Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Unanimity in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of Roe v. Baker

Unanimity in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of Roe v. Baker

Date: Nov 1, 2002
Unanimity in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of Roe v. Baker Introduction Roe v. Baker, 316 F.3d 557 (6th Cir. 2002), is a pivotal case addressing the procedural and constitutional safeguards in capital...
Exceptional Circumstances in Warrantless Searches of Parolees: Carnes v. United States

Exceptional Circumstances in Warrantless Searches of Parolees: Carnes v. United States

Date: Oct 30, 2002
Exceptional Circumstances in Warrantless Searches of Parolees: Carnes v. United States 1. Introduction Carnes v. United States (309 F.3d 950, 6th Cir. 2002) is a pivotal case that addresses the...
Legal Commentary: United States v. Lawrence - Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) and Sentencing Enhancements

Legal Commentary: United States v. Lawrence - Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) and Sentencing Enhancements

Date: Oct 29, 2002
United States v. Lawrence: Defining "In Furtherance of" and Enhancing Sentencing for Obstruction of Justice Introduction The case of UNITED STATES of America v. Allen Lawrence, Jr., adjudicated by...
Equitable Tolling and Deadlines for Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from Griffin v. Rogers

Equitable Tolling and Deadlines for Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from Griffin v. Rogers

Date: Oct 19, 2002
Equitable Tolling and Deadlines for Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from Griffin v. Rogers Introduction The legal landscape governing habeas corpus petitions underwent significant scrutiny in the...
Selective Enforcement and Qualified Immunity: Insights from Farm Labor Organizing Committee v. Ohio State Highway Patrol

Selective Enforcement and Qualified Immunity: Insights from Farm Labor Organizing Committee v. Ohio State Highway Patrol

Date: Oct 18, 2002
Selective Enforcement and Qualified Immunity: Insights from Farm Labor Organizing Committee v. Ohio State Highway Patrol Introduction The case of Farm Labor Organizing Committee, et al.,...
Enhancing Legal Clarity: United States v. Rudolph Keszthelyi and the Reasonable Continuation Rule in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence

Enhancing Legal Clarity: United States v. Rudolph Keszthelyi and the Reasonable Continuation Rule in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence

Date: Oct 18, 2002
Enhancing Legal Clarity: United States v. Rudolph Keszthelyi and the Reasonable Continuation Rule in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence Introduction The case of United States of America v. Rudolph...
Clarifying First Amendment Retaliation Standards in Prisoner §1983 Claims: Earnest Bell, Jr. v. Robert Johnson et al.

Clarifying First Amendment Retaliation Standards in Prisoner §1983 Claims: Earnest Bell, Jr. v. Robert Johnson et al.

Date: Oct 18, 2002
Clarifying First Amendment Retaliation Standards in Prisoner §1983 Claims Introduction In Earnest Bell, Jr. v. Robert Johnson et al., decided on October 17, 2002, the United States Court of Appeals...
Affirmation of Falsifying IRS Statements: United States v. Tarwater

Affirmation of Falsifying IRS Statements: United States v. Tarwater

Date: Oct 17, 2002
Affirmation of Falsifying IRS Statements: United States v. Tarwater Introduction United States v. Larry T. Tarwater is a significant appellate case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Finality of Convictions and §2255 Timeliness: Insights from United States v. Cottage

Finality of Convictions and §2255 Timeliness: Insights from United States v. Cottage

Date: Oct 11, 2002
Finality of Convictions and §2255 Timeliness: Insights from United States v. Cottage Introduction The case of United States of America v. George J. Cottage, decided on October 10, 2002, by the United...
Inherent Judicial Powers Affirmed: First Bank of Marietta v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company

Inherent Judicial Powers Affirmed: First Bank of Marietta v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company

Date: Oct 11, 2002
Inherent Judicial Powers Affirmed: First Bank of Marietta v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company Introduction In the case of First Bank of Marietta, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, versus...
United States v. Leachman: Harris v. US Confirms Apprendi Does Not Apply to Mandatory Minimums

United States v. Leachman: Harris v. US Confirms Apprendi Does Not Apply to Mandatory Minimums

Date: Oct 10, 2002
United States v. Leachman: HARRIS v. UNITED STATES Confirms Apprendi Does Not Apply to Mandatory Minimums Introduction United States v. Marc Milton Leachman is a significant appellate decision...
Interlocutory Appeals and Qualified Immunity: Establishing Jurisdiction Boundaries in Civil Rights Retaliation Cases

Interlocutory Appeals and Qualified Immunity: Establishing Jurisdiction Boundaries in Civil Rights Retaliation Cases

Date: Oct 4, 2002
Interlocutory Appeals and Qualified Immunity: Establishing Jurisdiction Boundaries in Civil Rights Retaliation Cases Introduction The case of Dale D. Hoover v. Patricia Radabaugh, et al. (307 F.3d...
Strict Application of AEDPA in Denying Habeas Corpus Claims: Insights from Sedley Alley v. Ricky Bell

Strict Application of AEDPA in Denying Habeas Corpus Claims: Insights from Sedley Alley v. Ricky Bell

Date: Oct 4, 2002
Strict Application of AEDPA in Denying Habeas Corpus Claims: Insights from Sedley Alley v. Ricky Bell Introduction Sedley Alley v. Ricky Bell, 307 F.3d 380 (6th Cir. 2002), is a pivotal case that...
Establishing Equitable Tolling Under Hostile Work Environment Claims: McFarland v. Henderson

Establishing Equitable Tolling Under Hostile Work Environment Claims: McFarland v. Henderson

Date: Oct 4, 2002
Establishing Equitable Tolling Under Hostile Work Environment Claims: McFarland v. Henderson Introduction In the landmark case of Jamie L. McFarland v. William J. Henderson, decided by the United...
Good Faith Requirement in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy: Insights from In re Nan Beth Alt

Good Faith Requirement in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy: Insights from In re Nan Beth Alt

Date: Oct 3, 2002
Good Faith Requirement in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy: Insights from In re Nan Beth Alt Introduction In re Nan Beth Alt, Debtor, 305 F.3d 413 (6th Cir. 2002), is a pivotal case that underscores the...
Genericness and Laches in Trademark Law: Nartron Corp. v. STMicroelectronics, Inc.

Genericness and Laches in Trademark Law: Nartron Corp. v. STMicroelectronics, Inc.

Date: Oct 2, 2002
Genericness and Laches in Trademark Law: Nartron Corp. v. STMicroelectronics, Inc. Introduction Nartron Corporation ("Nartron") brought a lawsuit against STMicroelectronics, Inc. ("ST") alleging...
Affirmation of Claim Preclusion in §1983 Actions: Peterson Novelties, Inc. v. City of Berkley

Affirmation of Claim Preclusion in §1983 Actions: Peterson Novelties, Inc. v. City of Berkley

Date: Oct 2, 2002
Affirmation of Claim Preclusion in §1983 Actions: Peterson Novelties, Inc. v. City of Berkley Introduction Peterson Novelties, Inc.; and Harold Barman, Plaintiffs-Appellants appealed the dismissal of...
Affirming Mandatory Real Estate Disclosure for Government Employees: Overstreet v. LFUCG

Affirming Mandatory Real Estate Disclosure for Government Employees: Overstreet v. LFUCG

Date: Oct 1, 2002
Affirming Mandatory Real Estate Disclosure for Government Employees: Overstreet v. LFUCG Introduction Philip D. Overstreet vs. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government (LFUCG) is a significant case...
Race Discrimination and Pretext in Employment Decisions: Hopson v. DaimlerChrysler

Race Discrimination and Pretext in Employment Decisions: Hopson v. DaimlerChrysler

Date: Oct 1, 2002
Race Discrimination and Pretext in Employment Decisions: Hopson v. DaimlerChrysler Introduction Hopson v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation, 306 F.3d 427 (6th Cir. 2002), is a significant appellate case...
Necessity of Substantial Reasonable Suspicion in Extended Traffic Stops: United States v. Sylvester Townsend and David Green

Necessity of Substantial Reasonable Suspicion in Extended Traffic Stops: United States v. Sylvester Townsend and David Green

Date: Sep 28, 2002
Necessity of Substantial Reasonable Suspicion in Extended Traffic Stops: United States v. Sylvester Townsend and David Green Introduction Case Overview: United States v. Sylvester Townsend and David...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert