden, Respondent-Appellee....
Establishing Causal Nexus in Employment Discrimination: Sixth Circuit Reverses Jury Verdict in Noble v. Brinker International

Establishing Causal Nexus in Employment Discrimination: Sixth Circuit Reverses Jury Verdict in Noble v. Brinker International

Date: Dec 4, 2004
Establishing Causal Nexus in Employment Discrimination: Sixth Circuit Reverses Jury Verdict in Noble v. Brinker International, Inc. Introduction In Noble v. Brinker International, Inc. (391 F.3d 715,...
United States v. Robinson: Affirmed Conviction on Drug and Firearm Charges with Remand for Sentencing Adjustments

United States v. Robinson: Affirmed Conviction on Drug and Firearm Charges with Remand for Sentencing Adjustments

Date: Dec 3, 2004
United States v. Robinson: Affirmed Conviction on Drug and Firearm Charges with Remand for Sentencing Adjustments Introduction In United States v. Michael A. Robinson, 390 F.3d 853 (6th Cir. 2004),...
Doyle v. Scutt: Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Denial in No Contest Plea Cases

Doyle v. Scutt: Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Denial in No Contest Plea Cases

Date: Dec 2, 2004
Doyle v. Scutt: Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Denial in No Contest Plea Cases Introduction Doyle v. Scutt is a seminal case adjudicated by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of...
Recharacterization of Pro Se Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from Martin v. Overton

Recharacterization of Pro Se Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from Martin v. Overton

Date: Dec 2, 2004
Recharacterization of Pro Se Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from Martin v. Overton Introduction The case of Eric Martin v. William Overton (391 F.3d 710) adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Sex-Based Wage Discrimination Under Ohio Civil Rights Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of Birch v. Cuyahoga County Probate Court

Sex-Based Wage Discrimination Under Ohio Civil Rights Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of Birch v. Cuyahoga County Probate Court

Date: Dec 2, 2004
Sex-Based Wage Discrimination Under Ohio Civil Rights Act: A Comprehensive Analysis of Birch v. Cuyahoga County Probate Court Introduction In Wanda Birch v. Cuyahoga County Probate Court, the United...
Reinforcing Confrontation Clause Protections: Crawford Impact on Confidential Informant Testimony

Reinforcing Confrontation Clause Protections: Crawford Impact on Confidential Informant Testimony

Date: Dec 1, 2004
Reinforcing Confrontation Clause Protections: Crawford Impact on Confidential Informant Testimony Introduction The case of United States of America v. Sean Lamont Cromer (389 F.3d 662) serves as a...
Qualified Immunity in Fourth Amendment Excessive Force Claims: Dunigan v. Noble and Jenkins

Qualified Immunity in Fourth Amendment Excessive Force Claims: Dunigan v. Noble and Jenkins

Date: Nov 30, 2004
Qualified Immunity in Fourth Amendment Excessive Force Claims: Dunigan v. Noble and Jenkins Introduction Dunigan v. Noble and Jenkins is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Enforceability of Abbreviated Statutes of Limitations in Employment Contracts: Insights from Thurman v. DaimlerChrysler

Enforceability of Abbreviated Statutes of Limitations in Employment Contracts: Insights from Thurman v. DaimlerChrysler

Date: Nov 20, 2004
Enforceability of Abbreviated Statutes of Limitations in Employment Contracts: Insights from Thurman v. DaimlerChrysler Introduction Thurman v. DaimlerChrysler, Inc., adjudicated by the United States...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert