Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Hamad v. Woodcrest: Broadening Standing as 'Aggrieved Persons' under the Fair Housing Act

Hamad v. Woodcrest: Broadening Standing as 'Aggrieved Persons' under the Fair Housing Act

Date: Apr 23, 2003
Hamad v. Woodcrest Condominium Association: Broadening 'Aggrieved Person' Standing under the Fair Housing Act Introduction In the landmark case of Terri L. Hamad et al. v. Woodcrest Condominium...
Qualified Immunity Upholding State Non-Liability in Private Assault Cases: Bukowski v. City of Akron

Qualified Immunity Upholding State Non-Liability in Private Assault Cases: Bukowski v. City of Akron

Date: Apr 17, 2003
Qualified Immunity Upholding State Non-Liability in Private Assault Cases: Bukowski v. City of Akron Introduction Lisa Bukowski et al. v. City of Akron et al., 326 F.3d 702 (6th Cir. 2003), is a...
Nominal Damages and the Limits of Attorney's Fees Under 42 U.S.C. § 1988: Pouillon v. Little and Blanchett

Nominal Damages and the Limits of Attorney's Fees Under 42 U.S.C. § 1988: Pouillon v. Little and Blanchett

Date: Apr 17, 2003
Nominal Damages and the Limits of Attorney's Fees Under 42 U.S.C. § 1988: Pouillon v. Little and Blanchett Introduction The case of James Pouillon v. Sharon Little and W.G. Blanchett addresses...
Trademark Implications of URL Path Usage: Interactive Products Corp. v. A2Z Mobile Office Solutions, Inc.

Trademark Implications of URL Path Usage: Interactive Products Corp. v. A2Z Mobile Office Solutions, Inc.

Date: Apr 11, 2003
Trademark Implications of URL Path Usage: Interactive Products Corp. v. A2Z Mobile Office Solutions, Inc. 1. Introduction The case of Interactive Products Corporation (IPC) v. A2Z Mobile Office...
EMTALA Compliance Affirmed and Batson Challenge Overruled in Galen of Virginia Appeal

EMTALA Compliance Affirmed and Batson Challenge Overruled in Galen of Virginia Appeal

Date: Apr 10, 2003
EMTALA Compliance Affirmed and Batson Challenge Overruled in Galen of Virginia Appeal Introduction The appellate case Jane Roberts, as Guardian for Wanda Y. Johnson,...
Res Judicata in Federal Proceedings: The Hutcherson v. Lauderdale County Case

Res Judicata in Federal Proceedings: The Hutcherson v. Lauderdale County Case

Date: Apr 10, 2003
Res Judicata in Federal Proceedings: The Hutcherson v. Lauderdale County Case Introduction The case of Wiley Hutcherson; Western Tennessee Enterprises, Inc.; and Hutcherson Metals, Inc.,...
Substantive and Procedural Due Process in Municipal Contractual Commitments: The Flint v. Bowers Decision

Substantive and Procedural Due Process in Municipal Contractual Commitments: The Flint v. Bowers Decision

Date: Apr 10, 2003
Substantive and Procedural Due Process in Municipal Contractual Commitments: The Flint v. Bowers Decision Introduction In Dan BOWERS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The CITY OF FLINT,...
MITCHELL v. MASON: Reinforcing Per Se Ineffective Assistance of Counsel During Critical Pre-Trial Stages

MITCHELL v. MASON: Reinforcing Per Se Ineffective Assistance of Counsel During Critical Pre-Trial Stages

Date: Apr 8, 2003
MITCHELL v. MASON: Reinforcing Per Se Ineffective Assistance of Counsel During Critical Pre-Trial Stages Introduction The case of Charlie Lee Mitchell v. Warden Gerald Mason, adjudicated by the...
Affirmation of Sentencing Guidelines § 2D1.1(b)(6)(A) in Methamphetamine Manufacturing Cases: Establishing the Substantial Risk Standard

Affirmation of Sentencing Guidelines § 2D1.1(b)(6)(A) in Methamphetamine Manufacturing Cases: Establishing the Substantial Risk Standard

Date: Apr 2, 2003
Affirmation of Sentencing Guidelines § 2D1.1(b)(6)(A) in Methamphetamine Manufacturing Cases: Establishing the Substantial Risk Standard Introduction The case of UNITED STATES of America v. Krystal...
Ouda v. INS: Expanding Asylum Eligibility for Stateless Individuals

Ouda v. INS: Expanding Asylum Eligibility for Stateless Individuals

Date: Apr 1, 2003
Ouda v. INS: Expanding Asylum Eligibility for Stateless Individuals Introduction The case of Sahar Ouda v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) delves into the complexities surrounding asylum...
Unreasonable Application of Batson and Hernandez in Jury Selection: Lancaster v. Adams

Unreasonable Application of Batson and Hernandez in Jury Selection: Lancaster v. Adams

Date: Mar 27, 2003
Unreasonable Application of Batson and Hernandez in Jury Selection: Lancaster v. Adams Introduction Burt Lancaster, the Petitioner-Appellee, challenged his conviction on several constitutional...
Conflict of Interest and Effective Assistance of Counsel: Analysis of Moss and Kohn v. United States

Conflict of Interest and Effective Assistance of Counsel: Analysis of Moss and Kohn v. United States

Date: Mar 27, 2003
Conflict of Interest and Effective Assistance of Counsel: Analysis of Moss and Kohn v. United States Introduction In the case of Robert Moss and Ronald Kohn v. United States of America (323 F.3d...
Establishing Specific Personal Jurisdiction in International Contract Disputes: Insights from Youn & Choi v. Track, Inc.

Establishing Specific Personal Jurisdiction in International Contract Disputes: Insights from Youn & Choi v. Track, Inc.

Date: Mar 25, 2003
Establishing Specific Personal Jurisdiction in International Contract Disputes: Insights from Youn & Choi v. Track, Inc. Introduction The case of Baron T. Youn; Kyong Hwan Choi, d/b/a CKH...
Renewal Rule Applied to Excess Liability Insurance: Northfield Insurance Co. v. Amway Distributors Benefits Association

Renewal Rule Applied to Excess Liability Insurance: Northfield Insurance Co. v. Amway Distributors Benefits Association

Date: Mar 20, 2003
Renewal Rule Applied to Excess Liability Insurance: Northfield Insurance Co. v. Amway Distributors Benefits Association Introduction In the landmark case of Amway Distributors Benefits Association,...
Affirmation of Racketeering Conspiracy and Armed Robbery Convictions under the Hobbs Act

Affirmation of Racketeering Conspiracy and Armed Robbery Convictions under the Hobbs Act

Date: Mar 18, 2003
Affirmation of Racketeering Conspiracy and Armed Robbery Convictions under the Hobbs Act Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Ronald Dupree, adjudicated by the United States Court...
Reaffirming Substantial Evidence and Residual Functional Capacity in Social Security Disability Determinations

Reaffirming Substantial Evidence and Residual Functional Capacity in Social Security Disability Determinations

Date: Mar 13, 2003
Reaffirming Substantial Evidence and Residual Functional Capacity in Social Security Disability Determinations Introduction The case of Evelyn E. Wright v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of...
Incentive Awards and Cost Recovery for Class Representatives: Analyzing C. Pepper Moore v. Perry Johnson

Incentive Awards and Cost Recovery for Class Representatives: Analyzing C. Pepper Moore v. Perry Johnson

Date: Mar 11, 2003
Incentive Awards and Cost Recovery for Class Representatives: Analyzing C. Pepper Moore v. Perry Johnson Introduction The case of C. Pepper Moore v. Perry Johnson et al., adjudicated by the United...
Affirmation of Bankruptcy Court Decision in In re Gerald Dale Burns and Linda Jane Burns: Clarifying §550(e) Liens and Appeal Timeliness

Affirmation of Bankruptcy Court Decision in In re Gerald Dale Burns and Linda Jane Burns: Clarifying §550(e) Liens and Appeal Timeliness

Date: Mar 11, 2003
Affirmation of Bankruptcy Court Decision in In re Gerald Dale Burns and Linda Jane Burns: Clarifying §550(e) Liens and Appeal Timeliness Introduction The case In re Gerald Dale Burns and Linda Jane...
Limiting Indefinite Detention: ROSALES-GARCIA v. HOLLAND and Carballo v. Luttrell Establishes Reasonable Time Constraints under IIRIRA

Limiting Indefinite Detention: ROSALES-GARCIA v. HOLLAND and Carballo v. Luttrell Establishes Reasonable Time Constraints under IIRIRA

Date: Mar 6, 2003
Limiting Indefinite Detention: ROSALES-GARCIA v. HOLLAND and Carballo v. Luttrell Establishes Reasonable Time Constraints under IIRIRA Introduction In Mario Rosales-Garcia v. J.T. Holland and Reynero...
Administrative Exhaustion in Prison Litigation: Burton v. Jones Establishes Key Precedent

Administrative Exhaustion in Prison Litigation: Burton v. Jones Establishes Key Precedent

Date: Mar 1, 2003
Administrative Exhaustion in Prison Litigation: Burton v. Jones Establishes Key Precedent Introduction Burton v. Jones, 321 F.3d 569 (6th Cir. 2003), is a pivotal case in the realm of prisoner...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert