Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Enhanced Procedural Compliance Standards under IDEA: Insights from N.L. v. Knox County Schools

Enhanced Procedural Compliance Standards under IDEA: Insights from N.L. v. Knox County Schools

Date: Jan 17, 2003
Enhanced Procedural Compliance Standards under IDEA: Insights from N.L. v. Knox County Schools Introduction The case N.L., a minor, by her mother, Ms. C., v. Knox County Schools (315 F.3d 688)...
State Action Requirement in §1983 Claims: Tahfs v. Proctor Establishes Rigorous Standards

State Action Requirement in §1983 Claims: Tahfs v. Proctor Establishes Rigorous Standards

Date: Jan 15, 2003
State Action Requirement in §1983 Claims: Tahfs v. Proctor Establishes Rigorous Standards Introduction In the landmark case of Judy Lynn Tahfs v. William N. Proctor and Miranda K. Proctor, the United...
Qualified Immunity in §1983 Claims: Analysis of Crockett & Greene v. Cumberland College

Qualified Immunity in §1983 Claims: Analysis of Crockett & Greene v. Cumberland College

Date: Jan 14, 2003
Qualified Immunity in §1983 Claims: Analysis of Crockett & Greene v. Cumberland College Introduction The case of Crockett v. Cumberland College concerns the wrongful arrest and subsequent punitive...
Receivership Bound by Arbitration Agreements: Javitch v. Brokerage Firms

Receivership Bound by Arbitration Agreements: Javitch v. Brokerage Firms

Date: Jan 11, 2003
Receivership Bound by Arbitration Agreements: Javitch v. Brokerage Firms Introduction The case of Victor M. Javitch, Receiver, Plaintiff-Appellee v. First Union Securities, Inc. et al., adjudicated...
Helton v. United States: Reinforcing Probable Cause Standards and Limiting the Leon Good-Faith Exception

Helton v. United States: Reinforcing Probable Cause Standards and Limiting the Leon Good-Faith Exception

Date: Jan 7, 2003
Helton v. United States: Reinforcing Probable Cause Standards and Limiting the Leon Good-Faith Exception Introduction Helton v. United States, 314 F.3d 812 (6th Cir. 2003), is a pivotal case that...
Clarification of Amount in Controversy Requirements in Diversity Jurisdiction: Marti Egan v. Premier Scales Systems

Clarification of Amount in Controversy Requirements in Diversity Jurisdiction: Marti Egan v. Premier Scales Systems

Date: Dec 31, 2002
Clarification of Amount in Controversy Requirements in Diversity Jurisdiction: Marti Egan v. Premier Scales Systems Introduction The case of Marti Egan Plaintiff v. Premier Scales Systems, d/b/a...
Shepherd v. Wellman: Affirming Proper §1983 Pleadings and Upholding Attorney Conduct Standards

Shepherd v. Wellman: Affirming Proper §1983 Pleadings and Upholding Attorney Conduct Standards

Date: Dec 24, 2002
Shepherd v. Wellman: Affirming Proper §1983 Pleadings and Upholding Attorney Conduct Standards Introduction Shepherd v. Wellman, 313 F.3d 963 (6th Cir. 2002), is a pivotal case addressing several...
Reverse Discrimination in Employment Promotions: Zambetti v. Cuyahoga Community College

Reverse Discrimination in Employment Promotions: Zambetti v. Cuyahoga Community College

Date: Dec 20, 2002
Reverse Discrimination in Employment Promotions: Zambetti v. Cuyahoga Community College Introduction Todd Zambetti, a Caucasian employee of Cuyahoga Community College (CCC), filed a lawsuit alleging...
Ensuring Comprehensive Evaluation in ERISA Benefit Denials: Insights from Spangler v. Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. & Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

Ensuring Comprehensive Evaluation in ERISA Benefit Denials: Insights from Spangler v. Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. & Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

Date: Dec 17, 2002
Ensuring Comprehensive Evaluation in ERISA Benefit Denials: Insights from Spangler v. Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. & Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. Introduction The case of Janice Spangler...
Tennessee FDEA Casket Retail Licensing Invalidated under Fourteenth Amendment: Sixth Circuit Decision

Tennessee FDEA Casket Retail Licensing Invalidated under Fourteenth Amendment: Sixth Circuit Decision

Date: Dec 7, 2002
Tennessee FDEA Casket Retail Licensing Invalidated under Fourteenth Amendment: Sixth Circuit Decision Introduction In Craigmiles et al. v. Giles et al., the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Establishing Liability in Malicious Prosecution: Hinchman v. Moore Jr. & Dombrowski

Establishing Liability in Malicious Prosecution: Hinchman v. Moore Jr. & Dombrowski

Date: Dec 3, 2002
Establishing Liability in Malicious Prosecution: Hinchman v. Moore Jr. & Dombrowski Introduction The case of Bonnie Lee Hinchman v. Edwin L. Moore Jr. and Robert A. Dombrowski serves as a significant...
Claim Preclusion in Land Use Zoning Disputes: Analysis of DUBUC v. GREEN OAK TOWNSHIP

Claim Preclusion in Land Use Zoning Disputes: Analysis of DUBUC v. GREEN OAK TOWNSHIP

Date: Dec 3, 2002
Claim Preclusion in Land Use Zoning Disputes: Analysis of DUBUC v. GREEN OAK TOWNSHIP Introduction The case of Dennis DUBUC v. GREEN OAK TOWNSHIP (312 F.3d 736) adjudicated by the United States Court...
Sixth Circuit Applies Thaddeus-X in Prisoner Retaliation Claim: Cle v. Brown

Sixth Circuit Applies Thaddeus-X in Prisoner Retaliation Claim: Cle v. Brown

Date: Nov 28, 2002
Sixth Circuit Applies Thaddeus-X in Prisoner Retaliation Claim: Cle v. Brown Introduction In Cle v. Brown, 312 F.3d 782 (6th Cir. 2002), the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit...
Excessive Use of Force in Correctional Facilities: Comprehensive Analysis of Combs v. Wilkinson (2002)

Excessive Use of Force in Correctional Facilities: Comprehensive Analysis of Combs v. Wilkinson (2002)

Date: Nov 28, 2002
Excessive Use of Force in Correctional Facilities: Comprehensive Analysis of Combs v. Wilkinson (2002) Introduction The case of Ronald Combs, Jason Robb, and George Skatzes v. Reginald Wilkinson...
Affirmation of Copes' Convictions: Insights into Conspiracy, Sufficiency of Evidence, and Constitutional Challenges

Affirmation of Copes' Convictions: Insights into Conspiracy, Sufficiency of Evidence, and Constitutional Challenges

Date: Nov 20, 2002
Affirmation of Copes' Convictions: Insights into Conspiracy, Sufficiency of Evidence, and Constitutional Challenges Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Randall Cope and Terry...
Reaffirming the Establishment Clause: Removal of Ten Commandments Displays in Public Schools

Reaffirming the Establishment Clause: Removal of Ten Commandments Displays in Public Schools

Date: Nov 20, 2002
Reaffirming the Establishment Clause: Removal of Ten Commandments Displays in Public Schools Introduction The case of Barry BAKER; Anonymous Plaintiff #1 v. ADAMS COUNTY/OHIO VALLEY SCHOOL BOARD...
Clarifying Fourth Amendment Protections in Police Detentions: Insights from Burchett v. Kiefer

Clarifying Fourth Amendment Protections in Police Detentions: Insights from Burchett v. Kiefer

Date: Nov 20, 2002
Clarifying Fourth Amendment Protections in Police Detentions: Insights from Burchett v. Kiefer Introduction In Charles E. Burchett; Carla Burchett v. Greg Kiefer et al., the United States Court of...
Mandatory Issuance of Certificate of Appealability Upon Filing Notice of Appeal: Insights from Castro v. United States

Mandatory Issuance of Certificate of Appealability Upon Filing Notice of Appeal: Insights from Castro v. United States

Date: Nov 14, 2002
Mandatory Issuance of Certificate of Appealability Upon Filing Notice of Appeal: Insights from Castro v. United States Introduction The case of Robert Jinx Castro v. United States of America, 310...
Qualified Immunity and Retaliatory Arrest for Protected Speech: Analysis of Greene v. Barber, 310 F.3d 889 (6th Cir. 2002)

Qualified Immunity and Retaliatory Arrest for Protected Speech: Analysis of Greene v. Barber, 310 F.3d 889 (6th Cir. 2002)

Date: Nov 9, 2002
Qualified Immunity and Retaliatory Arrest for Protected Speech: Analysis of Greene v. Barber, 310 F.3d 889 (6th Cir. 2002) Introduction Anthony C. Greene, a 300-pound lawyer, initiated a civil rights...
Preemption of State Tariff Requirements under the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Insights from Verizon North Inc. v. MPSC

Preemption of State Tariff Requirements under the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Insights from Verizon North Inc. v. MPSC

Date: Nov 8, 2002
Preemption of State Tariff Requirements under the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Insights from Verizon North Inc. v. MPSC Introduction The case of Verizon North, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert