Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Probable Cause and Reasonable Knock-and-Announce Procedures in Pinson v. United States

Affirmation of Probable Cause and Reasonable Knock-and-Announce Procedures in Pinson v. United States

Date: Feb 28, 2003
Affirmation of Probable Cause and Reasonable Knock-and-Announce Procedures in Pinson v. United States Introduction In the case of UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary DeWayne PINSON,...
Affirmation of Probable Cause and Sentencing in United States v. Copeland & Hartwell

Affirmation of Probable Cause and Sentencing in United States v. Copeland & Hartwell

Date: Feb 26, 2003
Affirmation of Probable Cause and Sentencing in United States v. Copeland & Hartwell Introduction In the appellate case United States of America v. Darwin Jay Copeland and Anthony Antoine Hartwell,...
Pretextual Justification in Racial Discrimination Claims: Analysis of Johnson v. Kroger Company

Pretextual Justification in Racial Discrimination Claims: Analysis of Johnson v. Kroger Company

Date: Feb 20, 2003
Pretextual Justification in Racial Discrimination Claims: Analysis of Johnson v. Kroger Company Introduction In the landmark case of Stanley Johnson v. The Kroger Company, 319 F.3d 858 (6th Cir....
Clarifications on Single Conspiracy and Co-Conspirator Testimony: Insights from Smith v. United States

Clarifications on Single Conspiracy and Co-Conspirator Testimony: Insights from Smith v. United States

Date: Feb 19, 2003
Clarifications on Single Conspiracy and Co-Conspirator Testimony: Insights from Smith v. United States Introduction Case: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlton Victor SMITH; Thomas...
Accrual of Statute of Limitations in §1983 Claims: Analysis of Trzebuckowski v. City of Cleveland

Accrual of Statute of Limitations in §1983 Claims: Analysis of Trzebuckowski v. City of Cleveland

Date: Feb 15, 2003
Accrual of Statute of Limitations in §1983 Claims: Analysis of Trzebuckowski v. City of Cleveland Introduction The case of Stanley Trzebuckowski; LeCue, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants versus City of...
Remand in Martin v. Perez: Upholding Section 2241 Habeas Corpus Procedures

Remand in Martin v. Perez: Upholding Section 2241 Habeas Corpus Procedures

Date: Feb 14, 2003
Remand in Martin v. Perez: Upholding Section 2241 Habeas Corpus Procedures Introduction Martin v. Perez, 319 F.3d 799 (6th Cir. 2003), is a pivotal case that addresses the procedural intricacies of...
Continuing Violation Doctrine Unapplicable in Retaliatory Employment Transfers: Avery v. Cureton

Continuing Violation Doctrine Unapplicable in Retaliatory Employment Transfers: Avery v. Cureton

Date: Feb 14, 2003
Continuing Violation Doctrine Unapplicable in Retaliatory Employment Transfers: SHARPE v. CURETON Introduction In the landmark case of SHARPE v. CURETON, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Qualified Immunity for Police Officers Based on Dispatcher-Provided Anonymous Tips: Insights from Feathers v. Aey

Qualified Immunity for Police Officers Based on Dispatcher-Provided Anonymous Tips: Insights from Feathers v. Aey

Date: Feb 14, 2003
Qualified Immunity for Police Officers Based on Dispatcher-Provided Anonymous Tips: Insights from Feathers v. Aey Introduction The case of Thomas L. Feathers and Kathleen Feathers v. William Aey and...
Protection Against Nongovernmental Discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981: The Chapman v. Higbee Company Decision

Protection Against Nongovernmental Discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981: The Chapman v. Higbee Company Decision

Date: Feb 12, 2003
Protection Against Nongovernmental Discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981: The Chapman v. Higbee Company Decision Introduction In the landmark case of Lynette Chapman v. The Higbee Company, d/b/a...
Impact of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Federal Habeas Corpus under AEDPA: Matthews v. Abramajtys

Impact of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Federal Habeas Corpus under AEDPA: Matthews v. Abramajtys

Date: Feb 11, 2003
Impact of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Federal Habeas Corpus under AEDPA: Matthews v. Abramajtys Introduction In Matthews v. Abramajtys, 319 F.3d 780 (6th Cir. 2003), the United States Court...
Protecting First Amendment Rights in Trademark Domain Use: Analysis of Taubman Co. v. Webfeats

Protecting First Amendment Rights in Trademark Domain Use: Analysis of Taubman Co. v. Webfeats

Date: Feb 8, 2003
Protecting First Amendment Rights in Trademark Domain Use: Analysis of Taubman Co. v. Webfeats Introduction The case The TAUBMAN COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WEBFEATS and Henry Mishkoff,...
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Mason v. Mitchell

Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Mason v. Mitchell

Date: Feb 7, 2003
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Mason v. Mitchell 1. Introduction Maurice A. Mason v. Betty Mitchell is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
PACCAR Inc. v. TeleScan Technologies: Defining Trademark Protections in Digital Domains

PACCAR Inc. v. TeleScan Technologies: Defining Trademark Protections in Digital Domains

Date: Feb 6, 2003
PACCAR Inc. v. TeleScan Technologies: Defining Trademark Protections in Digital Domains Introduction PACCAR Inc. v. TeleScan Technologies, L.L.C. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
Bankruptcy Clause and Abrogation of State Sovereign Immunity: A New Precedent from In re Hood

Bankruptcy Clause and Abrogation of State Sovereign Immunity: A New Precedent from In re Hood

Date: Feb 4, 2003
Bankruptcy Clause and Abrogation of State Sovereign Immunity: A New Precedent from In re Hood Introduction The case of In re Pamela L. Hood, Debtor versus the Tennessee Student Assistance Corporation...
Broad Interpretation of Initial Filing Requirements Under Title VII: Nichols v. Muskingum College

Broad Interpretation of Initial Filing Requirements Under Title VII: Nichols v. Muskingum College

Date: Feb 4, 2003
Broad Interpretation of Initial Filing Requirements Under Title VII: Nichols v. Muskingum College Introduction The case of Betsy L. Nichols v. Muskingum College, adjudicated by the United States...
Enforceability of Cost-Splitting Provisions in Employment Arbitration Agreements: Morrison v. Circuit City and Shankle v. Pep Boys

Enforceability of Cost-Splitting Provisions in Employment Arbitration Agreements: Morrison v. Circuit City and Shankle v. Pep Boys

Date: Jan 31, 2003
Enforceability of Cost-Splitting Provisions in Employment Arbitration Agreements Morrison v. Circuit City Stores, Inc. and Shankle v. Pep Boys — Manny, Moe & Jack, Inc. (317 F.3d 646) Introduction...
Reaffirming the Standards for Expert Testimony and Summary Judgment in Tennessee Medical Malpractice Cases

Reaffirming the Standards for Expert Testimony and Summary Judgment in Tennessee Medical Malpractice Cases

Date: Jan 31, 2003
Reaffirming the Standards for Expert Testimony and Summary Judgment in Tennessee Medical Malpractice Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Kent A. Sommer and Andrea Sommer v. G. William Davis...
Reversing Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination: The Role of Same-Actor and Same-Group Inferences in Wexler v. White's Fine Furniture

Reversing Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination: The Role of Same-Actor and Same-Group Inferences in Wexler v. White's Fine Furniture

Date: Jan 28, 2003
Reversing Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination: The Role of Same-Actor and Same-Group Inferences in Wexler v. White's Fine Furniture Introduction In the case of Donald G. WEXLER v. WHITE'S FINE...
Clarifying Medigap Coverage: Vencor Inc. v. Standard Life Establishes Limits on Post-Medicare Part A Payments

Clarifying Medigap Coverage: Vencor Inc. v. Standard Life Establishes Limits on Post-Medicare Part A Payments

Date: Jan 22, 2003
Clarifying Medigap Coverage: Vencor Inc. v. Standard Life Establishes Limits on Post-Medicare Part A Payments Introduction In the landmark case of VENCOR, INC., d/b/a Vencor Kentucky, Inc., d/b/a...
United States v. Galloway: Establishing Boundaries of Miranda Rights in Secondary Customs Inspections

United States v. Galloway: Establishing Boundaries of Miranda Rights in Secondary Customs Inspections

Date: Jan 18, 2003
United States v. Galloway: Establishing Boundaries of Miranda Rights in Secondary Customs Inspections Introduction In United States v. Jeffrey Glenn Galloway, the United States Court of Appeals for...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert