Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Reinforcing Counsel's Duty to Inform Defendants of Plea Offers: Griffin v. United States

Reinforcing Counsel's Duty to Inform Defendants of Plea Offers: Griffin v. United States

Date: Jun 5, 2003
Reinforcing Counsel's Duty to Inform Defendants of Plea Offers: Griffin v. United States Introduction The case of Phillip Griffin v. United States (330 F.3d 733, 6th Cir. 2003) serves as a pivotal...
Affirmation of District Court's Summary Judgment in Spadafore v. Gardner Establishes Requirements for § 1983 Conspiracy Claims

Affirmation of District Court's Summary Judgment in Spadafore v. Gardner Establishes Requirements for § 1983 Conspiracy Claims

Date: Jun 4, 2003
Affirmation of District Court's Summary Judgment in Spadafore v. Gardner Establishes Requirements for § 1983 Conspiracy Claims Introduction The case of Francis Spadafore and Carol Spadafore v. Chet...
Enhanced Protections Against Indigent Debt-Related Incarceration: Insights from Alkire v. Irving

Enhanced Protections Against Indigent Debt-Related Incarceration: Insights from Alkire v. Irving

Date: Jun 3, 2003
Enhanced Protections Against Indigent Debt-Related Incarceration: Insights from Alkire v. Irving Introduction In the landmark case Lloyd D. Alkire v. Judge Jane Irving, et al., adjudicated by the...
Defining the Boundaries of Prosecutorial Absolute Immunity: Thompson v. Spurlock

Defining the Boundaries of Prosecutorial Absolute Immunity: Thompson v. Spurlock

Date: May 31, 2003
Defining the Boundaries of Prosecutorial Absolute Immunity: Thompson v. Spurlock Introduction The case of Robert Spurlock and Ronnie Marshall v. Tommy P. Thompson (330 F.3d 791, 6th Cir. 2003) is a...
Administrative Forfeiture Actions Tolling Statute of Limitations: Insights from United States v. Short

Administrative Forfeiture Actions Tolling Statute of Limitations: Insights from United States v. Short

Date: May 28, 2003
Administrative Forfeiture Actions Tolling Statute of Limitations: Insights from United States v. Short Introduction United States v. NINETY-THREE (93) FIREARMS, and Assorted Firearm Parts and...
Establishing Intent in Wire Fraud: Insights from United States v. Ralph M. Daniel, Jr.

Establishing Intent in Wire Fraud: Insights from United States v. Ralph M. Daniel, Jr.

Date: May 23, 2003
Establishing Intent in Wire Fraud: Insights from United States v. Ralph M. Daniel, Jr. Introduction In United States of America v. Ralph M. Daniel, Jr. (329 F.3d 480), the United States Court of...
Impact of Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 39 on Procedural Default and Confrontation Clause Rights: Adams v. Holland

Impact of Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 39 on Procedural Default and Confrontation Clause Rights: Adams v. Holland

Date: May 21, 2003
Impact of Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 39 on Procedural Default and Confrontation Clause Rights: Adams v. Holland Introduction Frank E. Adams v. Flora J. Holland, 330 F.3d 398 (6th Cir. 2003), is a...
Sixth Circuit Establishes Two-Step Substantial Similarity Test in Copyright Infringement Cases

Sixth Circuit Establishes Two-Step Substantial Similarity Test in Copyright Infringement Cases

Date: May 21, 2003
Sixth Circuit Establishes Two-Step Substantial Similarity Test in Copyright Infringement Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Louis M. KOHUS v. John V. MARIOL; James F. Mariol; JVM Innovation...
Indiana Law Prevails in Choice-of-Law Analysis for Contribution Claims: Muncie Power Products, Inc. v. United Technologies Automotive, Inc.

Indiana Law Prevails in Choice-of-Law Analysis for Contribution Claims: Muncie Power Products, Inc. v. United Technologies Automotive, Inc.

Date: May 16, 2003
Indiana Law Prevails in Choice-of-Law Analysis for Contribution Claims: Muncie Power Products, Inc. v. United Technologies Automotive, Inc. Introduction The case of Muncie Power Products, Inc. v....
Confrontation Clause and Hearsay Exceptions Upheld in Richard BUGH v. Betty MITCHELL

Confrontation Clause and Hearsay Exceptions Upheld in Richard BUGH v. Betty MITCHELL

Date: May 14, 2003
Confrontation Clause and Hearsay Exceptions Upheld in Richard BUGH v. Betty MITCHELL Introduction Richard BUGH v. Betty MITCHELL is a significant case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Clarifying Defamation Per Se Standards: Gahafer v. Ford Motor Company

Clarifying Defamation Per Se Standards: Gahafer v. Ford Motor Company

Date: May 13, 2003
Clarifying Defamation Per Se Standards: Gahafer v. Ford Motor Company Introduction In the landmark case of Vincent Gahafer v. Ford Motor Company, reported in 328 F.3d 859, the United States Court of...
Balancing Artistic Expression and Celebrity Rights: Comprehensive Analysis of Rosa Parks v. LaFace Records

Balancing Artistic Expression and Celebrity Rights: Comprehensive Analysis of Rosa Parks v. LaFace Records

Date: May 13, 2003
Balancing Artistic Expression and Celebrity Rights: Comprehensive Analysis of Rosa Parks v. LaFace Records Introduction In the landmark case of Rosa Parks v. LaFace Records, et al. (329 F.3d 437,...
FCRA §1681t(b)(1)(F) and Preemption of State Defamation and Slander Claims: Comprehensive Analysis of Stafford v. Cross Country Bank

FCRA §1681t(b)(1)(F) and Preemption of State Defamation and Slander Claims: Comprehensive Analysis of Stafford v. Cross Country Bank

Date: May 9, 2003
FCRA §1681t(b)(1)(F) and Preemption of State Defamation and Slander Claims: Comprehensive Analysis of Stafford v. Cross Country Bank Introduction In John Julie Stafford v. Cross Country Bank (262 F....
Party Dismissal Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21: Insights from Letherer v. Alger Group

Party Dismissal Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21: Insights from Letherer v. Alger Group

Date: May 8, 2003
Party Dismissal Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21: Insights from Letherer v. Alger Group Introduction In the case of R. Kenny Letherer et al. v. Alger Group, L.L.C. et al., decided by the...
Statute of Limitations and Equitable Tolling in Habeas Corpus: McClendon v. Sherman

Statute of Limitations and Equitable Tolling in Habeas Corpus: McClendon v. Sherman

Date: May 8, 2003
Statute of Limitations and Equitable Tolling in Habeas Corpus: McClendon v. Sherman Introduction The case of Demetrius McClendon v. Terry Sherman, Warden, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Clarifying Personal Jurisdiction in Copyright Infringement: Sixth Circuit Emphasizes 'Stream of Commerce Plus' Approach

Clarifying Personal Jurisdiction in Copyright Infringement: Sixth Circuit Emphasizes 'Stream of Commerce Plus' Approach

Date: May 6, 2003
Clarifying Personal Jurisdiction in Copyright Infringement: Sixth Circuit Emphasizes 'Stream of Commerce Plus' Approach Introduction In the landmark case of Bridgeport Music, Inc., et al. v. Still N...
Lack of Federal Subject Matter Jurisdiction in Heydon v. MediaOne: A Comprehensive Analysis

Lack of Federal Subject Matter Jurisdiction in Heydon v. MediaOne: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: May 1, 2003
Lack of Federal Subject Matter Jurisdiction in Heydon v. MediaOne: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction The case of Peter N. Heydon and Henrietta Heydon v. MediaOne of Southeast Michigan, Inc. (327...
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Exigent Circumstances Entry: Thacker v. City of Columbus

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Exigent Circumstances Entry: Thacker v. City of Columbus

Date: May 1, 2003
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Exigent Circumstances Entry: Thacker v. City of Columbus Introduction In the case of Jeffrey M. Thacker; Jessica Gallagher v. City of Columbus, decided on April...
Affirmation of Policy Exclusions in Insurance Coverage: Northland Insurance Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.

Affirmation of Policy Exclusions in Insurance Coverage: Northland Insurance Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.

Date: Apr 26, 2003
Affirmation of Policy Exclusions in Insurance Coverage: Northland Insurance Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co. Introduction The case of Northland Insurance Company v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company,...
Insufficiency of Evidence in McKenzie v. Da: A Comprehensive Legal Analysis

Insufficiency of Evidence in McKenzie v. Da: A Comprehensive Legal Analysis

Date: Apr 24, 2003
Insufficiency of Evidence in McKenzie v. Da: A Comprehensive Legal Analysis Introduction Gerald McKenzie, a Michigan state prisoner, was convicted of assault with intent to murder and subsequently...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert