Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Anticipatory Search Warrant and Sentencing Enhancements in Drug Trafficking Cases

Affirmation of Anticipatory Search Warrant and Sentencing Enhancements in Drug Trafficking Cases

Date: Aug 17, 2002
Affirmation of Anticipatory Search Warrant and Sentencing Enhancements in Drug Trafficking Cases Introduction The case of UNITED STATES of America v. Donald Miggins, Edward McDaniels, and Charles...
Equitable Tolling of Statute of Limitations in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Hargrove v. Brigano

Equitable Tolling of Statute of Limitations in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Hargrove v. Brigano

Date: Aug 15, 2002
Equitable Tolling of Statute of Limitations in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Hargrove v. Brigano Introduction Judah Hargrove, the petitioner-appellee, appealed the decision in Hargrove v. Brigano,...
Execution of Mentally Retarded Individuals: Hill v. Anderson Establishes Procedural Pathway

Execution of Mentally Retarded Individuals: Hill v. Anderson Establishes Procedural Pathway

Date: Aug 14, 2002
Execution of Mentally Retarded Individuals: Hill v. Anderson Establishes Procedural Pathway Introduction Hill v. Anderson, 300 F.3d 679 (6th Cir. 2002), is a pivotal case in the realm of criminal...
Sixth Circuit Reaffirms ERISA Jurisdiction: Overruling Law-of-the-Case Doctrine and Burford Abstention in Rouse v. DaimlerChrysler

Sixth Circuit Reaffirms ERISA Jurisdiction: Overruling Law-of-the-Case Doctrine and Burford Abstention in Rouse v. DaimlerChrysler

Date: Aug 14, 2002
Sixth Circuit Reaffirms ERISA Jurisdiction: Overruling Law-of-the-Case Doctrine and Burford Abstention in Rouse v. DaimlerChrysler Introduction Rouse v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation UAW...
Re-Evaluating Brady Violations under AEDPA: Sawyer v. Hofbauer

Re-Evaluating Brady Violations under AEDPA: Sawyer v. Hofbauer

Date: Aug 10, 2002
Re-Evaluating Brady Violations under AEDPA: Sawyer v. Hofbauer Introduction Thomas W. Sawyer, a Michigan prisoner, appealed his convictions for first- and second-degree criminal sexual conduct,...
Duty of Defense Counsel to Inform Defendants of Prosecutorial Appeals in Guilty Plea Cases: Miller v. Straub

Duty of Defense Counsel to Inform Defendants of Prosecutorial Appeals in Guilty Plea Cases: Miller v. Straub

Date: Aug 9, 2002
Duty of Defense Counsel to Inform Defendants of Prosecutorial Appeals in Guilty Plea Cases: Miller v. Straub Introduction Miller v. Straub, 299 F.3d 570, is a landmark decision by the United States...
Strict Limitations on Rule 60(b) Relief Affirmed in Sixth Circuit's Turner Case

Strict Limitations on Rule 60(b) Relief Affirmed in Sixth Circuit's Turner Case

Date: Aug 8, 2002
Strict Limitations on Rule 60(b) Relief Affirmed in Sixth Circuit's Turner Case Introduction The appellate decision in Sondra McCurry, as Mother and next Friend of Frank E. Turner, Deceased; Vicki...
Fourth Amendment Consent and Exigent Circumstances: A Comprehensive Analysis of UNITED STATES v. ELKINS

Fourth Amendment Consent and Exigent Circumstances: A Comprehensive Analysis of UNITED STATES v. ELKINS

Date: Aug 3, 2002
Fourth Amendment Consent and Exigent Circumstances: A Comprehensive Analysis of UNITED STATES v. ELKINS Introduction The case of United States of America v. James Elkins; Carol Elkins, adjudicated by...
Affirmation of the Surface Transportation Board’s Authority in Forced Sale Proceedings: RAILROAD VENTURES, INC. v. SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD and United States

Affirmation of the Surface Transportation Board’s Authority in Forced Sale Proceedings: RAILROAD VENTURES, INC. v. SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD and United States

Date: Aug 2, 2002
Affirmation of the Surface Transportation Board’s Authority in Forced Sale Proceedings: RAILROAD VENTURES, INC. v. SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD and United States Introduction The case of Railroad...
Article III Standing Supersedes Rule 17(a) Real Party Substitution: Affirmation in Zurich Insurance v. Logitrans

Article III Standing Supersedes Rule 17(a) Real Party Substitution: Affirmation in Zurich Insurance v. Logitrans

Date: Jul 30, 2002
Article III Standing Supersedes Rule 17(a) Real Party Substitution: Affirmation in Zurich Insurance v. Logitrans Introduction The case of Zurich Insurance Company, a Swiss Corporation, a subrogee of...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Age and Sex Discrimination Claims: Policastro v. Northwest Airlines

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Age and Sex Discrimination Claims: Policastro v. Northwest Airlines

Date: Jul 30, 2002
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Age and Sex Discrimination Claims: Policastro v. Northwest Airlines Introduction The case of Barbara Policastro v. Northwest Airlines, Incorporated (297 F.3d 535)...
Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Convictions in Crack Cocaine Conspiracy and Clarifies Standards for Minimal-Role Sentencing Reductions

Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Convictions in Crack Cocaine Conspiracy and Clarifies Standards for Minimal-Role Sentencing Reductions

Date: Jul 30, 2002
Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Convictions in Crack Cocaine Conspiracy and Clarifies Standards for Minimal-Role Sentencing Reductions Introduction In the notable case of UNITED STATES of America v. Antonio...
Deliberate Indifference Standard Upheld in Substantive Due Process Claims Against Corrections Departments

Deliberate Indifference Standard Upheld in Substantive Due Process Claims Against Corrections Departments

Date: Jul 26, 2002
Deliberate Indifference Standard Upheld in Substantive Due Process Claims Against Corrections Departments Introduction Sperle v. Michigan Department of Corrections (297 F.3d 483) is a pivotal case...
Sixth Circuit Vacates Class Certification under Rule 23(b)(2) for ECOA Claims Involving Compensatory Damages

Sixth Circuit Vacates Class Certification under Rule 23(b)(2) for ECOA Claims Involving Compensatory Damages

Date: Jul 23, 2002
Sixth Circuit Vacates Class Certification under Rule 23(b)(2) for ECOA Claims Involving Compensatory Damages Introduction In the case of Addie T. Coleman v. General Motors Acceptance Corporation, the...
Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Denial in Sexual-Predator Statute Application: Leslie v. Randle

Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Denial in Sexual-Predator Statute Application: Leslie v. Randle

Date: Jul 23, 2002
Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Denial in Sexual-Predator Statute Application: Leslie v. Randle Introduction In the case of Oliver W. Leslie, Jr. v. Michael Randle, adjudicated by the United States...
Improper Joinder of Unrelated Offenses Under Federal Rule 8(a) – Analysis of United States v. Chavis

Improper Joinder of Unrelated Offenses Under Federal Rule 8(a) – Analysis of United States v. Chavis

Date: Jul 23, 2002
Improper Joinder of Unrelated Offenses Under Federal Rule 8(a) – Analysis of United States v. Chavis Introduction United States of America v. Jeremy Lee Chavis, 296 F.3d 450 (6th Cir. 2002), presents...
Enhancing Attorney Fees in Mortgage-Lending Discrimination Cases: Insights from Paschal v. Flagstar Bank

Enhancing Attorney Fees in Mortgage-Lending Discrimination Cases: Insights from Paschal v. Flagstar Bank

Date: Jul 18, 2002
Enhancing Attorney Fees in Mortgage-Lending Discrimination Cases: Insights from Paschal v. Flagstar Bank Introduction In the landmark case of Gerald Paschal, et al. v. Flagstar Bank, FSB, adjudicated...
Sixth Circuit Clarifies the Scope of the Continuing Violations Doctrine in Mortgage Lending Discrimination Cases

Sixth Circuit Clarifies the Scope of the Continuing Violations Doctrine in Mortgage Lending Discrimination Cases

Date: Jul 18, 2002
Sixth Circuit Clarifies the Scope of the Continuing Violations Doctrine in Mortgage Lending Discrimination Cases Introduction In Gerald Paschal, et al. v. Flagstar Bank, FSB, 295 F.3d 565 (6th Cir....
Establishing the Limits of Supervisory Liability under 42 U.S.C. §1983: Insights from Doe v. City of Roseville

Establishing the Limits of Supervisory Liability under 42 U.S.C. §1983: Insights from Doe v. City of Roseville

Date: Jul 17, 2002
Establishing the Limits of Supervisory Liability under 42 U.S.C. §1983: Insights from Doe v. City of Roseville Introduction The case of Sally DOE, as Next Friend of Jane Doe, a minor,...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in §1983 Claims Over Failure to Serve Protection Orders: Jones v. Union County

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in §1983 Claims Over Failure to Serve Protection Orders: Jones v. Union County

Date: Jul 17, 2002
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in §1983 Claims Over Failure to Serve Protection Orders Introduction In the case of Sherry Jones v. Union County, Tennessee; Union County Sheriff's Department (296...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert